Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joshua A. Hadler is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joshua A. Hadler.


Optics Letters | 2013

Use of radiation pressure for measurement of high-power laser emission

Paul A. Williams; Joshua A. Hadler; Robert Lee; Frank Maring; John H. Lehman

We demonstrate a paradigm in absolute laser radiometry where a laser beams power can be measured from its radiation pressure. Using an off-the-shelf high-accuracy mass scale, a 530 W Yb-doped fiber laser, and a 92 kW CO(2) laser, we present preliminary results of absolute optical power measurements with inaccuracies of better than 7% to 13%. We find negligible contribution from radiometric (thermal) forces. We also identify this scales dynamic-force noise floor for a 0.1 Hz modulation frequency as 4 μN/Hz(1/2) or, as optical power sensitivity, 600 W/Hz(1/2).


Journal of Laser Applications | 2013

Random testing reveals excessive power in commercial laser pointers

Joshua A. Hadler; Edna L. Tobares; Marla L. Dowell

In random testing of 122 commercial laser pointers, the authors observed that 90% of green pointers and 44% of red pointers were not in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), producing laser power in excess of the CFR-allowed limit at one or more laser wavelengths. The measurement results are presented and the authors describe the inexpensive test bed they used. Also, they suggest physical mechanisms that could account for the hazardous levels of laser pointer emissions.


Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology | 2004

Intramural Comparison of NIST Laser and Optical Fiber Power Calibrations

John H. Lehman; Igor Vayshenker; David J. Livigni; Joshua A. Hadler

The responsivity of two optical detectors was determined by the method of direct substitution in four different NIST measurement facilities. The measurements were intended to demonstrate the determination of absolute responsivity as provided by NIST calibration services at laser and optical-communication wavelengths; nominally 633 nm, 850 nm, 1060 nm, 1310 nm, and 1550 nm. The optical detectors have been designated as checks standards for the purpose of routine intramural comparison of our calibration services and to meet requirements of the NIST quality system, based on ISO 17025. The check standards are two optical-trap detectors, one based on silicon and the other on indium gallium arsenide photodiodes. The four measurement services are based on: (1) the laser optimized cryogenic radiometer (LOCR) and free field collimated laser light; (2) the C-series isoperibol calorimeter and free-field collimated laser light; (3) the electrically calibrated pyroelectric radiometer and fiber-coupled laser light; (4) the pyroelectric wedge trap detector, which measures light from a lamp source and monochromator. The results indicate that the responsivity of the check standards, as determined independently using the four services, agree to within the published expanded uncertainty ranging from approximately 0.02 % to 1.24 %.


Optics Express | 2017

Portable, high-accuracy, non-absorbing laser power measurement at kilowatt levels by means of radiation pressure

Paul A. Williams; Joshua A. Hadler; Frank Maring; Robert Lee; Kyle Rogers; Brian J. Simonds; Matthew Spidell; Michelle Stephens; Ari Feldman; John H. Lehman

We describe a non-traditional optical power meter which measures radiation pressure to accurately determine a lasers optical power output. This approach traces its calibration of the optical watt to the kilogram. Our power meter is designed for high-accuracy and portability with the capability of multi-kilowatt measurements whose upper power limit is constrained only by the mirror quality. We provide detailed uncertainty evaluation and validate experimentally an average expanded relative uncertainty of 0.016 from 1 kW to 10 kW. Radiation pressure as a power measurement tool is unique to the extent that it does not rely on absorption of the light to produce a high-accuracy result. This permits fast measurements, simplifies power scalability, and allows high-accuracy measurements to be made during use of the laser for other applications.


Measurement Science and Technology | 2013

Accurate, inexpensive testing of laser pointer power for safe operation

Joshua A. Hadler; Marla L. Dowell

An accurate, inexpensive test-bed for the measurement of optical power emitted from handheld lasers is described. The setup consists of a power meter, optical bandpass filters, an adjustable iris and self-centering lens mounts. We demonstrate this test-bed by evaluating the output power of 23 laser pointers with respect to the limits imposed by the US Code of Federal Regulations. We find a compliance rate of only 26%. A discussion of potential laser pointer hazards is included.


Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology | 2009

Uncertainty Calculation for Spectral-Responsivity Measurements.

