Julie Mayglothling

Practice management guidelines for identification of cervical spine injuries following trauma: update from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guidelines committee.

BACKGROUND Injury to the cervical spine (CS) is common after major trauma. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma first published its Practice Management Guidelines for the evaluation of CS injury in 1998. A subsequent revision was published in 2000. Since that time a large volume of literature has been published. As a result, the Practice Management Guidelines Committee set out to develop updated guidelines for the identification of CS injury. METHODS A search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE database was performed using PubMed (www.pubmed.gov). The search retrieved English language articles regarding the identification of CS injury from 1998 to 2007. The questions posed were: who needs CS imaging; what imaging should be obtained; when should computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or flexion/extension radiographs be used; and how is significant ligamentous injury excluded in the comatose patient? RESULTS Seventy-eight articles were identified. From this group, 52 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. CONCLUSION There have been significant changes in practice since the previous CS injury guidelines. Most significantly, computed tomography has supplanted plain radiography as the primary screening modality in those who require imaging. Clinical clearance remains the standard in awake, alert patients with trauma without neurologic deficit or distracting injury who have no neck pain or tenderness with full range of motion. Cervical collars should be removed as soon as feasible. Controversy persists regarding CS clearance in the obtunded patient without gross neurologic deficit.

Findings of a randomized controlled trial using limited transthoracic echocardiogram (LTTE) as a hemodynamic monitoring tool in the trauma bay

BACKGROUND We hypothesize that limited transthoracic echocardiogram (LTTE) is a useful tool to guide therapy during the initial phase of resuscitation in trauma patients. METHODS All highest-level alert patients with at least one measurement of systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg, a mean arterial pressure less than 60 mm Hg, and/or a heart rate greater than 120 beats per minute who arrived to the trauma bay (TB) were randomized to have either LTTE performed (LTTEp) or not performed (non-LTTE) as part of their initial evaluation. Images were stored, and results were reported regarding contractility (good vs. poor), fluid status (empty inferior vena cava [hypovolemic] vs. full inferior vena cava [not hypovolemic]), and pericardial effusion (present vs. absent). Time from TB to operating room, intravenous fluid administration, blood product requirement, intensive care unit admission, and mortality were examined in both groups. RESULTS A total of 240 patients were randomized. Twenty-five patients were excluded since they died upon arrival to the TB, leaving 215 patients in the study. Ninety-two patients were in the LTTEp group with 123 patients in the non-LTTE group. The LTTEp and non-LTTE groups were similar in age (38 years vs. 38.8 years, p = 0.75), Injury Severity Score (ISS) (19.2 vs. 19.0, p = 0.94), Revised Trauma Score (RTS) (5.5 vs. 6.0, p = 0.09), lactate (4.2 vs. 3.6, p = 0.14), and mechanism of injury (p = 0.44). Strikingly, LTTEp had significantly less intravenous fluid than non-LTTE patients (1.5 L vs. 2.5 L, p < 0.0001), less time from TB to operating room (35.6 minutes vs. 79.1 min, p = 0.0006), higher rate of intensive care unit admission (80.4% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.04), and a lower mortality rate (11% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.09). Mortality differences were particularly evident in the traumatic brain injury patients (14.7% in LTTEp vs. 39.5% in non-LTTE, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION LTTE is a useful guide for therapy in hypotensive trauma patients during the early phase of resuscitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level II.

National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study criteria is inadequate to rule out fracture after significant blunt trauma compared with computed tomography.

BACKGROUND EAST guidelines now recommend computed tomography (CT) to evaluate cervical spine (c-spine) fractures after blunt trauma in patients who do not meet National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study criteria (NC), yet no imaging is required in those patients who do meet these criteria. NC are based on patients with both minor and severe (trauma team activation [TTA]) trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the NC using CT as the gold standard in TTA patients. METHODS We prospectively evaluated 2,606 blunt TTA patients at our Level I trauma center. NC defined as alertness (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score = 15), evidence of intoxication, clinically distracting injury, midline c-spine tenderness, or neurologic deficits were documented. CT was used to determine the accuracy of these criteria. RESULTS There were 157 patients with c-spine fractures and 2,449 patients without c-spine fractures. The fracture group was older (age, 43.4 years ± 19.3 years fracture group vs. 37.7 years ± 17.5 years no fracture group, p = 0.0003) with a lower GCS score (fracture group 13.7 ± 4.5 vs. no fracture group 14.4 ± 3.6, p = 0.0001) and initial systolic blood pressure (132.5 mm Hg ± 23.4 mm Hg vs. 139.9 mm Hg vs. 23.5 mm Hg, p = 0.0009). The sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination for all patients were 82.8% (130 of 157) and 45.7% (1,118 of 2,449), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 8.9% (130 of 1,461) and 97.6% (1,118 of 1,145), respectively. Patients with a GCS score of 15 had a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 52.3%, PPV of 8.5%, and NPV of 97.5% for clinical examination. In those patients with the GCS score of 15, no intoxication or distracting injury, clinical examination had a sensitivity of 59.4%, specificity of 79.5%, PPV of 12.5%, and NPV of 97.5%. Of 26 patients with missed injuries based on NC, 19 (73.1%) required further intervention (16 collars, 2 OR, 1 Halo). CONCLUSION As in our previous trial, NC is inaccurate compared with CT to diagnose c-spine fractures in TTA patients. CT should be used in all blunt TTA patients regardless of whether they meet NC.

