K. Shibata
Kochi University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by K. Shibata.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010
Seok-Woo Son; Edwin P. Gerber; Judith Perlwitz; Lorenzo M. Polvani; Nathan P. Gillett; Kyong-Hwan Seo; Veronika Eyring; Theodore G. Shepherd; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; J. Austin; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Rolando R. Garcia; Steven C. Hardiman; Patrick Jöckel; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Tetsu Nakamura
The impact of stratospheric ozone on the tropospheric general circulation of the Southern Hemisphere (SH) is examined with a set of chemistry-climate models participating in the Stratospheric Processes and their Role in Climate (SPARC)/Chemistry-Climate Model Validation project phase 2 (CCMVal-2). Model integrations of both the past and future climates reveal the crucial role of stratospheric ozone in driving SH circulation change: stronger ozone depletion in late spring generally leads to greater poleward displacement and intensification of the tropospheric midlatitude jet, and greater expansion of the SH Hadley cell in the summer. These circulation changes are systematic as poleward displacement of the jet is typically accompanied by intensification of the jet and expansion of the Hadley cell. Overall results are compared with coupled models participating in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC AR4), and possible mechanisms are discussed. While the tropospheric circulation response appears quasi-linearly related to stratospheric ozone changes, the quantitative response to a given forcing varies considerably from one model to another. This scatter partly results from differences in model climatology. It is shown that poleward intensification of the westerly jet is generally stronger in models whose climatological jet is biased toward lower latitudes. This result is discussed in the context of quasi-geostrophic zonal mean dynamics.
Journal of Climate | 2010
Neal Butchart; Irene Cionni; Veronika Eyring; Theodore G. Shepherd; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; J. Austin; C. Brühl; M. P. Chipperfield; Eugene C. Cordero; Martin Dameris; Rudolf Deckert; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Andrew Gettelman; Marco A. Giorgetta; Douglas E. Kinnison; Feng Li; E. Mancini; Charles McLandress; Steven Pawson; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer; E. Rozanov; F. Sassi; J. F. Scinocca; K. Shibata; B. Steil; Wenshou Tian
The response of stratospheric climate and circulation to increasing amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and ozone recovery in the twenty-first century is analyzed in simulations of 11 chemistry–climate models using near-identical forcings and experimental setup. In addition to an overall global cooling of the stratosphere in the simulations (0.59 6 0.07 K decade 21 at 10 hPa), ozone recovery causes a warming of the Southern Hemisphere polar lower stratosphere in summer with enhanced cooling above. The rate of warming correlates with the rate of ozone recovery projected by the models and, on average, changes from 0.8 to 0.48 K decade 21 at 100 hPa as the rate of recovery declines from the first to the second half of the century. In the winter northern polar lower stratosphere the increased radiative cooling from the growing abundance of GHGs is, in most models, balanced by adiabatic warming from stronger polar downwelling. In the Antarctic lower stratosphere the models simulate an increase in low temperature extremes required for polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) formation, but the positive trend is decreasing over the twenty-first century in all models. In the Arctic, none of the models simulates a statistically significant increase in Arctic PSCs throughout the twentyfirst century. The subtropical jets accelerate in response to climate change and the ozone recovery produces a westward acceleration of the lower-stratospheric wind over the Antarctic during summer, though this response is sensitive to the rate of recovery projected by the models. There is a strengthening of the Brewer–Dobson
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008
John Austin; K. Tourpali; E. Rozanov; Hideharu Akiyoshi; Slimane Bekki; G. E. Bodeker; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Makoto Deushi; V. I. Fomichev; Marco A. Giorgetta; Liz Gray; Kunihiko Kodera; François Lott; Elisa Manzini; Daniel R. Marsh; Katja Matthes; Tatsuya Nagashima; K. Shibata; Richard S. Stolarski; H. Struthers; W. Tian
The 11-year solar cycles in ozone and temperature are examined using newsimulations of coupled chemistry climate models. The results show a secondary maximumin stratospheric tropical ozone, in agreement with satellite observations and in contrastwith most previously published simulations. The mean model response varies by upto about 2.5% in ozone and 0.8 K in temperature during a typical solar cycle, at the lowerend of the observed ranges of peak responses. Neither the upper atmospheric effectsof energetic particles nor the presence of the quasi biennial oscillation is necessaryto simulate the lower stratospheric response in the observed low latitude ozoneconcentration. Comparisons are also made between model simulations and observed totalcolumn ozone. As in previous studies, the model simulations agree well with observations.For those models which cover the full temporal range 1960–2005, the ozone solarsignal below 50 hPa changes substantially from the first two solar cycles to the last twosolar cycles. Further investigation suggests that this difference is due to an aliasingbetween the sea surface temperatures and the solar cycle during the first part of the period.The relationship between these results and the overall structure in the tropical solarozone response is discussed. Further understanding of solar processes requiresimprovement in the observations of the vertically varying and column integrated ozone.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Neal Butchart; Andrew Charlton-Perez; Irene Cionni; Steven C. Hardiman; Peter H. Haynes; Kirstin Krüger; Paul J. Kushner; Paul A. Newman; Scott M. Osprey; Judith Perlwitz; Michael Sigmond; Lei Wang; Hideharu Akiyoshi; J. Austin; Slimane Bekki; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; Veronika Eyring; Rolando R. Garcia; Hella Garny; Patrick Jöckel; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Olaf Morgenstern; Tetsu Nakamura