John H. Lehman; Chih-Ming Wang; Marla L. Dowell; Joshua A. Hadler

This paper discusses a procedure for measuring the absolute spectral responsivity of optical-fiber power meters and computation of the calibration uncertainty. The procedure reconciles measurement results associated with a monochromator-based measurement system with those obtained with laser sources coupled with optical fiber. Relative expanded uncertainties based on the methods from the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement and from Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement”-Propagation of Distributions using a Monte Carlo Method are derived and compared. An example is used to illustrate the procedures and calculation of uncertainties.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2016

Dual-beam laser thermal processing of silicon photovoltaic materials

Brian J. Simonds; Anthony Teal; Tian Zhang; Joshua A. Hadler; Zibo Zhou; Sergey Varlamov; Ivan Perez-Wurfl

We have developed an all-laser processing technique by means of two industrially-relevant continuous-wave fiber lasers operating at 1070 nm. This approach is capable of both substrate heating with a large defocused beam and material processing with a second scanned beam, and is suitable for a variety of photovoltaic applications. We have demonstrated this technique for rapid crystallization of thin film (~10 μm) silicon on glass, which is a low cost alternative to wafer-based solar cells. We have also applied this technique to wafer silicon to control dopant diffusion at the surface region where the focused line beam rapidly melts the substrate that then regrows epitaxially. Finite element simulations have been used to model the melt depth as a function of preheat temperature and line beam power. This process is carried out in tens of seconds for an area approximately 10 cm2 using only about 1 kW of total optical power and is readily scalable. In this paper, we will discuss our results with both c-Si wafers and thin-film silicon.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2016

Measuring laser power as a force: A new paradigm to accurately monitor optical power during laser-based machining operations

Paul A. Williams; Brian J. Simonds; Jeffrey W. Sowards; Joshua A. Hadler

In laser manufacturing operations, accurate measurement of laser power is important for product quality, operational repeatability, and process validation. Accurate real-time measurement of high-power lasers, however, is difficult. Typical thermal power meters must absorb all the laser power in order to measure it. This constrains power meters to be large, slow and exclusive (that is, the laser cannot be used for its intended purpose during the measurement). To address these limitations, we have developed a different paradigm in laser power measurement where the power is not measured according to its thermal equivalent but rather by measuring the laser beam’s momentum (radiation pressure). Very simply, light reflecting from a mirror imparts a small force perpendicular to the mirror which is proportional to the optical power. By mounting a high-reflectivity mirror on a high-sensitivity force transducer (scale), we are able to measure laser power in the range of tens of watts up to ~ 100 kW. The critical parameters for such a device are mirror reflectivity, angle of incidence, and scale sensitivity and accuracy. We will describe our experimental characterization of a radiation-pressure-based optical power meter. We have tested it for modulated and CW laser powers up to 92 kW in the laboratory and up to 20 kW in an experimental laser welding booth. We will describe present accuracy, temporal response, sources of measurement uncertainty, and hurdles which must be overcome to have an accurate power meter capable of routine operation as a turning mirror within a laser delivery head.


Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology | 2008

Reflective Optical Chopper Used in NIST High-Power Laser Measurements

Xiaoyu X. Li; Thomas Scott; Christopher L. Cromer; Joshua A. Hadler

For the past ten years, NIST has used high-reflectivity, optical choppers as beamsplitters and attenuators when calibrating the absolute responsivity and response linearity of detectors used with high-power CW lasers. The chopper-based technique has several advantages over the use of wedge-shaped transparent materials (usually crystals) often used as beam splitters in this type of measurement system. We describe the design, operation and calibration of these choppers. A comparison between choppers and transparent wedge beampslitters is also discussed.


Journal of Laser Applications | 2018

Femtosecond laser eyewear protection: Measurements and precautions for amplified high power applications

Maximilian Riedel-Topper; Sarah Wirick; Joshua A. Hadler; Brian G. Alberding; Christopher J. Stromberg; Edwin J. Heilweil

Ultrafast lasers have become increasingly important as research tools in laboratories and commercial enterprises suggesting laser safety, personal protection and awareness become ever more important. Laser safety eyewear are typically rated by their optical densities (OD) over various spectral ranges, but these measurements are usually made using low power, large beam size, and continuous beam conditions. These measurement scenarios are vastly different than the high power, small beam size, and pulsed laser beam conditions where ultrafast lasers have extremely high peak powers and broad spectra due to the short pulse durations. Many solid-state lasers are also tunable over a broad wavelength range, further complicating the selection of adequate laser safety eyewear. Eighteen laser eyewear filter samples were tested under real-world conditions using a Ti:Sapphire regenerative amplifier with output pulses centered at 800 nm running from 2 Hz to 1 KHz repetition rate. The typical maximum peak laser irrandiance employed was ca. 3 TW/cm2 (800 nm wavelength, 450 uJ/pulse with 80 fs FWHM pulse duration) or less when damage occurred, depending on the sample. While many samples maintained their integrity under these test conditions, many plastic samples showed signs of failure which reduced their OD, in some cases transmitting 4 to 5 orders of magnitude higher than expected. In general, glass filters performed significantly better than plastic filters, exhibiting less physical damage to the substrate and less absorber degradation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Joshua A. Hadler's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John H. Lehman

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul A. Williams

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marla L. Dowell

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian J. Simonds

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher L. Cromer

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian G. Alberding

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edwin J. Heilweil

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank Maring

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey W. Sowards

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge