Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Julie C. Pearson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Julie C. Pearson.


PLOS ONE | 2011

A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Stefan Monecke; Geoffrey W. Coombs; Anna C. Shore; David C. Coleman; Patrick Eberechi Akpaka; Michael A. Borg; Henry Chow; Margaret Ip; Lutz Jatzwauk; Daniel Jonas; Kristina Kadlec; Angela M. Kearns; Frédéric Laurent; Frances G. O'Brien; Julie C. Pearson; Antje Ruppelt; Stefan Schwarz; E.A. Scicluna; Peter Slickers; Hui-Leen Tan; Stefan Weber; Ralf Ehricht

In recent years, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have become a truly global challenge. In addition to the long-known healthcare-associated clones, novel strains have also emerged outside of the hospital settings, in the community as well as in livestock. The emergence and spread of virulent clones expressing Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) is an additional cause for concern. In order to provide an overview of pandemic, epidemic and sporadic strains, more than 3,000 clinical and veterinary isolates of MRSA mainly from Germany, the United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Malta, Abu Dhabi, Hong Kong, Australia, Trinidad & Tobago as well as some reference strains from the United States have been genotyped by DNA microarray analysis. This technique allowed the assignment of the MRSA isolates to 34 distinct lineages which can be clearly defined based on non-mobile genes. The results were in accordance with data from multilocus sequence typing. More than 100 different strains were distinguished based on affiliation to these lineages, SCCmec type and the presence or absence of PVL. These strains are described here mainly with regard to clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance- and virulence-associated markers, but also in relation to epidemiology and geographic distribution. The findings of the study show a high level of biodiversity among MRSA, especially among strains harbouring SCCmec IV and V elements. The data also indicate a high rate of genetic recombination in MRSA involving SCC elements, bacteriophages or other mobile genetic elements and large-scale chromosomal replacements.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 2004

Genetic Diversity among Community Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Causing Outpatient Infections in Australia

Geoffrey W. Coombs; Graeme R. Nimmo; Jan M. Bell; Flavia Huygens; Frances G. O'Brien; Mary J. Malkowski; Julie C. Pearson; Alex J. Stephens; Philip M. Giffard

ABSTRACT Increasing reports of the appearance of novel nonmultiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA (MRSA) strains in the community and of the spread of hospital MRSA strains into the community are cause for public health concern. We conducted two national surveys of unique isolates of S. aureus from clinical specimens collected from nonhospitalized patients commencing in 2000 and 2002, respectively. A total of 11.7% of 2,498 isolates from 2000 and 15.4% of 2,486 isolates from 2002 were MRSA. Approximately 54% of the MRSA isolates were nonmultiresistant (resistant to less than three of nine antibiotics) in both surveys. The majority of multiresistant MRSA isolates in both surveys belonged to two strains (strains AUS-2 and AUS-3), as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and resistogram typing. The 3 AUS-2 isolates and 10 of the 11 AUS-3 isolates selected for multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec) analysis were ST239-MRSA-III (where ST is the sequence type) and thus belonged to the same clone as the eastern Australian MRSA strain of the 1980s, which spread internationally. Four predominant clones of novel nonmultiresistant MRSA were identified by PFGE, MLST, and SCCmec analysis: ST22-MRSA-IV (strain EMRSA-15), ST1-MRSA-IV (strain WA-1), ST30-MRSA-IV (strain SWP), and ST93-MRSA-IV (strain Queensland). The last three clones are associated with community acquisition. A total of 14 STs were identified in the surveys, including six unique clones of novel nonmultiresistant MRSA, namely, STs 73, 93, 129, 75, and 80slv and a new ST. SCCmec types IV and V were present in diverse genetic backgrounds. These findings provide support for the acquisition of SCCmec by multiple lineages of S. aureus. They also confirm that both hospital and community strains of MRSA are now common in nonhospitalized patients throughout Australia.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2006

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones, Western Australia.

Geoffrey W. Coombs; Julie C. Pearson; Frances G. O'Brien; Ronan Murray; W.B. Grubb; Keryn Christiansen

The emergence of multiple multidrug-resistant Panton-Valentine leukocidin–positive MRSA clones in the community is a major public health concern.


BMC Microbiology | 2011

Evolution and diversity of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a geographical region

Geoffrey W. Coombs; Stefan Monecke; Julie C. Pearson; Hui-Leen Tan; Yi-Kong Chew; Lynne Wilson; Ralf Ehricht; Frances G. O'Brien; Keryn Christiansen

BackgroundCommunity-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) was first reported in remote regions of Western Australia and is now the predominant MRSA isolated in the state. The objective of this study is to determine the genetic relatedness of Western Australian CA-MRSA clones within different multilocus sequence type (MLST) clonal clusters providing an insight into the frequency of S. aureus SCCmec acquisition within a region.ResultsThe CA-MRSA population in Western Australia is genetically diverse consisting of 83 unique pulsed-field gel electrophoresis strains from which 46 MLSTs have been characterised. Forty five of these sequence types are from 18 MLST clonal clusters and two singletons. While SCCmec IV and V are the predominant SCCmec elements, SCCmec VIII and several novel and composite SCCmec elements are present. The emergence of MRSA in diverse S. aureus clonal clusters suggests horizontal transmission of the SCCmec element has occurred on multiple occasions. Furthermore DNA microarray and spa typing suggests horizontal transfer of SCCmec elements has also occurred within the same CC. For many single and double locus variant CA-MRSA clones only a few isolates have been detected.ConclusionsAlthough multiple CA-MRSA clones have evolved in the Western Australian community only three clones have successfully adapted to the Western Australian community environment. These data suggest the successful evolution of a CA-MRSA clone may not only depend on the mobility of the SCCmec element but also on other genetic determinants.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2010

Differentiation of Clonal Complex 59 Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Western Australia

Geoffrey W. Coombs; Stefan Monecke; Ralf Ehricht; Peter Slickers; Julie C. Pearson; Hui-Leen Tan; Keryn Christiansen; Frances G. O'Brien

ABSTRACT Clonal complex 59 (CC59) community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) strains were characterized using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, spa typing, multilocus sequence typing, diagnostic DNA microarrays, and PCRs targeting staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) elements and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). Six distinct groups within CC59 were characterized. At least seven different variants of SCCmec elements were identified (IVa [2B], IVb [2B], IVd [2B], IV variant [2B], IVa [2B&5], V variant [5C2], and V [5C2&5]). (The structural type is indicated by a Roman numeral, with a lowercase letter indicating the subtype, and the ccr complex and the mec complex are indicated by an Arabic numeral and an uppercase letter, respectively. Where there is an extra ccr element, this is indicated by “&” and an Arabic numeral designating the ccr type.) The first group is similar to the American sequence type 59 (ST59) MRSA-IV CA-MRSA strain USA1000. The second group includes a PVL-negative ST87 strain with an SCCmec element of subtype IVb (2B). The third group comprises PVL-variable ST59 MRSA-IV strains harboring multiple SCCmec IV subtypes. PVL-negative ST59 MRSA strains with multiple or composite SCCmec elements (IVa [2B&5]) form the fourth group. Group 5 corresponds to the internationally known “Taiwan clone,” a PVL-positive strain with a variant SCCmec element (V [5C2&5]). This strain proved to be the most common CC59 MRSA strain isolated in Western Australia. Finally, group 6 encompasses the ST59 MRSA-V variant (5C2). The differentiation of CC59 into groups and strains indicates a rapid evolution and spread of SCCmec elements. Observed differences between groups of strains as well as intrastrain variability within a group facilitate the tracing of their spread.


PLOS ONE | 2010

Community-Acquired Pneumonia Due to Pandemic A(H1N1)2009 Influenzavirus and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Co-Infection

Ronan Murray; James O. Robinson; Jodi N. White; Frank Hughes; Geoffrey W. Coombs; Julie C. Pearson; Hui-Leen Tan; Glenys Chidlow; Simon Williams; Keryn Christiansen; David W. Smith

Background Bacterial pneumonia is a well described complication of influenza. In recent years, community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (cMRSA) infection has emerged as a contributor to morbidity and mortality in patients with influenza. Since the emergence and rapid dissemination of pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenzavirus in April 2009, initial descriptions of the clinical features of patients hospitalized with pneumonia have contained few details of patients with bacterial co-infection. Methodology/Principal Findings Patients with community–acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by co-infection with pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenzavirus and cMRSA were prospectively identified at two tertiary hospitals in one Australian city during July to September 2009, the period of intense influenza activity in our region. Detailed characterization of the cMRSA isolates was performed. 252 patients with pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenzavirus infection were admitted at the two sites during the period of study. Three cases of CAP due to pandemic A(H1N1)2009/cMRSA co-infection were identified. The clinical features of these patients were typical of those with S. aureus co-infection or sequential infection following influenza. The 3 patients received appropriate empiric therapy for influenza, but inappropriate empiric therapy for cMRSA infection; all 3 survived. In addition, 2 fatal cases of CAP caused by pandemic A(H1N1)2009/cMRSA co-infection were identified on post–mortem examination. The cMRSA infections were caused by three different cMRSA clones, only one of which contained genes for Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL). Conclusions/Significance Clinicians managing patients with pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenzavirus infection should be alert to the possibility of co-infection or sequential infection with virulent, antimicrobial-resistant bacterial pathogens such as cMRSA. PVL toxin is not necessary for the development of cMRSA pneumonia in the setting of pandemic A( H1N1) 2009 influenzavirus co-infection.


European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases | 2009

Community-associated versus healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: A 10-year retrospective review

James O. Robinson; Julie C. Pearson; Keryn Christiansen; Geoffrey W. Coombs; R. Murray

The objective was to compare the epidemiology and outcome of healthcare- (HA-) and community-associated (CA-) MRSA bacteraemia. A 10-year retrospective study of MRSA bacteraemia was carried out. Episodes were classified according to established criteria. Molecular typing was performed on a subset of isolates. Of 197 MRSA bacteraemia episodes, 178 (90.4%) were classified as HA-MRSA and 19 (9.6%) as CA-MRSA. All-cause 7- and 30-day mortality rates were similar in the HA and CA-MRSA bacteraemia groups; however, 1-year mortality was higher in the HA-MRSA bacteraemia group (48.3% vs 21.1% [p = 0.023]). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower if empiric antimicrobial therapy included agent(s) to which the isolate tested susceptible, compared with patients receiving “inactive” therapy (19% vs 35.1% [p = 0.011]). The majority of MRSA bacteraemia episodes were caused by clones known to circulate in the community. All-cause mortality is as high in HA- as in CA-MRSA bacteraemia. Thirty-day mortality was significantly reduced if the patient received an antibiotic with activity against the MRSA isolate.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2008

Outbreak of Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection Associated With Acupuncture and Joint Injection

R. Murray; Julie C. Pearson; Geoffrey W. Coombs; James P. Flexman; C. L. Golledge; David J. Speers; J. R. Dyer; Duncan McLellan; M. Reilly; Jan M. Bell; S. F. Bowen; Keryn Christiansen

OBJECTIVE To describe an outbreak of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection after percutaneous needle procedures (acupuncture and joint injection) performed by a single medical practitioner. SETTING A medical practitioners office and 4 hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. PATIENTS Eight individuals who developed invasive MRSA infection after acupuncture or joint injection performed by the medical practitioner. METHODS We performed a prospective and retrospective outbreak investigation, including MRSA colonization surveillance, environmental sampling for MRSA, and detailed molecular typing of MRSA isolates. We performed an infection control audit of the medical practitioners premises and practices and administered MRSA decolonization therapy to the medical practitioner. RESULTS Eight cases of invasive MRSA infection were identified. Seven cases occurred as a cluster in May 2004; another case (identified retrospectively) occurred approximately 15 months earlier in February 2003. The primary sites of infection were the neck, shoulder, lower back, and hip: 5 patients had septic arthritis and bursitis, and 3 had pyomyositis; 3 patients had bacteremia, including 1 patient with possible endocarditis. The medical practitioner was found to be colonized with the same MRSA clone [ST22-MRSA-IV (EMRSA-15)] at 2 time points: shortly after the first case of infection in March 2003 and again in May 2004. After the medical practitioners premises and practices were audited and he himself received MRSA decolonization therapy, no further cases were identified. CONCLUSIONS This outbreak most likely resulted from a breakdown in sterile technique during percutaneous needle procedures, resulting in the transmission of MRSA from the medical practitioner to the patients. This report demonstrates the importance of surveillance and molecular typing in the identification and control of outbreaks of MRSA infection.


Pathology | 2006

Non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Sydney, Australia: emergence of EMRSA-15, Oceania, Queensland and Western Australian MRSA strains

Iain B. Gosbell; Thelma Barbagiannakos; Stephen A. Neville; Joanne L. Mercer; Alison M. Vickery; Frances G. O'Brien; Geoffrey W. Coombs; Mary J. Malkowski; Julie C. Pearson

Aims: To describe clinical features and molecular epidemiology of non‐multiresistant methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia. Methods: Patients with non‐multiresistant MRSA isolated from blood at South Western Area Pathology Service from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2001 were enrolled. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis, phage typing, and (selected instances) multilocus sequence and staphylococcal cassette chromosome typing was performed. PCR was used to detect Panton‐Valentine leukocidin (PVL), toxic shock syndrome toxin‐1 (TSST‐1), and enterotoxin genes. Results: Sixteen patients were detected: eight with UK EMRSA‐15 (ST22‐MRSA‐IV), three with Oceania (South‐West Pacific/Western Samoan phage pattern) (ST30‐MRSA‐IV), two with WA MRSA‐5 (ST8‐MRSA‐IV), and one each with WA MRSA‐1 (ST1‐MRSA‐IV), Queensland strain (ST93‐MRSA‐IV), and WA MRSA‐15 (ST59‐MRSA‐IV). Prior hospital admissions occurred with six of the eight patients with UK EMRSA‐15, none of the three with Oceania, and three of the five with other strains. Thirteen of 16 patients had underlying disease. Three of the three patients with Oceania strain bacteraemia were Polynesians; 11 of 13 of the others were Caucasians. PVL genes were detected in four of 16 isolates (all Oceania and Queensland strains). entC was detected in two EMRSA‐15 strains; entA in one Oceania, two WA MRSA‐5 and the WA MRSA‐1 strain, with entA and entB in the WA MRSA‐15 strain. tst was not detected. Conclusions: Multiple epidemic strains cause non‐multiresistant MRSA bacteraemia. Most patients had risk factors. Oceania and Queensland strains possess the PVL gene. Abbreviations: ccr, cassette chromosome recombinase; EMRSA‐15, epidemic methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus‐15 EMRSA‐16, epidemic methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus‐16; MLST, multilocus sequence typing; MRSA, Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PFGE, pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis; PVL, Panton‐Valentine leukocidin; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism; SCCmec, staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec; STx‐MRSA‐IV, multilocus sequence type x‐MRSA‐SCCmec type‐IV; SWP, South‐West Pacific; TSST‐1, (staphylococcal) toxic shock syndrome toxin‐1; WA MRSA, Western Australian MRSA; WSPP, Western Samoan phage pattern.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 2005

Survey of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains from Two Hospitals in El Paso, Texas

Frances G. O'Brien; Tien Tze Lim; David C. Winnett; Geoffrey W. Coombs; Julie C. Pearson; Alejandro Delgado; Mark J. Langevin; Stephanie A. Cantore; Leti Gonzalez; John E. Gustafson

ABSTRACT Seventy-one percent of 76 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from two medical centers in El Paso, Texas, represent three similar pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types. Overall, six pulsed-field types were identified represented by multilocus sequence/staphylococcal chromosomal cassette DNA mec (SCCmec) types: ST5-MRSA-II; ST36-MRSA-II; ST8 (untypeable SCCmec); and a newly described clonal cluster 8 strain, ST507-MRSA-IV. This study demonstrates the presence of multiple-antibiotic-resistant epidemic MRSA clones in El Paso.

Collaboration


Dive into the Julie C. Pearson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John D. Turnidge

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary-Louise McLaws

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan M. Bell

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge