Mario Cabrera

Substrate modification or ventricular tachycardia induction, mapping, and ablation as the first step? A randomized study

BACKGROUND The role and optimal sequence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) induction, mapping, and ablation when combined with substrate modification is unclear. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to test the benefits of starting the scar-related VT ablation procedure with substrate modification vs the standard protocol of VT induction, mapping, and ablation as the first step. METHODS Forty-eight consecutive patients with structural heart disease and clinical VTs were randomized to simplified substrate ablation procedure with scar dechanneling as the first step (group 1, n = 24) or standard procedure with VT induction, mapping, and ablation followed by scar dechanneling (group 2, n = 24). Procedure and fluoroscopy times, the need for external cardioversion, acute results, and VT recurrence during follow-up were compared between groups. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 10 nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 1 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Before substrate ablation, 32 VTs were induced and targeted for ablation in 23 patients of group 2. Procedure time (209 ± 70 minutes vs 262 ± 63 minutes; P = .009), fluoroscopy time (14 ± 6 minutes vs 21± 9 minutes; P = .005), and electrical cardioversion (25% vs 54%; P = .039) were lower in group 1. After substrate ablation, 16 patients (66%) of group 1 and 12 patients (50%) of group 2 were noninducible (P = .242). End-procedure success (after residual inducible VT ablation) was achieved in 87.5% and 70.8% of patients, respectively (P = .155). There were no differences in VT recurrence rate between groups during a mean follow-up of 22 ± 14 months (log rank, P = .557). CONCLUSION VT induction and mapping before substrate ablation prolongs the procedure, radiation exposure, and the need for electrical cardioversion without improving acute results and long-term ablation outcomes.

Ablation of frequent PVC in patients meeting criteria for primary prevention ICD implant: Safety of withholding the implant

BACKGROUND Premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation has been shown to improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association functional class in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Both are considered key variables in predicting risk of sudden cardiac death. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess whether ablation might remove the primary prevention (PP) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indication in patients with frequent PVC. METHODS Sixty-six consecutive patients with PP-ICD indication and frequent PVC [33 (50%) men; mean age 53 ± 13 years; 11 (17%) with ischemic heart disease] underwent PVC ablation. The ICD was withheld and the indication was reevaluated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS LVEF progressively improved from 28% ± 4% at baseline to 42% ± 12% at 12 months (P < .001). New York Heart Association functional class improved from 2 patients with NYHA functional class I (3%) at baseline to 35 (53%) at 12 months (P < .001). The brain natriuretic peptide level decreased from 246 ± 187 to 176 ± 380 pg/mL (P = .004). The PP-ICD indication was removed in 42 patients (64%) during follow-up, from 38 (92%) of them at 6 months, showing an independent association with baseline PVC burden and successful sustained ablation. In patients with successful sustained ablation, a cutoff value of 13% PVC burden had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93% (area under the curve 99%) for removing ICD indication postablation. No sudden cardiac deaths or malignant ventricular arrhythmias were observed. CONCLUSION In patients with frequent PVC and PP-ICD indication, ablation improves LVEF and, in most cases, allows removal of the indication. Withholding the ICD and reevaluating within 6 months of ablation seems to be a safe and appropriate strategy.

Multielectrode vs. point-by-point mapping for ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation: a randomized study

Aims Ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate ablation is based on detailed electroanatomical maps (EAM). This study analyses whether high-density multielectrode mapping (MEM) is superior to conventional point-by-point mapping (PPM) in guiding VT substrate ablation procedures. Methods and results This was a randomized controlled study (NCT02083016). Twenty consecutive ischemic patients undergoing VT substrate ablation were randomized to either group A [n = 10; substrate mapping performed first by PPM (Navistar) and secondly by MEM (PentaRay) ablation guided by PPM] or group B [n = 10; substrate mapping performed first by MEM and second by PPM ablation guided by MEM]. Ablation was performed according to the scar-dechanneling technique. Late potential (LP) pairs were defined as a Navistar-LP and a PentaRay-LP located within a three-dimensional distance of ≤ 3 mm. Data obtained from EAM, procedure time, radiofrequency time, and post-ablation VT inducibility were compared between groups. Larger bipolar scar areas were obtained with MEM (55.7±31.7 vs. 50.5±26.6 cm2; P = 0.017). Substrate mapping time was similar with MEM (19.7±7.9 minutes) and PPM (25±9.2 minutes); P = 0.222. No differences were observed in the number of LPs identified within the scar by MEM vs. PPM (73±50 vs. 76±52 LPs per patient, respectively; P = 0.965). A total of 1104 LP pairs were analysed. Using PentaRay, far-field/LP ratio was significantly lower (0.58±0.4 vs. 1.64±1.1; P = 0.01) and radiofrequency time was shorter [median (interquartile range) 12 (7-20) vs. 22 (17-33) minutes; P = 0.023]. No differences were observed in VT inducibility after procedure. Conclusion MEM with PentaRay catheter provided better discrimination of LPs due to a lower sensitivity for far-field signals. Ablation guided by MEM was associated with a shorter radiofrequency time.

