Josée E. Leysen

5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors and their atypical regulation properties.

The 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. GPCRs transduce extracellular signals to the interior of cells through their interaction with G-proteins. The 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors mediate effects of a large variety of compounds affecting depression, schizophrenia, anxiety, hallucinations, dysthymia, sleep patterns, feeding behaviour and neuro-endocrine functions. Binding of such compounds to either 5-HT(2) receptor subtype induces processes that regulate receptor sensitivity. In contrast to most other receptors, chronic blockade of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors leads not to an up- but to a (paradoxical) down-regulation. This review deals with published data involving such non-classical regulation of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors obtained from in vivo and in vitro studies. The underlying regulatory processes of the agonist-induced regulation of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors, commonly thought to be desensitisation and resensitisation, are discussed. The atypical down-regulation of both 5-HT(2) receptor subtypes by antidepressants, antipsychotics and 5-HT(2) antagonists is reviewed. The possible mechanisms of this paradoxical down-regulation are discussed, and a new hypothesis on possible heterologous regulation of 5-HT(2A) receptors is proposed.

Dopamine receptor‐mediated regulation of RGS2 and RGS4 mRNA differentially depends on ascending dopamine projections and time

RGS2 and RGS4 mRNAs are regulated in the rat striatum by dopaminergic agents. The present study further characterizes this regulation in three experiments. First, dopamine type 1 (receptor) (D1)‐ and dopamine type 2 (receptor) (D2)‐mediated regulator of G‐protein signalling (RGS) gene regulation was investigated in animals with deleted ascending dopaminergic pathways. We showed that RGS2 expression is controlled by D1 receptors either by direct action on D1 receptors or indirectly by presynaptic D2 receptors. Conversely, RGS4 gene expression is independent of presynaptic D2 receptors. Second, the study of colocalization between RGS2 or RGS4 and D1 or D2 by double labelling in situ hybridization histochemistry revealed broad expression of RGS2 and RGS4 mRNA in striatal subpopulations with colocalization of RGS2 and RGS4 with both D1 and D2 receptors. Finally, to test how far their gene regulation is temporally concerted, changes in RGS2 and RGS4 mRNA levels were measured in parallel with receptor occupancy by specific dopaminergic drugs at different time‐points. RGS2 was rapidly/transiently up‐regulated by the D1 agonist SKF82958 and the D2 antagonist haloperidol (peak at 0.5 h) and down‐regulated by the D1 antagonist SCH23390 and the D2 agonist quinpirole (trough at 1 and 2 h). RGS4 showed a delayed/transient up‐regulation with SCH23390 and quinpirole (peak at 4 and 2 h) and down‐regulation with haloperidol (trough at 8 h). Depending on the drug used, the degree of receptor occupancy did (D1 agonist and RGS2) or did not (D2 antagonist and RGS2) run parallel to RGS gene expression changes, indicating that certain drug effects are direct and others indirect. The precise control of RGS2 and RGS4 expression by dopamine receptors pleads in favour of their potential contribution to the fine‐tuning of D1 and D2 receptor signalling cascades.

Role of 5-HT2 receptors in the tryptamine-induced 5-HT syndrome in rats

We distinguished the functions of the different 5-hydroxytryptamine-2 (5-HT2) receptor (5-HT2R) subtypes in the tryptamine-induced 5-HT syndrome in rats using (1) the 5-HT2AR antagonist R93274 (N-[(3-p-fluorophenyl-1-propyl)-4-methyl-4-piperidinyl]-4-amino-5-iodo-2-methoxybenzamide), the 5-HT2A/CR antagonist R99647 (2-(dimethylaminomethyl)2,3,3 a,8-tetrahydrodibenzo[c,f]isoxazolo[2,3-a]azepine), the 5-HT2B/CR antagonist SB-242084 (6-chloro-5-methyl-1-[[2-[(2-methyl-3-pyridyl)oxy]-5-pyridyl]carbamoyl]-indoline), and several 5-HT2R antagonists (ketanserin, risperidone, pipamperone and mianserin); and (2) chronic 5-HT2R activation by 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM). In contrast to SB-242084, the selective 5-HT2AR antagonist R93274 as well as the non-selective 5-HT2AR antagonists (R99647, ketanserin, risperidone, pipamperone and mianserin) significantly inhibited tryptamine-induced forepaw treading and tremors, and reversed peripherally mediated cyanosis into hyperaemia; only the 5-HT2A/CR antagonists R99647 and mianserin inhibited the tryptamine-induced hunched back. Intermittent DOM administration (intravenously every 48 h for 12 days) did not change the centrally mediated tryptamine-induced forepaw treading, tremors and hunched back at 1, 4 or 7 days after the last DOM pretreatment. The DOM-induced head twitch response, measured immediately after every DOM injection, was not affected. In contrast, peripherally mediated cyanosis was reversed into hyperaemia in 75, 11 and 20% of all pretreated rats at 1, 4 and 7 days, respectively, after the last DOM administration. Taken together, these finding suggest that central 5-HT2ARs mediate tryptamine-induced forepaw treading and tremors, that peripheral 5-HT2ARs mediate tryptamine-induced cyanosis, and that 5-HT2CRs mediate tryptamine-induced hunched back. Peripheral 5-HT2ARs are more sensitive to desensitization after intermittent treatment with an agonist than central 5-HT2ARs.

Bilateral control of brain activity by dopamine D1 receptors: evidence from induction patterns of regulator of G protein signaling 2 and c-fos mRNA in D1-challenged hemiparkinsonian rats

Recent reports show that striatal dopamine D1-type receptors from one side of the normal rat brain can control brain activity (as measured by c-fos induction) on both sides of the brain. However, this phenomenon has not yet been studied in the presence of sensitized dopamine D1-type receptors. Here we address this issue by investigating the extent to which dopamine D1-type receptors control brain activation in rats with unilaterally sensitized dopamine D1-type receptors. Gene induction assays were used to identify activated regions from midbrain to forebrain in unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned (hemiparkinsonian) rats challenged with the full dopamine D1-type agonist SKF82958 (3 mg/kg, 0.5 and 2 h). The genes used are c-fos, the proven neuronal activity marker, and Regulator of G protein Signaling 2, a gene we propose as a marker of signaling homeostasis. SKF82958-mediated induction of both genes is greatly enhanced in hemiparkinsonian rats compared with shams, in both the lesioned and the intact hemisphere. For example, in the denervated caudate-putamen at 2 h postinjection, this enhancement is more than 80-fold for c-fos and up to 20-fold for Regulator of G protein Signaling 2; for the intact side this is 35-fold for c-fos and 27-fold for Regulator of G protein Signaling 2. Cortical induction of c-fos and Regulator of G protein Signaling 2 was generalized to most neocortical regions and was essentially equivalent in both the denervated and intact hemispheres. Interestingly, hippocampal structures also showed strong bilateral induction of both genes. This overall pattern of brain activation can be accounted for by the basal-ganglia thalamocortical and hippocampal circuits which both contain hemisphere-crossing connections and which can be initially activated in the lesioned hemisphere. Some regions, such as the intact striatum or the CA1 region, showed relatively low c-fos induction and relatively high Regulator of G protein Signaling 2 induction, possibly indicating that these regions are engaged in unusually strong signaling regulation activities. Our results show that, besides basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits, dopamine D1-type-mediated brain activation in hemiparkinsonian rats also involves hippocampal circuits.