Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Judith S. Palfrey is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Judith S. Palfrey.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1994

The Infant or Young Child with Developmental Delay

Lewis R. First; Judith S. Palfrey

The practitioner should attempt to identify the infant and young child with developmental delay as early as possible, so that appropriate services can be provided. Ongoing surveillance is required, rather than one-time screening. The practitioner should also serve as an advocate for children with developmental delay. He or she should ensure that appropriate services exist within the childs community and that they are readily accessible. This requires ongoing communication not only with the child and the family, but also with schools and community agencies.


Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics | 1985

The emergence of attention deficits in early childhood: A prospective study.

Judith S. Palfrey; Melvin D. Levine; Deborah Klein Walker; Maureen O’Sullivan

To study the emergence of attention deficits in early childhood, the diagnostic team of an early education program documented the occurrence of poor concentration, distractibility, behavioral disorganization, poor self-monitoring, and overactivity in a group of 174 children followed prospectively from birth to school entry. Persistent attentional problems were identified in 5% of the children; 8% had problems which abated before kindergarten. Over the period from birth to kindergarten, 40% of the preschool youngsters were found to have some attentional indicator, but many of the findings were minor or transient. This study points to (1) the clustering of persistent attentional concerns with other developmental and environmental concerns, (2) the substantial long-term consequences of early attentional problems and (3) the feasibility of early detection of some children with attentional disorders.


Pediatrics | 2010

Health Inequity in Children and Youth With Chronic Health Conditions

Jay G. Berry; Sheila R. Bloom; Susan Foley; Judith S. Palfrey

BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, there have been great advances in health care delivered to children with chronic conditions, but not all children have benefitted equally from them. OBJECTIVES: To describe health inequities experienced by children with chronic health conditions. METHODS: We performed a literature review of English-language studies identified from the Medline, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute, and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Web sites that were published between January 1985 and May 2009, included children aged 0 to 18 years, and contained the key words “incidence,” “prevalence,” “survival,” “mortality,” or “disparity” in the title or abstract for the following health conditions: acute leukemia, asthma, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders, cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, diabetes mellitus, Down syndrome, HIV/AIDS, major congenital heart defects, major depressive disorder, sickle cell anemia, spina bifida, and traumatic brain injury. RESULTS: Black children had higher rates of cerebral palsy and HIV/AIDS, were less likely to be diagnosed with ADHD, had more emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and had higher mortality rates associated with asthma; and survived less often with Down syndrome, type 1 diabetes, and traumatic brain injury when compared with white children. Hispanic children had higher rates of spina bifida from Mexico-born mothers, had higher rates of HIV/AIDS and depression, were less likely to be diagnosed with ADHD, had poorer glycemic control with type 1 diabetes, and survived less often with acute leukemia compared with white children. CONCLUSIONS: Serious racial and ethnic health and health care inequities persist for children with chronic health conditions.


Pediatrics | 2005

Introduction: Addressing the Millennial Morbidity—The Context of Community Pediatrics

Judith S. Palfrey; Thomas F. Tonniges; Morris Green; Julius B. Richmond

The test of the morality of a society is what it does for its children. Dietrich Bonhoeffer1 Pediatrics is a contextual specialty concerned about children, their families, and the communities in which they live. Historically, US pediatricians have demonstrated a deep appreciation of the relationship between community forces and child health outcomes. Abraham Jacobi, MD, and Job Lewis Smith, MD, the founders of American pediatrics, fought to ensure a clean water supply and decent housing for poor urban infants and children who were poor. They set the stage for pediatric activism in the community. In the decades since then, pediatricians have grappled to incorporate knowledge about the influences of the external environment into the practice of pediatrics.2 Although the morbidity and mortality of children have changed over the past 150 years, the need for engaging in the community with families and community-based partners has not. Rather, the salience of community pediatrics has risen as the effects of societal forces have intensified and knowledge of the bioenvironmental interface has become more sophisticated. This supplement is a collection of articles about training and practice in community pediatrics that offers specific examples of clinical practice and research aimed at fulfilling the promise that our profession has made to children in our society. The past century has seen astounding changes in the configuration of childhood health and illness (Table 1). In the early 1900s, infant mortality was as high as 140 per 1000 live births per year3; child health clinicians struggled to handle malnutrition and contagious illnesses. The major biological and medical breakthroughs of the midcentury created the basis for the subspecialty care of children with congenital and acquired organ-system illness. By the 1960s and 1970s, acute infectious morbidity increasingly was held in check by antibiotics and vaccines. Pediatricians began … Address correspondence to Judith S. Palfrey, MD, Childrens Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: palfrey{at}fas.harvard.edu


