K. A. Powell
Langley Research Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by K. A. Powell.
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | 2013
Jean-Paul Vernier; T. D. Fairlie; John J. Murray; A. Tupper; C. R. Trepte; D. M. Winker; Jacques Pelon; Anne Garnier; Julien Jumelet; Michael J. Pavolonis; A. H. Omar; K. A. Powell
AbstractMajor disruptions of the aviation system from recent volcanic eruptions have intensified discussions about and increased the international consensus toward improving volcanic ash warnings. Central to making progress is to better discern low volcanic ash loadings and to describe the ash cloud structure more accurately in three-dimensional space and time. Here, dispersed volcanic ash observed by the Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) space-based lidar near 20 000–40 000 ft [~(6–13) km] over Australia and New Zealand during June 2011 is studied. This ash event took place 3 weeks after the Puyehue-Cordon Caulle eruption, which disrupted air traffic in much of the Southern Hemisphere. The volcanic ash layers are shown to exhibit color ratios (1064/532 nm) near 0.5, significantly lower than unity, as is observed with ice. Those optical properties are used to develop an ash detection algorithm. A “trajectory mapping” technique is then demonstrated wherein ash clo...
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2000
Pi-Huan Wang; Geoffrey S. Kent; K. A. Powell; Glenn K. Yue; Lamont R. Poole; M. Patrick McCormick
The present study investigates the 1.0-μm extinction coefficient measurements obtained in the Antarctic region in 1979 from the Stratospheric Aerosol Measurement (SAM) II, with particular focus on the background aerosol properties. Correlative meteorological information from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction is incorporated in this investigation. The results indicate that the data frequency distribution of the background aerosol extinction coefficient in the local summer and fall can be adequately modeled by using a single-mode normal distribution, and that a binormal distribution is needed for modeling the distribution in the local winter and spring because of the different characteristics of the aerosols inside and outside the polar vortex. In general, the vertical distribution of the aerosol mean extinction coefficient exhibits two regions of different seasonal variation. Above 16 km the extinction coefficient is the highest during the local summer, and the lowest during the local spring inside the polar vortex. Below 16 km the aerosol seasonal variation is more complex, but the winter enhancement of the aerosol extinction coefficient inside the Antarctic polar vortex is clearly evident. As the season changes from winter to spring, the results inside the Antarctic polar vortex also indicate a reduction in aerosol optical depth in the stratosphere, but no significant changes in the upper troposphere. The present study further indicates that the bottom of the winter polar vortex in Antarctica is located at an altitude as low as 8 to 9 km, which is about 4 to 5 km lower than the bottom of the Arctic polar vortex. This difference may be attributable to the different strengths of the winter polar vortex and the planetary wave activities between the two hemispheres. In summary, the properties of the Antarctic background aerosol are very consistent with the effect of polar stratospheric clouds on the aerosol vertical distribution through their formation, sedimention, and evaporation, and with the seasonal evolution of the polar vortex. Finally, the result of the present study provides valuable opportunities for fully utilizing the multiyear SAM II tropospheric and stratospheric measurements to investigate the aerosol climatology and long-term variations in the Arctic and Antarctic regions.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2010
R. R. Rogers; Chris A. Hostetler; Johnathan W. Hair; Richard A. Ferrare; Zhaoyan Liu; Michael D. Obland; D. B. Harper; Anthony L. Cook; K. A. Powell; Mark A. Vaughan; David M. Winker
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2013
Ali H. Omar; D. M. Winker; Jason L. Tackett; David M. Giles; J. Kar; Zhaoyan Liu; Mark A. Vaughan; K. A. Powell; C. R. Trepte
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer | 2011
Zhaoyan Liu; David M. Winker; Ali H. Omar; Mark A. Vaughan; Charles R. Trepte; Yong Hu; K. A. Powell; Wenbo Sun; Bing Lin
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010
Ali H. Omar; Zhaoyan Liu; Mark A. Vaughan; Kenneth Thornhill; Chieko Kittaka; Syed Ismail; Yongxiang Hu; G. Chen; K. A. Powell; David M. Winker; Charles R. Trepte; E. L. Winstead; Bruce E. Anderson
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions | 2018
Stuart A. Young; Mark A. Vaughan; Anne Garnier; Jason L. Tackett; James B. Lambeth; K. A. Powell
25th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC) | 2010
Damien Josset; Jacques Pelon; Yongxiang Hu; Pengwang Zhai; K. A. Powell; Sharon Rodier; C. R. Trepte
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010
Ali H. Omar; Zhaoyan Liu; Mark A. Vaughan; Kenneth Thornhill; Chieko Kittaka; Syed Ismail; Yongxiang Hu; G. Chen; K. A. Powell; David M. Winker; Charles R. Trepte; E. L. Winstead; Bruce E. Anderson
25th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC) | 2010
Damien Josset; Yongxiang Hu; Jacques Pelon; Pengwang Zhai; D. Tanré; R. R. Rogers; Patricia L. Lucker; C. R. Trepte; K. A. Powell; Sharon Rodier; Nicolas Pascal