Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Judith Cave is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Judith Cave.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2016

Outcome and Biomarker Analysis from a Multicenter Phase 2 Study of Ipilimumab in Combination with Carboplatin and Etoposide as First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage SCLC

Edurne Arriola; Matthew Wheater; Ian Galea; Nadia Cross; Tom Maishman; Debbie Hamid; Louise Stanton; Judith Cave; Tom Geldart; Clive Mulatero; Vannessa Potter; Sarah Danson; Pennella J. Woll; Richard Griffiths; Luke Nolan; Christian Ottensmeier

Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab combined with standard first‐line chemotherapy for patients with extensive‐stage SCLC. Methods: Patients with chemotherapy‐naive extensive‐stage SCLC were treated with carboplatin and etoposide for up to six cycles. Ipilimumab, 10 mg/kg, was given on day 1 of cycles 3 to 6 and every 12 weeks. Response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.0, and immune‐related response criteria. The primary end point was 1‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) according to RECIST. Secondary end points included PFS according to immune‐related PFS and overall survival. Autoantibody serum levels were evaluated and correlated with clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled between September 2011 and April 2014; 39 were evaluable for safety and 38 for efficacy. Six of 38 patients (15.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.4–30.4]) were alive and progression‐free at 1‐year by RECIST. Median PFS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 5.5–7.9). Median immune‐related PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI: 5.5–8.8). Median overall survival was 17.0 months (95% CI: 7.9–24.3). Of the patients evaluable for response, 21 of 29 (72.4%) achieved an objective response by RECIST and 28 of 33 (84.8%) achieved an objective response by the immune‐related response criteria. All patients experienced at least one adverse event; at least one grade 3 or higher toxicity developed in 35 of 39 patients (89.7%); in 27 patients (69.2%) this was related to ipilimumab. Five deaths were reported to be related to ipilimumab. Positivity of an autoimmune profile at baseline was associated with improved outcomes and severe neurological toxicity. Conclusions: Ipilimumab in combination with carboplatin and etoposide might benefit a subgroup of patients with advanced SCLC. Autoantibody analysis correlates with treatment benefit and toxicity and warrants further investigation.


Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2016

The assessment of Ki-67 as a prognostic marker in neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sebastian Richards-Taylor; Sean Ewings; Eleanor Jaynes; Charles Tilley; Sarah Gabrielle Ellis; Thomas Armstrong; Neil W. Pearce; Judith Cave

Introduction Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) are classified according to tumour mitotic count or Ki-67 labelling index (LI). Aim(s) To systematically review articles reporting the prognosis of patients by Ki-67 LI and thereby improve the ability of clinicians to prognosticate for their patients. Method 265 abstracts were identified relating Ki-67 and survival. After exclusion criteria were applied, 22 articles remained. Articles were excluded if they described non-human specimens, were non-English language, published prior to 2000, reported non-GEP NETs, reported subgroups selected by treatment modality or included <20 cases. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to combine studies to estimate survival proportions. Results Authors used varied methods in which to present 5-year survival, with often limited survival information. This reduced the number of studies that could be included in the meta-analysis. 5-year survival for patients with grade 1 and 2 GEP NETs were estimated to be 89% (95% CI 85% to 92%, m=12 studies, n=977 participants) and 70% (95% CI 62% to 79%, m=9, n=726), respectively. Using an alternative grade 1/2 boundary of 5%, 5-year survival rates for Ki-67≤5% and 5–20% were estimated as 89% (95% CI 84% to 94%, m=7, n=654) and 51% (95% CI 44% to 59%, m=4, n=183), respectively. For Ki-67>20%, 5-year survival was estimated to be 25% (95% CI 12% to 38%, m=10, n=208). Conclusions Standardisation of grade boundaries has allowed us to combine data from multiple studies and amass a body of evidence linking Ki-67 and survival.


Chemotherapy | 2012

A Phase I Clinical Trial of Irinotecan and Carboplatin in Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simon J. Crabb; Jennifer Bradbury; Luke Nolan; Diana Selman; Sethupathi R. Muthuramalingam; Judith Cave; Peter Johnson; Christian Ottensmeier

Background: Treatment options for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remain inadequate. Irinotecan has been tested in various combinations with platinum agents but the optimal regimen remains uncertain. We undertook a phase I trial to optimise the dose intensity of a 3-weekly irinotecan/carboplatin combination. Methods: Twenty patients with extensive stage SCLC received intravenous carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 1, and irinotecan in 40–70 mg/m2 dose levels on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, for up to 6 cycles. Results: Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 1 patient at the 50 mg/m2 irinotecan level (grade 3 diarrhoea) and in 2 patients at 70 mg/m2 (grade 5 neutropenic sepsis; combined grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 diarrhoea and grade 3 thrombosis). Toxicity patterns were consistent with the expected profile for this combination. The objective response rate was 75% and the median survival was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval 7.5–11.2). Conclusion: Irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 combined with carboplatin AUC 5 every 21 days is recommended for phase II evaluation. This regimen has clinical activity, acceptable toxicity and greater dose intensity over those currently tested in phase III trials.


Supportive Care in Cancer | 2018

A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of aerobic exercise during cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment

Judith Cave; A. Paschalis; C. Y. Huang; M. West; Ellen Copson; Sandy Jack; Michael P. W. Grocott

PurposeAerobic exercise improves prognosis and quality of life (QoL) following completion of chemotherapy. However, the safety and efficacy of aerobic exercise during chemotherapy is less certain. A systematic review was performed of randomised trials of adult patients undergoing chemotherapy, comparing an exercise intervention with standard care.MethodFrom 253 abstracts screened, 33 unique trials were appraised in accordance with PRISMA guidance, including 3257 patients. Interventions included walking, jogging or cycling, and 23 were of moderate intensity (50–80% maximum heart rate).ResultsAerobic exercise improved, or at least maintained fitness during chemotherapy. Moderately intense exercise, up to 70–80% of maximum heart rate, was safe. Any reported adverse effects of exercise were mild and self-limiting, but reporting was inconsistent. Adherence was good (median 72%). Exercise improved QoL and physical functioning, with earlier return to work. Two out of four studies reported improved chemotherapy completion rates. Four out of six studies reported reduced chemotherapy toxicity. There was no evidence that exercise reduced myelosuppression or improved response rate or survival.ConclusionsExercise during chemotherapy is safe and should be encouraged because of beneficial effects on QoL and physical functioning. More research is required to determine the impact on chemotherapy completion rates and prognosis.


Pancreas | 2017

Clinically Significant Differences in Ki-67 Proliferation Index Between Primary and Metastases in Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Sebastian Richards-Taylor; Charles Tilley; Eleanor Jaynes; Haixiao Hu; Thomas Armstrong; Neil W. Pearce; Rachel Plant; Judith Cave

Objective Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) (pNETs) have a varied prognosis according to their grade. The European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society grading system uses assessment of the proliferation index via Ki-67 immunohistochemistry to aid prognosis. There is evidence that the proliferation index can vary significantly within a single tumor, but it is not fully understood to what extent heterogeneity occurs between the primary and metastatic sites and how this may affect the grade. The aim of this study is to determine whether the grade assigned to a pNET varies depending on which site is selected for Ki-67 immunolabeling. Methods Patients were selected from our institutions NET database. Patients were included if they had a confirmed pNETs, had multiple resection specimens, and had consented to research being performed on their specimens. Ki-67 immunohistochemistry was performed on all resected specimens meeting the inclusion criteria. Results Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors specimens resected from 16 patients were analyzed. There was no trend to higher Ki-67 in metastatic than primary disease. Ki-67 was on average 3% higher in liver metastases than lymph node metastases (P < 0.001). Conclusions The grade of pNETs varies according to the tumor selected for Ki-67 immunolabeling. Useful information can be gained by performing Ki-67 PI on liver metastases.


Endocrine connections | 2017

Tumour diameter is not reliable for management of non-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

L. Mills; Panagiotis Drymousis; Yogesh K. Vashist; Christoph Burdelski; Andreas Prachalias; Parthi Srinivasan; Krishna Menon; Corina Cotoi; Saboor Khan; Judith Cave; Thomas Armstrong; Martin O. Weickert; Jakob R. Izbicki; Joerg Schrader; Andreja Frilling; John Ramage; Raj Srirajaskanthan


UKI NETS 14th National Conference | 2016

UK Phase IV, Observational study to assess Quality of Life in patients (pts) with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) receiving treatment with Everolimus: The “Real-World” OBLIQUE Study

John Ramage; Pankaj Punia; Faluyi Olusola; Andrea Frilling; Tim Meyer; Gaurav Kapur; Judith Cave; Johnathan Wadsley; Sebastian Cummins; David Farrugia; Naureen Starling; Lucy Wall; Ruby Saharan; Juan W. Valle


UKI NETS 14th National Conference | 2016

Tumour size is not a reliable criterion for management of patients with Non-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: results of a large, multi-centre, operative cohort

L. Mills; Panagiotis Drymousis; J Vashist; Christoph Burdelski; Andreas Prachalias; Parthi Srinivasan; Krishna Menon; Saboor Khan; Judith Cave; Thomas Armstrong; Martin O. Weickert; Andreja Frilling; John Ramage; R Srirajaskanthan


Lancet Oncology | 2017

Towards personalised medicine in lung and thymus neuroendocrine tumours

Giuseppe Pelosi; Judith Cave; Christian Ottensmeier


Gastroenterology | 2017

Tumour Size is not a Reliable Criterion for Resection of Patients with Non-Secreting Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: Results of an International, Multi-Centre, Operative Cohort

L. Mills; Panagiotis Drymousis; Yogesh K. Vashist; Christoph Burdelski; Andreas Prachalias; Parthi Srinivasan; Krishna Menon; Saboor Khan; Judith Cave; Thomas Armstrong; Martin O. Weickert; Andrea Frilling; John Ramage; Raj Srirajaskanthan

Collaboration


Dive into the Judith Cave's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eleanor Jaynes

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles Tilley

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. Mills

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin O. Weickert

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge