Josep Miñana

Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid versus cefotaxime in the therapy of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM Cefotaxime is considered the first-choice antibiotic for empirical treatment in cirrhotic patients developing bacterial infections. It has been suggested that amoxicillin-clavulanic acid could be an alternative to cefotaxime, particularly in patients developing bacterial infections while on prophylactic norfloxacin. The aim of the present study was to compare amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with cefotaxime in the treatment of bacterial infections in cirrhosis. METHODS Ninety-six hospitalized cirrhotic patients with suspicion of bacterial infection were prospectively included and randomized into two groups: one group (n=48) received amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, first intravenously 1 g-0.2 g every 8 h, and then orally 500 mg-125 mg every 8 h, and the other group (n=48) received intravenous cefotaxime 1 g every 6 h. Patients were stratified for previous prophylaxis with norfloxacin and ascitic fluid infection. RESULTS Sixteen patients were excluded from the analysis because bacterial infection was not demonstrated or because of secondary peritonitis. Therefore, 38 patients from the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group and 42 from the cefotaxime group were finally analyzed. There were 24 ascitic fluid infections in each group. Infection resolution (86.8% vs 88%, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.13, p NS), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis resolution (87.5% vs 83.3%, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.24, p NS), duration of treatment, incidence of complications, time of hospitalization and hospital mortality were similar in both groups. Considering patients on prophylactic norfloxacin, infection resolution was also similar (100% vs 83.3%, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.37, p NS). No adverse events were observed in either of the two groups. The cost of antibiotics was statistically lower in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is as effective as cefotaxime in the treatment of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients, but is less expensive and can be administered orally. These results suggest that amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is an effective alternative to cefotaxime for the empirical treatment of bacterial infections in cirrhosis.

Development of Ascites in Compensated Cirrhosis With Severe Portal Hypertension Treated With β-Blockers

OBJECTIVES:In compensated cirrhosis, a threshold value of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mm Hg is required for the development of decompensation. However, whether the treatment of portal hypertension (PHT) can prevent the transition into development of ascites once this level has been reached is unclear. Our aim was to assess the relationship between changes in HVPG induced by β-blockers and development of ascites in compensated cirrhosis with severe PHT.METHODS:Eighty-three patients without any previous decompensation of cirrhosis, with large esophageal varices and HVPG ≥12 mm Hg were included. After baseline hemodynamic measurements nadolol was administered and a second hemodynamic study was repeated 1–3 months later.RESULTS:During 53±30 months of follow-up, decompensation occurred in 52 patients (62%) and in 81% of them ascites was the first manifestation. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis a decrease in HVPG ≥10% was the best cutoff to predict ascites. As compared with nonresponders, patients with an HVPG decrease ≥10% had a lower probability of developing ascites (19% vs. 57% at 3 years, P<0.001), refractory ascites (P=0.007), and hepatorenal syndrome (P=0.027). By Cox regression analysis hemodynamic nonresponse was the best predictor of ascites. By stepwise logistic regression, development of ascites was independently associated with nonresponse, whereas refractory ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were not.CONCLUSIONS:In patients with compensated cirrhosis and large varices treated with β-blockers, an HVPG decrease ≥10% significantly reduces the risk of developing ascitic decompensation and other related complications such as refractory ascites or hepatorenal syndrome.

Hemodynamic Effects of Terlipressin and High Somatostatin Dose during Acute Variceal Bleeding in Nonresponders to the Usual Somatostatin Dose

OBJECTIVES:High dose of somatostatin infusion achieves a greater reduction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than the usual dose, and terlipressin decreases HVPG through mechanisms other than somatostatin. Our aim was to assess the hemodynamic effects of terlipressin and high somatostatin dose during acute variceal bleeding in nonresponders to the usual somatostatin dose.METHODS:Hemodynamic studies were performed in 80 patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding during the first 3 days of admission. After baseline measurements, somatostatin was administered (250 μg/h with an initial bolus of 250 μg). Patients were considered responders when the HVPG decreased by >10% from baseline (n = 31). Nonresponders were randomized under double-blind conditions to a control group (n = 7), or to receive terlipressin (2 mg IV bolus, n = 22), or high dose of somatostatin (500 μg/h, n = 20). Final measurements were obtained 30 min later.RESULTS:Terlipressin caused a decrease in HVPG (from 22.2 ± 5 to 19.1 ± 5.2, p < 0.01) and heart rate (p < 0.01), while mean arterial pressure increased (p < 0.01). High somatostatin dose also reduced HVPG (from 21.8 ± 3.4 to 19.6 ± 3.1, p < 0.01), although this decrease was more pronounced with terlipressin (15%± 9% vs 10%± 6% from baseline, P = 0.05). Both terlipressin and high somatostatin dose achieved a significantly higher rate of response than that in the control group. A decrease in HVPG >20% was observed in 36% of cases with terlipressin versus 5% with high somatostatin dose (P = 0.02).CONCLUSIONS:In nonresponders to usual somatostatin dose, both terlipressin and high-dose of somatostatin infusion significantly decreased HVPG and increased the rate of hemodynamic responders. Such effects were greater with terlipressin. Both treatments may be an alternative when standard somatostatin fails.

Pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension in the prevention of community-acquired spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Introduction Given that &bgr;-blockers reduce the incidence of bacterial translocation in cirrhotic rats, the aim of this study was to compare the long-term incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients submitted to pharmacologic versus endoscopic treatment to prevent variceal rebleeding. Patients and methods Two hundred and thirty patients with variceal hemorrhage were included in two previous randomized trials performed to compare the efficacy of medication (nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate, n=115) versus endoscopic treatment (n=115) with sclerotherapy or ligation for the prevention of rebleeding. Results The mean follow-up was 23±1.4 months. The characteristics of the patients and the number of patients on long-term prophylaxis with norfloxacin were similar in both groups. The incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was lower in the medication group (9 versus 14.7%, P=NS). The probability of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was also lower in the medication group (6 versus 12% at 1 year, 22 versus 36% at 5 years; P=0.08), due to a significantly lower probability of community-acquired spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in this group (1 versus 10% at 1 year, 18 versus 32% at 5 years; P=0.02). Patients with no hemodynamic response to therapy had a significantly higher probability to develop community-acquired spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up than hemodynamic responders (P<0.03). Long-term probability of developing community-acquired spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is lower in patients submitted to pharmacologic treatment for preventing variceal rebleeding than in those submitted to endoscopic treatment. Conclusion Long-term pharmacologic prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding contributes to the prevention of community-acquired spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Survival of patients with cirrhosis and acute peptic ulcer bleeding compared with variceal bleeding using current first-line therapies

The presence of cirrhosis increases the mortality of patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). Both acute variceal bleeding (AVB) and PUB are associated with substantial mortality in cirrhosis. This multicenter cohort study was performed to assess whether the mortality of patients with cirrhosis with PUB is different from that of those with AVB. Patients with cirrhosis and acute gastrointestinal bleeding were consecutively included and treated with somatostatin and proton pump inhibitor infusion from admission and with antibiotic prophylaxis. Emergency endoscopy with endoscopic therapy was performed within the first 6 hours. 646 patients with AVB and 144 with PUB were included. There were baseline differences between groups, such as use of gastroerosive drugs or β‐blockers. Child‐Pugh and Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease MELD scores were similar. Further bleeding was more frequent in the AVB group than those in the PUB group (18% vs. 10%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29‐0.88). However, mortality risk at 45 days was similar in both groups (19% in the AVB group vs. 17% in the PUB group; OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.55‐1.33; P = 0.48). Different parameters, such as Child‐Pugh score, acute kidney injury, acute on chronic liver failure, or presence of shock or bacterial infection, but not the cause of bleeding, were related to the risk of death. Only 2% of the PUB group versus 3% of the AVB group died with uncontrolled bleeding (P = 0.39), whereas the majority of patients in either group died from liver failure or attributed to other comorbidities. Conclusion: Using current first‐line therapy, patients with cirrhosis and acute peptic ulcer bleeding have a similar survival than those with variceal bleeding. The risk of further bleeding is higher in patients with variceal hemorrhage. However, few patients in both groups died from uncontrolled bleeding, rather the cause of death was usually related to liver failure or comorbidities. (Hepatology 2018;67:1458‐1471).