K.E. Burton

Residual Postoperative Tumour Volume Predicts Outcome after High-dose Radiotherapy for Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma of the Skull Base and Spine

AIMS High-dose radiotherapy after surgical debulking is the treatment of choice for chordomas and chondrosarcomas. This study reviewed our outcomes, in relation to residual tumour volume and radiation dose, in order to inform our future practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nineteen patients referred to the Neuro-Oncology Unit at Addenbrookes Hospital (Cambridge, UK) between 1996 and 2009 and treated with photon radiotherapy were reviewed. Seventeen of the 19 were treated with curative intent. The median follow-up was 53 months. The tumours in the study had a mean gross tumour volume (GTV) of 17.2 cm(3) (median 10.5 cm(3)) and a range of 0-76.3 cm(3). The median dose was 65Gy in 39 fractions. RESULTS The 5 year cause-specific survival for radically treated patients with chordomas was 92% and the 5 year local control rate was 83%. The 5 year cause-specific survival and local control rates with chondrosarcomas were both 100%. A planning target volume (PTV) below 90 cm(3) is predictive of local control, but volumes above this are not. The GTV seems to be a better predictor of outcome: among the 17 of 19 patients treated curatively, a GTV threshold of 30 cm(3) distinguished local failures from the 15 patients with local control, with sensitivity to detect local control of 100% (95% confidence interval 78-100%), specificity 100% (95% confidence interval 16-100%) and positive predictive value 100% (95% confidence interval 78-100%). CONCLUSIONS Our results show a high level of efficacy for fractionated photon radiotherapy after surgery, in keeping with other series. In addition, we found that although surgical debulking is essential, a small residual tumour volume may still be controlled with high-dose photon radiotherapy. This information may be relevant during neurosurgical planning, possibly allowing a reduction in risk of serious neurological deficits. This should encourage the further development of sophisticated photon radiotherapy, for patients unsuitable for proton therapy.

Excellent Local Control of Paraganglioma in the Head and Neck with Fractionated Radiotherapy

AIMS Radiotherapy is an important treatment option for paraganglioma in the head and neck region. It seems to be highly effective and avoids important surgical morbidity, which can impair quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of radiotherapy for paraganglioma of the head and neck region in order to inform our future practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS The cohort of patients for the present study comprised 21 patients who received radiotherapy between 1998 and 2008. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 132 months, median 55 months. The mean age was 48.7 years, range 20-78 years. The female:male ratio was 2 : 1. Two patients had confirmed familial tumour syndromes. The gross tumour volume in 20 cases ranged from 1.3 to 74 cm(3), mean 23.2 cm(3), median 14.7 cm(3). Five patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The median dose was 50 Gy in 30 fractions. RESULTS The crude 5-year local control rate was 95% (20/21), although the 5-year actuarial local control rate was 87%. The one patient who relapsed, at 45 months after radiotherapy, had a comparatively small tumour of 10.8 cm(3). A relationship between tumour volume and local control seems unlikely. It was possible to obtain details of side-effects from electronic records for 11 patients. Grade 3 headache, which resolved, was the most serious acute side-effect. One patient had three teeth extracted due to exacerbation of dental caries, and one had deterioration of hearing thought to be due to a combination of tumour and radiotherapy. There were two serious complications in patients who had embolisation, which we no longer use. CONCLUSIONS Our results show a high level of efficacy for fractionated external beam radiotherapy, with minimal toxicity, in keeping with other series. This should encourage the use of radiotherapy as primary treatment for paragangliomas of the head and neck region.

Skull Base Meningioma — Comparison of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Planning Techniques using the Moduleaf Micro-multileaf Collimator and Helical Tomotherapy

AIMS Therapeutic radiotherapy to lesions of the skull base is limited by complex target shapes and their proximity to organs at risk. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy may result in improved dose distributions and safer dose escalation. The aim of this study was to compare plan efficacy and efficiency using, linac-based micro-multileaf collimator (mMLC) IMRT and helical tomotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five cases of skull base meningioma, previously treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (50 Gy/30 fractions) were identified. They were re-planned to a dose of 60 Gy/30 fractions using IMRT with Moduleaf mMLC (2.5 mm) and helical tomotherapy. Plan efficacy was compared using measures of PTV(60) coverage (D(min), D(max), V(90%), V(95%) and V(100%)). Plan efficiency was assessed by comparing estimated beam-on times. RESULTS The critical structure dose was limited to below predetermined tolerance levels in all cases, with similar doses obtained between techniques. The average PTV(60)D(max), D(min), D(med), D(mean), V(90%), V(95%) and V(100%) across the five cases achieved were as follows: mMLC IMRT: 64.9 Gy, 40.1 Gy, 60 Gy, 59.6 Gy, 95.4%, 88.8% and 69.2%, respectively; helical tomotherapy: 67.2 Gy, 50.3 Gy, 60 Gy, 59.9 Gy, 95.8%, 83.5% and 51.9%, respectively. The average treatment time per fraction was 18.4 min for IMRT with mMLC and 6.7 min for helical tomotherapy. DISCUSSION This study shows that safe dose escalation to a dose of 60G y to skull base lesions can be achieved; using either mMLC- or helical tomotherapy-based IMRT. A plan comparison between the two solutions is difficult, but they seem to be similar in efficacy with any small differences being difficult to interpret and of questionable clinical significance. Helical tomotherapy has the advantage of a significantly decreased beam-on time.

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Plan Optimisation for Skull Base Lesions: Practical Class Solutions for Dose Escalation

AIMS To identify practical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning solutions when attempting dose escalation in the skull base. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty cases of skull base meningioma were re-planned using a variation of beam number (three, five, seven and nine), beam arrangement (coplanar vs non-coplanar) and multileaf collimator (MLC) width (2.5 mm vs 10 mm) to 60 Gy/30 fractions. Plan quality and planning target volume coverage was assessed using planning target volume V(95%), equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and integral dose. RESULTS Critical structures were maintained below clinical tolerance levels. The 2.5 mm MLC achieved an average improvement in V(95%) by 22.8% (P=0.0003), EUD by 3.7 Gy (P=0.002) and reduced the integral dose by 13.4 Gy (P=0.0001). V(95%) and the integral dose improved with five vs three beams and seven vs five beams, but did not change with nine vs seven beams. There was no effect of beam number on EUD. There was no difference in V(95%) (P=0.54), integral dose (P=0.44) or EUD (P=0.47) for beam arrangement used. Segments per plan increased by a factor of 1.5 with each addition of two beams to a plan, and by a factor of 2.5 for 2.5 mm MLC plans vs 10 mm MLC plans. CONCLUSIONS We present evidence-based planning solutions for skull base intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and show that 2.5 mm MLC and five to seven beams can achieve safe dose escalation up to 60 Gy. This must be balanced with an increase in segmentation, which will increase treatment times.

Pattern of Relapse after Fractionated External Beam Radiotherapy for Meningioma: Experience from Addenbrooke's Hospital

AIMS Radiotherapy is an important treatment modality for meningioma. We aimed to review the clinical outcomes for meningioma patients treated with radiotherapy in the Addenbrookes Hospital Oncology Department. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review was carried out on patients with meningioma referred and treated in the department between 1 November 1996 and 31 October 2006. Patient details and outcomes were recorded and the results were analysed to assess survival outcomes. Survival data were confirmed by the Eastern Cancer Registration and Information Centre. RESULTS In total, 174 patients were referred to the department for an oncology opinion. Of these, 128 proceeded to radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range 2.1-11.9 years). Sixty-seven per cent of the patients were older than 50 years, and the female: male ratio was 2.2: 1. Overall survival was 78% at the time of follow-up, with death related to meningioma in 7% of the total cohort. Local control was 85% overall, 93% for grade 1 disease, 45% for grade 2 disease and 82% for grade 3 disease. Patients with non-benign disease were more likely to receive >50Gy (27% of grade 1 lesions vs 65% of grade 2/3 lesions), but despite this local control remained poor, even with the higher dose delivered (local control 60 and 40% for grade 2 lesions treated with 50 and >50Gy, respectively, and 100 and 75% for grade 3 lesions treated with 50 and >50Gy, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our cohort of patients had an overall local control and survival similar to those documented from other departments. Grade was an important prognostic factor. Patients treated with >50Gy had worse local control outcomes, probably due to selection bias. Dose escalation may still be appropriate for high-risk disease, and may be more effective with more conformal techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy.