Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Julia Brasch is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Julia Brasch.


Structure | 2011

The Extracellular Architecture of Adherens Junctions Revealed by Crystal Structures of Type I Cadherins

Oliver J. Harrison; Xiangshu Jin; Soonjin Hong; Fabiana Bahna; Goran Ahlsen; Julia Brasch; Yinghao Wu; Jeremie Vendome; Klara Felsovalyi; Cheri M. Hampton; Regina B. Troyanovsky; Avinoam Ben-Shaul; Joachim Frank; Sergey M. Troyanovsky; Lawrence Shapiro; Barry Honig

Adherens junctions, which play a central role in intercellular adhesion, comprise clusters of type I classical cadherins that bind via extracellular domains extended from opposing cell surfaces. We show that a molecular layer seen in crystal structures of E- and N-cadherin ectodomains reported here and in a previous C-cadherin structure corresponds to the extracellular architecture of adherens junctions. In all three ectodomain crystals, cadherins dimerize through a trans adhesive interface and are connected by a second, cis, interface. Assemblies formed by E-cadherin ectodomains coated on liposomes also appear to adopt this structure. Fluorescent imaging of junctions formed from wild-type and mutant E-cadherins in cultured cells confirm conclusions derived from structural evidence. Mutations that interfere with the trans interface ablate adhesion, whereas cis interface mutations disrupt stable junction formation. Our observations are consistent with a model for junction assembly involving strong trans and weak cis interactions localized in the ectodomain.


Science | 2012

Structures from anomalous diffraction of native biological macromolecules

Qun Liu; Tassadite Dahmane; Zhen Zhang; Zahra Assur; Julia Brasch; Lawrence Shapiro; Filippo Mancia; Wayne A. Hendrickson

Finessing Crystal Analysis Protein crystallography has revolutionized our understanding of a whole variety of biological processes (see the Perspective by Evans). In crystallography, the measure of agreement between the data and the calculated model is not on the same scale as the measure of data quality, making it challenging to choose an optimal high resolution limit beyond which the data should be discarded. Now, Karplus and Diederichs (p. 1030) introduce a statistical model that assesses agreement of model and data accuracy on the same scale. Determining the structures of biological macromolecules by x-ray crystallography requires solving the phase problem. The two techniques that dominate phase evaluation (multi- and single-wavelength anomalous diffraction) rely on element-specific scattering from incorporated heavy atoms. Liu et al. (p. 1033) present procedures for routine structure determination of native proteins with no heavy atom incorporation. The technique, which relies on combining data from multiple crystals, was used to determine the structures of four native proteins, including a 1200-residue complex. Don’t get MAD or be SAD; try lower energy. Crystal structure analyses for biological macromolecules without known structural relatives entail solving the crystallographic phase problem. Typical de novo phase evaluations depend on incorporating heavier atoms than those found natively; most commonly, multi- or single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD or SAD) experiments exploit selenomethionyl proteins. Here, we realize routine structure determination using intrinsic anomalous scattering from native macromolecules. We devised robust procedures for enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio in the slight anomalous scattering from generic native structures by combining data measured from multiple crystals at lower-than-usual x-ray energy. Using this multicrystal SAD method (5 to 13 equivalent crystals), we determined structures at modest resolution (2.8 to 2.3 angstroms) for native proteins varying in size (127 to 1148 unique residues) and number of sulfur sites (3 to 28). With no requirement for heavy-atom incorporation, such experiments provide an attractive alternative to selenomethionyl SAD experiments.


Nature Structural & Molecular Biology | 2010

T-cadherin structures reveal a novel adhesive binding mechanism

Carlo Ciatto; Fabiana Bahna; Niccolò Zampieri; Harper C VanSteenhouse; Phini S Katsamba; Goran Ahlsen; Oliver J. Harrison; Julia Brasch; Xiangshu Jin; Shoshana Posy; Jeremie Vendome; Barbara Ranscht; Thomas M. Jessell; Barry Honig; Lawrence Shapiro