Canadian Cervical Spine rule compared with computed tomography: a prospective analysis.

BACKGROUND The Canadian cervical spine rule (CCS) has been found to be an effective tool to determine the need for radiographic evaluation of the cervical spine (c-spine) incorporating both clinical findings and mechanism. Previously, it has been validated only through clinical follow-up or selective use of X-rays. The purpose of this study was to validate it using computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard to identify fractures. METHODS Prospective evaluation was performed on 3,201 blunt trauma patients who were screened by CCS and were compared with a complete c-spine CT. CSS positive indicated at least one positive clinical or mechanism finding, whereas CT positive indicated presence of a fracture. RESULTS There were 192 patients with c-spine fractures versus 3,009 without fracture on CT. The fracture group was older (42.7 ± 19.0 years vs. 37.8 ± 17.5 years, p = 0.0006), had a lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (13.8 ± 4.2 vs. 14.4 ± 4.3, p < 0.0001), and lower systolic blood pressure (133.3 ± 23.8 mm Hg vs. 139.5 ± 23.1 mm Hg, p = 0.0023). The sensitivity of CCS was 100% (192/192), specificity was 0.60% (18/3009), positive predictive value was 6.03% (192/3183), and negative predictive value was 100% (18/18). Logistic regression identified only 8 of the 19 factors included in the CCS to be independent predictors of c-spine fracture. CONCLUSIONS CCS is very sensitive but not very specific to determine the need for radiographic evaluation after blunt trauma. Based on this study, the rule should be streamlined to improve specificity while maintaining sensitivity.

CT for all or selective approach? Who really needs a cervical spine CT after blunt trauma.

BACKGROUND Computed tomography (CT) is the standard to screen blunt trauma patients for cervical spine (c-spine) fractures, yet there remains a reluctance to scan all trauma team activations because of radiation exposure and cost. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of positive CT in an effort to decrease future CT use without compromising patient care. METHODS We performed a prospective study in which we documented 18 combined NEXUS and Canadian c-spine criteria on 5,182 patients before CT comparing those with and without fractures to identify predictors of injury. Clinical examination was considered positive if any of the 18 criteria were positive. RESULTS There were 324 patients with a fracture, for an incidence rate of 6.25%. Fracture patients were older (43.89 ± 18.83 years vs. 38.42 ± 17.45 years, p <; 0.0001), with a lower GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) score (13.49 ± 3.49 vs. 14.32 ± 2.34, p < 0.0001), than nonfracture patients. Clinical examination had a 100% (324 of 324) sensitivity, 0.62% (30 of 4,858) specificity, 6.29% (324 of 5,152) positive predictive value, and 100% (30 of 30) negative predictive value. A total of 77.8% (14 of 18) criteria were significantly associated with fracture by univariate analysis, seven of which were independent predictors of fracture by logistic regression (midline tenderness, GCS score < 15, age ≥65 years, paresthesias, rollover motor vehicle collision, ejected, never in sitting position in emergency department). Evaluation of these seven factors demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.07% (321 of 324), positive predictive value of 6.95% (321 of 4,617), specificity of 11.57% (562 of 4,858), and negative predictive value of 99.47% (562 of 565). CONCLUSION Although sensitive, the standard clinical criteria used to determine patients who need radiographs lack specificity. Based on these results, more narrow criteria should be validated in an effort to limit the number of c-spine CTs while not compromising patient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level II; diagnostic study, level II.

Open extremity fractures: impact of delay in operative debridement and irrigation.

BACKGROUND Early (<8 hours) operative debridement and irrigation (D&I) of open fractures are considered essential to reduce the risk of deep infection. With the advent of powerful antimicrobials, this axiom has been challenged. The current study evaluates the rates of deep infections of open fractures in relation to the time to the first D&I. METHODS A list of all blunt open fractures during a 6-year period was obtained from the trauma registry. Patients were evaluated for age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), physiologic derangement (systolic blood pressure, lactate, Revised Trauma Score [RTS]), and fracture type (Gustilo). Time to the first D&I was calculated. All patients received appropriate prophylactic antimicrobials. Infection rates were calculated and correlated to the time to the first D&I (<8 hours vs. >8 hours). Regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of infection. RESULTS During the 72-month study period, 404 patients met entry criteria, with 415 open extremity fractures (upper, 129; lower, 287). Early (<8 hours) and delayed (>8 hours) groups were well matched, although the age was lower and ISS was higher in the group with greater than 8 hours. The rates of infection were 35 (11%) of 328 (<8 hour) and 17 (19%) of 87 (>8 hours) (p < 0.05). When fractures were subgrouped by extremity, for the lower extremity, both a delay of greater than 8 hours and higher Gustilo type correlated with the development of infection. In the upper extremity, only higher Gustilo type correlated, and a delay to the first D&I did not increase the incidence of infection. Regression analysis revealed that higher ISS (odd ratio [OR], 1.052; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.019–1.086), Gustilo grade, and a delay of greater than 8 hours (OR, 2.035; 95% CI, 1.022–4.054) were independent predictors of infection for the all-extremity model. Separate models for upper and lower extremities showed that the same three parameters were independent predictors for the lower extremity (ISS: OR, 1.045; 95% CI, 1.004–1.087; Gustilo type and >8-hour delay: OR, 3.006; 95% CI, 1.280–7.059), but none for the upper extremity. CONCLUSION Delay of greater than 8 hours to the first D&I for open fractures of the lower extremity increases the likelihood of infection but not for the upper extremity. Higher Gustilo type open fractures have a higher incidence of infection for both upper and lower extremities. The results have important implications in an era of decreasing surgeon availability, especially in off hours. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV.

