Sonja M. Reichert

Physical Activity and Diabetes

• Moderate to high levels of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with substantially lower morbidity and mortality in people with diabetes. • Both aerobic and resistance exercise are beneficial, and it is optimal to do both types of exercise. At least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise and at least 2 sessions per week of resistance exercise are recommended, though smaller amounts of activity still provide some health benefits. • A number of strategies that increase self-efficacy and motivation can be employed to increase physical activity uptake and maintenance, such as setting specific physical activity goals, using self-monitoring tools (pedometers or accelerometers) and developing strategies to overcome anticipated barriers. • For people with type 2 diabetes, supervised exercise programs have been particularly effective in improving glycemic control, reducing the need for noninsulin antihyperglycemic agents and insulin, and producing modest but sustained weight loss. • Habitual, prolonged sitting is associated with increased risk of death and major cardiovascular events.

Impact of a quality improvement program on primary healthcare in Canada: A mixed-method evaluation

PURPOSE Rigorous comprehensive evaluations of primary healthcare (PHC) quality improvement (QI) initiatives are lacking. This article describes the evaluation of the Quality Improvement and Innovation Partnership Learning Collaborative (QIIP-LC), an Ontario-wide PHC QI program targeting type 2 diabetes management, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, access to care, and team functioning. METHODS This article highlights the primary outcome results of an external retrospective, multi-measure, mixed-method evaluation of the QIIP-LC, including: (1) matched-control pre-post chart audit of diabetes management (A1c/foot exams) and rate of CRC screening; (2) post-only advanced access survey (third-next available appointment); and (3) post-only semi-structured interviews (team functioning). RESULTS Chart audit data was collected from 34 consenting physicians per group (of which 88% provided access data). Between-group differences were not statistically significant (A1c [p=0.10]; foot exams [p=0.45]; CRC screening [p=0.77]; advanced access [p=0.22]). Qualitative interview (n=42) themes highlighted the success of the program in helping build interdisciplinary team functioning and capacity. CONCLUSION The rigorous design and methodology of the QIIP-LC evaluation utilizing a control group is one of the most significant efforts thus far to demonstrate the impact of a QI program in PHC, with improvements over time in both QIIP and control groups offering a likely explanation for the lack of statistically significant primary outcomes. Team functioning was a key success, with team-based chronic care highlighted as pivotal for improved health outcomes. Policy makers should strive to endorse QI programs with proven success through rigorous evaluation to ensure evidence-based healthcare policy and funding.

Influence of a quality improvement learning collaborative program on team functioning in primary healthcare.

Quality improvement (QI) programs are frequently implemented to support primary healthcare (PHC) team development and to improve care outcomes. In Ontario, Canada, the Quality Improvement and Innovation Partnership (QIIP) offered a learning collaborative (LC) program to support the development of interdisciplinary team function and improve chronic disease management, disease prevention, and access to care. A qualitative study using a phenomenological approach was conducted as part of a mixed-method evaluation to explore the influence of the program on team functioning in participating PHC teams. A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify PHC teams (n = 10), from which participants of different professional roles were selected through a purposeful recruitment process to reflect maximum variation of team roles. Additionally, QI coaches working with the interview participants and the LC administrators were also interviewed. Data were collected through semistructured telephone interviews that were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted through an iterative and interpretive approach. The shared experience of participating in the program appeared to improve team functioning. Participants described increased trust and respect for each others clinical and administrative roles and were inspired by learning about different approaches to interdisciplinary care. This appeared to enhance collegial relationships, collapse professional silos, improve communication, and increase interdisciplinary collaboration. Teamwork involves more than just physically grouping healthcare providers from multiple disciplines and mandating them to work together. The LC program provided opportunities for participants to learn how to work collaboratively, and participation in the LC program appeared to enhance team functioning.

An Innovative Model of Diabetes Care and Delivery: The St. Joseph's Primary Care Diabetes Support Program (SJHC PCDSP)

The majority of diabetes care in Canada is provided within the primary healthcare setting. It is delivered in a variety of models ranging from the physician working in a solo fee-for-service practice to an interprofessional team setting with specialist collaboration. To augment diabetes-related health services, the Ontario government has provided substantial funding to support community diabetes education programs. These models and initiatives are improving diabetes outcomes, and continued evolution of these programs can provide even greater outcomes. The St. Josephs Primary Care Diabetes Support Program (SJHC PCDSP) is an innovative model that incorporates multidisciplinary allied health professionals together with physician support to provide care for more than 3000 patients in London, Ontario, Canada. It embodies the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA)s Organizations of Care recommendations to combine patient education and self-management with active medical support at each clinic encounter, all while embodying the tenets of primary care. A brief review of primary healthcare reform is provided to explain how the SJHC PCDSP combines features of current models in a unique format so as to deliver exceptional patient care. By providing a detailed description of the services delivered at the SJHC PCDSP, it is hoped that both specialists and primary care providers consider using and adapting approaches to diabetes management based on this innovative model to optimize their practices.

Real-world crude incidence of hypoglycemia in adults with diabetes: Results of the InHypo-DM Study, Canada

Objective Very few real-world studies have been conducted to assess the incidence of diabetes-related hypoglycemia. Moreover, there is a paucity of studies that have investigated hypoglycemia among people taking secretagogues as a monotherapy or in combination with insulin. Accordingly, our research team developed and validated the InHypo-DM Person with Diabetes Mellitus Questionnaire (InHypo-DMPQ) with the aim of capturing the real-world incidence of self-reported, symptomatic hypoglycemia. The questionnaire was administered online to a national sample of Canadians (≥18 years old) with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with insulin and/or insulin secretagogues. Research design and methods Self-report data obtained from the InHypo-DMPQ were descriptively analyzed to ascertain the crude incidence proportions and annualized incidence densities (rates) of 30-day retrospective non-severe and 1-year retrospective severe hypoglycemia, including daytime and nocturnal events. Results A total of 552 people (T2DM: 83%; T1DM: 17%) completed the questionnaire. Over half (65.2%) of the total respondents reported experiencing at least one event (non-severe or severe) at an annualized crude incidence density of 35.1 events per person-year. The incidence proportion and rate of non-severe events were higher among people with T1DM versus T2DM (77% and 55.7 events per person-year vs 54% and 28.0 events per person-year). Severe hypoglycemia was reported by 41.8% of all respondents, at an average rate of 2.5 events per person-year. Conclusions The results of the InHypo-DMPQ, the largest real-world investigation of hypoglycemia epidemiology in Canada, suggest that the incidence of hypoglycemia among adults with diabetes taking insulin and/or insulin secretagogues is higher than previously thought.

When Insulin Therapy Fails: The Impact of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Insulin is the most effective therapy for achieving optimal glycemic control; however, many patients with type 2 diabetes on an intensified treatment regimen fail to achieve the recommended HbA1c target (1,2) and face the risk of adverse effects such as hypoglycemia and weight gain (3). The addition of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to a regimen of insulin therapy in this patient population has the potential to mitigate insulin-related weight gain and risk of hypoglycemia, with the added benefit of insulin dose reduction (4). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown improved clinical outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors as monotherapy and as an add-on to oral and insulin therapy, but there is a paucity of real-world (RW) studies evaluating similar outcomes. Data extracted from WebDR (5) was used to evaluate the RW clinical impact of SGLT2 inhibitors (initiation of canagliflozin or dapagliflozin between February 2014 and December 2016) as an add-on to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving glycemic targets (those with HbA1c >7% [>53 mmol/mol]). Empagliflozin was excluded because of inadequate sample size. Ethical approval …

A qualitative enquiry of hypoglycemia and the social determinants of health: The InHypo-DM study, Canada.

Introduction: A significant body of research exists on the impact of the social determinants of health (SDoHs) on diabetes care and general health outcomes. However, less is known about health care practitioners’ (HCPs’) perspectives and experiences regarding the impact of the SDoHs on their patients with Type I and Type 2 diabetes mellitus and how this affects the prevention and treatment of hypoglycemia. Method: A descriptive qualitative study, derived from the InHypo-DM (Canada) research program. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit participants residing in southwestern Ontario, Canada, for a 30- to 45-min semistructured interview. Individual and team analysis of interviews was conducted to identify overarching and subthemes. Twenty HCP participants, including endocrinologists, family physicians, and allied health care practitioners, were recruited. Seven were Certified Diabetes Educators. Results: Participants articulated 2 overarching components of the SDoHs: patients’ socioeconomic issues and psychosocial issues. They highlighted two socioeconomic issues: occupation type and poverty. Participants also emphasized 3 areas pertaining to patients’ psychosocial issues: stage in the life cycle (e.g., elderly), social isolation, and mental health. Discussion: This study emphasizes the need for conducting detailed and comprehensive social histories during clinical diabetes assessments, as well as the necessity of adequate clinical time and resources for HCPs and patients to address these issues in the context of hypoglycemia management.

Results From a Feasibility Study of Square-Stepping Exercise in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes and Self-Reported Cognitive Complaints to Improve Global Cognitive Functioning

OBJECTIVES Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus have an increased risk for dementia. Therefore, we proposed an intervention called the Square-stepping exercise (SSE) program to mitigate this risk. Our primary aim was to determine the feasibility of SSE in adults with type 2 diabetes and self-reported cognitive complaints. Our secondary aim was to determine whether 24 weeks of SSE improved cognition. Our tertiary aim was to determine whether SSE improved antisaccade reaction time, which is a measure of executive-related oculomotor control. METHODS Adults >49 years with type 2 diabetes and self-reported cognitive complaints were randomized to an SSE group (2×/week for 24 weeks of SSE) or a control group. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and attendance. Participants were assessed at baseline, after 12 weeks and after 24 weeks for global cognitive function, memory, planning, reasoning and concentration via a computer-based cognitive battery (Cambridge Brain Sciences) and antisaccade reaction time (at baseline and 24 weeks). RESULTS Participants in the SSE group were (mean [SD]): 65.9 (5.2) years old; 33% female; body mass index 33.3 kg/m2 (4.8) (n=12). Participants in the control group were 71.2 (6.9) years old; 31% female; body mass index 31.9 kg/m2 (4.6) (n=13). Over 24 weeks, attendance was 70.2% (SD 17.2) for 4/12 participants. There were 4 withdrawals and 1 adverse event. There were no differences in global cognitive functioning. The SSE group improved in planning domain change scores between 12 and 24 weeks (F=5.8, p=0.03, ηp2=0.28) compared to controls. In the SSE group, we found a nonsignificant improvement in antisaccade reaction time of 38 ms (SD 16), n=2, compared to 9 ms (SD 45) in the control group, n=8. CONCLUSIONS SSE should be evaluated further to improve its feasibility in older adults with type 2 diabetes. This study provides preliminary evidence that SSE improves executive function in adults with type 2 diabetes and self-reported cognitive complaints.

Impact of a primary healthcare quality improvement program on diabetes in Canada: evaluation of the Quality Improvement and Innovation Partnership (QIIP)

Objective Primary healthcare (PHC) quality improvement (QI) initiatives are designed to improve patient care and health outcomes. We evaluated the Quality Improvement and Innovation Partnership (QIIP), an Ontario-wide PHC QI program on access to care, diabetes management and colorectal cancer screening. This manuscript highlights the impact of QIIP on diabetes outcomes and associated vascular risk factors. Research design and methods A cluster matched-control, retrospective prechart and postchart audit was conducted. One physician per QIIP-PHC team (N=34) and control (N=34) were recruited for the audit. Eligible charts were reviewed for prespecified type 2 diabetes mellitus clinical process and outcome data at baseline, during (intervention range: 15–17.5 months) and post. Primary outcome measures were the A1c of patients above study target and proportion of patients with an annual foot exam. Secondary outcome measures included glycemic, hypertension and lipid outcomes and management, screening for diabetes-related complications, healthcare utilization, and diabetes counseling, education and self-management goal setting. Results More patients in the QIIP group achieved statistically improved lipid testing, eye examinations, peripheral neuropathy exams, and documented body mass index. No statistical differences in A1c, low-density lipoprotein or systolic/diastolic blood pressure values were noted, with no significant differences in medication prescription, specialist referrals, or chart-reported diabetes counseling, education or self-management goals. Patients of QIIP physicians had significantly more PHC visits. Conclusion The QIIP-learning collaborative program evaluation using stratified random selection of participants and the inclusion of a control group makes this one of the most rigorous and promising efforts to date evaluating the impact of a QI program in PHC. The chart audit component of this evaluation highlighted that while QIIP improved some secondary diabetes measures, no improvements in clinical outcomes were noted. This study highlights the importance of formalized evaluation of QI initiatives to provide an evidence base to inform future program planning and scale-up.