Judd S. Day

Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015

HYPOTHESIS This study examined national trends and projections of procedure volumes and prevalence rates for shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States (U.S.). This study hypothesized that the growth in demand for upper extremity arthroplasty will be greater than the growth in demand for hip and knee arthroplasty and that demand for these procedures will continue to grow in the immediate future. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1993-2007) was used with U.S. Census data to quantify primary arthroplasty rates as a function of age, race, census region, and gender. Poisson regression was used to evaluate procedure rates and determine year-to-year trends in primary and revision arthroplasty. Projections were derived based on historical procedure rates combined with population projections from 2008 to 2015. RESULTS Procedure volumes and rates increased at annual rates of 6% to 13% from 1993 to 2007. Compared with 2007 levels, projected procedures were predicted to further increase by between 192% and 322% by 2015. The revision burden increased from approximately 4.5% to 7%. During the period studied, the hospital length of stay decreased by approximately 2 days for total and hemishoulder procedures. Charges, in 2007 Consumer Price Index-adjusted dollars, increased for all 4 procedural types at annual rates of

Bone Ingrowth in Well-Fixed Retrieved Porous Tantalum Implants

900 to

Polyethylene wear in retrieved reverse total shoulder components

1700. CONCLUSION The growth rates of upper extremity arthroplasty were comparable to or higher than rates for total hip and knee procedures. Of particular concern was the increased revision burden. The rising number of arthroplasty procedures combined with increased charges has the potential to place a financial strain on the health care system.

Role of Surgical Position on Interface Stress and Initial Bone Remodeling Stimulus around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

While first generation porous coatings have had clinical success, aseptic loosening remains a leading cause of revision. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons for revision and to assess the amount of bone ingrowth in retrieved porous tantalum components. In a prospective multicenter retrieval program, 76 porous tantalum acetabular shells, 5 femoral stems, 7 patellas and 36 tibial trays were collected from revision surgeries. A subset of the implants was analyzed for bone ingrowth. The main reason for revision was infection for acetabular shells (1.4 years implantation time) and instability for tibial trays (1.8 years implantation time). Two of the thirty primary surgery acetabular shells and one of the thirty-six primary surgery tibial trays were revised for implant loosening. We observed full depth penetration of bone into the porous tantalum layer for the acetabular shells and femoral stems.

Use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Medicare population

BACKGROUND Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has been used to treat rotator cuff tear arthropathy and proximal humerus fractures, as well as for failed conventional total shoulder prostheses. It has been suggested that polyethylene wear is potentially higher in reverse shoulder replacements than in conventional shoulder replacements. The modes and degree of polyethylene wear have not been completely elucidated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate polyethylene wear patterns in 7 specimens retrieved at revision arthroplasty and identify factors that may be associated with increased wear. METHODS Reverse total shoulder components were retrieved from 7 patients during revision arthroplasty for loosening and/or pain. Preoperative glenoid tilt and placement and scapular notching were evaluated by use of preoperative radiographs. Polyethylene wear was evaluated via micro-computed tomography and optical microscopy. RESULTS Wear on the rim of the polyethylene humeral cup was identified on all retrieved components. The extent of rim wear varied from a penetration depth of 0.1 to 4.7 mm. We could not show a correlation between scapular notching and rim wear. However, rim wear was more extensive when the inferior screw had made contact with the liner. Metal-on-metal wear between the humeral component and the inferior screw of 1 component was also observed. Wear of the intended bearing surface was minimal. DISCUSSION Rim damage was the predominant cause of polyethylene wear in our retrieved specimens. Direct contact between the humeral component and inferior metaglene screws is concerning because this could lead to accelerated ultra-highmolecular weight polyethylene wear and also induce mechanical loosening of the glenoid component.

Risk of venous thromboembolism after shoulder arthroplasty in the Medicare population

Valgus alignment of femoral resurfacing components has been advocated to reduce proximal femur loading and thus minimize the risk for femoral neck fractures. However, such reduction in loading may exacerbate undesirable stress shielding. This study examined the effect of extreme implant orientations (+/-15 degrees ) and stem canal overreaming on initial bone remodeling stimulus using finite element models. The changes in implant-cement interface stresses due to implant alignment were also evaluated. The valgus model showed increased initial bone resorption stimulus, which extended distally and peripherally around the femoral neck. The peak implant-cement interface shear stress for the varus model was 10.9 MPa, exceeding the interface shear strength. Overreaming of the stem canal eliminated distal tip loading, but proximal stress shielding was still unavoidable. These data show bone loading and interface fixation trends emanating from valgus and varus implant positions that will be of interest to practicing physicians.

Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Proximally Coated Femoral Stems: Effects of Stem Length and Surface Finish

BACKGROUND Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been Food and Drug Administration approved in the United States since 2004 but did not obtain a unique code until 2010. Therefore, the use of this popular procedure has yet to be reported. The purpose of this study was to examine the use and reimbursement of RSA compared with total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and shoulder hemiarthroplasty (SHA). METHODS We analyzed the 100% sample of the 2011 Medicare Part A claims data for patients aged 65 years or older. Patient demographic characteristics, diagnoses, provider information, reimbursements, and lengths of stay were extracted from the claims data. RESULTS In 2011, a total of 31,002 shoulder arthroplasty procedures were performed; 37% were RSAs, 42% were TSAs, and 21% were SHAs. Osteoarthritis was the primary diagnosis code in 91% of TSAs, 37% of SHAs, and 45% of RSAs. A primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis with no secondary code for rotator cuff tear was found in 22% of patients undergoing RSA. The mean length of stay for RSA (2.6 days; SD, 2.1 days) was longer than that for TSA (2.1 days; SD, 1.5 days) and shorter than that for SHA (3.5 days; SD, 3.6 days) (P < .001). Lower-volume surgeons (<10 arthroplasties per year) performed most shoulder arthroplasties: 57% of RSAs, 65% of TSAs, and 97% of SHAs. Seventy percent of RSAs were implanted by surgeons who performed more RSAs than TSAs and SHAs combined. CONCLUSIONS RSA is performed with similar frequency to TSA and almost twice as much as SHA in the Medicare population. Lower-volume surgeons perform most RSAs, and a majority of surgeons perform more RSAs than all anatomic shoulder arthroplasties combined.

Lumbar total disc replacement impingement sensitivity to disc height distraction, spinal sagittal orientation, implant position, and implant lordosis.

BACKGROUND Chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered standard of care after lower but not after upper extremity arthroplasty. Medicare claims data were analyzed to determine the national incidence of symptomatic VTE after shoulder arthroplasty during the index surgical admission and after discharge. METHODS Incidence of VTE was compared between shoulder arthroplasty and lower extremity arthroplasty, and patient-specific risk factors for pulmonary embolism were determined for shoulder arthroplasty. Finally, the incidence of surgical site bleeding was determined for each type of procedure. RESULTS VTE complications occurred in 1.2% of lower extremity and 0.53% of shoulder arthroplasties. Patient factors that were associated with an increased risk of VTE included a principal diagnosis of fracture, history of VTE, cardiac arrhythmia, presence of a metastatic tumor, coagulopathy, congestive heart failure, alcohol abuse, and obesity. Adjusted rates of VTE were generally higher for lower extremity compared with shoulder arthroplasties. Prevalence of readmission for VTE was higher for shoulder hemiarthroplasty than for total shoulder arthroplasty. Wound hematoma rates were similar between shoulder and lower extremity procedures. CONCLUSIONS VTE rates after shoulder arthroplasty were generally lower than those after lower extremity arthroplasty. We believe that the risk of bleeding combined with the lower rates of VTE with existing lower rates of chemoprophylaxis does not warrant the routine use of anticoagulation. Use of mechanical prophylaxis combined with aspirin may be sufficient for shoulder arthroplasty patients who are not at increased risk of VTE. Chemoprophylaxis with agents other than aspirin may be warranted in patients with a demonstrated risk of VTE.

Outcomes and Cost of Care for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures

Proximally hydroxyapatite-coated stems have performed well clinically but produced moderate proximal stress shielding and midstem cancellous condensation. Stem modification (stem shortening and distal tip polishing) has resulted in greater incidence of thigh pain. We performed a retrospective finite element analysis of the effects of stem length and surface finish to determine if midstem fixation could be avoided and the results could relate to the clinical outcomes. The modified short stem not only produced moderately less proximal bone resorption but also exhibited greater instability with 40% to 94% greater bone-implant relative motion at the stem tip. Bone formation potential at the transition between the coated and uncoated regions of both stems was observed based on changes in strain energy density. These findings are consistent with previous radiographic and clinical comparisons of short- and long-stem designs. Increased pain incidence for short-stem patients may be related to decreased implant instability and increased interface relative motion.

Characterization of wear debris in total elbow arthroplasty

Study Design. A 3-dimensional finite element model of 2 lumbar motion segments (L4–L5 and L5–S1) was used to evaluate the sensitivity of lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) impingement to disc height distraction, spinal sagittal orientation, implant position, and implant lordosis. The models were implanted with a mobile-bearing TDR and exposed to simulated sagittally balanced erect posture. Objective. The objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity of TDR impingement to disc height distraction, implant lordotic angle, implant anterior-posterior position, and spinal orientation relative to the horizon. Summary of Background Data. TDR has the potential to replace fusion as the “gold standard” for treatment of painful degenerative disc disease. However, complications after TDR have been associated with device impingement and accelerated polyethylene wear. Methods. A previously developed finite element model of the lumbar spine was altered to include implantation of a mobile-bearing TDR. A series of sensitivity analyses was performed to determine impingement risk. Specifically, spinal orientation, disc height distraction, footplate lordotic angle, and anterior-posterior position were evaluated. Results. Generally, TDR tended to result in an increase in extension rotation and facet contact force during simulated erect posture when compared with the intact models. Impingement risk was sensitive to all of the tested parameters. Conclusion. The data from this study indicate that lumbar mobile-bearing TDR impingement is sensitive to disc height distraction, anterior-posterior position, implant lordosis, and spinal sagittal orientation. TDR impingement risk can be minimized by choosing an implant with an appropriate amount of lordosis, not overdistracting the disc space, and taking care not to place the implant too far anterior or posterior.