The stratospheric climate and variability from simulations of sixteen chemistry-climate models is evaluated. On average the polar night jet is well reproduced though its variability is less well reproduced with a large spread between models. Polar temperature biases are less than 5 K except in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) lower stratosphere in spring. The accumulated area of low temperatures responsible for polar stratospheric cloud formation is accurately reproduced for the Antarctic but underestimated for the Arctic. The shape and position of the polar vortex is well simulated, as is the tropical upwelling in the lower stratosphere. There is a wide model spread in the frequency of major sudden stratospheric warnings (SSWs), late biases in the breakup of the SH vortex, and a weak annual cycle in the zonal wind in the tropical upper stratosphere. Quantitatively, metrics indicate a wide spread in model performance for most diagnostics with systematic biases in many, and poorer performance in the SH than in the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Correlations were found in the SH between errors in the final warming, polar temperatures, the leading mode of variability, and jet strength, and in the NH between errors in polar temperatures, frequency of major SSWs, and jet strength. Models with a stronger QBO have stronger tropical upwelling and a colder NH vortex. Both the qualitative and quantitative analysis indicate a number of common and long-standing model problems, particularly related to the simulation of the SH and stratospheric variability.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010
M. I. Hegglin; Andrew Gettelman; P. Hoor; R. Krichevsky; G. L. Manney; Laura L. Pan; Say-Jin Son; G. P. Stiller; Simone Tilmes; Kaley A. Walker; Veronika Eyring; Theodore G. Shepherd; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; Juan A. Añel; J. Austin; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Steven C. Hardiman; Patrick Jöckel; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque
A multimodel assessment of the performance of chemistry-climate models (CCMs) in the extratropical upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS) is conducted for the first time. Process-oriented diagnostics are used to validate dynamical and transport characteristics of 18 CCMs using meteorological analyses and aircraft and satellite observations. The main dynamical and chemical climatological characteristics of the extratropical UTLS are generally well represented by the models, despite the limited horizontal and vertical resolution. The seasonal cycle of lowermost stratospheric mass is realistic, however with a wide spread in its mean value. A tropopause inversion layer is present in most models, although the maximum in static stability is located too high above the tropopause and is somewhat too weak, as expected from limited model resolution. Similar comments apply to the extratropical tropopause transition layer. The seasonality in lower stratospheric chemical tracers is consistent with the seasonality in the Brewer-Dobson circulation. Both vertical and meridional tracer gradients are of similar strength to those found in observations. Models that perform less well tend to use a semi-Lagrangian transport scheme and/or have a very low resolution. Two models, and the multimodel mean, score consistently well on all diagnostics, while seven other models score well on all diagnostics except the seasonal cycle of water vapor. Only four of the models are consistently below average. The lack of tropospheric chemistry in most models limits their evaluation in the upper troposphere. Finally, the UTLS is relatively sparsely sampled by observations, limiting our ability to quantitatively evaluate many aspects of model performance.
RADIATION PROCESSES IN THE ATMOSPHERE AND OCEAN (IRS2012): Proceedings of the International Radiation Symposium (IRC/IAMAS) | 2013
K. Shibata; Makoto Deushi; Takashi Maki; Tomohiro Nagai; Testu Sakai; Masahisa Nakazato
Ozone vertical profile in the troposphere was continually measured by lidar at Tsukuba, Japan and diurnal variations of ozone was investigated in relation to the daily weather system variations. A chemistry-climate model including detailed tropospheric chemistry was also run to get continuous ozone distribution. Based on the observed and simulated ozone profile in the troposphere, diurnal and daily variations in the actinic flux of ultraviolet radiation at the surface were calculated under a clear sky assumption. A preliminary calculation shows that the reduction in UVB due to tropospheric ozone decreases in magnitude with wavelengths, while the reduction displays greater diurnal variations at middle wavelengths (290 and 300 nm) than the shorter (280 nm) and the longer (310 nm) wavelengths.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2010
Veronika Eyring; I. Cionni; G. E. Bodeker; Andrew Charlton-Perez; Douglas E. Kinnison; J. F. Scinocca; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; Slimane Bekki; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Andrew Gettelman; Anne Kubin; Ulrike Langematz; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; Tetsu Nakamura; Luke D. Oman; Steven Pawson; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer; E. Rozanov; Theodore G. Shepherd; K. Shibata; W. Tian; Peter Braesicke; Steven C. Hardiman
Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics | 2011
Makoto Deushi; K. Shibata
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2008
K. Tourpali; A. F. Bais; A. Kazantzidis; C. Zerefos; Hideharu Akiyoshi; John Austin; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; Makoto Deushi; Veronika Eyring; Marco A. Giorgetta; Douglas E. Kinnison; E. Mancini; Daniel R. Marsh; Tatsuya Nagashima; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer; E. Rozanov; K. Shibata; W. Tian
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2010
Andrew Charlton-Perez; Ed Hawkins; Veronika Eyring; I. Cionni; G. E. Bodeker; Douglas E. Kinnison; Hideharu Akiyoshi; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Andrew Gettelman; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Tetsu Nakamura; Steven Pawson; Yousuke Yamashita; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; M. P. Chipperfield; S. Dhomse; Marion Marchand; E. Mancini; Olaf Morgenstern; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer; J. A. Pyle; E. Rozanov; J. F. Scinocca; K. Shibata; Theodore G. Shepherd; W. Tian; Darryn W. Waugh