Lisa M. Krumroy

RNASEL Arg462Gln variant is implicated in up to 13% of prostate cancer cases.

RNASEL (encoding ribonuclease L) has recently been proposed as a candidate for the hereditary prostate cancer (HPC1) gene. We determined that the RNASEL variant Arg462Gln has three times less enzymatic activity than the wildtype and is significantly associated with prostate cancer risk (P = 0.007). At least one copy of the mutated allele that causes this substitution is carried by nearly 60% of the men in our study. Men that are heterozygous with respect to the mutated allele have 50% greater risk of prostate cancer than non-carriers, and homozygotes have more than double the risk.

Genetic and epigenetic classifications define clinical phenotypes and determine patient outcomes in colorectal cancer

A molecular classification of colorectal cancer has been proposed based on microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and mutations in the KRAS and BRAF oncogenes. This study examined the prevalence of these molecular classes, and differences in clinical presentation and outcome.

Prostate cancer aggressiveness locus on chromosome segment 19q12–q13.1 identified by linkage and allelic imbalance studies

Whole‐genome scan studies recently identified a locus on chromosome segments 19q12–q13.11 linked to prostate tumor aggressiveness by use of the Gleason score as a quantitative trait. We have now completed finer‐scale linkage mapping across this region that confirmed and narrowed the candidate region to 2 cM, with a peak between markers D19S875 and D19S433. We also performed allelic imbalance (AI) studies across this region in primary prostate tumors from 52 patients unselected for family history or disease status. A high level of AI was observed, with the highest rates at markers D19S875 (56%) and D19S433 (60%). Furthermore, these two markers defined a smallest common region of AI of 0.8 Mb, with 15 (29%) prostate tumors displaying interstitial AI involving one or both markers. In addition, we noted a positive association between AI at marker D19S875 and extension of tumor beyond the margin (P = 0.02) as well as a higher Gleason score (P = 0.06). These data provide strong evidence that we have mapped a prostate tumor aggressiveness locus to chromosome segments 19q12–q13.11 that may play a role in both familial and non‐familial forms of prostate cancer.

MIC1 and IL1RN Genetic Variation and Advanced Prostate Cancer Risk

Recently, polymorphisms in macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 ( MIC1 ) and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist ( IL1RN ) were identified to be associated with prostate cancer risk ([1][1]-[3][2]). MIC-1 is a divergent member of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily of cytokines. In the Cancer

Ascending the learning curve – MSI testing experience of a six-laboratory consortium

According to recently published guidelines, microsatellite instability (MSI) testing of colorectal cancers may be clinically indicated on a significant proportion of all colorectal tumors. To date, nothing has been published regarding the reproducibility of MSI testing between laboratories. We present MSI quality control activities experience of a six center multinational consortium, as laboratories developed competency with MSI testing and interpretation. The aim of this paper is to share lessons learned and to describe the final concordance rates in scoring MSI markers within this consortium.

Chromosomal autonomy of hMLH1 methylation in colon cancer

Silencing of hMLH1 expression by aberrant hMLH1 promoter methylation accounts for the majority of sporadic colon cancers with microsatellite instability. We have previously shown hMLH1 silencing is biallelic and actively maintained. To study the mechanism of aberrant hMLH1 methylation, we assayed whether an hMLH1 methylated cell could transfer methylation and silencing to an exogenous hMLH1 promoter in somatic cell hybrids between hMLH1 methylated-silenced and hMLH1 unmethylated-expressing colon cancer cells. Conversely, we assayed whether these hybrids could reactivate expression of initially methylated and silenced hMLH1 alleles. Compellingly, within the hybrids each hMLH1 allele remained unchanged, retaining the expression status of its parental cell of origin. This chromosomal autonomy may not be simply determined by DNA methylation, as it is reasserted after experimentally forced demethylation of all hMLH1 alleles in the hybrids. Confirming findings included hMLH1 methylated cells being unable to methylate single transferred exogenous hMLH1 expressing chromosomes or transfected hMLH1 reporter constructs. hMLH1 silencing does not conform to either a dominant or recessive model, and is not determined by trans-acting factors differing between hMLH1 expressing or silenced genomes. We posit that hMLH1 methylation is dependent on and maintained by cis chromosomal marks, whose nature remains to be elucidated.

Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a clinic‐based series of breast and ovarian cancer families

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for a significant proportion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer cases. In this study, we sought to determine the frequency of BRCA1‐ and BRCA2‐mutation carrier families in a hospital‐based cancer family registry. The frequency of families with germline truncating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was 17.3% (18/104) and 1.9% (2/104), respectively. Two novel truncating mutations, BRCA1 1848delGA and BRCA2 5694insT, were identified. We also sought to determine the carrier frequency of other affected family members for which the mutation lineage could be established within these families. Not including the probands, 72% (18/25) of the affected family members within the BRCA1 mutation‐associated families were carriers, and all four affected members of the BRCA2 families were carriers. These data imply that risk evaluation based on cancer family history alone may result in inaccurate estimates, and where possible, mutation testing should be considered in other affected family members to verify carrier status.