José Sanz

Sustained virological response to interferon plus ribavirin reduces liver‐related complications and mortality in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection modifies the natural history of chronic hepatitis C, thus promoting more rapid progression to cirrhosis and end‐stage liver disease. The objective of our study was to determine whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) clearance is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients positive for HIV and HCV. It was an ambispective cohort study carried out in 11 HIV units in Spain and involved 711 consecutive patients positive for HIV/HCV who started interferon plus ribavirin therapy between 2000 and 2005. We measured sustained virologic response (SVR), i.e., undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment, and clinical outcomes, defined as death (liver‐related or non–liver‐related), liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation. Of 711 patients who were positive for HIV/HCV, 31% had SVR. During a mean follow‐up of 20.8 months (interquartile range: 12.2‐38.7), the incidence rates per 100 person‐years of overall mortality, liver‐related mortality, and liver decompensation were 0.46, 0.23, and 0.23 among patients with SVR and 3.12, 1.65, and 4.33 among those without SVR (P = 0.003, 0.028, and <0.001 by the log‐rank test), respectively. Cox regression analysis adjusted for fibrosis, HCV genotype, HCV RNA viral load, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention clinical category, and nadir CD4+ cell count showed that the adjusted hazard ratio of liver‐related events was 8.92 (95% confidence interval, 1.20; 66.11, P = 0.032) for nonresponders in comparison with responders and 4.96 (95% confidence interval, 2.27; 10.85, P < 0.001) for patients with fibrosis grade of F3‐F4 versus those with F0‐F2.Because this was not a prospective study, selection and survival biases may influence estimates of effect. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the achievement of an SVR after interferon‐ribavirin therapy in patients coinfected with HIV/HCV reduces liver‐related complications and mortality. (HEPATOLOGY 2009.)

Less lipoatrophy and better lipid profile with abacavir as compared to stavudine: 96-week results of a randomized study.

Objective:To assess lipoatrophy, other toxicities, and efficacy associated with abacavir as compared with stavudine in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patients. Methods:This was a prospective, randomized, open trial, stratified by viral load and CD4 cell count, conducted January 2001 to July 2004. Two hundred thirty-seven adult patients with HIV infection initiating antiretroviral therapy were assigned to receive abacavir (n = 115) or stavudine (n = 122), both combined with lamivudine and efavirenz. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with lipoatrophy as assessed by physician and patient observation at 96 weeks. Results:A lower proportion of patients assigned to abacavir developed clinical signs of lipoatrophy (4.8% vs. 38.3%; P < 0.001). These observations were confirmed by anthropometric data. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans performed in 57 patients showed significantly greater total limb fat loss in the stavudine arm (−1579 vs. 913 g; P < 0.001). The lipid profile in abacavir patients presented more favorable changes in the levels of triglycerides (P = 0.03), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc; P < 0.001), and apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.001) as well as in the ratio between total cholesterol and HDLc (P = 0.005). Throughout the study, a higher proportion of patients in the stavudine group received lipid-lowering agents as compared to the abacavir group (17% vs. 4%; P = 0.002). Similar virologic and immunologic responses were observed. Conclusions:Assuming the limitations inherent to clinical assessment, this study shows a notably weaker association of abacavir with lipoatrophy than stavudine. DEXA scans and anthropometric measurements supported the clinical findings. In addition, the lipid changes that occurred were more favorable in patients receiving abacavir.

Pegylated interferon α2a plus ribavirin versus pegylated interferon α2b plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVES The two currently available types of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) used to treat hepatitis C have different pharmacokinetic properties. It is unclear how these differences affect response to therapy. We compared the effectiveness and safety of peg-IFN-alpha2a and peg-IFN-alpha2b, both with ribavirin, against chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in HIV-infected patients. METHODS From the GESIDA HIV/HCV cohort, we analysed patients treated with peg-IFN-alpha2a (n = 315) or peg-IFN-alpha2b (n = 242). The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS Both groups were well matched in baseline characteristics except for a higher frequency of injection drug users in the peg-IFN-alpha2b group than in the peg-IFN-alpha2a group (85% versus 76%; P = 0.01) and a higher frequency of bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis (F3-F4) in the peg-IFN-alpha2b group than in the peg-IFN-alpha2a group (42% versus 33%; P = 0.04). End-of-treatment response was significantly lower among patients treated with peg-IFN-alpha2b [40% versus 52%; odds ratio (OR), 1.63; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.16-2.29; P < 0.01]. However, no significant differences were found in SVR between patients treated with peg-IFN-alpha2b and those treated with peg-IFN-alpha2a (31% versus 33%; OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.75-1.59; P = 0.655). Therapy was interrupted due to adverse events in 33 (14%) patients treated with peg-IFN-alpha2b and 47 (15%) patients treated with peg-IFN-alpha2a. CONCLUSIONS No differences in effectiveness and safety were found between peg-IFN-alpha2b and peg-IFN-alpha2a for the treatment of chronic HCV infection in HIV-infected patients.

Clinical effects of viral relapse after interferon plus ribavirin in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND & AIMS Sustained viral response (SVR) after therapy with interferon-ribavirin (IF-RB) reduces liver-related (LR) complications and mortality in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients. Here, we assess the impact of end-of-treatment response with subsequent relapse (REL) on LR events (LR death, liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, or liver transplantation), and liver stiffness (LS) by transient elastography. METHODS We analyzed the GESIDA 3603 Cohort (HIV/HCV-co-infected patients treated with IF-RB in 19 centers in Spain). Response to IF-RB was categorized as SVR, REL, and no response (NR). The study started when IF-RB was stopped and ended at death or the last follow-up visit. Multivariate regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, HIV category of transmission, CDC clinical category, nadir CD4+ cell count, HCV genotype, HCV-RNA viral load, and liver fibrosis. RESULTS Of 1599 patients included, response was categorized as NR in 765, REL in 250 and SVR in 584. Median follow-up was more than 4 years in each group. Taking the group of patients with NR as reference, we found that the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of liver-related events (liver-related death, liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation) for patients with REL and for patients with SVR were 0.17 (0.05; 0.50) and 0.03 (0; 0.20), respectively. We also found that SVR was followed by less liver stiffness than both REL and NR. However, REL was associated with less liver stiffness than NR. CONCLUSIONS Best outcomes were achieved with an SVR. However, REL was associated with less LR mortality, decompensation, and liver stiffness than NR.

Failure of cetirizine to prevent nevirapine-associated rash: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial for the GESIDA 26/01 Study.

ObjectivesRash is the most frequent adverse event associated with nevirapine. The use of antihistamines remains unclear in this setting. A double-blind placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of cetirizine in the prevention of nevirapine rash. MethodsA multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with cetirizine (10 mg/d × 30 days) was conducted. Inclusion criteria were HIV-1 infection and nevirapine therapy started with any CD4 cell count or plasma viral load and without simultaneous use of abacavir, cotrimoxazole, or rifampin. Clinical follow-up was performed at 15, 30, and 90 days. ResultsTwo hundred seventeen evaluable patients were enrolled (107 patients receiving cetirizine and 110 patients receiving placebo), 32.3% of whom were women. The median baseline CD4 cell count and plasma viral load were 341 cells/mm3 and 11,000 copies/mL, respectively. Overall, 29 rashes (13.4%) were detected: 16 (15.0%) in the cetirizine group and 13 (11.8%) in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–2.88; P = 0.50). The incidence of moderate to severe rashes leading to nevirapine withdrawal was 10.3% (11 of 107 patients) in the cetirizine group and 7.3% (8 of 110 patients) in the placebo group (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 0.52–4.18; P = 0.43). Adverse events leading to withdrawal of therapy appeared in 14 patients (13.1%) from the cetirizine group and 10 (9.1%) from the placebo group (P = 0.34). ConclusionCetirizine does not prevent the incidence or affect the severity of nevirapine-associated rash.

Effect of accompanying antiretroviral drugs on virological response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus

OBJECTIVES The effects of antiretroviral drugs on the response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin remain uncertain. We evaluated whether antiretroviral drugs affected the response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of two cohorts of HIV/HCV-co-infected patients treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin between 2001 and 2007 in Spain. The outcome measure was sustained virological response (SVR). Logistic regression models were used to test possible associations between non-response and pre-treatment characteristics, including accompanying antiretroviral drugs. RESULTS The study sample comprised 1701 patients: 63% were infected with HCV genotype (G) 1 or 4 and 88% were taking highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Factors independently associated with increased odds of SVR were G2 or 3, HVC RNA <500,000 IU/mL and CDC clinical category A or B. When we adjusted for these prognostic factors and dose of ribavirin/kg, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of SVR for patients without HAART was 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.88; P = 0.144]. Taking the backbone of tenofovir and lamivudine/emtricitabine as a reference, we found that, with the exception of regimens including zidovudine, the effect of other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones had little effect on SVR. The AOR of SVR for zidovudine and lamivudine was 0.65 (95% CI 0.46-0.93, P = 0.017). We carried out several sensitivity analyses, the results of which were consistent with the findings of the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that, with the exception of regimens including zidovudine, accompanying antiretroviral drugs have little effect on the virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients.

A randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of switching from a protease inhibitor to nevirapine in patients with undetectable viral load

To assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of switching from a protease inhibitor (PI) to nevirapine in patients with long‐term HIV‐1 RNA suppression on PI‐containing regimens, and to assess its influence in the adherence to treatment.

Eradication of hepatitis C virus and non‐liver‐related non–acquired immune deficiency syndrome–related events in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection

We assessed non‐liver‐related non–acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)‐related (NLR‐NAR) events and mortality in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)–coinfected patients treated with interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), between 2000 and 2008. The censoring date was May 31, 2014. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the adjusted hazard rate (HR) of overall death in responders and nonresponders. Fine and Gray regression analysis was conducted to determine the adjusted subhazard rate (sHR) of NLR deaths and NLR‐NAR events considering death as the competing risk. The NLR‐NAR events analyzed included diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, cardiovascular events, NLR‐NAR cancer, bone events, and non‐AIDS‐related infections. The variables for adjustment were age, sex, past AIDS, HIV transmission category, nadir CD4+ T‐cell count, antiretroviral therapy, HIV RNA, liver fibrosis, HCV genotype, and exposure to specific anti‐HIV drugs. Of the 1,625 patients included, 592 (36%) had a sustained viral response (SVR). After a median 5‐year follow‐up, SVR was found to be associated with a significant decrease in the hazard of diabetes mellitus (sHR, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35‐0.93; P = 0.024) and decline in the hazard of chronic renal failure close to the threshold of significance (sHR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.17‐1.09; P = 0.075). Conclusion: Our data suggest that eradication of HCV in coinfected patients is associated not only with a reduction in the frequency of death, HIV progression, and liver‐related events, but also with a reduced hazard of diabetes mellitus and possibly of chronic renal failure. These findings argue for the prescription of HCV therapy in coinfected patients regardless of fibrosis stage. (Hepatology 2017;66:344–356).

Human herpesvirus-8 in blood donors in Spain

practice. Halvard Bonig, MD e-mail: hbonig@u.washington.edu, hboenig@blutspende.de German Red Cross Blood Center and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University and Department of Medicine/Hematology University of Washington Kai-Hsin Chang, PhD Department of Medicine/Hematology University of Washington Christof Geisen, MD Erhard Seifried, MD German Red Cross Blood Center and Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany Carol Ware, PhD Department of Comparative Medicine University of Washington Seattle, Washington

Prevalence of Antibodies against Rubella Virus in Spain

The importance acquired by the strategy of anticipating rubella revacunation needs no emphasis1. Recommendations by experts committees and actualization of the prevailing childhood immunization schedules are unanimous when it comes to including the above-mentioned strategy2. In this context, seroepidemiologic survey studies allow the assesment of humoral immunologic response against viral structural antigens3,4 despite the assumed potential bias attached to their design. Being aware of the importance of describing rubella seropositivity real status in our setting we decided to document such situation in children under theoretically proper immunization schedules. The present contribution relies on data from a cross-sectional study carried out between 1999 and 2000 in children from the autonomous region of Spain, Castilla y Leon, (the largest region in the European Economic Community). The chosen framework was restricted to serum samples received in a Microbiology Laboratory of a University Hospital with the request of analyzing infectious markers other than rubella antibodies. According to demographic features a double stratification was made and we evaluated 323 children whose age was between 1 and 5 years and 1166 from 6 to 14 years of age. All samples were alicuoted and frozen (-20oC) until the moment of processing. Antibodies to proteic antigens of rubella viral envelope were determined by means of an indirect enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) (Bio-Whittaker, USA). Results were validated according to manufacturers instructions and samples that showed a neat absorbance greater the cut-off value plus 15% were considered positive. Our findings reveal that 309 of the investigated samples belonging to children from 1 to 5 years of age (95.7%) had antibodies to rubella virus (95% CI, 93.2% to 98.2%), being the rest of them seronegative at the moment of our study. In the age group ranging from 6 to 14 years the prevalence of antibodies was 90.5% (1055/1166) (95% CI, 88.6% to 92.5%) which resulted lower to that found in the previous group and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.003). This fact reflects a decrease of 5.2% in the seropositivity percentage of the second age group. An additional finding was that when we investigated the 6 to 14 years old group in terms of gender differences, girls (568) reached significantly higher percentages of seroprotection than boys (521) did (94.4 vs 87.1%, p=0.000). Conscious of the caution required in this kind of studies and assuming the internal validity for the evaluated population, our results point out to a age dependent loss of seroprotection. Among the potential causes that maintain this fact we may denote on the one hand the differences in vaccine coverage reached by both groups of children, just as Davidkina et al.5 have recently reported, and on the other hand limitations inherent in the vaccination itself6,7. Moreover, it is of course true that in our country, as well as in all developed countries, systematic vaccination of girls before puberty yields high efficiency, in order to prevent consequences derived from a potential primary infection during pregnancy8,9, all the same it is also certain that we still attend to the presence of small proportions of unprotected persons. The efficiency of new strategies of anticipating combined vaccines needs to be evaluated, and seroepidemiological studies seem to be a good tool for such