Xavier Langlois

JNJ16259685, a highly potent, selective and systemically active mGlu1 receptor antagonist

We examined the pharmacological profile of (3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3]b quinolin-7-yl) (cis-4-methoxycyclohexyl) methanone (JNJ16259685). At recombinant rat and human metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) 1a receptors, JNJ16259685 non-competitively inhibited glutamate-induced Ca2+ mobilization with IC50 values of 3.24+/-1.00 and 1.21+/-0.53 nM, respectively, while showing a much lower potency at the rat and human mGlu5a receptor. JNJ16259685 inhibited [3H]1-(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-b]quinolin-7-yl)-2-phenyl-1-ethanone ([3H]R214127) binding to membranes prepared from cells expressing rat mGlu1a receptors with a Ki of 0.34+/-0.20 nM. JNJ16259685 showed no agonist, antagonist or positive allosteric activity toward rat mGlu2, -3, -4 or -6 receptors at concentrations up to 10 microM and did not bind to AMPA or NMDA receptors, or to a battery of other neurotransmitter receptors, ion channels and transporters. In primary cerebellar cultures, JNJ16259685 inhibited glutamate-mediated inositol phosphate production with an IC50 of 1.73+/-0.40 nM. Subcutaneously administered JNJ16259685 exhibited high potencies in occupying central mGlu1 receptors in the rat cerebellum and thalamus ( ED50=0.040 and 0.014 mg/kg, respectively). These data show that JNJ16259685 is a selective mGlu1 receptor antagonist with excellent potencies in inhibiting mGlu1 receptor function and binding and in occupying the mGlu1 receptor after systemic administration.

Systemic Immune Activation Leads to Neuroinflammation and Sickness Behavior in Mice

Substantial evidence indicates an association between clinical depression and altered immune function. Systemic administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is commonly used to study inflammation-associated behavioral changes in rodents. In these experiments, we tested the hypothesis that peripheral immune activation leads to neuroinflammation and depressive-like behavior in mice. We report that systemic administration of LPS induced astrocyte activation in transgenic GFAP-luc mice and increased immunoreactivity against the microglial marker ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 in the dentate gyrus of wild-type mice. Furthermore, LPS treatment caused a strong but transient increase in cytokine levels in the serum and brain. In addition to studying LPS-induced neuroinflammation, we tested whether sickness could be separated from depressive-like behavior by evaluating LPS-treated mice in a panel of behavioral paradigms. Our behavioral data indicate that systemic LPS administration caused sickness and mild depressive-like behavior. However, due to the overlapping time course and mild effects on depression-related behavior per se, it was not possible to separate sickness from depressive-like behavior in the present rodent model.

Characterization of an orphan G protein-coupled receptor localized in the dorsal root ganglia reveals adenine as a signaling molecule

The cloning of novel G protein-coupled receptors and the search for their natural ligands, a process called reverse pharmacology, is an excellent opportunity to discover novel hormones and neurotransmitters. Based on a degenerate primer approach we have cloned a G protein-coupled receptor whose mRNA expression profile indicates highest expression in the dorsal root ganglia, specifically in the subset of small neurons, suggesting a role in nociception. In addition, moderate expression was found in lung, hypothalamus, peripheral blood leukocytes, and ovaries. Guided by a receptor-activation bioassay, we identified adenine as the endogenous ligand, which activated the receptor potently and with high structural stringency. Therefore, we propose to name this receptor as the adenine receptor. Hormonal functions have already been demonstrated for adenine derivatives like 6-benzylaminopurine in plants and 1-methyladenine in lower animals. Here, we demonstrate that adenine functions as a signaling molecule in mammals. This finding adds a third family besides P1 and P2 receptors to the class of purinergic receptors.

Striatal gene expression of RGS2 and RGS4 is specifically mediated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors: clues for RGS2 and RGS4 functions.