Elucidation of hidden slow conduction by double ventricular extrastimuli: a method for further arrhythmic substrate identification in ventricular tachycardia ablation procedures

Aims Identification of local abnormal electrograms (EGMs) during ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation (VTSA) is challenging when they are hidden within the far-field signal. This study analyses whether the response to a double ventricular extrastimulus during substrate mapping could identify slow conducting areas that are hidden during sinus rhythm. Methods and results Consecutive patients (n = 37) undergoing VTSA were prospectively included. Bipolar EGMs with >3 deflections and duration <133 ms were considered as potential hidden slow conduction EGMs (HSC-EGM) if located within/surrounding the scar area. Whenever a potential HSC-EGM was identified, a double ventricular extrastimulus was delivered. If the local potential delayed, it was annotated as HSC-EGM. The incidence of HSC-EGM in core, border-zone, and normal-voltage regions was determined. Ablation was delivered at conducting channel entrances and HSC-EGMs. VT inducibility after VTSA obtained was compared with data from a historic control group. 2417 EGMs were analyzed. 575 (23.7%) qualified as potential HSC-EGM, and 198 of them were tagged as HSC-EGMs. Scars in patients with HSC-EGMs (n = 21, 56.7%) were smaller (35.424.7 vs 67.639.1 cm2; P = 0.006) and more heterogeneous (core/scar area ratio 0.250.2 vs 0.450.19; P = 0.02). 28.8% of HSC-EGMs were located in normal-voltage tissue; 81.3% were targeted for ablation. Patients undergoing VTSA incorporating HSC analysis needed less radiofrequency time (17.411 vs 2310.7 minutes; P = 0.016) and had a lower rate of VT inducibility after VTSA than the historic controls (24.3% vs 50%; P = 0.018). Conclusion Ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation incorporating HSC analysis allowed further arrhythmic substrate identification (especially in normal-voltage areas) and reduced RF time and VT inducibility after VTSA.

A New Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus Series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from Western Argentina

ABSTRACT. A new species of the Iguanian genus Liolaemus, member of the montanus series, is described. The species inhabits altitudes above 4000 meters and is endemic to the Provincial Reserves of Laguna Brava, province of La Rioja, and San Guillermo, province of San Juan, areas located in the Andes mountains of Argentina. Liolaemus sp. nov. has a medium-sized body (maximum SVL = 76.9 mm) with tail subequal in length to the SVL; unkeeled, juxtaposed dorsal scales, in high number around midbody (86–106); precloacal pores in males (4–7), mostly absent in females or in very low number (up to 2 pores); head and body strongly melanic; evident sexual dichromatism, and a distinctive color pattern. Liolaemus sp. nov. lives geographically close but in allopatry to L. andinus, L. eleodori and L. vallecurensis, all species of the montanus series, morphologically alike and probably phylogenetically related to the new species.

Image-based criteria to identify the presence of epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with transmural myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND Patients with transmural myocardial infarction (MI) who undergo endocardial-only substrate ablation are at increased risk for ventricular tachycardia recurrence. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) can be used to assess infarct transmurality (IT). However, the degree of IT associated with an epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate (AS) has not been determined. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of IT observed by LGE-CMR and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) that predicts the presence of epicardial AS. METHODS The study included 38 post-MI patients. Ten patients with a subendocardial infarction underwent endocardial-only mapping, and 28 with a classic transmural MI (C-TMI), defined as hyperenhancement ≥75% of myocardial wall thickness (WT), underwent endo-epicardial mapping. LGE-CMR/MDCT data were registered to high-density endocardial or epicardial maps to be analyzed for the presence of AS. RESULTS Of the 28 post-MI patients with C-TMI, 18 had epicardial AS (64%) and 10 (36%) did not. An epicardial scar area ≥14 cm2 on LGE-CMR identified patients with epicardial AS (sensitivity 1, specificity 1). Mean WT in the epicardial scar area in these patients was lower than in patients without epicardial AS (3.14 ± 1.16 mm vs 5.54 ± 1.78 mm; P = .008). A mean WT cutoff value ≤3.59 mm identified patients with epicardial AS (sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.93). CONCLUSION An epicardial scar area ≥14 cm2 on LGE-CMR and mean CT-WT ≤3.59 mm predict epicardial AS in post-MI patients.

