Juan Acosta

Scar Dechanneling New Method for Scar-Related Left Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate Ablation

Background—Ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate ablation usually requires extensive ablation. Scar dechanneling technique may limit the extent of ablation needed. Methods and Results—The study included 101 consecutive patients with left ventricular scar–related VT (75 ischemic patients; left ventricular ejection fraction, 36±13%). Procedural end point was the elimination of all identified conducting channels (CCs) by ablation at the CC entrance followed by abolition of residual inducible VTs. By itself, scar dechanneling rendered noninducibility in 54.5% of patients; ablation of residual inducible VT increased noninducibility to 78.2%. Patients needing only scar dechanneling had a shorter procedure (213±64 versus 244±71 minutes; P=0.027), fewer radiofrequency applications (19±11% versus 27±18%; P=0.01), and external cardioversion/defibrillation shocks (20% versus 65.2%; P<0.001). At 2 years, patients needing scar dechanneling alone had better event-free survival (80% versus 62%) and lower mortality (5% versus 11%). Incomplete CC-electrogram elimination was the only independent predictor (hazard ratio, 2.54 [1.06–6.10]) for the primary end point. Higher end point-free survival rates were observed in patients noninducible after scar dechanneling (log-rank P=0.013) and those with complete CC-electrogram elimination (log-rank P=0.013). The complications rate was 6.9%, with no deaths. Conclusions—Scar dechanneling alone results in low recurrence and mortality rates in more than half of patients despite the limited ablation extent required. Residual inducible VT ablation improves acute results, but patients who require it have worse outcomes. Recurrences are mainly related to incomplete CC-electrogram elimination.

3D delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance sequences improve conducting channel delineation prior to ventricular tachycardia ablation.

AIMSnNon-invasive depiction of conducting channels (CCs) is gaining interest for its usefulness in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. The best imaging approach has not been determined. We compared characterization of myocardial scar with late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance using a navigator-gated 3D sequence (3D-GRE) and conventional 2D imaging using either a single shot inversion recovery steady-state-free-precession (2D-SSFP) or inversion-recovery gradient echo (2D-GRE) sequence.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnWe included 30 consecutive patients with structural heart disease referred for VT ablation. Preprocedural myocardial characterization was conducted in a 3 T-scanner using 2D-GRE, 2D-SSFP and 3D-GRE sequences, yielding a spatial resolution of 1.4 × 1.4 × 5 mm, 2 × 2 × 5 mm, and 1.4 × 1.4 × 1.4 mm, respectively. The core and border zone (BZ) scar components were quantified using the 60% and 40% threshold of maximum pixel intensity, respectively. A 3D scar reconstruction was obtained for each sequence. An electrophysiologist identified potential CC and compared them with results obtained with the electroanatomic map (EAM). We found no significant differences in the scar core mass between the 2D-GRE, 2D-SSFP, and 3D-GRE sequences (mean 7.48 ± 6.68 vs. 8.26 ± 5.69 and 6.26 ± 4.37 g, respectively, P = 0.084). However, the BZ mass was smaller in the 2D-GRE and 2D-SSFP than in the 3D-GRE sequence (9.22 ± 5.97 and 9.39 ± 6.33 vs. 10.92 ± 5.98 g, respectively; P = 0.042). The matching between the CC observed in the EAM and in 3D-GRE was 79.2%; when comparing the EAM and the 2D-GRE and the 2D-SSFP sequence, the matching decreased to 61.8% and 37.7%, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONn3D scar reconstruction using images from 3D-GRE sequence improves the overall delineation of CC prior to VT ablation.

