S.J. Jefferies

Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial

Summary Background Xerostomia is the most common late side-effect of radiotherapy to the head and neck. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can reduce irradiation of the parotid glands. We assessed the hypothesis that parotid-sparing IMRT reduces the incidence of severe xerostomia. Methods We undertook a randomised controlled trial between Jan 21, 2003, and Dec 7, 2007, that compared conventional radiotherapy (control) with parotid-sparing IMRT. We randomly assigned patients with histologically confirmed pharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma (T1–4, N0–3, M0) at six UK radiotherapy centres between the two radiotherapy techniques (1:1 ratio). A dose of 60 or 65 Gy was prescribed in 30 daily fractions given Monday to Friday. Treatment was not masked. Randomisation was by computer-generated permuted blocks and was stratified by centre and tumour site. Our primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with grade 2 or worse xerostomia at 12 months, as assessed by the Late Effects of Normal Tissue (LENT SOMA) scale. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis, with all patients who had assessments included. Long-term follow-up of patients is ongoing. This study is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial register, number ISRCTN48243537. Findings 47 patients were assigned to each treatment arm. Median follow-up was 44·0 months (IQR 30·0–59·7). Six patients from each group died before 12 months and seven patients from the conventional radiotherapy and two from the IMRT group were not assessed at 12 months. At 12 months xerostomia side-effects were reported in 73 of 82 alive patients; grade 2 or worse xerostomia at 12 months was significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the conventional radiotherapy group (25 [74%; 95% CI 56–87] of 34 patients given conventional radiotherapy vs 15 [38%; 23–55] of 39 given IMRT, p=0·0027). The only recorded acute adverse event of grade 2 or worse that differed significantly between the treatment groups was fatigue, which was more prevalent in the IMRT group (18 [41%; 99% CI 23–61] of 44 patients given conventional radiotherapy vs 35 [74%; 55–89] of 47 given IMRT, p=0·0015). At 24 months, grade 2 or worse xerostomia was significantly less common with IMRT than with conventional radiotherapy (20 [83%; 95% CI 63–95] of 24 patients given conventional radiotherapy vs nine [29%; 14–48] of 31 given IMRT; p<0·0001). At 12 and 24 months, significant benefits were seen in recovery of saliva secretion with IMRT compared with conventional radiotherapy, as were clinically significant improvements in dry-mouth-specific and global quality of life scores. At 24 months, no significant differences were seen between randomised groups in non-xerostomia late toxicities, locoregional control, or overall survival. Interpretation Sparing the parotid glands with IMRT significantly reduces the incidence of xerostomia and leads to recovery of saliva secretion and improvements in associated quality of life, and thus strongly supports a role for IMRT in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Funding Cancer Research UK (CRUK/03/005).

Years of life lost (YLL) from cancer is an important measure of population burden — and should be considered when allocating research funds

Recently, cancer mortality has been compared to research spending by the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI), whose research budget is approximately £250 million. The analysis shows a mis-match between mortality and research spending. As well as crude mortality rates, other measures of cancer burden should be considered because they contribute additional information. ‘Years of life lost’ (YLL) summed over each individual dying after a diagnosis of cancer represents a population-based mortality indicator of the impact of that disease on society. Years of life lost divided by the number of deaths for each cancer site produces an additional statistic, the average years of life lost (AYLL), which is a measure of the burden of cancer to the individual patient. For 17 cancer sites where data are available, four tumour sites have a rather large difference in mortality, comparing YLL to crude mortality. Years of life lost shows the population burden from cancers of the ovary, cervix, and CNS to be rather larger than suggested by crude mortality, despite screening programmes for cervix cancer. Using YLL, the underprovision of funding for lung cancer research is similar to that reported using percentage mortality. Breast cancer and leukaemia receive a relatively higher research spend than the population burden of these cancers, and the spending on leukaemia is quite extreme. Prostate cancer has a low per cent YLL but attracts a moderate amount of research spending. The use of AYLL as an indicator of individual cancer burden considerably changes the ranking of the mortality from different tumours. The mean AYLL is 12.5 years. Prostate cancer has the lowest AYLL, only 6.1 years; brain tumour patients have the highest, at just over 20 years. Comparing AYLL to research spending suggests four ‘Cinderella’ cancer sites with high individual cancer burden but low research spending: CNS tumours, cervix and kidney cancers, and melanoma. Breast cancer and leukaemia have roughly average AYLL but a considerable excess of research spending. YLL emphasises the discrepancy between research spending and mortality, and may be helpful for decisions concerning research support. Avearage years of life lost measures the burden to individual patients and may be helpful where individuals’ needs are relevant, such as palliative care. As well as crude mortality, more subtle and comprehensive calculations of mortality statistics would be useful in debates on research funding and public health issues.

Residual Postoperative Tumour Volume Predicts Outcome after High-dose Radiotherapy for Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma of the Skull Base and Spine

AIMS High-dose radiotherapy after surgical debulking is the treatment of choice for chordomas and chondrosarcomas. This study reviewed our outcomes, in relation to residual tumour volume and radiation dose, in order to inform our future practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nineteen patients referred to the Neuro-Oncology Unit at Addenbrookes Hospital (Cambridge, UK) between 1996 and 2009 and treated with photon radiotherapy were reviewed. Seventeen of the 19 were treated with curative intent. The median follow-up was 53 months. The tumours in the study had a mean gross tumour volume (GTV) of 17.2 cm(3) (median 10.5 cm(3)) and a range of 0-76.3 cm(3). The median dose was 65Gy in 39 fractions. RESULTS The 5 year cause-specific survival for radically treated patients with chordomas was 92% and the 5 year local control rate was 83%. The 5 year cause-specific survival and local control rates with chondrosarcomas were both 100%. A planning target volume (PTV) below 90 cm(3) is predictive of local control, but volumes above this are not. The GTV seems to be a better predictor of outcome: among the 17 of 19 patients treated curatively, a GTV threshold of 30 cm(3) distinguished local failures from the 15 patients with local control, with sensitivity to detect local control of 100% (95% confidence interval 78-100%), specificity 100% (95% confidence interval 16-100%) and positive predictive value 100% (95% confidence interval 78-100%). CONCLUSIONS Our results show a high level of efficacy for fractionated photon radiotherapy after surgery, in keeping with other series. In addition, we found that although surgical debulking is essential, a small residual tumour volume may still be controlled with high-dose photon radiotherapy. This information may be relevant during neurosurgical planning, possibly allowing a reduction in risk of serious neurological deficits. This should encourage the further development of sophisticated photon radiotherapy, for patients unsuitable for proton therapy.

A mathematical model of brain tumour response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy considering radiobiological aspects

Glioblastoma is the most frequent and malignant brain tumour. For many years, the conventional treatment has been maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy (RT), with a median survival time of less than 10 months. Previously, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (given after RT) has failed to demonstrate a statistically significant survival advantage. Recently, a randomized phase III trial has confirmed the benefit of temozolomide (TMZ) and has defined a new standard of care for the treatment of patients with high-grade brain tumours. The results showed an increase of 2.5 months in median survival, and 16.1% in 2 year survival, for patients receiving RT with TMZ compared with RT alone. It is not clear whether the major benefit of TMZ comes from either concomitant administration of TMZ with RT, or from six cycles of adjuvant TMZ, or both. The objectives were to develop our original model, which addressed survival after RT, to construct a new module to assess the potential role of TMZ from clinical data, and to explore its synergistic contribution in addition to radiation. The model has been extended to include radiobiological parameters. The addition of the linear quadratic equation to describe cellular response to treatment has enabled us to quantify the effects of radiation and TMZ in radiobiological terms. The results indicate that the model achieves an excellent fit to the clinical data, with the assumption that TMZ given concomitantly with RT synergistically increases radiosensitivity. The alternative, that the effect of TMZ is due only to direct cell killing, does not fit the clinical data so well. The addition of concomitant TMZ appears to change the radiobiological parameters. This aspect of our results suggests possible treatment developments. Our observations need further evaluations in real clinical trials, may suggest treatment strategies for new trials, and inform their design.

Defining the tumour and target volumes for radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy is a localised treatment. The definition of tumour and target volumes for radiotherapy is vital to its successful execution. This requires the best possible characterisation of the location and extent of tumour. Diagnostic imaging, including help and advice from diagnostic specialists, is therefore essential for radiotherapy planning. There are three main volumes in radiotherapy planning. The first is the position and extent of gross tumour, i.e. what can be seen, palpated or imaged; this is known as the gross tumour volume (GTV). Developments in imaging have contributed to the definition of the GTV. The second volume contains the GTV, plus a margin for sub-clinical disease spread which therefore cannot be fully imaged; this is known as the clinical target volume (CTV). It is the most difficult because it cannot be accurately defined for an individual patient, but future developments in imaging, especially towards the molecular level, should allow more specific delineation of the CTV. The CTV is important because this volume must be adequately treated to achieve cure. The third volume, the planning target volume (PTV), allows for uncertainties in planning or treatment delivery. It is a geometric concept designed to ensure that the radiotherapy dose is actually delivered to the CTV. Radiotherapy planning must always consider critical normal tissue structures, known as organs at risk (ORs). In some specific circumstances, it is necessary to add a margin analogous to the PTV margin around an OR to ensure that the organ cannot receive a higher-than-safe dose; this gives a planning organ at risk volume. This applies to an organ such as the spinal cord, where damage to a small amount of normal tissue would produce a severe clinical manifestation. The concepts of GTV, CTV and PTV have been enormously helpful in developing modern radiotherapy. Attention to detail in radiotherapy planning is vital, and does affect outcomes: ‘the devil is in the detail’. Radiotherapy planning is also dependent on high quality imaging, and the better the imaging the better will be the outcomes from radiotherapy.

A Cancer Research UK first time in human phase I trial of IMA950 (novel multipeptide therapeutic vaccine) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Purpose: To perform a two-cohort, phase I safety and immunogenicity study of IMA950 in addition to standard chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. IMA950 is a novel glioblastoma-specific therapeutic vaccine containing 11 tumor-associated peptides (TUMAP), identified on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) surface receptors in primary human glioblastoma tissue. Experimental Design: Patients were HLA-A*02–positive and had undergone tumor resection. Vaccination comprised 11 intradermal injections with IMA950 plus granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) over a 24-week period, beginning 7 to 14 days prior to initiation of chemoradiotherapy (Cohort 1) or 7 days after chemoradiotherapy (Cohort 2). Safety was assessed according to NCI CTCAE Version 4.0 and TUMAP-specific T-cell immune responses determined. Secondary observations included progression-free survival (PFS), pretreatment regulatory T cell (Treg) levels, and the effect of steroids on T-cell responses. Results: Forty-five patients were recruited. Related adverse events included minor injection site reactions, rash, pruritus, fatigue, neutropenia and single cases of allergic reaction, anemia and anaphylaxis. Two patients experienced grade 3 dose-limiting toxicity of fatigue and anaphylaxis. Of 40 evaluable patients, 36 were TUMAP responders and 20 were multi-TUMAP responders, with no important differences between cohorts. No effect of pretreatment Treg levels on IMA950 immunogenicity was observed, and steroids did not affect TUMAP responses. PFS rates were 74% at 6 months and 31% at 9 months. Conclusions: IMA950 plus GM-CSF was well-tolerated with the primary immunogenicity endpoint of observing multi-TUMAP responses in at least 30% of patients exceeded. Further development of IMA950 is encouraged. Clin Cancer Res; 22(19); 4776–85. ©2016 AACR. See related commentary by Lowenstein and Castro, p. 4760

Haematological toxicity of cranio-spinal irradiation.

BACKGROUND To assess the frequency and severity of myelosuppression due to cranio-spinal irradiation either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and to identify patients at high risk of haematological toxicity who may require supportive therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 1965 and 1994, 210 patients received cranio-spinal axis (CSA) radiotherapy as a component of treatment for primary CNS tumours at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Full blood counts (FBC) were obtained before, during and after radiotherapy in 200 patients. Haematological toxicity was graded according to the WHO criteria and duration was measured from the onset of grades 3 and 4 toxicity until recovery to grade 2. RESULTS Sixty-six (33%) patients developed grades 3 and 4 haematological toxicity. Nadir occurred during radiotherapy and was most frequent during the second week of spinal radiotherapy. Low haemoglobin and white cell counts prior to radiotherapy increased the likelihood of myelosuppression. Nine patients had febrile episodes requiring antibiotic therapy. Treatment was interrupted in 49 patients but treatment time was extended beyond 12 weeks in only 17 (8%) patients of which nine were due to haematological toxicity. Chemotherapy (vincristine) during radiotherapy did not impact on haematological toxicity. Age and prior chemotherapy were independent predictive factors for haematological toxicity. The relative risk of leukopaenia in children compared to adults was 7.9 (95% CI 3.4-18.6%). Patients who received prior chemotherapy had a relative risk of toxicity of 6.1 (95% CI 2.9-12.8%). CONCLUSION One-third of patients undergoing CSA radiotherapy develop grades 3 and 4 haematological toxicity. The risk is higher in children and in patients who receive chemotherapy prior to radiation. There was no treatment-related mortality and only nine of 200 patients (9/60 of those with toxicity) required supportive treatment for neutropaenic sepsis. The low incidence severe haematological toxicity does not warrant routine use of haemopoietic growth factors during CSA irradiation and future studies should target high risk subgroups.

Tumour Shrinkage and Contour Change during Radiotherapy Increase the Dose to Organs at Risk but not the Target Volumes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated on the TomoTherapy HiArt™ System

AIMS To quantify the changes in contours of the target and organs at risk and the differences between planned and delivered doses to the target and organs at risk during the course of radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy on the TomoTherapy HiArt™ system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radical chemoradiotherapy using the TomoTherapy HiArt system were included in the study. The target volumes were treated to three different dose levels depending on the level of clinical risk for harbouring disease. Patient positions were assessed daily with megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) and positional correction made before each treatment when necessary. MVCTs were superimposed on to the planning kilovoltage computed tomography images for each patient and target volumes and organ at risk volumes were re-outlined on MVCT images. Doses to clinical target volumes and organs at risk were recalculated to show the actual delivered doses. RESULTS There was shrinkage in the volume of the parotid glands during treatment in all cases. The mean volume reduction in the ipsilateral parotid gland was more marked at 30.2%, compared with the contralateral parotid glands. However, the mean percentage dose per fraction increase was higher in the contralateral parotid glands at 24%, compared with the ipsilateral parotids. The calculated doses were higher than the planned doses in all CTV-54, CTV-60 and CTV-68, but the mean dose differences were modest, in the range 1.3-2.4%. CONCLUSIONS We have shown that there were considerable changes in the volume and dose to the parotids during treatment. The changes in volume and dose to the clinical target volume were more modest in comparison. Adaptive radiotherapy planning can be helpful in improving the dose to the parotid glands. However, its role in the optimisation of the dosage to the clinical target volume is less likely to result in a significant clinical benefit.

Implementation of neuro-oncology service reconfiguration in accordance with NICE guidance provides enhanced clinical care for patients with glioblastoma multiforme

Background:Brain tumours account for <2% of all primary neoplasms but are responsible for 7% of the years of life lost from cancer before age 70 years. The latest survival trends for patients with CNS malignancies have remained largely static. The objective of this study was to evaluate the change in practice as a result of implementing the Improving Outcomes Guidance from the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).Methods:Patients were identified from the local cancer registry and hospital databases. We compared time from diagnosis to treatment, proportion of patients discussed at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, treatment received, length of inpatient stay and survival. Inpatient and imaging costs were also estimated.Results:Service reconfiguration and implementation of NICE guidance resulted in significantly more patients being discussed by the MDT—increased from 66 to 87%, reduced emergency admission in favour of elective surgery, reduced median hospital stay from 8 to 4.5 days, increased use of post-operative MRI from 17 to 91% facilitating early discharge and treatment planning, and reduced cost of inpatient stay from £2096 in 2006 to £1316 in 2009. Patients treated with optimal surgery followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide achieved outcomes comparable to those reported in clinical trials: median overall survival 18 months (2-year survival 35%).Conclusions:Advancing the management of neuro-oncology patients by moving from an emergency-based system of patient referral and management to a more planned elective outpatient-based pattern of care improves patient experience and has the potential to deliver better outcomes and research opportunities.

An Assessment of Action Levels in Imaging Strategies in Head and Neck Cancer using TomoTherapy. Are Our Margins Adequate in the Absence of Image Guidance

AIMS To assess the effectiveness of different on-treatment correction strategies on set-up accuracy in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated on a TomoTherapy HiArt system. To assess the adequacy of clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) treatment planning margins when treating with intensity-modulated radiotherapy without daily image guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS The set-up accuracy measured by daily online volumetric imaging was retrospectively reviewed for the first 15 patients with HNC treated on the TomoTherapy unit at Addenbrookes Hospital. For each fraction, megavoltage computed tomography was carried out, any discrepancy from the planning scan was noted, and corrected, before treatment. These data were used to evaluate imaging correction protocols using three different action levels. The first three fractions were imaged and used to correct for systematic error, using a 5 mm action level (5 mmAL), a 3 mm action level (3 mmAL), and no action level (NAL). All imaging strategies were applied, to assess the number of fractions that would potentially have exceeded a 5 and 3 mm margin. Systematic and random errors were calculated for the population, assuming the NAL protocol had been applied, and minimum CTV-PTV margins, required to allow for errors attributable only to set-up, were calculated using van Herks formula. RESULTS In total, 490 fractions were analysed. Using a 5 mmAL imaging protocol, potentially 198/490 fractions (40%) were outside a 5 mm CTV-PTV margin and 400/490 (82%) were outside a 3 mm margin. Using a 3 mmAL imaging protocol, potentially 67/490 fractions (14%) were outside a 5 mm CTV-PTV margin and 253/490 (52%) were outside a 3 mm margin. A small systematic error was identified in the system; once corrected this would improve these results. Using the NAL imaging protocol, potentially 31/490 fractions (6%) were outside a 5 mm CTV-PTV margin and 143/490 fractions (29%) were outside a 3 mm margin. Estimated minimum CTV-PTV margins to account only for set-up errors, with three-fraction image-guided radiotherapy and a NAL protocol, were 2.8, 3.1 and 4.1 mm in the mediolateral, superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. CONCLUSION Reducing the action level at which the systematic error is corrected improves the probability of treatment delivery accuracy. Using the NAL correction protocol reduces the number of fractions that have set-up displacements outside a 5 mm CTV-PTV margin. Although a 5 mm margin is probably sufficient for standard HNC radiotherapy, change to a 3 mm margin is not favoured at our centre without access to daily image-guided radiotherapy.