Judith Belle Brown

Use of Complementary/Alternative Medicine by Breast Cancer Survivors in Ontario: Prevalence and Perceptions

PURPOSE To determine the prevalence of use of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) by breast cancer survivors in Ontario, Canada, and to compare the characteristics of CAM users and CAM nonusers. PATIENTS AND METHODS A questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of Ontario women diagnosed with breast cancer in 1994 or 1995. RESULTS The response rate was 76.3%. Overall, 66.7% of the respondents reported using CAM, most often in an attempt to boost the immune system. CAM practitioners (most commonly chiropractors, herbalists, acupuncturists, traditional Chinese medicine practitioners, and/or naturopathic practitioners) were visited by 39.4% of the respondents. In addition, 62.0% reported use of CAM products (most frequently vitamins/minerals, herbal medicines, green tea, special foods, and essiac). Almost one half of the respondents informed their physicians of their use of CAM. Multiple logistic regression analysis determined that support group attendance was the only factor significantly associated with CAM use. CONCLUSION CAM use is common among Canadian breast cancer survivors, many of whom are discussing CAM therapy options with their physicians. Knowledge of CAM therapies is necessary for physicians and other health care practitioners to help patients make informed choices. CAM use may play a role in the positive benefits associated with support group attendance.

Breast Cancer Survivors’ Perceptions of Complementary/Alternative Medicine (CAM): Making the Decision to Use or Not to Use

The study described in this article explored breast cancer survivors’ perceptions and experiences as they decided whether to use a variety of complementary/alternative therapies. Six focus groups were conducted composed of women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Each 2-hour session was audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. In this article, the process by which the participants made the decision to use or not to use complementary/alternative therapies, including their discovery and investigation of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) and their experiences using or not using CAM, are described. Barriers to using CAM included cost, access, and time. Family and friends generally supported the decision to use CAM; however, the participants described health care practitioners’ reactions as mixed.

Use of complementary/alternative medicine by men diagnosed with prostate cancer: prevalence and characteristics☆

OBJECTIVES To ascertain the prevalence of the use of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) among a random sample of Ontario (Canadian) men diagnosed with prostate cancer and to explore in what way users of CAM differ from nonusers. METHODS A questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 696 men diagnosed with prostate cancer. RESULTS The final response rate was 78.8%. Almost one third (29.8%) reported using CAM for their prostate cancer care. Natural health products (most commonly vitamin E, saw palmetto, and selenium) were used by 26.5% of the respondents. CAM therapies were used by 17.0% of the men (most commonly dietary changes), and only 9.1% visited CAM practitioners. Three characteristics appear to differentiate CAM users from nonusers. Men who had attended support groups were much more likely to use CAM. Men who had more advanced disease, and those who believed in the efficacy of CAM, but were not concerned about potential adverse effects of CAM, were also more likely to use CAM. CAM use was not related to education, income, or geographic location. CONCLUSIONS The data suggest that CAM use is no longer a phenomenon restricted to a unique segment of the population that is highly educated and enjoys a high family income. CAM use appears to be more related to other factors such as support group attendance, disease characteristics, and beliefs about CAM. Our findings highlight the need for urologists to ask all their patients about their use of CAM.

Breast cancer patients' experiences of patient-doctor communication: a working relationship.

The traumas of diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer are well researched and generally addressed in care. While women with breast cancer continue to identify the need for better communication with physicians, studies to date have not investigated how the process of communication between physicians and women with breast cancer actually unfolds. This phenomenological study therefore explored how women with breast cancer experience patient-physician communication to gain a greater understanding of effective approaches. Interviews of a purposeful sample of 11 women within 6 months of initial diagnosis or recurrence of breast cancer were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive interpretation. Themes and patterns of positive and negative experiences emerged. All experiences began with the womans feeling of vulnerability. In positive experiences, information sharing and relationship building were inextricably linked components of a working relationship which was at the same time affective, behavioural and instrumental. This experience, in turn, influenced the womans experience of control and mastery of the illness experience, and their experience of learning to live with breast cancer. Findings illuminate the importance of comprehensively patient-centred, working relationships. Several specific techniques to enhance effective communication are identified.

THE INFLUENCE OF OLDER PATIENT-PHYSICIAN COMMUNICATION ON HEALTH AND HEALTH-RELATED OUTCOMES

Effective patient-physician communication significantly influences health outcomes of older patients. For example, concordance between patient and physician expectations and patient participation in the decision-making process affects older patients. Communication is also linked to patient recall, adherence, and satisfaction. Furthermore, communication impacts emotional and physical outcomes of older patients, although evidence of improved physical outcomes remains under-investigated in this population. Dimensions of communication, such as continuity of relationship, seem to be important in decreasing hospitalization of older patients. This article explores the link between communication and health care outcomes in the older population.

Women's decision-making about their health care: views over the life cycle

This paper describes a compilation and further analysis of three qualitative studies, conducted independently, on womens health care decisions. Key areas regarding womens health, which span the life cycle, were examined including prenatal genetic screening, hormone replacement therapy and the use of complementary/alternative medicine in the treatment of breast cancer. Common themes were evident across all the focus groups in each of the three studies including: womens information seeking behavior; reliance on trusted information sources; the desire for information sharing; active involvement in the decision-making process; and accepting the consequences of the final decision. The findings have important implications for health care professionals as they engage women in the decision-making process about health concerns.

Creating Health with Chronic Illness

Within the current context of health care, health promotion for individuals with chronic illness often reflects the priorities of disease-specific preventive care needs and related physical, social, emotional, and spiritual well-being. This article reports a phenomenological study of how older people with chronic illness experience health and health promotion and illuminates a different perspective of health resources and strategies. The findings have profound implications for nursing practice and theory, suggesting the need for restructuring work assignments and refocusing nursing care more clearly away from the medical model.

A new perspective on threatened autonomy in elderly persons: The disempowering process

This study explored factors other than medical condition and treatments which contributed to the discharge experiences of 12 rural and 9 urban patients. Interpretive research methodology included document review, observation and in-depth interviews of all key participants. The purposefully selected sample consisted of a total of 21 patients, 22 informal caregivers, and 117 professionals involved in the hospital and/or home setting. Findings document a new perspective on how patients and professionals together contribute to the patients threatened autonomy. Lack of clarity about goals, aspirations, and purpose in life and a generally negative frame of mind in the elderly combine with professional practice approaches to create a disempowering process. Faced with the biomedical orientation and paternalism of professionals, patients with a positive mindset and sense of direction and purpose in life did not experience threat to their autonomy. The researchers conclude that empowerment strategies must encompass a patient-centred approach, which includes an understanding of the patients mindset, goals, aspirations, and sense of purpose within a larger life context. This consideration is essential to enable elderly patients to maintain autonomy despite continued health care requirements.

Men with Prostate Cancer: Making Decisions about Complementary/Alternative Medicine

Purpose. The purpose ofthis study was to explore prostate cancer patients’ perceptions, feelings, ideas, and experiences regarding making decisions to use (or not use) complementary/alternative medicine (CAM). Methods. Five focus groups were conducted with 29 men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Content analysis ofthe verbatim transcripts was used to identify key themes in the data. Findings. Decision making about CAM treatments appears to depend on both fixed (e.g., disease characteristics, demographic characteristics, and medical history) and flexible (e.g., perceptions of CAM and conventional-medicine, experiences with the health care system and health care practitioners, and perceptions about the need for control or action) decision factors. Conclusions. The participants in this study appeared more likely to be “pushed” toward using CAM by negative experiences with the health care system than to be “pulled” toward CAM by perceptions about its safety or congruence with their beliefs about health and illness.

Patient attitudes towards the arteriovenous fistula: a qualitative study on vascular access decision making

BACKGROUND The use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) among hemodialysis (HD) patients has been consistently associated with lower rates of morbidity and mortality; however, up to 30% of eligible patients refuse the creation or cannulation of an AVF. We aimed to understand the attitudes, beliefs, preferences and values of patients who refused creation or use of an AVF. METHODS With qualitative methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 HD patients (Canada, 2009), who previously refused creation or use of an AVF. Three independent analysts reviewed interview transcripts. RESULTS We discovered three main themes that impacted the decision to refuse a fistula: (i) poor previous personal or vicarious experiences with the fistula, including cannulation, bleeding, time commitment and appearance; (ii) knowledge transfer and informed decision making. Patients identified information from other patients to be as important as information from health care workers, that information on vascular access (VA) was presented but not understood and that timing of information was crucial with information overload at the start of dialysis and (iii) maintenance of status quo and outlook on life. Some patients stated they live day-to-day without being influenced by the mortality risks with a catheter. CONCLUSIONS AVF refusal is multifactorial and depends on individual patients. Although nephrologists consider the fistula to be the optimal VA, patients do not think in the same terms of reducing infection rates but focus on the practical day-to-day use of their VA and its influence on their quality of life and future outlook.