Prediction of premature ventricular complex origin in left vs. right ventricular outflow tract: a novel anatomical imaging approach

Aims Left ventricular (LV) outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OTVA) are associated with hypertension (HT), older age, and LV dysfunction, suggesting that LV overload plays a role in the aetiopathogenesis. We hypothesized that anatomical modifications of the LV outflow tract (LVOT) could predict left vs. right OTVA site of origin (SOO). Methods and results Fifty-six (32 men, 53 ± 18 years old) consecutive patients referred for OTVA ablation were included. Cardiac multidetector computed tomography was performed before ablation and then imported to the CARTO system to aid the mapping and ablation procedure. Anatomical characteristics of the aortic root as well as aortopulmonary valvular planar angulation (APVPA) were analysed. The LV was the OTVA SOO (LVOT-VA) in 32 (57%) patients. These patients were more frequently male (78% vs. 22%, P = 0.001), older (57 ± 18 vs. 47 ± 18 years, P = 0.055), and more likely to have HT (59% vs. 21%, P = 0.004), compared to right OTVA patients. Aortopulmonary valvular planar angulation was higher in LVOT-VA patients (68 ± 5° vs. 55 ± 6°, respectively; P < 0.001). Absolute size of all aortic root diameters was associated with LVOT origin. However, after indexing by body surface area, only sinotubular junction diameter maintained a significant association (P = 0.049). Multivariable analysis showed that APVPA was an independent predictor of LVOT origin. Aortopulmonary valvular planar angulation ≥62° reached 94% sensitivity and 83% specificity (area under the curve 0.95) for predicting LVOT origin. Conclusions The measurement of APVPA as a marker of chronic LV overload is useful for the prediction of left vs. right ventricular OTVA origin.

Long-term benefit of first-line peri-implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implant ventricular tachycardia-substrate ablation in secondary prevention patients

Aims This study assessed the benefit of peri-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant ventricular tachycardia (VT)-substrate ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). Methods and results Patients with SHD and indication for secondary prevention ICD implant were prospectively included. Patients presenting with incessant and/or slow VT or frequent (≥2) VT episodes who underwent peri-ICD VT-substrate ablation (the scar dechannelling technique) were compared with those who received ICD alone and did not meet ablation criteria. The primary endpoint was any sustained VT/ICD therapy during follow-up. Of 206 patients included (43.2% non-ischaemic), 70 were assigned to ablation and 136 received ICD implant alone. During a mean follow-up of 45.6 ± 24.7 months, the primary endpoint was more frequent in the non-ablation group (47.1 vs. 22.9%; P< 0.0001). Higher VT recurrence-free survival rate [log-rank P= 0.001; HR = 0.42 (0.24-0.73), P= 0.002] and ICD shock-free survival rate [log-rank P= 0.007; HR = 0.36 (0.17-0.78); P = 0.01] were observed in the ablation group. Higher relative risk reduction was observed in ischaemic [HR = 0.38 (0.18-0.83); P = 0.015] vs. non-ischaemic patients [HR = 0.49 (0.23-1.01); P = 0.08]. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% showed no differences in VT recurrence between treatment groups (log-rank P = 0.213) although VT burden during follow-up was lower in the ablation group [median (interquartile range) 1 (1-3) vs. 4 (1-10) VT episodes; P = 0.05]. Conclusion First-line peri-ICD implant VT-substrate ablation was associated with decreased VT recurrence and ICD shocks during long-term follow-up in patients with SHD and indication for secondary prevention ICD implant, especially in ischaemic patients. In patients with LVEF <35%, no benefit was observed in terms of VT recurrence-free survival, although VT burden during follow-up was lower in the ablation group.