Infarct transmurality as a criterion for first-line endo-epicardial substrate–guided ventricular tachycardia ablation in ischemic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUNDnThere is no consensus on the appropriate indications for the epicardial approach in substrate ablation of post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular tachycardia (VT).nnnOBJECTIVEnThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether infarct transmurality (IT) could identify patients who would benefit from a combined first-line endo-epicardial approach.nnnMETHODSnBefore ablation, IT was assessed by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (hyperenhancement ≥75% of the wall thickness in ≥1 segment), echocardiography (dyskinesia/akinesia + hyperrefringency + wall thinning), computed tomography (wall thinning), or scintigraphy (transmural necrosis). Prospectively from January 2011, an endocardial approach was used in patients with subendocardial MI (group 1) and a combined endo-epicardial approach in patients with transmural MI (group 2). Outcomes in both groups were compared with those in patients with transmural MI and only endocardial approach due to previous cardiac surgery or procedure performed before January 2011 (group 3). The primary end point was VT/ventricular fibrillation recurrence-free survival.nnnRESULTSnNinety patients (92.2% men; mean age 67.4 ± 9.8 years) undergoing VT substrate ablation were included: group 1, n = 34; group 2, n = 24; group 3, n = 32. During a mean follow-up duration of 22.5 ± 13.7 months, 5 patients in group 1 (14.7%), 3 patients in group 2 (12.5%), and 13 patients in group 3 (40.6%) had VT recurrences (P = .011). Time to recurrence was the shortest in group 3 (log-rank, P = .018). The endocardial approach in patients with transmural MI was associated with an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 4.01; 95% confidence interval 1.41-11.3; P = .009).nnnCONCLUSIONnThe endocardial approach in patients with transmural MI undergoing VT substrate ablation is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. IT may be a useful criterion for the selection of a first-line combined endo-epicardial approach.

Cardiac magnetic resonance–aided scar dechanneling: Influence on acute and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUNDnLate gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) provides tissue characterization of ventricular myocardium and scar that can be depicted as pixel signal intensity (PSI) maps.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo assess the possible benefit of guiding the ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate mapping by integrating these PSI maps into the navigation system.nnnMETHODSnIn total, 159 consecutive patients (66 ± 11 years old, 151 men [95%]) with scar-related left ventricular (LV) VT were included. VT substrate ablation used the scar dechanneling technique. A CMR-aided ablation using the PSI maps was performed in 54 patients (34%). Procedural data as well as acute and long-term outcomes were compared with those of the remaining 105 patients (66%).nnnRESULTSnMean procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were 229 ± 67 minutes and 20 ± 9 minutes, respectively, without significant differences between groups. Both the number of radiofrequency (RF) applications and RF delivery time were lower in the CMR-aided group (28 ± 18 applications vs 36 ± 18 applications, P = .037, and 19 ± 12 minutes vs 27 ± 16 minutes, P = .009, respectively). After substrate ablation, monomorphic VT inducibility was lower in the CMR-aided than in the control group (17 [32%] vs 53 [51%] patients, P = .022). After a mean follow-up period of 20 ± 19 months, patients from the CMR-aided group had a lower recurrence rate than those in the control group (10 patients [18.5%] vs 46 patients [43.8%], respectively, P = .002; log-rank P = .017). Multivariate analysis found that CMR-aided ablation (hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% Confirdence Interval (CI) 0.24-0.96], Pxa0=xa0.037) was an independent predictor of recurrences.nnnCONCLUSIONnCMR-aided scar dechanneling is associated with a lower need for RF delivery, higher noninducibility rates after substrate ablation, and a higher VT-recurrence-free survival.

Impact of earliest activation site location in the septal right ventricular outflow tract for identification of left vs right outflow tract origin of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias

BACKGROUNDnThe earliest activation site (EAS) location in the septal right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) could be an additional mapping data predictor of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) vs RVOT origin of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).nnnOBJECTIVEnThe purpose of this study was to assess the impact of EAS location in predicting LVOT vs RVOT origin.nnnMETHODSnMacroscopic and histologic study was performed in 12 postmortem hearts. Electroanatomic maps (EAMs) from 37 patients with outflow tract (OT) VA with the EAS in the septal RVOT were analyzed. Pulmonary valve (PV) was defined by voltage scanning after validation of voltage thresholds by image integration. EAM measurements were correlated with those of macroscopic/histologic study.nnnRESULTSnA cutoff value of 1.9 mV discriminated between subvalvular and supravalvular positions (90% sensitivity, 96% specificity). EAS ≥1 cm below PV excluded RVOT site of origin (SOO). According to anatomic findings (distance PV-left coronary cusp = 5 ± 3 vs PV-right coronary cusp = 11 ± 5 mm), EAS-PV distance was significantly shorter in VAs arising from left coronary cusp than from the other LVOT locations (4.2 ± 5.4 mm vs 9.2 ± 7 mm; P = .034). The 10-ms isochronal longitudinal/perpendicular diameter ratio was higher in the RVOT vs the LVOT SOO group (1.97 ± 1.2 vs 0.79 ± 0.49; P = .001). An algorithm based on EAS-PV distance and the 10-ms isochronal longitudinal/perpendicular diameter ratio predicted LVOT SOO with 91% sensitivity and 100% specificity.nnnCONCLUSIONnAn algorithm based on the EAS-PV distance and the 10-ms isochronal longitudinal/perpendicular diameter ratio accurately predicts LVOT vs RVOT SOO in outflow tract VAs with EAS in the septal RVOT.