Vertebrate genomes encode 19 classical cadherins and about 100 nonclassical cadherins. Adhesion by classical cadherins depends on binding interactions in their N-terminal EC1 domains, which swap N-terminal β-strands between partner molecules from apposing cells. However, strand-swapping sequence signatures are absent from nonclassical cadherins, raising the question of how these proteins function in adhesion. Here, we show that T-cadherin, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cadherin, forms dimers through an alternative nonswapped interface near the EC1-EC2 calcium-binding sites. Mutations within this interface ablate the adhesive capacity of T-cadherin. These nonadhesive T-cadherin mutants also lose the ability to regulate neurite outgrowth from T-cadherin–expressing neurons. Our findings reveal the likely molecular architecture of the T-cadherin homophilic interface and its requirement for axon outgrowth regulation. The adhesive binding mode used by T-cadherin may also be used by other nonclassical cadherins.


Nature Structural & Molecular Biology | 2012

Nectin ectodomain structures reveal a canonical adhesive interface.

Oliver J. Harrison; Jeremie Vendome; Julia Brasch; Xiangshu Jin; Soonjin Hong; Phinikoula S. Katsamba; Goran Ahlsen; Regina B. Troyanovsky; Sergey M. Troyanovsky; Barry Honig; Lawrence Shapiro

Nectins are immunoglobulin superfamily glycoproteins that mediate intercellular adhesion in many vertebrate tissues. Homophilic and heterophilic interactions between nectin family members help mediate tissue patterning. We determined the homophilic binding affinities and heterophilic specificities of all four nectins and the related protein nectin-like 5 (Necl-5) from human and mouse, revealing a range of homophilic interaction strengths and a defined heterophilic specificity pattern. To understand the molecular basis of their adhesion and specificity, we determined the crystal structures of natively glycosylated full ectodomains or adhesive fragments of all four nectins and Necl-5. All of the crystal structures revealed dimeric nectins bound through a stereotyped interface that was previously proposed to represent a cis dimer. However, conservation of this interface and the results of targeted cross-linking experiments showed that this dimer probably represents the adhesive trans interaction. The structure of the dimer provides a simple molecular explanation for the adhesive binding specificity of nectins.


Journal of Molecular Biology | 2011

Structure and binding mechanism of vascular endothelial cadherin: a divergent classical cadherin.

Julia Brasch; Oliver J. Harrison; Goran Ahlsen; Stewart M. Carnally; Robert M. Henderson; Barry Honig; Lawrence Shapiro

Vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin), a divergent member of the type II classical cadherin family of cell adhesion proteins, mediates homophilic adhesion in the vascular endothelium. Previous investigations with a bacterially produced protein suggested that VE-cadherin forms cell surface trimers that bind between apposed cells to form hexamers. Here we report studies of mammalian-produced VE-cadherin ectodomains suggesting that, like other classical cadherins, VE-cadherin forms adhesive trans dimers between monomers located on opposing cell surfaces. Trimerization of the bacterially produced protein appears to be an artifact that arises from a lack of glycosylation. We also present the 2.1-Å-resolution crystal structure of the VE-cadherin EC1-2 adhesive region, which reveals homodimerization via the strand-swap mechanism common to classical cadherins. In common with type II cadherins, strand-swap binding involves two tryptophan anchor residues, but the adhesive interface resembles type I cadherins in that VE-cadherin does not form a large nonswapped hydrophobic surface. Thus, VE-cadherin is an outlier among classical cadherins, with characteristics of both type I and type II subfamilies.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2016

Structural basis of adhesive binding by desmocollins and desmogleins.

Oliver J. Harrison; Julia Brasch; Gorka Lasso; Phinikoula S. Katsamba; Goran Ahlsen; Barry Honig; Lawrence Shapiro