Defining the cervical spine clearance algorithm: A single-institution prospective study of more than 9,000 patients.

BACKGROUND Variability exists in the approach to cervical spine (c-spine) clearance after significant trauma. Using concurrently gathered data on more than 9,000 such patients, the current study develops an evidence-based and readily adoptable algorithm for c-spine clearance aimed at timely removal of collar, optimal use of imaging, and appropriate spine consultations. METHODS Prospective study of adult blunt trauma team alert (TTA) patients presenting at a Level I trauma center who underwent screening computed tomography (CT) to diagnose/rule out c-spine injury (January 2008 to May 2014). Regression analysis comparing patients with and without c-spine injury—fracture and/or ligament—was used to identify significant predictors of injury. The predictors with the highest odds ratio were used to develop the algorithm. RESULTS Among 9,227 patients meeting inclusion criteria, c-spine injury was identified in 553 patients (5.99%). All 553 patients had a c-spine fracture, and of these, 57 patients (0.6% of entire population and 10.31% of patients with injury) also had a ligamentous injury. No patient with a normal CT result was found to have an injury. The five greatest predictors of ligament injury that follow were used to develop the algorithm: (1) CT evidence of ligament injury; (2) fracture pattern “not” isolated transverse/spinous process; (3) neurologic symptoms; (4) midline tenderness; and (5) Glasgow Coma Scale score <15. CONCLUSION TTA patients should undergo screening c-spine CT to rule out injury. Most patients will have a negative CT and can have their collars removed. A select group of patients will require collars and spine consultation and a smaller subset of magnetic resonance imaging to rule out ligament injury. LEVEL OF EVEDINCE Therapeutic study, level III.

Bladder Pressure Measurements and Urinary Tract Infection in Trauma Patients

BACKGROUND The purpose of this trial was to determine if using a closed technique for bladder pressure measurements (BPMs) would eliminate them as a risk factor for urinary tract infection (UTI) in trauma patients, as was shown previously using an open technique. METHODS Data were collected prospectively from January 2006 until December 2009 by a dedicated epidemiology nurse and combined with trauma registry data at our Level 1 trauma center. All trauma patients admitted to the surgical trauma intensive care unit (STICU) with and without UTIs were compared for demographic and epidemiologic data. A closed system was used in which the urinary drainage catheter (UDC) remained connected to the bag and 45 mL of saline was injected through a two-way valved sideport, with subsequent measurements through the sideport. RESULTS There were 1,641 patients in the trial. The UTI group was sicker (Injury Severity Score [ISS] 18.7±11.9 no UTI vs. 28±10.7 UTI; p<0.0001), with longer stays (11.4±12.4 days no UTI vs. 37.9±20.3 days UTI; p<0.0001) and more UDC days (4.3±6.6 no UTI vs. 23.9±16.6 UTI; p<0.0001). The BPM group had more UDC days (15.6 days±16.0 BPM vs. 5.4 days±7.3 no BPM; p<0.0001), yet no difference in UTI rate/1,000 UDC days (5.7 no BPM vs. 8.0 BPM; p=0.5291). Logistic regression demonstrated only UDC days to be a predictor of UTI (1.125; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.097-1.154; p<0.0001), whereas ISS (1.083, 95% CI 1.063-1.104; p<0.0001) and age (1.051, 95% CI 1.037-1.065; p<0.0001) were the only predictors of death. CONCLUSION Although patients undergoing BPM have more UTIs than patients without BPM, the measurements are not an independent predictor of UTI when done by the closed technique. These findings emphasize the judicious use of BPM with a closed system and, more importantly, the need for early removal of catheters.

Pathogenetic Changes: Secondary Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

The World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS), formed by a group of investigators interested in the syndrome, has had three sessions as world congresses. The most recent one was in Antwerp, Belgium, in March 2007. The society reviewed the existing literature on the syndrome and proposed consensus definitions and recommendations [1, 2] for several key elements. State-of-the-art concepts have also been published as a monograph [3]. The consensus definition of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension (IAH) is a persistently elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure (IAP) greater than 12 mmHg. Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is defined by the WSACS as ‘the presence of IAH accompanied by organ dysfunction(s) such as cardiac, respiratory, and renal [1] dysfunction.’ ACS is referred to as “secondary” when there are no conditions originating from the abdomino-pelvic region.