Impact of Contact Force Monitoring in Acute Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using an Anatomic Approach. A Randomized Study.

The impact of contact force (CF) monitoring in pulmonary vein (PV) isolation after a circumferential anatomic ablation (CAA) is unknown. We analyze the usefulness of CF monitoring in acute PV isolation and procedure parameters using a CAA.

Safety, long-term outcomes and predictors of recurrence after first-line combined endoepicardial ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Impact of arrhythmic substrate distribution pattern. A prospective multicentre study

BackgroundnFirst-line endoepicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation has been proposed for patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC). This study reports procedural safety, outcomes, and predictors of recurrence.nnnMethods and ResultsnForty-one consecutive patients [12 with left ventricle (LV) involvement, 7 left-dominant] underwent first-line endoepicardial VT substrate ablation. Standard bipolar and unipolar thresholds were used to define low-voltage areas (LVA). Arrhythmogenic substrate area (ASA) was defined as the area containing electrograms with delayed components. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator interrogations were evaluated for VT recurrence. Epicardial LVA was larger in all cases (102.5 ± 78.6 vs. 19.3 ± 24.4 cm2; P< 0.001). Consistent with an epicardium-to-endocardium arrhythmogenic substrate progression pattern, epicardial ASA (epi-ASA) was negatively correlated with bipolar endocardial LVA (r = -0.368; P= 0.035) and with endocardial bipolar/unipolar-LVA (Bi/Uni-LVA) ratio (r= -0.38; P= 0.037). A Bi/Uni-LVA ratio >0.23 predicted an epi-ASA ≤10 cm2 (100% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Patients showing an epi-ASA < 10 cm2 required less epicardial (8.4 ± 5.8 vs. 25.3 ± 16; P= 0.045) and more endocardial (16.5 ± 8.6 vs. 7.5 ± 8.2; P= 0.047) radiofrequency applications. One patient with epi-ASA < 10 cm2 died of cardiac tamponade after epicardial puncture. Acute success (no VT inducibility after procedure) was achieved in 36 patients (90%). After 32.2 ± 21.8 months, 11 (26.8%) patients had VT recurrences. Left-dominant AC was associated with an increased risk of recurrence (HR = 3.41 [1.1-11.2], P= 0.044; log-rank P= 0.021).nnnConclusionnFirst-line endoepicardial VT substrate ablation achieves good long-term results in AC. Left-dominant AC is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. The Bi/Uni-LVA ratio identifies patients with limited epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate in whom the indication of epicardial approach should be more cautiously assessed.

Substrate modification or ventricular tachycardia induction, mapping, and ablation as the first step? A randomized study

BACKGROUNDnThe role and optimal sequence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) induction, mapping, and ablation when combined with substrate modification is unclear.nnnOBJECTIVEnThe purpose of this study was to test the benefits of starting the scar-related VT ablation procedure with substrate modification vs the standard protocol of VT induction, mapping, and ablation as the first step.nnnMETHODSnForty-eight consecutive patients with structural heart disease and clinical VTs were randomized to simplified substrate ablation procedure with scar dechanneling as the first step (group 1, n = 24) or standard procedure with VT induction, mapping, and ablation followed by scar dechanneling (group 2, n = 24). Procedure and fluoroscopy times, the need for external cardioversion, acute results, and VT recurrence during follow-up were compared between groups.nnnRESULTSnThirty-seven patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 10 nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 1 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Before substrate ablation, 32 VTs were induced and targeted for ablation in 23 patients of group 2. Procedure time (209 ± 70 minutes vs 262 ± 63 minutes; P = .009), fluoroscopy time (14 ± 6 minutes vs 21± 9 minutes; P = .005), and electrical cardioversion (25% vs 54%; P = .039) were lower in group 1. After substrate ablation, 16 patients (66%) of group 1 and 12 patients (50%) of group 2 were noninducible (P = .242). End-procedure success (after residual inducible VT ablation) was achieved in 87.5% and 70.8% of patients, respectively (P = .155). There were no differences in VT recurrence rate between groups during a mean follow-up of 22 ± 14 months (log rank, P = .557).nnnCONCLUSIONnVT induction and mapping before substrate ablation prolongs the procedure, radiation exposure, and the need for electrical cardioversion without improving acute results and long-term ablation outcomes.