Of all partners involved in G‐protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling, the regulator of G‐protein signalling (RGS) proteins are the only ones showing fast gene expression changes after various stimuli. These expression changes can offer feedback regulation to GPCR signalling as RGS accelerate the return of G‐proteins to their inactive form and exert regulatory functions on intracellular effectors. However, it is not yet known which RGS regulate which receptor transduction pathways in the brain. To start to answer this question, we studied the influence of specific agonists and antagonists of the dopamine D1 and D2 receptors on the gene expression of the five most abundant RGS in the striatum: RGS2, RGS4, RGS8, RGS9 and RGS10. Only changes in RGS2 and RGS4 mRNA levels were observed. The D1 agonist SKF82958 and D2 antagonist haloperidol caused an up‐regulation of RGS2 (+ 38.0% and + 41.6%, respectively). The D1 antagonist SCH23390 and D2 agonist quinpirole caused a down‐regulation of RGS2 (− 25.0% and − 35.0%) and an up‐regulation of RGS4 (+ 57.2% and + 52.5%). D1 and D2 receptors exert opposite effects on RGS2 expression, as they do on cAMP levels, suggesting a cAMP‐mediated transcription of RGS2. This was confirmed by the unique induction of RGS2 (+ 111.1%) observed in the periventricular zone of the striatum after intracerebroventricular injection of forskolin. RGS4 was up‐regulated only when RGS2 was down‐regulated. This suggests that both RGS exert distinct functions. Considering the coupling of D1 and D2 receptors to the intracellular effector adenylate cyclase 5 (AC5) through their respective Gα subunits in the striatum, our data allow us to suggest that RGS2 regulates the D1/Gαolf/AC5 pathway and RGS4 the D2/Gαo/AC5 pathway.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 blockade impairs acquisition and retention in a spatial Water maze task

Metabotropic glutamate receptors, including the mGlu1 receptor, have received considerable attention as potential targets for anxiolytic, antidepressant, antipsychotic and antinociceptive drugs. mGlu1 receptors have also been suggested to play a role in the modulation of cognitive processes, but knowledge is still very limited. In the present study the effects of the selective mGlu1 receptor antagonist 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3]beta-quinolin-7-yl)(cis-4-methoxycyclohexyl)methanone (JNJ16259685, 0.63-10 mg/kg s.c.) on more or less spatially demanding learning and spatial memory (retention and re-acquisition) were investigated in mice performing in a water maze. Selective mGlu1 receptor blockade with JNJ16259685 impaired spatial acquisition processes, irrespective of spatial load, as well as spatial re-acquisition, already at the lowest dose tested (0.63 mg/kg). In contrast, effects on spatial retention performance were relatively mild in mice that had learned to locate the position of the escape platform prior to treatment. Thigmotaxic behaviour and locomotor activity appeared to be unaffected by JNJ16259685. These data suggest that blockade of the mGlu1 receptor primarily affects learning of new information, but leaves retention of spatial information relatively unaffected. Blockade of the mGlu5 receptor with MPEP also impaired spatial learning, although only at the highest dose tested (10 mg/kg). An ex vivo receptor occupancy study in rats revealed that MPEP occupied central mGlu5 receptors with an ED(50) of 2.0 mg/kg one hour after subcutaneous administration. This is 50-150 times higher than the ED(50) reported for JNJ16259685 at central mGlu1 receptors and suggests that one reason why the two compounds cause cognitive effects at different doses might be due to differences in central mGlu receptor occupancy, rather than fundamentally different roles of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors in the modulation of cognitive function.

Combined α2 and D2/3 receptor blockade enhances cortical glutamatergic transmission and reverses cognitive impairment in the rat

The alpha(2) adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan enhances antipsychotic efficacy of classical dopamine D(2) antagonists in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The mechanisms are not fully understood, but we have previously shown that the combination of idazoxan with the D(2/3) receptor antagonist raclopride, similarly to clozapine but not classical antipsychotic drugs, augments dopamine efflux in the prefrontal cortex, and also generates an enhanced suppression of the conditioned avoidance response. We have now investigated the effects of clozapine, raclopride, idazoxan and the combination of raclopride and idazoxan on (i) electrically evoked excitatory post-synaptic potentials and currents in pyramidal cells of the rat medial prefrontal cortex, using intracellular electrophysiological recording in vitro, (ii) the impaired cognitive function induced by the selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801, using the 8-arm radial maze test, (iii) the in-vivo D2, alpha(2A) and alpha(2C) receptor occupancies of these pharmacological treatments, using ex-vivo autoradiography. Whereas neither idazoxan nor raclopride alone had any effect, the combination exerted the same facilitation of glutamatergic transmission in rat prefrontal pyramidal neurons as clozapine, and this effect was found to be mediated by dopamine acting at D(1) receptors. Similarly to clozapine, the combination of idazoxan and raclopride also completely reversed the working-memory impairment in rats induced by MK-801. Moreover, these effects of the two treatment regimes were obtained at similar occupancies at D(2), alpha(2A) and alpha(2C) receptors respectively. Our results provide novel neurobiological and behavioural support for a pro-cognitive effect of adjunctive use of idazoxan with antipsychotic drugs that lack appreciable alpha(2) adrenoceptor-blocking properties, and define presynaptic alpha(2) adrenoceptors as major targets in antipsychotic drug development.

Metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor distribution and occupancy in the rat brain: a quantitative autoradiographic study using [3H]R214127

We used the selective metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) 1 receptor antagonist [3H]1-(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano[2,3-b]quinolin-7-yl)-2-phenyl-1-ethanone ([3H]R214127) to investigate the distribution of mGlu1 receptor binding sites in rat brain. We found high mGlu1 receptor binding in the cerebellum, thalamus, dentate gyrus and medial central gray, moderate binding within the CA3 of the hippocampus and hypothalamus, and low mGlu1 receptor binding in the basal ganglia and cortex. The mGlu1 receptor is also present in variable degree in the dorsal lateral septal nucleus, amygdala, interpeduncular nucleus and median raphe nucleus. Additionally, we employed [3H]R214127 autoradiography as a means of investigating the occupancy of central mGlu1 receptors following in vivo administration of mGlu1 receptor antagonists that prevent binding of this radioligand. We found that the mGlu1 receptor antagonist (3aS,6aS)-6a-naphtalan-2-ylmethyl-5-methyliden-hexahydro-cyclopenta[c]furan-1-on (BAY 36-7620), administered subcutaneously (s.c.) at 10 mg/kg, only occupied about 30% of cerebellar and thalamic mGlu1 receptors. The mGlu1/5 receptor antagonist 2-quinoxaline-carboxamide-N-adamantan-1-yl (NPS 2390) exhibited a relatively high potency in occupying mGlu1 receptors in rat cerebellum (ED50 = 0.75 mg/kg, s.c.) and thalamus (ED50 = 0.63 mg/kg, s.c). In the future, this method can be employed to gain more insight into the in vivo profile and central activity of potential therapeutic agents that act upon the mGlu1 receptor.

Detailed distribution of Neurokinin 3 receptors in the rat, guinea pig and gerbil brain: a comparative autoradiographic study

The neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptor is predominantly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS). Species differences in neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptor pharmacology have led to the preferential use of guinea pigs and gerbils in the characterization of non-peptide NK3 antagonists. Little is known about the central localization of NK3 receptors in the CNS of these species. To study this, [(3)H]senktide and [(3)H]SR 142801 were used in autoradiography experiments to visualize the NK3 receptors in the guinea pig and gerbil brain and compared to with the distribution of [(3)H]senktide binding sites in the rat brain. In the three species, the NK3 receptor was similarly distributed within the cerebral cortex, the zona incerta, the medial habenula, the amygdaloid complex, the superior colliculus and the interpeduncular nucleus. Outside of these structures, our study has revealed that each species displayed a specific distribution pattern of central NK3 receptors. The rat was the only species where NK3 receptors could be visualized in the striatum, the supraoptic nucleus and the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. The guinea pig differed mainly from the two other species by the absence of detectable binding sites in the substantia nigra pars compacta and the ventral tegmental area. A specific localization of NK3 receptors in the anterodorsal and anteroventral thalamic nuclei characterized the gerbil. This last species is also unique by in the higher level of NK3 receptors in the dorsal and median raphe nuclei. All these differences suggest that the NK3 receptor mediates different functions in different species.

Mapping of serotonin 5‐HT4 receptor mRNA and ligand binding sites in the post‐mortem human brain

The anatomical localization of 5‐HT4 receptor mRNA and 5‐HT4 receptor protein was examined in sections of post‐mortem human brain by in situ hybridization histochemistry and radioligand receptor autoradiography. In the in situ hybridization study, the highest levels of 5‐HT4 receptor mRNA were found in caudate nucleus, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and in the hippocampal formation. No 5‐HT4 receptor mRNA was detected in globus pallidus and substantia nigra. For receptor autoradiography, two new and highly selective radioligands were compared: [3H]prucalopride, which preferentially labels the G‐protein coupled fraction of receptors, and [3H]R116712, which labels the entire receptor population at subnanomolar concentrations. [3H]Prucalopride and [3H]R116712 binding was performed on human brain hemisphere sections. The highest densities for both radioligands were found in the basal ganglia (caudate nucleus, putamen, nucleus accumbens, globus pallidus, substantia nigra). Moderate to low densities were detected in the hippocampal formation and in the cortical mantle. Mismatches between 5‐HT4 receptor mRNA and binding sites in the globus pallidus and the substantia nigra suggested that the binding sites may be localized on axonal projections originating from the striatum. To compare densities of binding sites, concentration binding curves with [3H]prucalopride, [3H]R116712 and [3H]GR113808 were performed on membranes from homogenates of several human brain regions. Comparison of Bmax‐values obtained with [3H]prucalopride and [3H]R116712 indicated that the G‐protein coupled fraction of 5‐HT4 receptors in the substantia nigra was exceptionally high (54%) in comparison with percentages (16–27%) found in the frontal cortex, the striatum and the hippocampus. Such a high percentage (40%) of [3H]prucalopride vs. [3H]R116712 binding was also observed in the substantia nigra in the receptor autoradiography experiments. The [3H]prucalopride binding was GppNHp‐sensitive, whereas [3H]R116712 and [3H]GR113808 was not. These data indicate that in the substantia nigra 5‐HT4 receptors are more strongly coupled to their signal transduction pathway than in other brain regions. Synapse 36:35–46, 2000.

Dopamine receptor‐mediated regulation of RGS2 and RGS4 mRNA differentially depends on ascending dopamine projections and time

RGS2 and RGS4 mRNAs are regulated in the rat striatum by dopaminergic agents. The present study further characterizes this regulation in three experiments. First, dopamine type 1 (receptor) (D1)‐ and dopamine type 2 (receptor) (D2)‐mediated regulator of G‐protein signalling (RGS) gene regulation was investigated in animals with deleted ascending dopaminergic pathways. We showed that RGS2 expression is controlled by D1 receptors either by direct action on D1 receptors or indirectly by presynaptic D2 receptors. Conversely, RGS4 gene expression is independent of presynaptic D2 receptors. Second, the study of colocalization between RGS2 or RGS4 and D1 or D2 by double labelling in situ hybridization histochemistry revealed broad expression of RGS2 and RGS4 mRNA in striatal subpopulations with colocalization of RGS2 and RGS4 with both D1 and D2 receptors. Finally, to test how far their gene regulation is temporally concerted, changes in RGS2 and RGS4 mRNA levels were measured in parallel with receptor occupancy by specific dopaminergic drugs at different time‐points. RGS2 was rapidly/transiently up‐regulated by the D1 agonist SKF82958 and the D2 antagonist haloperidol (peak at 0.5 h) and down‐regulated by the D1 antagonist SCH23390 and the D2 agonist quinpirole (trough at 1 and 2 h). RGS4 showed a delayed/transient up‐regulation with SCH23390 and quinpirole (peak at 4 and 2 h) and down‐regulation with haloperidol (trough at 8 h). Depending on the drug used, the degree of receptor occupancy did (D1 agonist and RGS2) or did not (D2 antagonist and RGS2) run parallel to RGS gene expression changes, indicating that certain drug effects are direct and others indirect. The precise control of RGS2 and RGS4 expression by dopamine receptors pleads in favour of their potential contribution to the fine‐tuning of D1 and D2 receptor signalling cascades.