Juan Bagó

Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain

Study Design. Prospective observational case series. Objectives. To improve the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) questionnaire Function domain internal consistency for patients younger than 18 years. Summary of Background Data. During English validation as well as Spanish and Turkish transcultural adaptation studies, low internal consistency of the Function domain was discovered for patients younger than 18 years. The problem was traced to questions 15 (relating to financial considerations) and 18 (relating to going out with friends). Otherwise, the SRS-22 HRQL questionnaire has been shown to be valid and has been successfully translated into Spanish and Turkish. Methods. Based on existing data, question 18s stem and responses were revised without changing its content and added to the SRS-22 questionnaire. Question 15 remained unchanged, and the effect of inclusion or exclusion on domain score was determined. During a 3-month period, the questionnaire was completed by 111 outpatients, including four groups: idiopathic scoliosis age <18 years (n = 37), idiopathic scoliosis age ≥18 years (n = 32), other spinal disorders age <18 years (n = 17), and other spinal disorders age ≥18 years (n = 25). Results. As a result of the revision of question 18, the Function domain internal consistency, Cronbachs alpha, for patients age <18 years was increased from 0.67 to 0.78 for patients with idiopathic scoliosis and from 0.60 to 0.80 for patients with other spinal disorders. Domain internal consistency remained high, 0.77 to 0.96 for all the other domain-patient groupings. Removal of question 15 slightly improved Function domain internal consistency for idiopathic scoliosis patients <18 years old and slightly decreased it for patients <18 years old with other spinal conditions. Conclusion. With a minor revision of question 18 (related to going out) the internal consistency of the SRS-22 Function domain has been improved in idiopathic scoliosis patients <18 years of age. Deletion of question 15 (related to financial considerations) has a variable, small effect depending on patient group. Retention of question 15 is recommended unless a cultural variable, such as differences in healthcare payment schemes, substantially lowers domain psychometric properties.

The Spanish Version of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire for Idiopathic Scoliosis : Transcultural Adaptation and Reliability Analysis

Study Design. Validation of the transcultural adaptation of a questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life. Objectives. To translate and culturally adapt the SRS-22 questionnaire to Spanish. To determine the metric qualities (internal consistency and test–retest reproducibility) of this questionnaire. Summary of Background Data. The SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire has proven to be a valid instrument for clinical assessment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. The widespread use of the SRS-22 in non–English-speaking countries requires its transcultural adaptation. Methods. Transcultural adaptation of the SRS-22 was carried out according to the International Quality of Life Assessment Project guidelines and included two translations and two back-translations of the material. A committee of experts decided on the final version. The questionnaire was administered to 175 individuals (152 women and 23 men) with idiopathic scoliosis. The mean age of the participants at the time they received the questionnaire was 18.9 years, thoracic curve magnitude was 28.8°, and lumbar curve magnitude was 28.1°. At this time, 85 patients had been treated surgically, 45 had been treated with orthesis, and 45 were under observation. A subgroup of 30 patients completed the questionnaire a second time 1 week later. Internal consistency was determined with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and test–retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results. The overall alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.89. Coefficients for individual domains were as follows: function/activity, 0.67; pain, 0.81; mental health, 0.83; self-image, 0.73; and satisfaction, 0.78. The questionnaire as a whole had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96. Intraclass correlation coefficients for individual domains were as follows: pain, 0.93; function, 0.82; self-image, 0.94; mental health, 0.94; and satisfaction, 0.98. Conclusions. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire demonstrated adequate internal consistency for the majority of domains and excellent reproducibility. These results suggest that the process of adaptation has produced an instrument that is apparently equivalent to the original and suitable for clinical research.

Validity of the Spanish Version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (srs-22) Patient Questionnaire

Study Design. A cross-sectional multicenter study was performed to validate the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Objectives. To determine the construct validity and convergent validity of the instrument. Methods. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 was given to 175 patients with scoliosis (mean age, 19 years old and 86% women). A subgroup of 31 patients also received the Quality of Life for Spine Deformities Profile (QLSDP). Construct validity was studied by factor analysis. Discriminant validity was assessed analyzing the relation between SRS-22 scores and the variables of deformity severity. Convergent validity as related to the QLSDP was studied with a multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. Results. Factor analysis offered a solution of four factors coherent with the dimensions of the original instrument. SRS-22 scores were worse in older patients (r = −0.34); patients using analgesics demonstrated lower scores (P < 0.001). Patients treated with a brace had a poorer self-image and were less satisfied with their treatment (P < 0.001) than the other treatment groups. Angular improvement of the curves was associated with better self-image scores (r = 0.34). The SRS-22 and QLSDP demonstrated high correlation coefficients in the convergent validity tests (r = 0.84). Conclusion. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 is valid. It has a factorial structure similar to that of the original questionnaire. Moreover, it relates to known severity characteristics of the disease, distinguishes among scoliosis patient groups, and shows concordant values with another valid instrument for measuring self-perceived health.

Preoperative erythropoietin in spine surgery

Spine surgery may be associated with profuse intraoperative bleeding that often requires blood transfusions. In recent years several techniques have been developed to avoid allogenic transfusions and their potential complications to surgical patients. In this study we review and analyse the role of preoperative recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) administration in spine surgery as a blood conservation strategy. Between 1998 and 2002, a total of 250 patients scheduled for spine surgery were included in our blood-sparing program: 114 patients (group 1), operated on before rHuEPO approval (2000), underwent preoperative autologous blood donation (ABD) alone, and 136 patients operated on after rHuEPO approval (groups 2 and 3) received rHuEPO while undergoing ABD. Adding rHuEPO to ABD resulted in higher haemoglobin and haematocrit values the day of surgery, more ABD units retrieved per patient and, consequently, reduced allogenic transfusion requirements. The effectiveness of rHuEPO as the only preoperative blood conservation technique was evaluated in ten patients with a predicted blood loss of less than 30% of their total volume, scheduled for lumbar surgery. Data from these patients were matched with those from a similar group of patients who had undergone ABD. Patients receiving rHuEPO alone had higher haemoglobin levels the day of surgery than did patients in the ABD program. Neither group required allogenic transfusions. Conclusions: preoperative rHuEPO is useful for reducing allogenic blood requirements in elective spine surgery. In patients with an expected blood loss of around 50% of blood volume, rHuEPO improves ABD, minimising preoperative anaemia and increasing the number of ABD units collected. In patients with expected blood loss below 30% of total volume, rHuEPO administration may replace ABD.

Validity of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale to measure subjective perception of spine deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis

BackgroundThe Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) was designed to allow idiopathic scoliosis patients to describe their perception of their deformity. In a previous stduy, the scale has shown good correlation with magnitude of the curveMethodsThe study included 70 patients (60 women and 10 men), mean age 19.4 years (range 12–40), with idiopathic scoliosis. Each patient filled out the WRVAS and the SRS-22 questionnaire. Thoracic and lumbar curve angles were determined in standing X-rays and the largest was named Cobbmax. WRVAS internal consistency was assessed with Cronbachs alpha. Correlation coefficients were calculated between Cobbmax and the various WRVAS questions, and Cobbmax and the SRS-22 scales. The correlation between the WRVAS and SRS-22 was also determinedResultsMean magnitudes were thoracic curve, 36.6° and lumbar curve, 33.2°; average Cobbmax was 37.9°. The mean total WRVAS score was 15.6. Mean scores for the various SRS-22 scales were function 4.6, pain 4.3, self-image 3.7, mental health 4.2, and total score 84.1. Internal consistency for the WRVAS was excellent (Cronbachs alpha, 0.9), and there were no signs of collinearity among the seven questions (tolerance range 0.2–0.5). All the items on the WRVAS correlated significantly with Cobbmax (correlation coefficients, 0.4 to 0.7). The correlation between the total WRVAS and total SRS-22 score was -0.54 (P = .0001) and between WRVAS total score and SRS-22 image domain score was -0.57 (p = 0.0001)ConclusionThe WRVAS showed excellent internal consistency and absence of collinearity. There was a highly significant correlation between the results of the test and the magnitude of the deformity. The WRVAS correlated significantly with the SRS-22 image scale. The WRVAS is a valid instrument to assess scoliosis patients perception of their deformity

Further evaluation of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale: correlation with curve pattern and radiological deformity

BackgroundThe Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) was designed to measure physical deformity as perceived by patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Previous studies have shown that the instrument has excellent internal consistency and a high correlation with the radiological magnitude of scoliotic curves. Nonetheless, it is not known whether the scale can discriminate between the various curve patterns of the deformity, or whether the deformities represented in the scales drawings relate to the corresponding radiological deformities.MethodsThis study included 101 patients (86 women and 15 men; mean age 19.4 years) with idiopathic scoliosis. In a single visit, patients underwent standing PA radiography of the spine and completed the WRVAS. X-ray measurements included: 1) magnitude (Cobb angle) of the proximal thoracic curve (PT), main thoracic curve (MT), and thoracolumbar/lumbar curve (TL/L); 2) difference in shoulder level; 3) T1 offset from the central sacral line (T1-CSL); 4) apical vertebra (apV) rotation at the MT and TL/L curves and 5) apical vertebra offset of the MT and TL/L curves from the central sacral line. A variable designated Cobbmax was defined as the largest angle of the three curves (PT, MT or TL/L). Patients were grouped onto three patterns: Thoracic (TH Group)(n = 30, mean MT 42.1°, TL/L 20.9°); double major (DM Group) (n = 39, mean MT 38.6°, TL/L 34.4°) and thoracolumbar (TL Group)(n = 32, mean MT 14.3°, TL/L 25.5°). The magnitude of the curves in the TL Group was significantly smaller than in the other groups (P < 0.05). The Spearman partial correlation coefficient was determined between the score for each WRVAS question and the curve pattern, adjusting for the Cobbmax variable. The Spearman correlation coefficient was determined between the WRVAS items and shoulder imbalance, T1-CSL offset, MT Cobb angle, MT apV rotation, MT apV offset, PT Cobb, TL/L Cobb, TL/L apV rotation and TL/L apV offset.ResultsThe median (interquartile range) of the total WRVAS score was 14 (IQR 6). No correlation was found between the curve pattern and the various scores on the scale (partial correlation coefficients ranged from -0.16 to 0.12). WRVAS drawings for items 1, 2, 4 and 7 correlated satisfactorily with the corresponding radiological measurements (correlation coefficients, 0.62, 0.3, 0.48 and 0.53, respectively). Items 3, 5 and 6 did not correlate with the radiological measurements (correlation coefficients -0.06, -0.07 and 0.05, respectively).ConclusionThe profile of the individual WRVAS scores does not differentiate among specific curve patterns (thoracic, double major and thoracolumbar/lumbar). Moreover, some of the drawings (items 3, 5 and 6) do not correlate with the radiological deformity they were designed to measure.

Outcome instruments to assess scoliosis surgery

PurposeTo review and summarize the current knowledge regarding the outcome measures used to evaluate scoliosis surgery.MethodsLiterature review.ResultsOutcome instruments should be tested to ensure that they have adequate metric characteristics: content and construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness. In the evaluation of scoliosis, generic instruments to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) have been used, such as the SF-36 questionnaire and the EuroQol5D instrument. Nonetheless, it is preferable to use disease-specific instruments for this purpose, such as the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire and the quality of life profile for spinal deformities (QLPSD). More recently, these generic and disease-specific instruments have been complemented with the use of super-specific instruments; i.e., those assessing a single aspect of the condition or specific populations with the condition. The patients’ perception of their trunk deformity and body image has received particular attention, and several instruments are available to evaluate these aspects, such as the Walter-Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS), the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ), and the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS). The impacts of brace use can also be measured with specific scales, including the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire (BSSQ) and the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ). The available instruments to evaluate the treatment for non-idiopathic scoliosis have not been sufficiently validated and analyzed.ConclusionsEvaluation of scoliosis treatment should include the patient’s perspective, which can be obtained with the use of patient-reported outcome measures.

Does the lower instrumented vertebra have an effect on lumbar mobility, subjective perception of trunk flexibility, and quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated by spinal fusion?

Study Design: Cross-sectional study in patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with spinal fusion. Objectives: To measure lumbar spine mobility in the study population; determine low back pain intensity (LBPi), subjective perception of trunk flexibility (TF), and quality of life using validated outcome instruments; and investigate correlations of the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) with TF, LBPi, and quality of life. Summary of Background Data: The loss of range of motion resulting from spinal fusion might lead to low back pain, trunk rigidity, and a negative impact on quality of life. Nonetheless, these outcomes have not been conclusively demonstrated because lumbar mobility and LIV have not been correlated with validated outcome instruments. Methods: Forty-one patients (mean age, 27 y) with idiopathic scoliosis treated by spinal fusion (mean time since surgery, 135 mo) were included. Patients were assigned to 3 groups according to LIV level: group 1 (fusion to T12, L1, or L2) 14 patients; group 2 (fusion to L3) 13 patients, and group 3 (fusion to L4, L5, or S1) 14 patients. At midterm follow-up, patients completed the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 Questionnaire and Quality of Life Profile for Spine Deformities to evaluate perceived TF, and rated LBPi with a numerical scale. Lumbar mobility was assessed using a dual digital inclinometer. Results: Group 3 (fusion to L4, L5, or S1) showed statistically significant differences relative to the other groups, with less lumbar mobility and poorer scores for the SRS subtotal (P=0.003) and SRS pain scale (P=0.01). Nevertheless, LBPi and TF were similar in the 3 groups. TF correlated with SRS-22 subtotal (r=−0.38, P=0.01) and pain scale (r=−0.42, P=0.007) scores, and with LBPi (r=0.43, P=0.005). Conclusions: LIV correlated moderately with lumbar mobility, health-related quality of life (SRS-22), and spinal pain (SRS-22 pain subscale), but not with intensity of pain in the lumbar area or perceived TF.

The Reliability of Sagittal Pelvic Parameters: The Effect of Lumbosacral Instrumentation and Measurement Experience

Study Design. Sagittal pelvic parameters (SPPs) of a representative patient sample drawn from a consecutive adult spinal deformity database were measured using Surgimap Spine. Estimated coefficient of reliability intraclass coefficient (95% confidence interval), standard error of measurement, and mean absolute deviation were used for the analysis. Objective. The primary objective of this study was to assess the reliability of SPP measurements using Surgimap Spine. The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of pelvic instrumentation as well as the impact of user expertise. Summary of Background Data. The radiographical measurement of SPP is increasingly recognized as playing a critical role in establishing the surgical goals and surgical strategy of many spinal disorders. Although instrumented flatback is a common cause of sagittal malalignment, to our knowledge, SPP measurement reliability has never been assessed in instrumented spines. Methods. Sixty-three adult full-spine standing lateral radiographs (31 with lumbosacral instrumentation) were measured twice by 13 observers using Surgimap Spine. Observers were stratified into 3 levels of experience: high (research coordinators, 4), mid (senior surgeons, 5), and low (junior surgeons, 4). Research coordinators trained all surgeons for less than 30 minutes. Parameters measured were pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. Results. Thirteen observers and 63 radiographs generated 817 observations (2 misses). Overall inter- and intraobserver reliability of SPP measurement was excellent (intraclass coefficient > 0.85). Lumbosacral instrumentation did not modify intraobserver reliability but reduced significantly interobserver reliability of pelvic tilt (P = 0.006) and sacral slope (P = 0.007). Experience did not affect intraobserver reliability but interobserver reliability of highly experienced observers was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than among less experienced observers. Conclusion. Measurement of SPP using Surgimap Spine equals or improves previously reported reliability data. Lumbosacral instrumentation reduces interobserver reliability taking it from excellent to moderate in the sacral slope measurement. Inexperienced observers can measure SPP reliably after a short tutorial. Level of Evidence: 4

Lateral distraction injury to the lumbar spine. Report of spontaneous reduction.

Study Design. A patient with a lateral distraction injury of the lumbar spine that reduced spontaneously and not associated with any thoracic or abdominal injury is reported. Summary of Background Data. A brief summary of the clinical presentation is given as is the surgical technique employed. Lateral distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine associate a distraction injury with lateral bending in the frontal plane, causing unilateral disruption of the ligamentous and osseous restraints. They have been associated with life-threatening thoracic and abdominal injuries. Closed reduction of this spine injury is not believed to be feasible. Conclusions. This case introduces interesting new features to this spine lesison. It is the first reported case with documented spontaneous reduction.