Ablation of frequent PVC in patients meeting criteria for primary prevention ICD implant: Safety of withholding the implant

BACKGROUNDnPremature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation has been shown to improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association functional class in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Both are considered key variables in predicting risk of sudden cardiac death.nnnOBJECTIVEnThe objective of this study was to assess whether ablation might remove the primary prevention (PP) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indication in patients with frequent PVC.nnnMETHODSnSixty-six consecutive patients with PP-ICD indication and frequent PVC [33 (50%) men; mean age 53 ± 13 years; 11 (17%) with ischemic heart disease] underwent PVC ablation. The ICD was withheld and the indication was reevaluated at 6 and 12 months.nnnRESULTSnLVEF progressively improved from 28% ± 4% at baseline to 42% ± 12% at 12 months (P < .001). New York Heart Association functional class improved from 2 patients with NYHA functional class I (3%) at baseline to 35 (53%) at 12 months (P < .001). The brain natriuretic peptide level decreased from 246 ± 187 to 176 ± 380 pg/mL (P = .004). The PP-ICD indication was removed in 42 patients (64%) during follow-up, from 38 (92%) of them at 6 months, showing an independent association with baseline PVC burden and successful sustained ablation. In patients with successful sustained ablation, a cutoff value of 13% PVC burden had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93% (area under the curve 99%) for removing ICD indication postablation. No sudden cardiac deaths or malignant ventricular arrhythmias were observed.nnnCONCLUSIONnIn patients with frequent PVC and PP-ICD indication, ablation improves LVEF and, in most cases, allows removal of the indication. Withholding the ICD and reevaluating within 6 months of ablation seems to be a safe and appropriate strategy.

Multielectrode vs. point-by-point mapping for ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation: a randomized study

AimsnVentricular tachycardia (VT) substrate ablation is based on detailed electroanatomical maps (EAM). This study analyses whether high-density multielectrode mapping (MEM) is superior to conventional point-by-point mapping (PPM) in guiding VT substrate ablation procedures.nnnMethods and resultsnThis was a randomized controlled study (NCT02083016). Twenty consecutive ischemic patients undergoing VT substrate ablation were randomized to either group A [nu2009=u200910; substrate mapping performed first by PPM (Navistar) and secondly by MEM (PentaRay) ablation guided by PPM] or group B [nu2009=u200910; substrate mapping performed first by MEM and second by PPM ablation guided by MEM]. Ablation was performed according to the scar-dechanneling technique. Late potential (LP) pairs were defined as a Navistar-LP and a PentaRay-LP located within a three-dimensional distance ofu2009≤u20093u2009mm. Data obtained from EAM, procedure time, radiofrequency time, and post-ablation VT inducibility were compared between groups. Larger bipolar scar areas were obtained with MEM (55.7±31.7 vs. 50.5±26.6u2009cm2; Pu2009=u20090.017). Substrate mapping time was similar with MEM (19.7±7.9u2009minutes) and PPM (25±9.2u2009minutes); Pu2009=u20090.222. No differences were observed in the number of LPs identified within the scar by MEM vs. PPM (73±50 vs. 76±52 LPs per patient, respectively; Pu2009=u20090.965). A total of 1104 LP pairs were analysed. Using PentaRay, far-field/LP ratio was significantly lower (0.58±0.4 vs. 1.64±1.1; Pu2009=u20090.01) and radiofrequency time was shorter [median (interquartile range) 12 (7-20) vs. 22 (17-33) minutes; Pu2009=u20090.023]. No differences were observed in VT inducibility after procedure.nnnConclusionnMEM with PentaRay catheter provided better discrimination of LPs due to a lower sensitivity for far-field signals. Ablation guided by MEM was associated with a shorter radiofrequency time.