Juan A. Garcia-Valero
University of Murcia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Juan A. Garcia-Valero.
Meteorologische Zeitschrift | 2010
Juan J. Gomez-Navarro; Juan Pedro Montavez; Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero; Sonia Jerez; Juan A. Garcia-Valero; J. F. González-Rouco
A set of four regional climate change projections over the Iberian Peninsula has been performed. Simulations were driven by two General Circulation Models (consisting of two versions of the same atmospheric model coupled to two different ocean models) under two different SRES scenario. The XXI century has been simulated following a full-transient approach with a climate version of the mesoscale model MM5. An Empirical Orthogonal Function analysis (EOF) is applied to the monthly mean series of daily maximum and minimum 2-metre temperature to extract the warming signal. The first EOF is able to capture the spatial structure of the warming. The obtained warming patterns are fairly dependent on the month, but hardly change with the tested scenarios and GCM versions. Their shapes are related to geographical parameters, such as distance to the sea and orography. The main differences among simulations mostly concern the temporal evolution of the warming. The temperature trend is stronger for maximum temperatures and depends on the scenario and the driving GCM. This asymmetry, as well as the different warming rates in summer and winter, leads to a continentalization of the climate over the IP.
Climate Dynamics | 2013
Sonia Jerez; Juan Pedro Montavez; Juan J. Gomez-Navarro; R. Lorente-Plazas; Juan A. Garcia-Valero; Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero
This study illustrates the sensitivity of regional climate change projections to the model physics. A single-model (MM5) multi-physics ensemble of regional climate simulations over the Iberian Peninsula for present (1970–1999) and future (2070–2099 under the A2 scenario) periods is assessed. The ensemble comprises eight members resulting from the combination of two options of parameterization schemes for the planetary boundary layer, cumulus and microphysics. All the considered combinations were previously evaluated by comparing hindcasted simulations to observations, none of them providing clearly outlying climates. Thus, the differences among the various ensemble members (spread) in the future projections could be considered as a matter of uncertainty in the change signals (as similarly assumed in multi-model studies). The results highlight the great dependence of the spread on the synoptic conditions driving the regional model. In particular, the spread generally amplifies under the future scenario leading to a large spread accompanying the mean change signals, as large as the magnitude of the mean projected changes and analogous to the spread obtained in multi-model ensembles. Moreover, the sign of the projected change varies depending on the choice of the model physics in many cases. This, together with the fact that the key mechanisms identified for the simulation of the climatology of a given period (either present or future) and those introducing the largest spread in the projected changes differ significantly, make further claims for efforts to better understand and model the parameterized subgrid processes.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology | 2012
Juan A. Garcia-Valero; Juan Pedro Montavez; Sonia Jerez; Juan J. Gomez-Navarro; R. Lorente-Plazas; Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero
A seasonal analysis of the atmospheric circulation over the Iberian Peninsula (IP) based on circulation types (CTs) obtained from sea level pressure and 500-hPa geopotential height is presented. The study covers the period of 1958–2008, when a high variability and important changes in winter and spring precipitation and temperature have been reported. Frequency, persistence, and the most probable transitions of the circulation types are analyzed. Among the clustering methods available in the literature, two of the most reliable classification methods have been tested, K-means and simulated annealing and diversified randomization. A comparison of both methods over the IP is presented for winter (DJF). The quality of the circulation types obtained through both methods as well as the better stability achieved by K-means suggest this method as more appropriated for our target area. Twelve CTs were obtained for each season and were analyzed. The patterns obtained were regrouped in five general situations: anticyclonic, cyclonic, zonal, summertime, and hybrid-mixed. The analysis of frequencies of these situations offers a similar characterization of the atmospheric circulation that others previously obtained by subjective methods. The analysis of the trends in frequency and persistence for each CT shows few significant trends, mainly in winter and spring with a general decrease of the cyclonic patterns and an increase of the anticyclonic situations. This can be related to the negative precipitation trends reported by other authors. Regarding the persistence, an interesting result is that there is a high interannual variability of the persistence in autumn and spring, when patterns can persist longer than in other seasons. An analysis of the most probable transitions between the CTs has been performed, revealing the existence of cyclic sequences in all seasons. These sequences are related to the high frequency of certain patterns such as the anticyclonic situations in winter. Finally, a clear seasonal dependence of the transitions between cyclonic situations associated with extratropical disturbances was found. This dependence suggests that the transitions of low-pressure systems towards the south of the IP are more likely in spring and autumn than in winter.
Atmospheric Environment | 2011
Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero; Juan J. Gomez-Navarro; Sonia Jerez; R. Lorente-Plazas; Juan A. Garcia-Valero; Juan Pedro Montavez
International Journal of Climatology | 2015
R. Lorente-Plazas; Juan Pedro Montavez; Pedro A. Jiménez; Sonia Jerez; Juan J. Gomez-Navarro; Juan A. Garcia-Valero; Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero
Renewable Energy and Power Quality | 2012
R. Lorente-Plazas; Juan Pedro Montavez; Sonia Jerez; J.J. Gómez Navarro; P. Jiménez Guerrero; Pedro A. Jiménez; Juan A. Garcia-Valero; F. Gomáriz-Castillo; F. Alonso-Sarría
Global and Planetary Change | 2017
S. Fernández-Montes; Juan J. Gomez-Navarro; F.S. Rodrigo; Juan A. Garcia-Valero; Juan Pedro Montavez
Geoscientific Model Development Discussions | 2018
Juan J. Gomez-Navarro; Christoph C. Raible; Denica Bozhinova; Olivia Martius; Juan A. Garcia-Valero; Juan Pedro Montavez
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences | 2015
Juan A. Garcia-Valero; Juan Pedro Montavez; Juan J. Gomez-Navarro; Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero
Archive | 2010
Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero; Juan J. Gomez-Navarro; Sonia Jerez; Raquel Lorente; Juan A. Garcia-Valero; Juan Pedro Montavez