Joshua Courtney

Review of Magnetic Shark Deterrents: Hypothetical Mechanisms and Evidence for Selectivity

Several papers published since 2006 describe effects of magnetic fields on elasmobranchs and assess their utility in reducing negative interactions between sharks and humans, including bycatch reduction. Most of these repeat a single untested hypothesis regarding physical mechanisms by which elasmobranchs detect magnetic fields and also neglect careful consideration of magnetoreception in teleosts. Several species of teleosts are known to have magnetoreception based in biogenic magnetite, and direct magnetic field detection also has support in several species of elasmobranchs. The overly narrow focus of earlier papers on the unsupported hypothesis that magnetoreception in elasmobranchs is based in the ampullae of Lorenzini creates the impression that all teleosts will be insensitive to magnetic deterrents. However, magnetite based magnetoreception has been demonstrated in several teleosts, and is supported in others. Furthermore, electroreception is present in many teleost species; therefore, the possibility of induction based indirect magnetoreception should be considered. Finally, experiments reported as demonstrating insensitivity in teleost species to magnetic deterrents suffer from inadequate design and sample sizes to reject the hypothesis of magnetic detection in any given species. Since adoption of deterrent hook technologies depends on both deterrent effects in sharks and the absence of effects in target teleosts, the hypothesis of detection in teleost species must be independently tested with adequate sample sizes.

Rainbow Trout and Their Hybrids Out compete Cutthroat Trout in a Lentic Ecosystem

Much has been written about introduced rainbow trout interbreeding and outcompeting native cutthroat trout. However, the specific mechanisms by which rainbow trout and their hybrids outcompete cutthroat trout have not been thoroughly explored, and most of the published data is limited to lotic ecosystems. Samples of Snake River cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii bouvieri), the rainbow-cutthroat hybrid, the cutbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss x clarkii), and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), were obtained from a lentic ecosystem (Eleven Mile Reservoir, Colorado) by creel surveys conducted from May to October, 2012. The total length and weight of each fish was measured and the relative condition factor of each fish was computed using expected weight from weight-length relationships from the Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife (CDPW). Data from the CDPW collected from 2003 ? 2010 in the same lentic ecosystem were used to compute relative condition factors for additional comparison, as was independent creel survey data from 2011. The data was also compared with minimum, 25th percentile, mean, 75th percentile, and maximum weight-length curves generated from independent North American data. Cutthroat trout were plump: the mean relative condition factor of the cutthroat trout was 112.0% (? 1.0%). Cutbow hybrid trout were close to the expected weights with a mean relative condition factor of 99.8% (? 0.6%). Rainbow trout were thinner with a mean relative condition factor of 96.4% (? 1.4%). Comparing mean relative condition factors of CDPW data from earlier years and plotting the 2012 data relative to percentile curves also shows the same trend of cutthroat trout being plumper than expected and rainbow trout being thinner than the cutthroat trout, with the hybrid cutbow trout in between. This data supports the hypothesis that rainbow trout do not outcompete cutthroat trout in lentic ecosystems. Comparison with data from three other Colorado reservoirs also shows that cutthroat trout tend to be more plump than rainbow trout and their hybrids in sympatric lentic ecosystems.