Josée Rhéaume

Psychometric validation of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire and the Interpretation of Intrusions Inventory: Part I

This article reports on the validation of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ) and Interpretations of Intrusions Inventory (III) developed by the Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group (OCCWG) to assess the primary beliefs and appraisals considered critical to the pathogenesis of obsessions. A battery of questionnaires that assessed symptoms of anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and worry was administered to 248 outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), 105 non-obsessional anxious patients, 87 non-clinical adults from the community, and 291 undergraduate students. Tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability indicated that the OBQ and III assessed stable aspects of OC-related thinking. Between-group differences and correlations with existing measures of OC symptoms indicated that the OBQ and III assess core cognitive features of obsessionality. However, the various subscales of the OBQ and III are highly correlated, and both measures evidenced low discriminant validity. The findings are discussed in terms of the relevance and specificity of cognitive constructs like responsibility, control and importance of thoughts, overestimated threat, tolerance of uncertainty and perfectionism for OCD.

Cognitive—behavioral treatment of obsessive thoughts: A controlled study.

Twenty-nine patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder as diagnosed in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., revised; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) who did not have overt compulsive rituals were randomly assigned to treatment and waiting-list conditions. Patients in the treatment condition received cognitive-behavioral therapy consisting of a detailed explanation of the occurrence and maintenance of obsessive thoughts, exposure to obsessive thoughts, response prevention of all neutralizing strategies, cognitive restructuring, and relapse prevention. Compared with waiting-list patients, treated patients improved significantly on measures of severity of obsessions, current functioning, self-report obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and anxiety. When waiting-list patients were subsequently treated, the combined group improved on all outcome measures. Treatment gains were maintained at 6-month follow-up. Results indicate that cognitive-behavioral therapy is effective in the treatment of patients with obsessive thoughts, a group that has often been considered resistant to treatment.

Correcting faulty appraisals of obsessional thoughts

Cognitive techniques are becoming more widely established in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This paper extends previous work by van Oppen and Arntz (1994, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 79-87) on overestimation of threat and excessive responsibility by discussing other types of appraisals that may be involved in OCD, particularly when overt compulsions are absent. Examples are given of types of intervention that may be useful to correct faulty appraisals concerning the overestimation of the importance of thoughts such as thought-action fusion, excessive responsibility, perfectionistic concerns such as the need for absolute certainty, and expectations about anxiety and its consequences.

Perfectionism, responsibility and Obsessive-Compulsive symptoms

Although both perfectionism and responsibility have been associated with OCD at a theoretical level, responsibility has been the focus of a number of recent articles. This study was conducted in order to empirically test the relative importance of perfectionism and responsibility in Obsessive-Compulsive symptoms. Perfectionism and two measures of responsibility showed moderate correlations with Obsessive-Compulsive symptoms. A hierarchical regression analysis revealed that although responsibility accounted for more variance, perfectionism was still a significant predictor of Obsessive-Compulsive symptoms, once responsibility had been partialled out. These results suggest that although responsibility is related to OC symptoms, perfectionism is also independently associated. While responsibility has received much attention lately from OCD theorists and clinicians, perfectionism may also play a significant if underestimated role in some OC patients. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for current cognitive models and treatment procedures that give responsibility a central role in OCD. A new definition of perfectionism is also proposed.

Specificity of generalized anxiety disorder symptoms and processes

This studys main goal is to test the broad specificity of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) symptom and process variables. These variables were compared in four groups of participants: (1) 24 patients with primary GAD, (2) 24 patients with secondary GAD, (3) 38 other anxiety disorder patients, and (4) 20 nonclinical control subjects. Each participant received a structured diagnostic interview and a series of standardized questionnaires. The results show that DSM-IV GAD symptoms (worry, GAD physical symptoms, and interference due to worry and anxiety) distinguish GAD patients from those with other anxiety disorders. Two process variables, problem orientation and intolerance of uncertainty, also differentiated GAD patients from other anxiety disorder patients. Overall, these results support the DSM-IV definition of GAD and the broad specificity of problem orientation and intolerance of uncertainty as GAD process variables.

Experimental manipulations of responsibility: An analogue test for models of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Several authors attribute excessive responsibility a predominant role in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) [Salkovskis, P. M. (1985) Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 571-583; Rachman, S. (1993) Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 149-154; van Oppen, P. & Arntz, A. (1994) Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 79-87]. The present studies aimed at demonstrating the link between different levels of perceived responsibility and checking behaviors by experimentally manipulating responsibility in non-clinical Ss. In the first study, a sound recognition task was used to compare checking behaviors in Ss with high (HR) and low (LR) perceived responsibility. Only one variable was significantly different, Ss from the HR group reporting more anxiety during the task than Ss from the LR group. Results did not support a link between responsibility and checking behavior. In a second study HR and LR Ss were compared on a manual classification task. Subjects from the HR group hesitated and checked more, and reported more preoccupation with errors and anxiety during the task than Ss from the LR group. Since perceived severity of the outcome was the most variable affected by the manipulation, the implications for current models of OCD are discussed and an alternative explanation is attempted. Finally, clinical implications are examined and suggestions are made for future directions of research.

Responsibility and perfectionism in OCD: an experimental study

Cognitive models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) suggest a number of different variables that may play a role in the development and maintenance of obsessive compulsive symptoms [Freeston, M. H., Rhéaume, J., & Ladouceur, R. (1996) Correcting faulty appraisals of obsessional thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 433-446]. This studys aim was to verify the effect of perfectionism and excessive responsibility on checking behaviors and related variables. Twenty-four moderately perfectionistic subjects (MP) and 27 highly perfectionistic subjects (HP) were submitted to a manipulation of responsibility (low and high). After each manipulation, they had to perform a classification task during which checking behaviors were observed. Results indicate that more checking behaviors (hesitations, checking) occurred in the high responsibility condition than in the low responsibility condition for subjects of both groups. After executing the task in the high responsibility condition, HP subjects reported more influence over and responsibility for negative consequences than MP subjects. These results suggest that high perfectionistic tendencies could predispose individuals to overestimate their perceived responsibility for negative events. Furthermore, perfectionism could be conceived as playing a catalytic role in the perception of responsibility. Results are discussed according to cognitive models of OCD.

Self-report of obsessions and worry

The relationships between self-reported worry and obsessional-compulsive symptoms were examined among 145 hospital outpatients. Subjects completed the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Padua Inventory. Despite moderately strong correlations, the scales measured distinct constructs. Eliminating five items from the Padua Inventory may improve its discriminant validity. Correlations with the Padua Inventory subscales showed that obsessional loss of mental control was moderately correlated to both worry and checking, whereas worry and checking were only weakly correlated. The results are discussed in terms of possible relationships between worry and obsessions.

Correction of inflated responsibility in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

This study evaluates the efficacy of a cognitive treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Four patients with OCD whose major complaints were checking rituals were treated in a multiple baseline across subjects design. Cognitive correction targeted inflated responsibility, without any exposure or response prevention. All subjects reported a clinically significant decrease in interference caused by rituals, a 52-100% reduction in Y-BOCS scores, and a decrease in perceived responsibility. Therapeutic gains were maintained at follow-up (6 and 12 months) for three patients. Results suggest that cognitive therapy targeting inflated responsibility is a promising alternative to exposure-based treatment.

Inflated responsibility in obsessive compulsive disorder: Validation of an operational definition

An excessive sense of responsibility has been identified in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) where patients evaluate their thoughts in terms of the harm they could cause to themselves or others. In a new definition, responsibility was defined as the belief that one possesses pivotal power to provoke or prevent subjective crucial negative outcomes. In order to empirically test the validity of this definition, two studies used a semi-idiographic design to evaluate responsibility across ambiguous situations related to major OCD themes like contamination, verification, somatic concerns, loss of control, making errors, sexuality and magical thinking. In the first study, 397 volunteer adults participated in the experiment. For each situation, subjects briefly described a possible negative outcome and then rated this outcome on four dimensions: (1) probability; (2) severity; (3) influence; and (4) pivotal influence, using a 9-point Likert scale. Finally Ss rated perceived responsibility and personal relevance. Highly relevant situations were retained for the final analysis. Regression analysis suggested that influence and pivotal influence were better predictors of responsibility ratings than probability and severity. The second study examined the effect of the order of the questions on the responsibility ratings. A first group of Ss (n = 85) answered the Responsibility Questionnaire (RQ) in the original order, while a second group (n = 53) rated responsibility before the other ratings. Regression analysis showed that although proportion of variance explained diminished when the order was reversed, pivotal influence was still the best predictor of responsibility. Results are discussed in terms of current models of OCD and implications for future research and cognitive treatment are identified.