Pediatrics | 2005

The Brookline Early Education Project: A 25-Year Follow-up Study of a Family-Centered Early Health and Development Intervention

Judith S. Palfrey; Penny Hauser-Cram; Martha B. Bronson; Marji Erickson Warfield; Selcuk R. Sirin; Eugenia Chan

Background. Clinicians, scientists, and policy makers are increasingly taking interest in the long-term outcomes of early intervention programs undertaken during the 1960s and 1970s, which were intended to improve young childrens health and educational prospects. The Brookline Early Education Project (BEEP) was an innovative, community-based program that provided health and developmental services for children and their families from 3 months before birth until entry into kindergarten. It was open to all families in the town of Brookline and to families from neighboring Boston, to include a mixture of families from suburban and urban communities. The goal of the project, which was administered by the Brookline Public Schools, was to ensure that children would enter kindergarten healthy and ready to learn. Objective. Outcome studies of BEEP and comparison children during kindergarten and second grade demonstrated the programs effectiveness during the early school years. The goal of this follow-up study was to test the hypotheses that BEEP participants, in comparison with their peers, would have higher levels of educational attainment, higher incomes, and more positive health behaviors, mental health, and health efficacy during the young adult period. Methods. Participants were young adults who were enrolled in the BEEP project from 1973 to 1978. Comparison subjects were young adults in Boston and Brookline who did not participate in BEEP but were matched to the BEEP group with respect to age, ethnicity, mothers educational level, and neighborhood (during youth). A total of 169 children were enrolled originally in BEEP and monitored through second grade. The follow-up sample included a total of 120 young adults who had participated in BEEP as children. The sample differed from the original BEEP sample in having a slightly larger proportion of college-educated mothers and a slightly smaller proportion of urban families but otherwise resembled the original BEEP sample. The demographic features of the BEEP and comparison samples were similar. The young adults were asked to complete a survey that focused on the major domains of educational/functional outcomes and health/well-being. The study used a quasi-experimental causal-comparative design involving quantitative analyses of differences between the BEEP program and comparison groups, stratified according to community. Hypotheses were tested with analysis of variance and multivariate analysis of variance techniques. Analyses of the hypotheses included the main effects of group (BEEP versus comparison sample) and community (suburban versus urban location), as well as their interaction. Results. Young adults from the suburban community had higher levels of educational attainment than did those in the urban group, with little difference between the suburban BEEP and comparison groups. In the urban group, participation in the BEEP program was associated with completing >1 additional year of schooling. Fewer BEEP young adults reported having a low income (less than


Journal of Learning Disabilities | 1984

An Analysis of the Learning Styles of Adolescent Delinquents

Lynn J. Meltzer; Melvin D. Levine; Walt Karniski; Judith S. Palfrey; Simon Clarke

20000); the income differences were accounted for largely by the urban participants. The percentage of subjects with private health insurance was significantly lower in the urban group overall, but the BEEP urban group had higher rates of private insurance than did the comparison group. More than 80% of both suburban samples reported being in very good or excellent health; the 2 urban groups had significantly lower ratings, with 64% of the BEEP group and only 41.67% of the comparison group reaching this standard. Overall, suburban participants reported more positive health behaviors, more perceived competence, and less depression. Among the urban samples, however, participation in BEEP was associated with higher levels of health efficacy, more positive health behaviors, and less depression than their peers. Conclusions. No previous study has focused as extensively on health-related outcomes of early education programs. BEEP participants living in urban communities had advantages over their peers in educational attainment, income, health, and well-being. The educational advantages found for BEEP participants in the early years of schooling included executive skills such as planning, organizing, and completing school-related tasks. It is likely that these early advantages in executive function extended beyond education-related tasks to other activities as participants became responsible for their own lives. The long-term benefits revealed in this study are consistent with the findings of previous long-term studies that indicated that participants in high-quality intervention programs are less likely to cost taxpayers money for health, educational, and public assistance services. The BEEP program appears to have somewhat blunted differences between the urban and suburban groups. The results of this study add to the growing body of findings that indicate that long-term benefits occur as the result of well-designed, intensive, comprehensive early education. The health benefits add a unique and important extension to the findings of other studies.


Medical Care | 1986

Health care access and use among handicapped students in five public school systems.

Judith D. Singer; John A. Butler; Judith S. Palfrey

The association between school failure and antisocial behavior has been the focus of much discussion but little consensus. In the present study, 53 delinquent adolescents and 51 junior high school students were compared on the basis of their learning profiles. An educational battery was devised to evaluate quality of learning style and error clusters in addition to traditional grade-equivalents. Significant differences were found in the type and prevalence of multiple error clusters within each of the eight educational skill areas and across the eight combined skills. In a second part of the study early school records and parent questionnaires were reviewed. Results indicated a significantly higher prevalence of school problems among the delinquents as early as kindergarten. By second grade, 45% of the delinquents were already delayed in reading and 36% in handwriting, in contrast to only 14% of the comparison group (p < .001). Finally, the prevalence of special education services recommended or provided over the years was surveyed. It is concluded that the learning styles of delinquents may be qualitatively different and that early learning difficulties may provide a sensitive indicator of risk for later delinquency.


American Educational Research Journal | 1989

Variation in Special Education Classification Across School Districts: How Does Where You Live Affect What You Are Labeled?

Judith D. Singer; Judith S. Palfrey; John A. Butler; Deborah Klein Walker

The authors studied the health care access and utilization patterns for a stratified random sample of 1,726 special education students in five large metropolitan school systems. Overall, 7% of the special education students had no regular source of care, 26% had no regular physician, and 38% had not visited a physician in the previous year; 13% had no health insurance. Each of these measures was worse for nonwhite and poorer children as well as for those whose mothers who had less formal education. Insurance coverage was associated with physician visits, with 45% of the uninsured children visiting a physician compared with 63% of those with public insurance and 66% of those with private insurance. Odds ratios for all health care access and use measures showed striking geographic variations. Thus, even for children identified as handicapped by their communities, barriers to health care are evident and are significantly greater for groups traditionally at risk.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1978

New directions in the evaluation and education of handicapped children.

Judith S. Palfrey; Richard C. Mervis; John A. Butler

Using independent information collected from the parents and teachers of a stratified random sample of 829 special education students, we compared the classification practices of five major metropolitan school districts. We examined the functional levels of students with the same labels living in different districts and tested whether differences in functional status were associated with the prevalence of the classification. To determine whether special education designations might change if the students lived elsewhere, we reclassified the students in each district’s sample using discriminant functions estimated within each of the other districts (which empirically replicated that district’s classification scheme). We found that (a) functional levels of students classified as mentally retarded, physically/multiply handicapped and hearing impaired differed across districts; (b) districts that classified more students as mentally retarded were serving less severely impaired students under this label; and (c) districts were least consistent in their use of the mentally retarded and emotionally disturbed designations and most consistent in their use of the hearing impaired and, to a lesser extent, physically/multiply handicapped designations; districts’ use of the speech impaired and learning disabled designations fell between these two extremes.


Ambulatory Pediatrics | 2002

The Doctor's Dilemma: Challenges for the Primary Care Physician Caring for the Child With Special Health Care Needs

Emily Davidson; Thomas J. Silva; Lisa A. Sofis; Michael L. Ganz; Judith S. Palfrey

The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, which went into effect last October, ensures the right of handicapped children to free appropriate public education. State and local education agencies are required to identify, evaluate and provide services for all disabled children. This multibilliondollar program will guarantee special education resources for up to 12 per cent of American children. A role for physicians in the program is implied rather than defined in the law. Their involvement will vary somewhat from state to state, but will at a minimum involve counseling parents whose children are under evaluation. The law assumes a sophistication of diagnostic ability and curriculum design that does not yet exist, and therefore places a special burden upon physicians to deal effectively with patients now, while developing better training programs and assessment tools, and makes essential the enhancement of the communication between doctors and educators.

Collaboration


Dive into the Judith S. Palfrey's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judith D. Singer

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melvin D. Levine

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephanie Porter

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynn J. Meltzer

University of the Witwatersrand

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Butler

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald C. Samuels

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Foley

University of Massachusetts Boston

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge