Julian A. Sanchez

BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with distinct clinical characteristics and worse prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with multiple underlying genetic mutations causing different clinical phenotypes. Mutation in the BRAF oncogene is a key step in malignant transformation within the methylator pathway to colorectal cancer. However, there is a paucity of information about BRAF mutant colorectal tumors. OBJECTIVE: This study defines the clinical characteristics and oncologic outcome associated with colorectal cancer BRAF mutations. DESIGN: Colorectal adenocarcinomas from a single-institution frozen-tumor biobank were studied. Genomic DNA was isolated and analyzed for mutations in the BRAF oncogene by polymerase chain reaction amplification followed by direct sequencing. A sample was classified as mutant if any of the tested loci were mutated. Patient and tumor characteristics were recorded including patient age, sex, tumor location, tumor differentiation, and microsatellite instability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statistical associations with BRAF mutant tumors were determined by the Fisher exact probability test, &khgr;2 test, or Wilcoxon analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed for overall survival. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-five colorectal adenocarcinomas were included in the study population; 56 samples harbored a BRAF mutation (12%). There were significant differences between BRAF wild-type and mutant tumors in age (66 vs 75 years, p = 0.004), female sex (44% vs 71%, p < 0.001), proximal tumor location (44% vs 95%, p < 0.001), and frequency of microsatellite instability (16% vs 76%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in cancer stage between BRAF mutant and wild-type populations. Survival data were analyzed for 322 patients with stage I to III disease, and patients with a BRAF mutation had decreased overall survival than those without a mutation (p = 0.018). With the use of Cox regression analysis, BRAF mutation conferred a worse overall survival (HR 1.79, CI 1.05–3.05, p = 0.03) independent of microsatellite instability status. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF mutations in colorectal cancers are associated with distinct clinical characteristics and worse prognosis.

Genetic and epigenetic classifications define clinical phenotypes and determine patient outcomes in colorectal cancer

A molecular classification of colorectal cancer has been proposed based on microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and mutations in the KRAS and BRAF oncogenes. This study examined the prevalence of these molecular classes, and differences in clinical presentation and outcome.

Divergent Oncogenic Changes Influence Survival Differences between Colon and Rectal Adenocarcinomas

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancers develop through various mechanisms such as chromosomal instability, DNA mismatch repair deficiency (microsatellite instability), and epigenetic DNA promoter methylation (CpG island methylator phenotype). This study evaluated the disparity in neoplastic changes between colon and rectal cancers. METHODS: A clinic-based colorectal frozen tumor bank at a single institution was queried for colon and rectal adenocarcinomas. Tumor DNA was extracted and analyzed for microsatellite instability, methylation, and mutations in the oncogenes KRAS and BRAF. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The 268 patients with colon cancer and 89 with rectal cancer were similar in gender, tumor size, stage, and differentiation. Colon cancers had a higher incidence of microsatellite instability (27 percent) and methylator phenotype (28 percent) compared with rectal cancers (7 percent, 3 percent, respectively; P < 0.001). Although KRAS mutation rate was similar, colon cancers had a higher incidence of BRAF mutations (16.7 percent vs. 0 percent; P < 0.001). Microsatellite stable tumors had an increased risk of disease recurrence compared with microsatellite unstable tumors (odds ratio, 3.86). Despite overall differences in outcome between colon and rectal cancers, no significant difference in survival existed when similar molecular phenotypes were compared across anatomic sites. CONCLUSIONS: Although colon cancers are molecularly heterogeneous, rectal cancers arise mostly via a single neoplastic pathway. Genetic and molecular differences influence prognosis more than anatomic location and suggest that oncogenic pathways contribute to survival differences between colon and rectal cancers.

Mutated in Colorectal Cancer, a Putative Tumor Suppressor for Serrated Colorectal Cancer, Selectively Represses β-catenin-Dependent Transcription

Mutated in colorectal cancer (MCC) was originally identified as a candidate gene for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) but further study identified adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) as responsible for FAP and the physiologic/pathologic roles of MCC remained poorly understood. Recently, MCC promoter methylation was discovered as a frequent early event in a distinct subset of precursor lesions and colorectal cancer (CRC) associated with the serrated CRC pathway. Here we provide the first evidence of the biological significance of MCC loss in CRC and the molecular pathways involved. We show MCC expression is dramatically decreased in many CRC cell lines and the distinct subset of sporadic CRC characterized by the CpG island methylator phenotype and BRAFV600E mutation due to promoter methylation as reported previously. Importantly, we find MCC interacts with β-catenin and that reexpression of MCC in CRC cells specifically inhibits Wnt signaling, β-catenin/T-cell factor/lymphoid-enhancer factor-dependent transcription and cellular proliferation even in the presence of oncogenic mutant APC. We also show that MCC is localized in the nucleus and identify two functional nuclear localization signals. Taken together, MCC is a nuclear, β-catenin-interacting protein that can act as a potential tumor suppressor in the serrated CRC pathway by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction.

Relative role of methylator and tumor suppressor pathways in ulcerative colitis-associated colon cancer

Background: Chronic ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with an increased colorectal cancer risk which may be secondary to repetitive mucosal injury. Both epigenetic methylation and the classic adenoma‐to‐carcinoma sequence have been implicated in this malignant transformation, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly defined. This study compares the molecular characteristics of colitis‐associated and common colorectal cancers. Methods: Nineteen patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas arising within UC were matched for age and cancer site with 54 patients with sporadic adenocarcinomas. Tumor tissue was examined for BRAF mutations, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and MLH1 promoter methylation. Mutations of KRAS and p53 were assessed by sequencing. Results: Patient demographics were similar for the two groups. CIMP was observed in 22% of sporadic colorectal cancers and in 5% of UC cancers (P = 0.162). Rates of BRAF mutation (4% vs 5%, P = 1.0), MLH1 methylation (9% versus 5%, P = 0.682), and KRAS mutations (24% versus 32%, P = 0.552) were similar between the groups. However, colitis‐associated colorectal cancers were more likely to have a p53 mutation compared to sporadic adenocarcinomas (95% versus 53%, P = 0.001). The dominant mutation for colitis‐associated cancers was a mutation in codon 4, representing half of the mutations. Furthermore, colitis‐associated cancers had a higher rate of mutation in codon 8 (48% versus 6%, P < 0.001) than sporadic counterparts. Conclusions: Unlike other inflammatory gastrointestinal cancers, colitis‐associated colorectal cancers do not preferentially arise via a methylator pathway when compared to sporadic colorectal cancers. Chromosomal instability remains an important etiology, but with a unique p53 frequency and mutation pattern. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010;)

Identifying Lynch Syndrome: We Are All Responsible

PurposeThe Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines are used to identify patients with Lynch syndrome. A family history of Lynch syndrome-related cancers or histopathology suggestive of microsatellite instability should prompt responses by the pathologist and clinician. This study evaluated the impact of microsatellite instability pathology findings on Lynch syndrome evaluation by clinicians.MethodsMicrosatellite unstable tumors were identified from a maintained tissue bank, and MLH1 methylation was determined. Clinical information and management recommendations by the pathologist and clinician were collected from the medical record.ResultsFifty-one patients with microsatellite unstable colorectal tumors were identified between 2003 and 2006. Thirteen (25 percent) patients were appropriately referred for additional testing, including eight with documented microsatellite instability histology and five based on history alone. Thirty-seven (73 percent) patients with microsatellite unstable tumors were not detected by pathologists or clinicians, and no additional workup for Lynch syndrome was performed. Two patients met Amsterdam criteria and represent potentially missed Lynch syndrome.ConclusionsMicrosatellite instability-H histology was the driving force for the Lynch syndrome evaluation. Histopathology alone failed to identify all potential Lynch syndrome patients. Omission of an adequate familial risk assessment may lead to missed diagnosis of Lynch syndrome when suspicious histopathology fails to trigger appropriate testing.

Genetic and molecular diversity of colon cancer hepatic metastases

BACKGROUND Colon cancer arises through distinct molecular pathways resulting in diverse tumor populations demonstrated by differences in microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and mutations in oncogenes KRAS and BRAF. Although these molecular differences are well-described for primary neoplasms, the molecular nature of hepatic metastases is not well-characterized. This study seeks to describe molecular characteristics of colon cancer hepatic metastases in terms of oncogenic pathway. METHODS Tumor DNA was isolated from fresh frozen hepatic metastases from colon cancer and analyzed for MSI by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based microsatellite analysis and for CIMP using MethyLight quantitative PCR. KRAS and BRAF oncogenes were analyzed for DNA mutations. Metastases were classified by their molecular and genetic features. Unfortunately, tissue from the primary neoplasms from these patients were not available RESULTS Thirty patients with liver metastases from colon cancer were studied. Molecular analysis revealed 10% (3/30) were MSI-H, 10% (3/30) were CIMP positive, 33% (10/30) had KRAS mutations, and none had BRAF mutations. Literature describing primary colon cancers reports an incidence of approximately 20% MSI-H, 20% CIMP-positive, 35% KRAS mutants, and 17% BRAF mutants. CONCLUSION Hepatic metastases from colon cancer, like primary colon adenocarcinomas, show genetic and molecular diversity. Furthermore, hepatic metastases may have a different incidence of MSI and methylation compared with primary neoplasms. These differences could impact treatment decisions.

CEACAM-7: A predictive marker for rectal cancer recurrence

BACKGROUND The identification of rectal cancer patients predisposed to developing recurrent disease could allow directed adjuvant therapy to improve outcomes while decreasing unnecessary morbidity. This study evaluates carcinoembryonic antigen cellular adhesion molecule-7 (CEACAM-7) expression in rectal cancer as a predictive recurrence factor. METHODS A single-institution colorectal cancer database and a frozen tissue biobank were queried for rectal cancer patients. CEACAM-7 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression from normal rectal mucosa and rectal cancers was analyzed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Expression-level differences among normal tissue, disease-free survivors, and those that developed recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS Eighty-four patients were included in the study, which consisted of 37 patients with nonrecurrent disease (median follow-up, 170 months), 29 patients with recurrent disease, and 18 patients with stage IV disease. CEACAM-7 expression was decreased 21-fold in rectal cancers compared with normal mucosa (P = .002). The expression levels of CEACAM-7 were relatively decreased in tumors that developed recurrence compared with nonrecurrence, significantly for stage II patients (14-fold relative decrease, P = .002). For stages I-III, disease-free survival segregates were based on relative CEACAM-7 expression values (P = .036), specifically for stage II (P = .018). CONCLUSION CEACAM-7 expression is significantly decreased in rectal cancer. Expression differences between long-term survivors and those with recurrent disease introduce a potential tumor marker to define a subset of patients who benefit most from adjuvant therapy.