Significance Desmosomes are crucial for the integrity of tissues that undergo mechanical stress. Their intercellular attachments are assembled from desmogleins (Dsgs) and desmocollins (Dscs), two families of specialized cadherins whose structures and interactions have remained uncharacterized. Our study demonstrates family-wise heterophilic interactions between these proteins, with all Dsgs forming adhesive dimers with all Dscs. Crystal structures of ectodomains from Dsg2 and Dsg3 and from Dsc1 and Dsc2 show binding through a strand-swap mechanism similar to that of classical cadherins, which we show underlie heterophilic interactions. Conserved compatibly charged amino acids in the interfaces promote heterophilic Dsg:Dsc interactions. We show that Dsg:Dsc heterodimers represent the fundamental adhesive unit of desmosomes and provide a structural framework for understanding the extracellular assembly of desmosomes. Desmosomes are intercellular adhesive junctions that impart strength to vertebrate tissues. Their dense, ordered intercellular attachments are formed by desmogleins (Dsgs) and desmocollins (Dscs), but the nature of trans-cellular interactions between these specialized cadherins is unclear. Here, using solution biophysics and coated-bead aggregation experiments, we demonstrate family-wise heterophilic specificity: All Dsgs form adhesive dimers with all Dscs, with affinities characteristic of each Dsg:Dsc pair. Crystal structures of ectodomains from Dsg2 and Dsg3 and from Dsc1 and Dsc2 show binding through a strand-swap mechanism similar to that of homophilic classical cadherins. However, conserved charged amino acids inhibit Dsg:Dsg and Dsc:Dsc interactions by same-charge repulsion and promote heterophilic Dsg:Dsc interactions through opposite-charge attraction. These findings show that Dsg:Dsc heterodimers represent the fundamental adhesive unit of desmosomes and provide a structural framework for understanding desmosome assembly.


Structure | 2008

Crystal structures of β-neurexin 1 and β-neurexin 2 ectodomains and dynamics of splice insertion sequence 4

Jesko Koehnke; Xiangshu Jin; Nikola Trbovic; Phinikoula S. Katsamba; Julia Brasch; Goran Ahlsen; Peter Scheiffele; Barry Honig; Arthur G. Palmer; Lawrence Shapiro

Presynaptic neurexins (NRXs) bind to postsynaptic neuroligins (NLs) to form Ca(2+)-dependent complexes that bridge neural synapses. beta-NRXs bind NLs through their LNS domains, which contain a single site of alternative splicing (splice site 4) giving rise to two isoforms: +4 and Delta. We present crystal structures of the Delta isoforms of the LNS domains from beta-NRX1 and beta-NRX2, crystallized in the presence of Ca(2+) ions. The Ca(2+)-binding site is disordered in the beta-NRX2 structure, but the 1.7 A beta-NRX1 structure reveals a single Ca(2+) ion, approximately 12 A from the splice insertion site, with one coordinating ligand donated by a glutamic acid from an adjacent beta-NRX1 molecule. NMR studies of beta-NRX1+4 show that the insertion sequence is unstructured, and remains at least partially disordered in complex with NL. These results raise the possibility that beta-NRX insertion sequence 4 may function in roles independent of neuroligin binding.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2017

Discovery of an O-mannosylation pathway selectively serving cadherins and protocadherins

Ida Signe Bohse Larsen; Yoshiki Narimatsu; Hiren J. Joshi; Lina Siukstaite; Oliver J. Harrison; Julia Brasch; Kerry Goodman; Lars Kai Hansen; Lawrence Shapiro; Barry Honig; Sergey Y. Vakhrushev; Henrik Clausen; Adnan Halim

Significance The large superfamily of cadherins serve essential roles in cell–cell interactions and guidance. The extracellular cadherin (EC) domains responsible for the biological functions are decorated with O-linked mannose glycans, but the functions of these O-glycans are poorly understood. Here we describe an O-mannosylation pathway orchestrated by four homologous TMTC1–4 genes that is dedicated selectively to the cadherin superfamily. Mutations in the TMTC3 gene cause cobblestone lissencephaly, demonstrating the importance of this type of O-mannosylation. The cadherin (cdh) superfamily of adhesion molecules carry O-linked mannose (O-Man) glycans at highly conserved sites localized to specific β-strands of their extracellular cdh (EC) domains. These O-Man glycans do not appear to be elongated like O-Man glycans found on α-dystroglycan (α-DG), and we recently demonstrated that initiation of cdh/protocadherin (pcdh) O-Man glycosylation is not dependent on the evolutionary conserved POMT1/POMT2 enzymes that initiate O-Man glycosylation on α-DG. Here, we used a CRISPR/Cas9 genetic dissection strategy combined with sensitive and quantitative O-Man glycoproteomics to identify a homologous family of four putative protein O-mannosyltransferases encoded by the TMTC1–4 genes, which were found to be imperative for cdh and pcdh O-Man glycosylation. KO of all four TMTC genes in HEK293 cells resulted in specific loss of cdh and pcdh O-Man glycosylation, whereas combined KO of TMTC1 and TMTC3 resulted in selective loss of O-Man glycans on specific β-strands of EC domains, suggesting that each isoenzyme serves a different function. In addition, O-Man glycosylation of IPT/TIG domains of plexins and hepatocyte growth factor receptor was not affected in TMTC KO cells, suggesting the existence of yet another O-Man glycosylation machinery. Our study demonstrates that regulation of O-mannosylation in higher eukaryotes is more complex than envisioned, and the discovery of the functions of TMTCs provide insight into cobblestone lissencephaly caused by deficiency in TMTC3.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2017

Mammalian O-mannosylation of cadherins and plexins is independent of protein O-mannosyltransferases 1 and 2.

Ida Signe Bohse Larsen; Yoshiki Narimatsu; Hiren J. Joshi; Zhang Yang; Oliver J. Harrison; Julia Brasch; Lawrence Shapiro; Barry Honig; Sergey Y. Vakhrushev; Henrik Clausen; Adnan Halim

Protein O-mannosylation is found in yeast and metazoans, and a family of conserved orthologous protein O-mannosyltransferases is believed to initiate this important post-translational modification. We recently discovered that the cadherin superfamily carries O-linked mannose (O-Man) glycans at highly conserved residues in specific extracellular cadherin domains, and it was suggested that the function of E-cadherin was dependent on the O-Man glycans. Deficiencies in enzymes catalyzing O-Man biosynthesis, including the two human protein O-mannosyltransferases, POMT1 and POMT2, underlie a subgroup of congenital muscular dystrophies designated α-dystroglycanopathies, because deficient O-Man glycosylation of α-dystroglycan disrupts laminin interaction with α-dystroglycan and the extracellular matrix. To explore the functions of O-Man glycans on cadherins and protocadherins, we used a combinatorial gene-editing strategy in multiple cell lines to evaluate the role of the two POMTs initiating O-Man glycosylation and the major enzyme elongating O-Man glycans, the protein O-mannose β-1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, POMGnT1. Surprisingly, O-mannosylation of cadherins and protocadherins does not require POMT1 and/or POMT2 in contrast to α-dystroglycan, and moreover, the O-Man glycans on cadherins are not elongated. Thus, the classical and evolutionarily conserved POMT O-mannosylation pathway is essentially dedicated to α-dystroglycan and a few other proteins, whereas a novel O-mannosylation process in mammalian cells is predicted to serve the large cadherin superfamily and other proteins.


eLife | 2018

Routine single particle CryoEM sample and grid characterization by tomography

Alex J. Noble; Venkata P. Dandey; Hui Wei; Julia Brasch; Jillian Chase; Priyamvada Acharya; Yong Zi Tan; Zhening Zhang; Laura Y. Kim; Giovanna Scapin; Micah Rapp; Edward T. Eng; William J Rice; Anchi Cheng; Carl J Negro; Lawrence Shapiro; Peter D. Kwong; David Jeruzalmi; Amedee des Georges; Clinton S. Potter; Bridget Carragher

Single particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) is often performed under the assumption that particles are not adsorbed to the air-water interfaces and in thin, vitreous ice. In this study, we performed fiducial-less tomography on over 50 different cryoEM grid/sample preparations to determine the particle distribution within the ice and the overall geometry of the ice in grid holes. Surprisingly, by studying particles in holes in 3D from over 1000 tomograms, we have determined that the vast majority of particles (approximately 90%) are adsorbed to an air-water interface. The implications of this observation are wide-ranging, with potential ramifications regarding protein denaturation, conformational change, and preferred orientation. We also show that fiducial-less cryo-electron tomography on single particle grids may be used to determine ice thickness, optimal single particle collection areas and strategies, particle heterogeneity, and de novo models for template picking and single particle alignment.

Collaboration


Dive into the Julia Brasch's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barry Honig

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Phinikoula S. Katsamba

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge