K.P.R. Vittal
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by K.P.R. Vittal.
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis | 2009
Cherukumalli Srinivasarao; K.P.R. Vittal; B. Venkateswarlu; S. P. Wani; K. L. Sahrawat; S. Marimuthu; Sumanta Kundu
Soil carbon (C) pool plays a crucial role in the soils quality, availability of plant nutrients, environmental functions, and global C cycle. Drylands generally have poor fertility and little organic matter and hence are candidates for C sequestration. Carbon storage in the soil profile not only improves fertility but also abates global warming. Several soils, production, and management factors influence C sequestration, and it is important to identify production and management factors that enhance C sequestrations in dryland soils. The objective of the present study was to examine C stocks at 21 sites under ongoing rainfed production systems and management regimes over the last 25 years on dominant soil types, covering a range of climatic conditions in India. Organic C stocks in the soil profiles across the country showed wide variations and followed the order Vertisols > Inceptisols > Alfisols > Aridisols. Inorganic C and total C stocks were larger in Vertisols than in other soil types. Soil organic C stocks decreased with depth in the profile, whereas inorganic C stocks increased with depth. Among the production systems, soybean‐, maize‐, and groundnut‐based systems showed greater organic C stocks than other production systems. However, the greatest contribution of organic C to total C stock was under upland rice system. Organic C stocks in the surface layer of the soils increased with rainfall (r = 0.59*), whereas inorganic C stocks in soils were found in the regions with less than 550 mm annual rainfall. Cation exchange capacity had better correlation with organic C stocks than clay content in soils. Results suggest that Indian dryland soils are low in organic C but have potential to sequester. Further potential of tropical soils to sequester more C in soil could be harnessed by identifying appropriate production systems and management practices for sustainable development and improved livelihoods in the tropics.
Soil Research | 2007
Ch. Srinivasarao; K.P.R. Vittal; K.N. Tiwari; Pravin N. Gajbhiye; Sumanta Kundu
Crop fertilisation with potassium in rainfed agriculture in India is not practised, merely on the assumption that Indian soils are rich in potassium and crops do not need external K supply. However, under continuous cropping in rainfed regions, huge crop K removals are reported, up to 150-200 kg/ha annually, depending upon amount and distribution of rainfall and biomass production. Thus, most of the crops essentially deplete soil K reserves. The present study evaluates the soil K reserves under diverse rainfed production systems and categorises rainfed soils based on different soil K fractions. Depth-wise sampling was done from 21 locations across different soil types under 8 production systems, and various fractions of soil K were determined. Total K was highest in Inceptisols (1.60-2.28%), followed by Aridisols (1.45-1.84%), Vertisols and Vertic sub-groups (0.24-1.72%), and Alfisols and Oxisols (0.30-1.86%), showing a wide variation within each group. Nonexchangeable K reserves were found in a proportionate manner to total K in most of the soil profile. Unlike nonexchangeable K reserves, Vertisols had higher exchangeable K than Inceptisols and Alfisols/Oxisols. Nonexchageable K showed significant positive correlation with total K in Inceptisols and Vertisols, whereas it was non-significant in Alfisols/Oxisosls. However, significant positive correlations were recorded with exchangeable K and nonexchangeable K in all soil types, indicating the dynamic equilibrium between 2 soil K fractions. Nonexchangeable K reserves were included along with exchangeable K in categorising soils into 9 groups for evolving better strategies to manage soil K fertility in rainfed agriculture in India. Finger millet and groundnut crops at Bangalore and Anantapur regions (category I) need immediate attention on K nutrition, as these soils are low in both exchangeable and nonexchangeable K. Similarly, crops grown on soils of S.K. Nagar, Ballowal-Saunkri, and Rakh-Dhiansar, with low exchangeable K and medium nonexchangeable K, would need K fertilisation as these crops (maize and pearlmillet) are K-exhaustive (category II). Pearl millet and upland rice in category III and cotton in category IV need K additions at critical stages. Upland rice in category V needs a maintenance dose of K. In category VI, cereal crops may not need K additions immediately as they have medium exchangeable K and high nonexchangeable K. Long-term sorghum cropping may need K supply after few years (category VII). Soils in category VIII are adequate in nonexchangeable K and medium exchangeable K and the crops, groundnut, cotton, sorghum, and soybean, may not need external K immediately. For soils in category IX, K fertilisation is not required to the crops (sorghum and soybean) as these soils have high exchangeable and nonexchangeable K.
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis | 2013
K. L. Sharma; J. Kusuma Grace; Milakh Raj; S. B. Mittal; Jagdev Singh; S. K. Sharma; P. S. Sangwan; M. S. Sidhpuria; K.P.R. Vittal; P. K. Mishra; G.R. Maruthi Sankar; Uttam Kumar Mandal; G. Ravindrachary; G. R. Korwar; B. Venkateswarlu; M. Madhavi; Pravin N. Gajbhiye; D. Suma Chandrika; K. Usha Rani
Soils in the hot, arid topical regions are low in organic matter and fertility and are structurally poor. Consequently, these soils suffer on account of poor physical, chemical, and biological soil quality traits, leading to miserably low crop yields. Long-term use of conjunctive nutrient management and conservation tillage practices may have a profound effect on improving the quality of these soils. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify the key soil quality indicators, indices, and the best soil- and nutrient-management practices that can improve soil quality on long-term basis for enhanced productivity under a pearl millet–based system. The studies were conducted for the Hissar Centre of All-India Coordinated Research Project at the Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad. Conjunctive nutrient-use treatments and conservation tillage significantly influenced the majority of the soil quality parameters in both the experiments. In experiment 1, the key soil quality indicators that significantly contributed to soil quality in a rainfed pearl millet–mung bean system were available nitrogen (N, 35%), available zinc (Zn; 35%), available copper (Cu; 10%), pH (10%), available potassium (K; 5%), and dehydrogenase assay (5%). The three best conjunctive nutrient-use treatments in terms of soil quality indices (SQI) were T3, 25 kg N (compost) (1.52) > T6, 15 kg N (compost) + 10 kg N (inorganic) + biofertilizer (1.49) > T5, 15 kg N (compost) + 10 kg N (green leaf manure) (1.47). In experiment 2, under a rainfed pearl millet system, the key indicators and their percentage contributions were electrical conductivity (15%), available N (19%), exchangeable magnesium (Mg; 18%), available manganese (Mn; 13%), dehydrogenase assay (19%), microbial biomass carbon (C; 5%), and bulk density (11%). The three best tillage + nutrient treatments identified from the viewpoint of soil quality were T1, conventional tillage (CT) + two intercultures (IC) + 100% N (organic source/compost) (1.74) > T3, CT + two IC + 100% N (inorganic source) (1.74) > T4, low tillage + two IC + 100% N (organic source/compost) (1.70). The findings of the present study as well as the state-of-the-art methodology adopted could be of much interest and use to the future researchers including students, land managers, state agricultural officers, growers/farmers, and all other associated stakeholders. The prediction function developed between long-term pearl millet crop yields (y) and soil quality indices (x) in this study could be of much use in predicting the crop yields with a given change in soil quality index under similar situations.
Land Degradation & Development | 2014
Ch. Srinivasarao; B. Venkateswarlu; Rattan Lal; Anil Kumar Singh; Sumanta Kundu; K.P.R. Vittal; J. J. Patel; M. M. Patel
Soil Science Society of America Journal | 2012
Ch. Srinivasarao; B. Venkateswarlu; Rattan Lal; Anil Kumar Singh; K.P.R. Vittal; Sumanta Kundu; Surender Singh; Sheo Pratap Singh
European Journal of Agronomy | 2012
Ch. Srinivasarao; B. Venkateswarlu; Rattan Lal; Anil Kumar Singh; Sumanta Kundu; K.P.R. Vittal; G. Balaguravaiah; M Vijaya Shankar Babu; G. Ravindra Chary; M.B.B. Prasadbabu; T. Yellamanda Reddy
Geoderma | 2012
Ch. Srinivasarao; A.N. Deshpande; B. Venkateswarlu; Rattan Lal; Anil Kumar Singh; Sumanta Kundu; K.P.R. Vittal; P.K. Mishra; J.V.N.S. Prasad; Uttam Kumar Mandal; K. L. Sharma
Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development | 2006
Ch. Srinivasa Rao; K.P.R. Vittal; G. Ravindra Chary; Pravin N. Gajbhiye; B. Venkateswarlu
Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development | 2006
G.R. Maruthi Sankar; K.P.R. Vittal; G. Ravindra Chary; Y.S. Ramakrishna; A. Grija
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems | 2013
Ch. Srinivasarao; Sumanta Kundu; B. Venkateswarlu; Rattan Lal; Ashwinder Singh; G. Balaguravaiah; M. Vijayasankarbabu; K.P.R. Vittal; Sharanbhoopal Reddy; V. Rupendra Manideep