Juhan Lee

The clinicopathological relevance of pretransplant anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in renal transplantation

Background Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been suggested as a risk factor for graft failure and acute rejection (AR). However, the prevalence and clinical significance of pretransplant AT1R-Abs have seldom been evaluated in Asia. Methods In this multicenter, observational cohort study, we tested the AT1R-Abs in pretransplant serum samples obtained from 166 kidney transplant recipients. Statistical analysis was used to set a threshold AT1R-Abs level at 9.05 U/mL. Results Pretransplant AT1R-Abs were detected in 98/166 (59.0%) of the analyzed recipients. No graft loss or patient death was reported during the study period. AT1R-Abs (+) patients had a significantly higher incidence of biopsy-proven AR than AT1R-Abs (-) patients (27.6 versus 10.3%, P = 0.007). Recipients with pretransplant AT1R-Abs had a 3.2-fold higher risk of AR within a year of transplantation (P = 0.006). Five study subjects developed microcirculation inflammation (score ≥2). Four of them were presensitized to AT1R-Abs. In particular, three patients had a high titer of anti-AT1R-Abs (>22.7 U/mL). Conclusions Pretransplant AT1R-Abs is an independent risk factor for AR, especially acute cellular rejection, and is possibly associated with the risk of antibody-mediated injury. Pretransplant assessment of AT1R-Abs may be useful for stratifying immunologic risks.

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Measurement in Renal Transplantation: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study With Protocol Biopsies.

AbstractInterstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) is a common cause of kidney allograft loss. Several noninvasive techniques developed to assess tissue fibrosis are widely used to examine the liver. However, relatively few studies have investigated the use of elastographic methods to assess transplanted kidneys. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical implications of the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technique in renal transplant patients.A total of 91 patients who underwent living donor renal transplantation between September 2010 and January 2013 were included in this prospective study. Shear wave velocity (SWV) was measured by ARFI at baseline and predetermined time points (1 week and 6 and 12 months after transplantation). Protocol biopsies were performed at 12 months.Instead of reflecting IF/TA, SWVs were found to be related to time elapsed after transplantation. Mean SWV increased continuously during the first postoperative year (P < 0.001). In addition, mixed model analysis showed no correlation existed between SWV and serum creatinine (r = −0.2426, P = 0.0771). There was also no evidence of a relationship between IF/TA and serum creatinine (odds ratio [OR] = 1.220, P = 0.7648). Furthermore, SWV temporal patterns were dependent on the kidney weight to body weight ratio (KW/BW). In patients with a KW/BW <3.5 g/kg, mean SWV continuously increased for 12 months, whereas it decreased after 6 months in those with a KW/BW ≥3.5 g/kg.No significant correlation was observed between SWV and IF/TA or renal dysfunction. However, SWV was found to be related to the time after transplantation. Renal hemodynamics influenced by KW/BW might impact SWV values.

Rituximab and hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg-negative/ anti-HBc-positive kidney transplant recipients

Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-known complication of immunosuppressive therapy. Although rituximab is increasingly used for desensitization of ABO-incompatible or positive crossmatch kidney transplantation, the risk of HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative/hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive kidney transplant patients receiving rituximab desensitization remains undetermined. Methods We analysed 172 resolved HBV patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation between 2008 and 2014. Patients were divided into rituximab ( n  =  49) or control ( n  =  123) groups. All patients were observed for HBV reactivation, which was defined as the reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen or HBV DNA. Results During the follow-up period (median, 58 months; range, 4-95 months), five patients (10.2%) in the rituximab group and two patients (1.6%) in the control group experienced HBV reactivation (P   =   0.003). In the rituximab group, two patients experienced HBV-related severe hepatitis, and one patient died due to hepatic failure. The median time from rituximab desensitization to HBV reactivation was 11 months (range, 5-22 months). By contrast, no patients in the control group experienced severe hepatitis. The status of hepatitis B surface antibody was similar between groups. Rituximab desensitization [hazard ratio (HR), 9.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.74-48.86; P   =   0.009] and hepatitis B surface antibody status (HR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.05-21.23, P =   0.04) were significant risk factors for HBV reactivation. Conclusions Rituximab desensitization for incompatible kidney transplantation significantly increased the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients. Therefore, close monitoring of HBV DNA is required in these patients.

A survival benefit of major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma identified by preoperative [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with well-preserved hepatic function

AIMS Hepatic resection can cure hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal extent of resection remains controversial. Major hepatectomy could minimize a tumor recurrence, but it is harmful due to decreased hepatic functional reserve. [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans are known as their reflection tumor differentiation and biological activity in HCC. To evaluate a benefit of major hepatectomy for HCC, we performed this retrospective analysis in patients with well-preserved hepatic function, and further analyzed in the subset identified by preoperative FDG-PET. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 189 patients with HCC who underwent curative resection between August 2004 and December 2010 at two institutes. All patients underwent anatomical resection, either by major or minor hepatectomy. RESULTS Median overall survival did not differ significantly between the major and minor hepatectomy groups (29.4 versus 26.3 months, p = 0.269). However, the major hepatectomy group had a better recurrence-free survival (24.5 versus 19.9 months, p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, the presence of intrahepatic metastasis independently predicted overall survival (p = 0.009), but other examined variables did not. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival were significantly better following major hepatectomy rather than minor hepatectomy in patients whose preoperative FDG-PET indicated that the maximum standardized uptake value of the tumor (SUVtumor) was ≥4 and the tumor-to-nontumor SUV ratio (TNR) was ≥1.5. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that preoperative FDG-PET may be useful in identifying patients with favorable hepatic reserve who are most likely to benefit from major rather than minor hepatectomy.

The Effect of Bortezomib on Antibody-Mediated Rejection after Kidney Transplantation

Purpose Recently, bortezomib has been used to treat antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) refractory to conventional treatment such as plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab. The authors aimed to describe their experiences when bortezomib was used to treat refractory AMR. Materials and Methods Eleven refractory AMR episodes treated with bortezomib were included in this study. The patients received one or two cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Results Bortezomib effectively reduced antibodies against various targets, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II, ABO blood group antigen, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Antibodies were depleted or reduced significantly in eight AMR episodes. Overall, there was a significant improvement in the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3 months after therapy (36.91±22.15 mL/min/1.73 m2) versus eGFR at time of AMR diagnosis (17.00±9.25 mL/min/1.73 m2; p=0.007). All six early-onset AMR episodes (within 6 months post-transplantation) showed full recovery of allograft function. Additionally, three of the five late-onset AMR episodes (>6 months post-transplantation) showed improved allograft function. Conclusion Anti-humoral treatment based on bortezomib might be an effective strategy against refractory AMR caused by various types of antibodies. Notably, this treatment could be more effective in early-onset AMR than in late-onset AMR.

A 12-Month Single Arm Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus in Combination with Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients at High Immunologic Risk

The optimal immunosuppressive strategy for renal transplant recipients at high immunologic risk remains a topic of investigation. This prospective single arm pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combined tacrolimus and sirolimus regimen in recipients at immunological high risk and to compare outcomes with a contemporaneous control group received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients that received a renal allograft between 2010 and 2011 at high risk (defined as panel reactive antibodies > 50%, 4 or more human leukocyte antigen mismatches, or retransplantation) were enrolled. All patients received basiliximab induction and corticosteroids. A total of 28 recipients treated with tacrolimus and sirolimus were enrolled in this study and 69 recipients were retrospectively reviewed as a control group. The sirolimus group showed a higher, but not statistically significant, incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection and a lower glomerular filtration rate than the control group. Furthermore, sirolimus group was associated with significant increases in BKV infection (P = 0.031), dyslipidemia (P = 0.004), and lymphocele (P = 0.020). The study was terminated prematurely due to a high incidence of adverse events. A de novo tacrolimus/sirolimus combination regimen may not be an ideal choice for recipients at high immunological risk. Graphical Abstract

Risk factors for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in kidney transplantation recipients.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a potentially life-threatening infection that occurs in immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for PJP in kidney transplantation recipients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient data from 500 consecutive kidney transplants performed at Severance Hospital between April 2011 and April 2014. Eighteen kidney transplantation recipients (3.6%) were diagnosed with PJP. In the univariate analysis, acute graft rejection, CMV infection, use of medication for diabetes mellitus, and lowest lymphocyte count were associated with PJP. Recipients who experienced acute graft rejection (odds ratio [OR] 11.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.06–45.57, P < 0.001) or developed CMV infection (OR 5.42, 95% CI 1.69–17.39, P = 0.005) had high odds of PJP in multivariate analysis. In the acute graft rejection subgroup, patients treated with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) had significantly higher odds of PJP (OR 5.25, 95% CI 1.01–27.36, P = 0.006) than those who were not. Our data suggest that acute graft rejection and CMV infection may be risk factors for PJP in kidney transplant patients. The use of ATG for acute graft rejection may increase the risk of PJP.

Efficacy of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin for steroid-resistant acute rejection after liver transplantation

AbstractAcute cellular rejection after liver transplantation (LT) can be treated with steroid pulse therapy, but there is no ideal treatment for steroid-resistant acute rejection (SRAR). We aimed to determine the feasibility and potential complications of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) application to treat SRAR in liver transplant recipients. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 429 recipients who underwent LT at Severance Hospital between January 2010 and March 2015. We compared clinical features and graft survival between patients with steroid-sensitive acute rejection (SSAR; n = 23) and SRAR (n = 11). We also analyzed complications and changes in laboratory findings after 2.5 mg/kg rATG treatment in patients with SRAR for 6 to 10 days. There were no significant differences in gender, age, model for end-stage liver disease score, Child–Turcotte–Pugh score, or original liver diseases between patients with SSAR and SRAR, although deceased donors were more frequently associated with the SRAR group (P = 0.004). All SRAR patients responded positively to rATG treatment; after treatment, the patients’ median AST levels decreased from 138 to 63 IU/L, and their median ALT levels dropped from 327 to 70 IU/L 1 day after rATG treatment (P = 0.022 and 0.017, respectively). Median aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and total bilirubin levels significantly decreased 1 month post-treatment (P = 0.038, 0.004, and 0.041, respectively). Median survival after LT was 23 months, and median survival after rATG was 22 months in patients with SRAR. Adverse effects included hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation, fungemia, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Nine SRAR patients survived with healthy liver function, 1 died from a traffic accident during follow-up, and 1 died from graft-versus-host disease and fungemia. Administration of rATG is an effective therapeutic option for SRAR with acceptable complications in liver transplant recipients. However, the occurrence of HCV reactivation and CMV infection in LT patients should be monitored after rATG treatment in these patients.

Successful kidney transplantation after desensitization in a patient with positive flow crossmatching and donor-specific anti-HLA-DP antibody: A Case report

Background:Traditionally, the presence of antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-C and DP was considered to be associated with only a low risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in kidney transplantation (KT), because the antigenicities of these proteins are weak. However, the clinical effects of HLA-C and -DP donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSHAs) have recently been reevaluated. Methods:Here, we report the case of a retransplant patient with positive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) and high level of HLA-DP DSHA who was desensitized using rituximab, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin. Results:The epitope-based antibody reactivity was identified that the positive B-cell FCXM in our patient was attributable to the specific epitope. The patient underwent a successful retransplantation and has continued to do well for 10 month after KT. Conclusion:If an HLA-DP DSHA is present, it is important to detect any mismatched HLA-DP epitope pretransplantation and to monitor HLA-DP levels carefully. According to previous reports, anti-HLA-DP DSHA can induce ABMR soon after transplantation, but such ABMR can be prevented by pretransplantation desensitization and careful monitoring of DSHA levels.

Oncologic Outcomes of ABO Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction ABO incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi LDLT) could be one of the treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to overcome organ scarcity. However, desensitization protocol including B cell depletion besides traditional T cell suppression could be a risk factor for HCC recurrence that is a major cause of graft failure and patient death. There is no enough data of ABOi LT for HCC patients. Herein, we analyzed oncologic outcomes of ABOi LDLT comparing to ABO compatible LDLT. Method The data of 101 recipients who underwent LDLT for HCC were prospectively collected and reviewed. Of the patients, 21 patients underwent ABOi LT. We compared the pre- and post-transplant tumor factors, HCC recurrence and survival between ABOi and ABOc LT. Result There was no significant difference in pre-transplant tumor staging, recipient and donor demographics between the groups. One and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 89.8% and 86.9% for the ABOc LT group and 85.4% and 80.1% for the ABOi LT, respectively (P=0.439). One and 3-year overall survival rates were 96.3% and 88.1% for the ABOc LT group and 90.5% and 85.2% for the ABOi LT, respectively (P=0.651). In multivariate analysis, a pre-transplant AFP level over 400 ng/mL and a poorly differentiated HCC were the independent risk factor for HCC recurrence. A pre-transplant AFP level over 400 ng/mL were related to poor patient survival. Conclusion The HCC recurrence survival and overall survival of ABOi LT were comparable to those of ABOc LT. ABOi LT is safe and feasible option for HCC patients. Figure. No caption available.