K. Komminaho
University of Helsinki
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by K. Komminaho.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2004
Marianne Bruneton; Helle A. Pedersen; Véronique Farra; Nicholas T. Arndt; Pierre Vacher; U. Achauer; A. Alinaghi; J. Ansorge; G. Bock; W. Friederich; Marek Grad; Aleksander Guterch; Pekka Heikkinen; S.‐E. Hjelt; T. L. Hyvönen; J.‐P. Ikonen; E. Kissling; K. Komminaho; A. Korja; Elena Kozlovskaya; M. V. Nevsky; Hanneke Paulssen; N. I. Pavlenkova; J. Plomerová; Tero Raita; O. Y. Riznichenko; Roland Roberts; S. Sandoval; I. A. Sanina; N. V. Sharov
Complex lithospheric structure under the central Baltic Shield from surface wave tomography
Gff | 2014
Marek Grad; Timo Tiira; Sverker Olsson; K. Komminaho
The problem of the existence of the asthenosphere for old Precambrian cratons is still discussed. In order to study the seismic lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath the Baltic Shield, we used records of nine local earthquakes with magnitudes ranging from 2.7 to 5.9. To model the LAB, original data were corrected for topography and Moho depth using a reference model with a 46-km-thick crust. For two northern events at Spitsbergen and Novaya Zemlya, we observe a low-velocity layer, 60–70-km-thick asthenosphere, and the LAB beneath Barents Sea was found at depth of c. 200 km. Sections for other events show continuous first arrivals of P-waves with no evidence for “shadow zone” in the whole range of registration, which could either be interpreted as the absence of the asthenosphere beneath the central part of the Baltic Shield, or that the LAB in this area occurs deeper (>200 km). The relatively thin low-velocity layer found beneath southern Sweden, 15 km below the Moho, could be interpreted as small-scale lithospheric heterogeneities, rather than asthenosphere. Differentiation of the lower lithosphere velocities beneath the Baltic Shield could be interpreted as regional heterogeneity or as anisotropy of the Baltic Shield lithosphere, with high velocities approximately in the east–west direction, and slow velocities approximately in the south–north direction.
Izvestiya-physics of The Solid Earth | 2017
V. I. Starostenko; T. Janik; Oleg Gintov; D. V. Lysynchuk; P. Środa; Wojciech Czuba; E. V. Kolomiyets; P. Aleksandrowski; V. Omelchenko; K. Komminaho; A. Guterch; Timo Tiira; D. Gryn; O. V. Legostaeva; G. Thybo; A. Tolkunov
This part of the paper addresses the geotectonic interpretation of the velocity model obtained from the results of seismic studies under the DOBRE-4 project in Ukraine. The velocity field does not show distinct lateral changes from the Precambrian platform towards the younger tectonic structures in the southwest. Hence, based on the seismic data alone, it is not possible to recognize the tectonic units that are known on the surface. The Moho has an undulating pattern over an interval with a length of ~150 km. The amplitude of the undulations reaches 8 to 17 km. The similar wavelike behavior, although on a shorter spatial scale and lower amplitude, is also typical of the upper crust and upper mantle. The presence of several separate horizons in the folded crust revealed by the velocity model is consistent with the presence of the folded systems which have different extensions on the different depth levels in the Earth’s crust. This situation is believed to be typical of folding on the lithospheric scale and to reflect the rheological stratification of the crust. The DOBRE-4 velocity section of the crust and adjacent part of the mantle promotes a clearer view of the geodynamical model describing the formation of the southwestern part of East European Platform in the Early Precambrian from the plate’s tectonic standpoint.
Izvestiya-physics of The Solid Earth | 2017
V. I. Starostenko; T. Janik; Oleg Gintov; D. V. Lysynchuk; P. Środa; Wojciech Czuba; E. V. Kolomiyets; P. Aleksandrowski; V. Omelchenko; K. Komminaho; A. Guterch; Timo Tiira; D. Gryn; O. V. Legostaeva; G. Thybo; A. Tolkunov
For studying the structure of the lithosphere in southern Ukraine, wide-angle seismic studies that recorded the reflected and refracted waves were carried out under the DOBRE-4 project. The field works were conducted in October 2009. Thirteen chemical shot points spaced 35–50 km apart from each other were implemented with a charge weight varying from 600 to 1000 kg. Overall 230 recording stations with an interval of 2.5 km between them were used. The high quality of the obtained data allowed us to model the velocity section along the profile for P- and S-waves. Seismic modeling was carried out by two methods. Initially, trial-and-error ray tracing using the arrival times of the main reflected and refracted P- and S-phases was conducted. Next, the amplitudes of the recorded phases were analyzed by the finite-difference full waveform method. The resulting velocity model demonstrates a fairly homogeneous structure from the middle to lower crust both in the vertical and horizontal directions. A drastically different situation is observed in the upper crust, where the Vp velocities decrease upwards along the section from 6.35 km/s at a depth of 15–20 km to 5.9–5.8 km/s on the surface of the crystalline basement; in the Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic deposits, it diminishes from 5.15 to 3.80 km/s, and in the Mesozoic layers, it decreases from 2.70 to 2.30 km/s. The subcrustal Vp gradually increases downwards from 6.50 to 6.7–6.8 km/s at the crustal base, which complicates the problem of separating the middle and lower crust. The Vp velocities above 6.80 km/s have not been revealed even in the lowermost part of the crust, in contrast to the similar profiles in the East European Platform. The Moho is clearly delineated by the velocity contrast of 1.3–1.7 km/s. The alternating pattern of the changes in the Moho depths corresponding to Moho undulations with a wavelength of about 150 km and the amplitude reaching 8 to 17 km is a peculiarity of the velocity model.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2003
Marek Grad; Susanne L. Jensen; G. Randy Keller; Aleksander Guterch; H. Thybo; T. Janik; Timo Tiira; J. Yliniemi; U. Luosto; G. Motuza; Viktor Nasedkin; Wojciech Czuba; E. Gaczyński; P. Środa; Kate C. Miller; Monika Wilde-Piórko; K. Komminaho; Juozas Jacyna; Larisa Korabliova
Tectonophysics | 1999
Marek Grad; T. Janik; J. Yliniemi; A. Guterch; U. Luosto; Timo Tiira; K. Komminaho; P. Środa; K. Höing; Jannis Makris; C.-E. Lund
Tectonophysics | 2003
H. Thybo; T. Janik; V. Omelchenko; Marek Grad; R.G. Garetsky; Aa Belinsky; G.I. Karatayev; G. Zlotski; M.E. Knudsen; R. Sand; J. Yliniemi; Timo Tiira; U. Luosto; K. Komminaho; R. Giese; A. Guterch; C.-E. Lund; O.M. Kharitonov; T. Ilchenko; D. V. Lysynchuk; V.M. Skobelev; Jonathan J. Doody
Tectonophysics | 2004
J. Yliniemi; Elena Kozlovskaya; Sven-Erik Hjelt; K. Komminaho; Anton Ushakov
Studia Geophysica Et Geodaetica | 2008
Monika Wilde-Piórko; Wolfram H. Geissler; J. Plomerová; Marek Grad; V. Babuška; Ewald Brückl; J. Cyziene; Wojciech Czuba; Richard W. England; E. Gaczyński; R. Gazdova; S. Gregersen; A. Guterch; W. Hanka; Endre Hegedűs; B. Heuer; P. Jedlička; J. Lazauskiene; G. Randy Keller; R. Kind; K. Klinge; P. Kolinsky; K. Komminaho; E. Kozlovskaya; Frank Krüger; T. Larsen; M. Majdański; J. Málek; G. Motuza; O. Novotný
Tectonophysics | 2001
J. Yliniemi; Timo Tiira; U. Luosto; K. Komminaho; R. Giese; G. Motuza; V. Nasedkin; J. Jacyna; R. Seckus; Marek Grad; Wojciech Czuba; T. Janik; A. Guterch; C.-E. Lund; Jonathan J. Doody