Juan-Pablo Abugattas

Efficacy and safety of the second generation cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients over 75 years: a comparison with a younger cohort

Aims In this double centre, retrospective study, we aimed to analyse the 1-year efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CB-A) in patients older than 75 years compared with those younger than 75-years old. Methods and results Fifty-three consecutive patients aged 75 years or older with drug-resistant paroxysmal AF (PAF) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by the means of second generation CB-A, were compared with 106 patients aged <75 years. The mean age in the study group (>75 years) was 78.19 ± 2.7 years and 58.97 ± 8.5 in the control group. At 1-year follow-up the global success rate was 83.6% and did not significantly differ between older (10/53) and younger patients (16/106) (81.1 vs. 84.9%, P = 0.54). Transient phrenic nerve palsy was the most common complication which occurred in eight patients in the younger group and in three in the older group (7.5 vs. 5.7%, respectively, P = 0.66). Conclusions The results of our study showed that CB-A for the treatment of PAF is a feasible and safe procedure in elderly patients, with similar success and complications rates when compared with a younger population.

Single freeze per vein strategy with the second-generation cryoballoon for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched study between 180- and 240-s application time in a large cohort of patients

Aims The single-freeze strategy using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-A, Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has been reported to be as effective as the recommended double-freeze approach in several single-centre studies. In this retrospective, international, multicentre study, we compare the 3-min single-freeze strategy with the 4-min single-freeze strategy. Methods and results Four hundred and thirty-two patients having undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by means of CB-A using a single-freeze strategy were considered for this analysis. A cohort of patients who were treated with a 3-min strategy (Group 1) was compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who underwent a 4-min strategy (Group 2). Pulmonary vein isolation was successfully achieved in all the veins using the 28-mm CB-A. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were lower in Group 1 (67.8 ± 17 vs. 73.8 ± 26.3, P < 0.05; 14.9 ± 7.8 vs. 24.2 ± 10.6 min, P < 0.05). The most frequent complication was PNP, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.67). After a mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months, taking into consideration a blanking period of 3 months, 85.6% of patients in Group 1 and 87% of patients in Group 2 were free from arrhythmia recurrence at final follow-up (P = 0.67). Conclusion There is no difference in acute success, rate of complications, and freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrences during the follow-up between 3-min and 4-min per vein freeze strategies. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter in 3-min per vein strategy.

Impact of an additional right pulmonary vein on second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity matched score study

PurposeCryoballoon (CB) technology in the context of anatomical pulmonary vein (PV) variants might hypothetically hamper successful PV isolation (PVI). Our aim was to assess the impact of a right middle PV (RMPV) in the setting of second-generation cryoballoon (CB advance—CB-A), on procedural parameters and on mid-term follow-up.MethodsConsecutive patients with AF presenting RMPV (RMPV+) at the pre-procedural computed tomography who underwent PVI by CB-A were enrolled. Comparison with propensity score-matched patients without RMPV (RMPV−) was performed. Acute procedural parameters and clinical follow-up were assessed.ResultsA total of 240 patients (80 RMPV+) were included in the analysis. Twelve of 80 (15%) RMPV+ patients underwent a direct cryo-application in this variant and accomplished the isolation without phrenic nerve palsy, whereas in 25 of 80 (31%) RMPV+ patients, the RMPVs were not targeted directly nor indirectly (by co-occlusion during application at a major PV). At a median follow-up of 17.3 [interquartile range 11.3–26.5] months, there was no significant difference in AF-free survival between RMPV+ and RMPV− patients (78.8 vs 78.1%, P = 1.00), and the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias among patients with versus without an intentional or indirect cryo-application to the RMPV was not different (22 vs 20%, P = 1.00).ConclusionsMid-term outcome after CB-A ablation did not differ between RMPV+ and RMPV− patients. Within RMPV+ patients, outcome was similar between those with versus without a cryo-application (either direct or indirect) to the additional vein.

Continuous monitoring after second-generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

BACKGROUND The second-generation cryoballoon (CB) is effective in achieving pulmonary vein isolation. Continuous monitoring would eliminate any over- or underestimated freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) postablation. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to differentiate between arrhythmias occurring after cryoballoon ablation (CBA), detecting true AF in symptomatic patients and detecting silent subclinical AF. METHODS Between June 2012 and January 2015, 54 patients with a preexisting cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) who had undergone CBA for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) were included in our retrospective study. Regular CIED controls, physical examination, and ECG recordings were performed by an experienced cardiologist blinded to the ablation procedure. Data on any hospitalization during follow-up were gathered. Patients were encouraged to note all clinical symptoms during follow-up. RESULTS Continuous monitoring showed a success rate of 83.3% after 1 year and 75.93% after 3 years of follow-up. During the first year, 68% of episodes of palpitations after ablation were due to sinus tachycardia, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, or supraventricular tachycardia. AF recurrence was detected in 15.6% of asymptomatic patients during follow-up. Total AF burden post-CBA had decreased to 0.64% ± 4.34% (P <.001) during long-term follow-up of 3.3 years. CONCLUSION Although this is a selected group of patients with a preexisting CIED, continuous monitoring showed freedom from AF in 83.3% of patients post-CBA after 1 year and 75.93% after 3 years of follow-up.

Phrenic nerve injury during right inferior pulmonary vein ablation with the second-generation cryoballoon: clinical, procedural, and anatomical characteristics

Aims There is still sparse information regarding phrenic nerve injury (PNI) during ablation of the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV) by means of the second-generation cryoballoon advance (CB-A). The aim of this study was to describe the procedural, anatomical, and clinical characteristics of patients who experienced PNI during the RIPV ablation. Methods and results Consecutive patients who had undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using CB-A and suffered PNI during RIPV ablation were retrospectively included in our study. A cohort of patients who did not suffer any PNI was randomly included in a 1:3 ratio as a control group. The incidence of PNI during RIPV cryoapplication was 3.5%, (34 of 979 patients). There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between patients with and without PNI. The prevalence of right common ostium (RCO) was significantly higher in patients with a PNI [4 patients (11.8%) vs. 1 patient (1.0%); P < 0.01]. A temperature drop velocity from the basal temperature to - 20 °C of 2.38 °C/s rendered a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 51.0% with a negative predictive value of 89.7%. Temperature drop velocity from basal to - 20 °C and the presence of an RCO were predictors of PNI in the multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) 7.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.54-20.80; P < 0.01 and OR 18.41, 95%CI 1.87-181.23; P = 0.01, respectively). Conclusion PNI during RIPV freeze might occur in around 3.5% of cases. The presence of an RCO and a fast temperature drop must prompt a careful monitoring of the phrenic nerve function during cryoapplications on the RIPV.

Clinical value of induction protocol after second generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Aims The predictive value of induction studies after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is still debatable. To date, these studies have not been implemented in patients after cryoballoon (CB) ablation. Our aim was to analyse the clinical value of AF induction in patients treated by second generation CB for paroxysmal AF. Methods and results Seventy patients underwent at first an isoproterenol challenge after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation to assess AF induction and early PV reconnections (EPVR). Patients without EPVR were evaluated for premature atrial contraction (PAC) induction; atrial ectopy was considered frequent (PAC+) if >1/10 cycles or >6/min. After restitution of baseline heart rate, rapid atrial pacing (RAP) was performed on all patients. AF induction by isoproterenol occurred only in 3/70 (4%) patients of whom 2/3 (66%) patients with an EPVR of a triggering vein. In the 62 patients without EPVR, PAC+ occurred in 17 patients (27%). RAP could induce AF in 23/70 (33%) patients. At a mean follow-up of 13.5 months, there were 11/70 (16%) AF recurrences. There was no significant difference in the AF recurrence rate between RAP inducible vs. non-inducible patients (log-rank P = 0.33). A 41% recurrence rate (7/17 patients) was seen in the PAC+ group with significantly different AF-free survival for PAC+ vs. PAC- patients (log rank P < 0.0001). PAC+ was the only independent determinant to predict AF recurrence after multivariate analysis. Conclusion PAC occurrence in response to isoproterenol could predict AF recurrence after PV isolation by CB, while RAP showed no prognostic implication.

Second generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in young adults: midterm outcome in patients under 40 years of age

Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been demonstrated more effective in young patients, in which the substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF) is probably more confined to pulmonary vein potentials. The present study sought to focus on the midterm outcomes in patients under 40 years having undergone PVI with the Cryoballoon Advance because of drug resistant AF. Methods and results Between June 2012 and December 2015, 57 patients having undergone Cryoballoon ablation (CB-A) below 40 years of age for AF in our centre were retrospectively analysed and considered for our analysis. All patients underwent this procedure with the 28 mm Cryoballon Advance. All 227 veins were successfully isolated without the need for additional focal tip ablation. Median follow-up was 18 ±10 months. The freedom from AF after a blanking period of 3 months was 88% in our cohort of patients younger than 40 years old. The most frequent periprocedural complication was related to the groin puncture and occurred in 2 patients. After a single procedure, the only univariate predictor of clinical recurrence was the diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Conclusion Young patients affected by AF can be effectively and safely treated with CB-A that grants freedom from AF in 88% of the patients at 18 months follow-up following a 3-month blanking period. All veins could be isolated with the large 28 mm Cryoballoon Advance only.