José Carlos Almeida
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by José Carlos Almeida.
Animal | 2008
João Simões; G. Baril; José Carlos Almeida; Jorge Manuel Teixeira de Azevedo; Paulo J. Fontes; Ramiro Mascarenhas
Fifteen nulliparous and nine multiparous Serrana goats were used, through two successive oestrous cycles, in order to characterize their ovulation time with regard to the number of ovulations after induced and natural oestrus during the breeding season. The onset of oestrus was detected by the amount of vasectomized bucks after oestrus synchronization with prostaglandin, given 10 days apart, and in the following two expected natural oestrus. The preovulatory LH peak was determined from blood samples collected 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h after onset of oestrus. A transrectal ovarian ultrasound scanning was performed 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 60 h after onset of oestrus, for the detection of ovulations by means of the disappearance of large follicles (>4 to 5 mm). Single ovulations were observed in 76% of oestrous periods in nulliparous goats and in 18% of nulliparous goats. The onset of oestrus to LH peak interval was lower in nulliparous (12.1 ± 0.9 h, n = 38) than in multiparous (15.6 ± 1.0 h, n = 22, P < 0.05) goats with no oestrus interaction effects (P > 0.05). The LH peak to first ovulation interval was higher after natural (18.9 ± 0.7 h, n = 36) than after induced (15.8 ± 1.2 h, n = 24, P < 0.05) oestrus. The onset of oestrus to total ovulation interval was influenced by parity (P < 0.01) and oestrus type (P < 0.05) with a length of 30.1 ± 1.1 h (n = 15) and 33.4 ± 1.5 h (n = 9) for induced oestrus of nulliparous and multiparous goats, respectively, and 32.5 ± 1.0 h (n = 23) and 36.5 ± 1.1 h (n = 13) for natural oestrus of nulliparous and multiparous goats, respectively. The onset of oestrus to first ovulation interval was not influenced by parity, but an interval of 8.0 ± 1.6 h was observed between the first and second ovulations in polyovulatory oestrus. Consequently, nulliparous goats that are predominantly monovular ovulate earlier than multiparous goats that are predominantly polyovulatory. In conclusion, significant differences occurred in the number and time of ovulations between nulliparous and multiparous goats. More research is necessary for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms regulating monovularory and polyovulatory oestrous cycles regarding the parity of goats.
Italian Journal of Animal Science | 2010
Antόnio Mário Domingues Silvestre; José Carlos Almeida; Virgínia Santos; Paulo J. Fontes; Virgílio Alves
This study aimed to investigate the lactation curve properties of primiparous and multiparous Barrosã cows, using two different milking systems. A data set with 2518 daily milk yields of 15 primiparous (107 test day records by lactation) and 11 multiparous (83 test day records by lactation) cows was individually fitted with the Wood’s model by the application of a non linear procedure. Milk yield measurements were recorded using a weigh-suckle-weigh technique in half of the cows and the remaining cows were handmilked. Average daily milk yield of primiparous and multiparous suckled cows were 4.9 and 5.2 kg, respectively, while correspondent scores on milked cows were lower (2.4 and 3.0 kg). All 26 fitted lactations followed the typical curve shape with high goodness of fit. Analysis performed on Wood’s parameters indicated that milked cows have a peak yield of 3.5 and 4.6 kg reached at lactation day 23 and 16, for primiparous and multiparous, respectively. On the other hand, suckled cows reached later (56–63 d) their peak of lactation and the peak yield (5.3–5.7 kg) was greater than milked cows. The absence of the calf and the cow’s difficulty in adapting to the handmilking can explain differences between milked and suckled cows. Barrosã cows, in their traditional production system, have lactation yields of 805 and 843 kg in parities 1 and 2, respectively.
Animal Reproduction Science | 2005
João Simões; José Potes; Jorge Manuel Teixeira de Azevedo; José Carlos Almeida; Paulo J. Fontes; G. Baril; Ramiro Mascarenhas
Animal Reproduction Science | 2007
João Simões; José Carlos Almeida; G. Baril; Jorge Manuel Teixeira de Azevedo; Paulo J. Fontes; Ramiro Mascarenhas
Animal Reproduction Science | 2006
João Simões; José Carlos Almeida; Ramiro Valentim; G. Baril; Jorge Manuel Teixeira de Azevedo; Paulo J. Fontes; Ramiro Mascarenhas
Sensors and Actuators A-physical | 2006
Raul Morais; A. Valente; José Carlos Almeida; Amélia Silva; Salviano Soares; Manuel J. C. S. Reis; Ramiro Valentim; Jorge Manuel Teixeira de Azevedo
Revista Portuguesa de Ciências Veterinárias | 2002
Jorge Manuel Teixeira de Azevedo; Teresa Montenegro Correia; José Carlos Almeida; Ramiro Valentim; Paulo J. Fontes; Álvaro Mendonça
Procedia Chemistry | 2009
Nuno Miranda; Raul Morais; Maria Isabel Dias; Carlos Viegas; F.G.A. Silva; Carlos Serôdio; José Carlos Almeida; Jorge Manuel Teixeira de Azevedo; Manuel J. C. S. Reis
REDVET. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria | 2007
Diana: Utad Abreu; José Carlos Almeida; Severiano Silva; Jorge Manuel Teixeira de Azevedo; Paulo J. Fontes; João Simões
Revista de Ciências Agrárias | 2010
Carmo Horta; Samuel Lupi; Ofélia Anjos; José Carlos Almeida