Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where K. Hurley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by K. Hurley.


Nature | 1998

An X-ray pulsar with a superstrong magnetic field in the soft gamma-ray repeater SGR 1806-20

C. Kouveliotou; S. Dieters; T.E. Strohmayer; J.A. van Paradijs; G. J. Fishman; C.A. Meegan; K. Hurley; J.M. Kommers; I. A. Smith; Dale A. Frail; Toshio Murakami

Soft γ-ray repeaters (SGRs) emit multiple, brief (∼0.1-s), intense outbursts of low-energy γ-rays. They are extremely rare—three are known in our Galaxy and one in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Two SGRs are associated with young supernova remnants (SNRs), and therefore most probably with neutron stars, but it remains a puzzle why SGRs are so different from ‘normal’ radio pulsars. Here we report the discovery of pulsations in the persistent X-ray flux of SGR1806 − 20, with a period of 7.47 s and a spindown rate of 2.6 × 10−3 s yr−1. We argue that the spindown is due to magnetic dipole emission and find that the pulsar age and (dipolar) magnetic field strength are ∼1,500 years and 8× 1014 gauss, respectively. Our observations demonstrate the existence of ‘magnetars’, neutron stars with magnetic fields about 100 times stronger than those of radio pulsars, and support earlier suggestions, that SGR bursts are caused by neutron-star ‘crustquakes’ produced by magnetic stresses. The ‘magnetar’ birth rate is about one per millennium—a substantial fraction of that of radio pulsars. Thus our results may explain why some SNRs have no radio pulsars.


Nature | 2005

A short γ-ray burst apparently associated with an elliptical galaxy at redshift z = 0.225

Neil Gehrels; Craig L. Sarazin; Paul T. O'Brien; Bing Zhang; Loius M. Barbier; S. D. Barthelmy; Alexander J. Blustin; David N. Burrows; J. Cannizzo; J. R. Cummings; Michael R. Goad; Stephen T. Holland; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; Andrew J. Levan; Craig B. Markwardt; K. O. Mason; P. Meszaros; M. J. Page; David M. Palmer; E. Rol; Takanori Sakamoto; R. Willingale; Lorella Angelini; Andrew P. Beardmore; Patricia T. Boyd; Alice A. Breeveld; Sergio Campana; Margaret Chester; Guido Chincarini

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) come in two classes: long (> 2 s), soft-spectrum bursts and short, hard events. Most progress has been made on understanding the long GRBs, which are typically observed at high redshift (z ≈ 1) and found in subluminous star-forming host galaxies. They are likely to be produced in core-collapse explosions of massive stars. In contrast, no short GRB had been accurately (< 10″) and rapidly (minutes) located. Here we report the detection of the X-ray afterglow from—and the localization of—the short burst GRB 050509B. Its position on the sky is near a luminous, non-star-forming elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.225, which is the location one would expect if the origin of this GRB is through the merger of neutron-star or black-hole binaries. The X-ray afterglow was weak and faded below the detection limit within a few hours; no optical afterglow was detected to stringent limits, explaining the past difficulty in localizing short GRBs.


Nature | 2005

An exceptionally bright flare from SGR 1806-20 and the origins of short-duration γ-ray bursts

K. Hurley; S. E. Boggs; David M. Smith; R. C. Duncan; Robert P. Lin; Andreas Zoglauer; S. Krucker; G. Hurford; H. Hudson; C. Wigger; W. Hajdas; C. Thompson; I. G. Mitrofanov; A. B. Sanin; William V. Boynton; C. Fellows; A. von Kienlin; Giselher G. Lichti; T. L. Cline

Soft-γ-ray repeaters (SGRs) are galactic X-ray stars that emit numerous short-duration (about 0.1 s) bursts of hard X-rays during sporadic active periods. They are thought to be magnetars: strongly magnetized neutron stars with emissions powered by the dissipation of magnetic energy. Here we report the detection of a long (380 s) giant flare from SGR 1806–20, which was much more luminous than any previous transient event observed in our Galaxy. (In the first 0.2 s, the flare released as much energy as the Sun radiates in a quarter of a million years.) Its power can be explained by a catastrophic instability involving global crust failure and magnetic reconnection on a magnetar, with possible large-scale untwisting of magnetic field lines outside the star. From a great distance this event would appear to be a short-duration, hard-spectrum cosmic γ-ray burst. At least a significant fraction of the mysterious short-duration γ-ray bursts may therefore come from extragalactic magnetars.


Nature | 2005

The afterglow of GRB 050709 and the nature of the short-hard gamma-ray bursts.

Derek B. Fox; Dale A. Frail; Paul A. Price; S. R. Kulkarni; Edo Berger; Tsvi Piran; Alicia M. Soderberg; S. B. Cenko; P. B. Cameron; Avishay Gal-Yam; Mansi M. Kasliwal; D.-S. Moon; Fiona A. Harrison; Ehud Nakar; Brian Paul Schmidt; Bryan E. Penprase; Roger A. Chevalier; Pawan Kumar; Kathy Roth; D. Watson; Brian Leverett Lee; Stephen A. Shectman; Mark M. Phillips; M. Roth; Patrick J. McCarthy; M Rauch; L. L. Cowie; Bruce A. Peterson; Joshua Rich; Nobuyuki Kawai

The final chapter in the long-standing mystery of the γ-ray bursts (GRBs) centres on the origin of the short-hard class of bursts, which are suspected on theoretical grounds to result from the coalescence of neutron-star or black-hole binary systems. Numerous searches for the afterglows of short-hard bursts have been made, galvanized by the revolution in our understanding of long-duration GRBs that followed the discovery in 1997 of their broadband (X-ray, optical and radio) afterglow emission. Here we present the discovery of the X-ray afterglow of a short-hard burst, GRB 050709, whose accurate position allows us to associate it unambiguously with a star-forming galaxy at redshift z = 0.160, and whose optical lightcurve definitively excludes a supernova association. Together with results from three other recent short-hard bursts, this suggests that short-hard bursts release much less energy than the long-duration GRBs. Models requiring young stellar populations, such as magnetars and collapsars, are ruled out, while coalescing degenerate binaries remain the most promising progenitor candidates.


Nature | 2006

An enigmatic long-lasting γ-ray burst not accompanied by a bright supernova

M. Della Valle; Guido Chincarini; N. Panagia; G. Tagliaferri; Daniele Malesani; Vincenzo Testa; Dino Fugazza; Sergio Campana; S. Covino; Vanessa Mangano; L. A. Antonelli; P. D’Avanzo; K. Hurley; I. F. Mirabel; L. J. Pellizza; S. Piranomonte; L. Stella

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are short, intense flashes of soft γ-rays coming from the distant Universe. Long-duration GRBs (those lasting more than ∼2 s) are believed to originate from the deaths of massive stars, mainly on the basis of a handful of solid associations between GRBs and supernovae. GRB 060614, one of the closest GRBs discovered, consisted of a 5-s hard spike followed by softer, brighter emission that lasted for ∼100 s (refs 8, 9). Here we report deep optical observations of GRB 060614 showing no emerging supernova with absolute visual magnitude brighter than MV = -13.7. Any supernova associated with GRB 060614 was therefore at least 100 times fainter, at optical wavelengths, than the other supernovae associated with GRBs. This demonstrates that some long-lasting GRBs can either be associated with a very faint supernova or produced by different phenomena.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1999

Discovery of a magnetar associated with the soft gamma repeater SGR 1900+14

C. Kouveliotou; Tod E. Strohmayer; K. Hurley; J. van Paradijs; Mark H. Finger; S. Dieters; Peter M. Woods; Christopher Thompson; Richard C. Duncan

The soft gamma repeater SGR 1900+14 became active again on 1998 June after a long period of quiescence; it remained at a low state of activity until 1998 August, when it emitted a series of extraordinarily intense outbursts. We have observed the source with the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer twice, during the onset of each active episode. We confirm the pulsations at the 5.16 s period reported earlier from SGR 1900+14. Here we report the detection of a secular spin-down of the pulse period at an average rate of 1.1 × 10-10 s s-1. In view of the strong similarities between SGRs, we attribute the spin-down of SGR 1900+14 to magnetic dipole radiation, possibly accelerated by a quiescent flux, as in the case of SGR 1806-20. This allows an estimate of the pulsar dipolar magnetic field, which is (2–8) × 1014 G. Our results confirm that SGRs are magnetars.


Nature | 1999

A giant periodic flare from the soft γ-ray repeater SGR1900+14

K. Hurley; T. L. Cline; E. P. Mazets; S. D. Barthelmy; Paul Butterworth; F. E. Marshall; D. Palmer; R. L. Aptekar; S. Golenetskii; V. Il'Inskii; D. Frederiks; J. McTiernan; Robert E. Gold; Jack I. Trombka

Soft γ-ray repeaters are transient sources of high-energy photons; they emit sporadic and short (about 0.1 s) bursts of ‘soft’ γ-rays during periods of activity, which are often broken by long stretches of quiescence. These objects are associated with neutron stars in young supernova remnants. The event of 5 March 1979 was the most intense burst to date, and the only one that showed a clear periodicity in the signal. Here we report the detection, on 27 August 1998, of an even more intense burst from a different soft γ-ray repeater. This event was characterized by ‘hard’ γ-rays at its peak, followed by a tail 300 s long with a soft spectrum and a clear periodicity of 5.16 s. The burst was probably initiated by a massive disruption of the crust of the neutron star, followed by an outflow of energetic particles rotating with the period of the star. A comparison of the events of 27 August 1998 and 5 March 1979 supports the idea that magnetic energy plays an important role in the genesis of such events. Although these giant flares are rare, they are not unique events and may occur at any time in a neutron stars activity cycle.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2001

A Possible Cepheid-like Luminosity Estimator for the Long Gamma-Ray Bursts

Daniel E. Reichart; Donald Q. Lamb; E. E. Fenimore; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; Thomas L. Cline; K. Hurley

We present a possible Cepheid-like luminosity estimator for the long gamma-ray bursts based on the variability of their light curves. To construct the luminosity estimator, we use CGRO/BATSE data for 13 bursts, Wind/Konus data for five bursts, Ulysses/GRB data for one burst, and NEAR/XGRS data for one burst. Spectroscopic redshifts, peak fluxes, and high-resolution light curves are available for 11 of these bursts; partial information is available for the remaining nine bursts. We find that the isotropic equivalent peak luminosities L of these bursts positively correlate with a rigorously constructed measure V of the variability of their light curves. We fit to these data a model that accommodates both intrinsic scatter (statistical variance) and extrinsic scatter (sample variance). We find that L ~ V. If one excludes GRB 980425 from the fit, on the grounds that its association with SN 1998bw at a redshift of z = 0.0085 is not secure, the luminosity estimator spans ≈2.5 orders of magnitude in L, and the slope of the correlation between L and V is positive with a probability of 1 - (1.4 × 10-4) (3.8 σ). Although GRB 980425 is excluded from this fit, its L and V values are consistent with the fitted model, which suggests that GRB 980425 may well be associated with SN 1998bw and that GRB 980425 and the cosmological bursts may share a common physical origin. If one includes GRB 980425 in the fit, the luminosity estimator spans ≈6.3 orders of magnitude in L, and the slope of the correlation is positive with a probability of 1 - (9.3 × 10-7) (4.9 σ). In either case, the luminosity estimator yields best-estimate luminosities that are accurate to a factor of ≈4, or best-estimate luminosity distances that are accurate to a factor of ≈2. Regardless of whether GRB 980425 should be included in the fit, its light curve is unique in that it is much less variable than the other ≈17 light curves of bursts in our sample for which the signal-to-noise ratio is reasonably good.


Nature | 2006

An optical spectrum of the afterglow of a γ-ray burst at a redshift of z = 6.295

Nobuyuki Kawai; George Kosugi; Kazumaro Aoki; Toru Yamada; Tomonori Totani; Kouji Ohta; Masanori Iye; Takashi Hattori; Wako Aoki; Hisanori Furusawa; K. Hurley; Koji S. Kawabata; Naoto Kobayashi; Yutaka Komiyama; Yoshihiko Mizumoto; K. Nomoto; Junichi Noumaru; Ryusuke Ogasawara; Rie Sato; K. Sekiguchi; Yuji Shirasaki; M. Suzuki; Tadafumi Takata; Toru Tamagawa; Hiroshi Terada; Jun-ichi Watanabe; Yoichi Yatsu; Atsumasa Yoshida

The prompt γ-ray emission from γ-ray bursts (GRBs) should be detectable out to distances of z > 10 (ref. 1), and should therefore provide an excellent probe of the evolution of cosmic star formation, reionization of the intergalactic medium, and the metal enrichment history of the Universe. Hitherto, the highest measured redshift for a GRB has been z = 4.50 (ref. 5). Here we report the optical spectrum of the afterglow of GRB 050904 obtained 3.4 days after the burst; the spectrum shows a clear continuum at the long-wavelength end of the spectrum with a sharp cut-off at around 9,000 Å due to Lyman α absorption at z ≈ 6.3 (with a damping wing). A system of absorption lines of heavy elements at z = 6.295 ± 0.002 was also detected, yielding the precise measurement of the redshift. The Si ii fine-structure lines suggest a dense, metal-enriched environment around the progenitor of the GRB.


Nature | 2009

GRB 090423 at a redshift of z ≈ 8.1

R. Salvaterra; M. Della Valle; Sergio Campana; Guido Chincarini; S. Covino; P. D’Avanzo; Alberto Fernandez-Soto; C. Guidorzi; F. Mannucci; Raffaella Margutti; C. C. Thöne; L. A. Antonelli; S. D. Barthelmy; M. De Pasquale; V. D’Elia; F. Fiore; Dino Fugazza; L. K. Hunt; E. Maiorano; S. Marinoni; F. E. Marshall; Emilio Molinari; John A. Nousek; E. Pian; Judith Lea Racusin; L. Stella; L. Amati; G. Andreuzzi; G. Cusumano; E. E. Fenimore

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced by rare types of massive stellar explosion. Their rapidly fading afterglows are often bright enough at optical wavelengths that they are detectable at cosmological distances. Hitherto, the highest known redshift for a GRB was z = 6.7 (ref. 1), for GRB 080913, and for a galaxy was z = 6.96 (ref. 2). Here we report observations of GRB 090423 and the near-infrared spectroscopic measurement of its redshift, z = . This burst happened when the Universe was only about 4 per cent of its current age. Its properties are similar to those of GRBs observed at low/intermediate redshifts, suggesting that the mechanisms and progenitors that gave rise to this burst about 600,000,000 years after the Big Bang are not markedly different from those producing GRBs about 10,000,000,000 years later.

Collaboration


Dive into the K. Hurley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. L. Cline

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Kouveliotou

George Washington University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Golenetskii

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas L. Cline

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Mazets

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. D. Barthelmy

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles A. Meegan

University of Alabama in Huntsville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nobuyuki Kawai

Tokyo Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge