Junpei Sasadai

Effect of Whole-Body-Vibration Training on Trunk-Muscle Strength and Physical Performance in Healthy Adults: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Whole-body-vibration (WBV) stimulus equipment has been used as a new training method for health promotion. Its use in the clinic has expanded to the field of sports and rehabilitation for disabled patients. WBV training is rapidly gaining popularity in health and fitness centers as an alternative method for improving muscle performance. Acute positive effects of WBV have been shown on lower-extremity muscle power and vertical-jump ability; however, there have not been any studies focusing on the long-term effects of WBV for trunk muscle and dynamic balance. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of an 8-wk program of WBV in combination with trunk-muscle training on muscle performance in healthy, untrained adults. DESIGN Laboratory-based, repeated-measures study. SETTING University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS 20 healthy university men. INTERVENTION Participants were randomly assigned to a WBV or non-WBV group. The WBV group performed a trunk-muscle-training program in combination with WBV; the non-WBV group performed the same muscle-training program without WBV for 8 wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES In the pre- and posttraining period, the participants were evaluated using the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), Y Balance Test (Y-test) (anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral reach), trunk-muscle isometric strength (flexor, extensor, and flexor:extensor ratio), squat jump, and countermovement jump. RESULTS The WBV group had greater improvement than the non-WBV group in both trunk-flexor muscle strength (P = .02) and the Y-test (anterior reach) (P = .004) between pre- and posttraining. CONCLUSION Adding WBV to a trunk-muscle-strengthening program may improve trunk-flexor isometric strength and anterior reach during the Y-test more than training without WBV. The WBV protocol used in this study had no significant impact on FMS scores, squat jumping, countermovement jumping, trunk-extensor isometric strength, or trunk flexor:extensor ratio.

[The effect of different working postures while felling a tree with a chain-saw on trunk muscles' activity].

PURPOSE Many forestry workers who use chain-saws suffer from low back pain. Previous studies have reported that low back pain is related to the working postures while felling a tree with a using chain-saws. However, no previous study has investigated trunk muscle activities during work. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between working postures while holding a chain-saw, and trunk muscles activities as measured by surface electromyography (EMG). METHOD Subjects were 10 males who were not forestry workers. Four task postures while holding a chain-saw were tested: standing, 30(o) trunk flexion, 90(o) trunk flexion and half-kneeling. EMG recordings were obtained bilaterally of the lumbar paraspinal (LP) muscles and rectus abdominis (RA) muscles. Raw EMG data were processed by integrating the EMG and normalizing them to %MVC. The paired t-test was used to detect statistical differences in the activities between the right and left LP muscles and RA muscles. One-factor repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the bilateral LP and RA muscle activities among the 4 different postures. The significance level was set to less than 5%. RESULTS In the half-kneeling posture, the right LP muscle activity was 14.7% higher than the left LP muscle activity (p<0.05); however, there were no significant differences in muscle activities among the other postures. The right LP muscle activity of 30(o) trunk flexion posture was 25.6% higher than that of the standing posture, and 14.2% higher than that of half-kneeling posture (p<0.05). The bilateral LP muscle activities of the 90(o) trunk flexion posture were the highest of the 4 postures, 16.7% higher than the half-kneeling posture (p<0.05) right LP muscle activity. There was a tendency of increase in the left LP muscle activity when trunk flexion angle increased, but no significant differences among the 4 postures were found. The bilateral RA muscle activities were low and did not significantly differ among the 4 postures. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that when the trunk is flexed, the LP muscle activities change asymmetrically, with the right LP muscle activity increasing significantly compared to the standing posture and the half-kneeing posture, but there was no significant difference in the left LP muscle activity. These results suggest that working postures that involve trunk flexion while felling a tree with a holding chain-saw may lead to increased loading of the LP muscles.