K. Jones
Rutgers University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by K. Jones.
Nuclear Physics | 1981
F. Todd Baker; M.A. Grimm; A. Scott; R.C. Styles; T.H. Kruse; K. Jones; R. Suchannek
Abstract Angular distributions of 24 MeV alpha particles elastically and inelastically scattered from 192 Os have been measured for the angular range θ lab = 50°–140°. Data are reportedhere for 0 + , 2 + 1 , 2 + 2 , 4 + 1 , 4 + 2 and 4 + 3 states. Coupled-channels analysis of the data was performed using matrix elements predicted by the interacting boson model assuming 192 Os to be a perturbed O(6) nucleus. Fits to the data are excellent for the ground band (0 + , 2 + 1 , 4 + 1 ), fairly good for the quasi-gamma band (2 + 2 , 4 + 2 ), and poor for the K = 4 band (4 + 3 ).
Nuclear Physics | 1981
F. Todd Baker; A. Scott; R.C. Styles; T.H. Kruse; K. Jones; R. Suchannek
Abstract Angular distributions of 24 MeV α-particles elastically and inelastically scattered from 182, 184, 186 W have been measured for the angular range θ lab = 40°–140°. Coupled-channels analyses of the data for the ground-state rotational bands which assume a symmetric-rotor model lead to the conclusion that, for each nucleus, the β 2 and β 4 deformation parameters for the Coulomb and the nuclear potentials are quite different ; these differences are not accounted for by the geometrical scaling method of Hendrie but are, in most cases, accounted for by the multipole-moment method of Mackintosh. A rigid asymmetric-rotor model is found to provide a good description of the data for excitation of the second 2 + state in 186 W. A second-order rotational-vibrational model provides a good description of the excitation of the 3 − state in 184 W and suggests that transitions other than the direct excitation (0 + → 3 − ) play an important role in the description of the data; this interpretation, however, fails to clearly distinguish between K = 0 and K = 2 models for the 3 − state.
Physical Review Letters | 1987
C. Glashausser; K. Jones; F.T. Baker; L. Bimbot; H. Esbensen; R. W. Fergerson; Green A; S. Nanda; Smith Rd
Physical Review Letters | 1993
A. Green; W. Unkelbach; F.T. Baker; D. Beatty; L. Bimbot; X.Y. Chen; V.R. Cupps; C. Djalali; G. Edwards; R.W. Fergerson; C. Glashausser; K. Jones; M.K. Jones; G. Kumbartzki; A. Sethi; B. Storm; J. Wambach
Physical Review C | 1993
F.T. Baker; D. Beatty; L. Bimbot; Cupps; C. Djalali; R.W. Fergerson; C. Glashausser; G. Graw; A. Green; K. Jones; M. Morlet; S. Nanda; A. Sethi; B. H. Storm; W. Unkelbach; A. Willis
Physical Review C | 1995
R. de Swiniarski; C. Glashausser; K. Jones; D. L. Pham
Physical Review C | 1990
L. Bimbot; R.W. Fergerson; C. Glashausser; K. Jones; F.T. Baker; D. Beatty; V. Cupps; A. Green; S. Nanda
Physical Review C | 1995
R. de Swiniarski; C. Glashausser; K. Jones; D. L. Pham
Physical Review C | 1993
F.T. Baker; D. Beatty; L. Bimbot; V. Cupps; C. Djalali; R.W. Fergerson; C. Glashausser; G. Graw; A. Green; K. Jones; M. Morlet; S. Nanda; A. Sethi; B. H. Storm; W. Unkelbach; A. Willis
Physical Review C | 1993
F.T. Baker; D. Beatty; L. Bimbot; V. Cupps; C. Djalali; R.W. Fergerson; C. Glashausser; G. Graw; A. Green; K. Jones; M. Morlet; S. Nanda; A. Sethi; B. H. Storm; W. Unkelbach; A. Willis