Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M. P. Chipperfield is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M. P. Chipperfield.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2006

Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past

Veronika Eyring; Neal Butchart; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; John Austin; Slimane Bekki; G. E. Bodeker; B. A. Boville; C. Brühl; M. P. Chipperfield; Eugene C. Cordero; Martin Dameris; Makoto Deushi; Vitali E. Fioletov; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Andrew Gettelman; Marco A. Giorgetta; Volker Grewe; L. Jourdain; Douglas E. Kinnison; E. Mancini; Elisa Manzini; Marion Marchand; Daniel R. Marsh; Tatsuya Nagashima; Paul A. Newman; J. E. Nielsen; Steven Pawson; G. Pitari

Simulations of the stratosphere from thirteen coupled chemistry-climate models (CCMs) are evaluated to provide guidance for the interpretation of ozone predictions made by the same CCMs. The focus of the evaluation is on how well the fields and processes that are important for determining the ozone distribution are represented in the simulations of the recent past. The core period of the evaluation is from 1980 to 1999 but long-term trends are compared for an extended period (1960–2004). Comparisons of polar high-latitude temperatures show that most CCMs have only small biases in the Northern Hemisphere in winter and spring, but still have cold biases in the Southern Hemisphere spring below 10 hPa. Most CCMs display the correct stratospheric response of polar temperatures to wave forcing in the Northern, but not in the Southern Hemisphere. Global long-term stratospheric temperature trends are in reasonable agreement with satellite and radiosonde observations. Comparisons of simulations of methane, mean age of air, and propagation of the annual cycle in water vapor show a wide spread in the results, indicating differences in transport. However, for around half the models there is reasonable agreement with observations. In these models the mean age of air and the water vapor tape recorder signal are generally better than reported in previous model intercomparisons. Comparisons of the water vapor and inorganic chlorine (Cly) fields also show a large intermodel spread. Differences in tropical water vapor mixing ratios in the lower stratosphere are primarily related to biases in the simulated tropical tropopause temperatures and not transport. The spread in Cly, which is largest in the polar lower stratosphere, appears to be primarily related to transport differences. In general the amplitude and phase of the annual cycle in total ozone is well simulated apart from the southern high latitudes. Most CCMs show reasonable agreement with observed total ozone trends and variability on a global scale, but a greater spread in the ozone trends in polar regions in spring, especially in the Arctic. In conclusion, despite the wide range of skills in representing different processes assessed here, there is sufficient agreement between the majority of the CCMs and the observations that some confidence can be placed in their predictions.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1999

Multiannual simulations with a three-dimensional chemical transport model

M. P. Chipperfield

An off-line three-dimensional stratospheric chemical transport model (CTM) has been developed and integrated in a series of 6-year experiments covering 1991 to 1997. The model has a detailed chemistry scheme and is forced by the meteorological analyses for the temperatures and horizontal winds, while the vertical motion is diagnosed using a radiation scheme. By using the meteorological analyses, the model captures the interannual variability in chlorine activation in the Arctic winter lower stratosphere, as well as the much more regular, strong activation in the Antarctic. The model fields show generally good agreement with long time series of ground-based observations. In particular, the model simulations of column O3 are excellent in terms of capturing the magnitude and day-to-day, seasonal, and interannual variations at all latitudes. However, a large model/observation discrepancy for O3 occurs at high latitudes during the summer, when the model overestimates the O3 profile throughout the lower and mid-stratosphere. The model also reproduces many features in ground-based observations of HCl, ClONO2, HNO3, and NO2, such as short-term variability, the seasonal cycles, and winter/spring enhancements of ClONO2 at northern midlatitudes. By running the model without cold, chlorine activating heterogeneous reactions the effect of polar (and subpolar) processing on midlatitudes has been estimated. Polar processing results in 2–3% less O3 at 50°N throughout the year, and around 5% less O3 at 50°S. Direct chlorine activation on enhanced midlatitude aerosol contributes 1% to column ozone depletion at mid and low latitudes in early 1992. The enhanced aerosol also caused column ozone reductions of around 3% at 45°N throughout 1992 and 1993. However, the CTM runs confirm the suggestion interannual dynamical variability (which may be partly driven by the radiative effects of the aerosols) contributed to the large negative ozone anomaly in northern midlatitudes in 1992/1993.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007

Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century

Veronika Eyring; Darryn W. Waugh; G. E. Bodeker; Eugene C. Cordero; Hideharu Akiyoshi; John Austin; S. R. Beagley; B. A. Boville; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; Rudolf Deckert; Makoto Deushi; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Andrew Gettelman; Marco A. Giorgetta; Douglas E. Kinnison; E. Mancini; Elisa Manzini; Daniel R. Marsh; Sigrun Matthes; Tatsuya Nagashima; Paul A. Newman; J. E. Nielsen; S. Pawson; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer

[1] Simulations from eleven coupled chemistry-climate models (CCMs) employing nearly identical forcings have been used to project the evolution of stratospheric ozone throughout the 21st century. The model-to-model agreement in projected temperature trends is good, and all CCMs predict continued, global mean cooling of the stratosphere over the next 5 decades, increasing from around 0.25 K/decade at 50 hPa to around 1 K/ decade at 1 hPa under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) A1B scenario. In general, the simulated ozone evolution is mainly determined by decreases in halogen concentrations and continued cooling of the global stratosphere due to increases in greenhouse gases (GHGs). Column ozone is projected to increase as stratospheric halogen concentrations return to 1980s levels. Because of ozone increases in the middle and upper stratosphere due to GHGinduced cooling, total ozone averaged over midlatitudes, outside the polar regions, and globally, is projected to increase to 1980 values between 2035 and 2050 and before lowerstratospheric halogen amounts decrease to 1980 values. In the polar regions the CCMs simulate small temperature trends in the first and second half of the 21st century in midwinter. Differences in stratospheric inorganic chlorine (Cly) among the CCMs are key to diagnosing the intermodel differences in simulated ozone recovery, in particular in the Antarctic. It is found that there are substantial quantitative differences in the simulated Cly, with the October mean Antarctic Cly peak value varying from less than 2 ppb to over 3.5 ppb in the CCMs, and the date at which the Cly returns to 1980 values varying from before 2030 to after 2050. There is a similar variation in the timing of recovery of Antarctic springtime column ozone back to 1980 values. As most models underestimate peak Clynear 2000, ozone recovery in the Antarctic could occur even later, between 2060 and 2070. In the Arctic the column ozone increase in spring does not follow halogen decreases as closely as in the Antarctic, reaching 1980 values before Arctic halogen amounts decrease


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1997

Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models using 222Rn and other short‐lived tracers

Daniel J. Jacob; Michael J. Prather; Philip J. Rasch; Run-Lie Shia; Yves Balkanski; S. R. Beagley; D. Bergmann; W. T. Blackshear; Margaret Brown; Masaru Chiba; M. P. Chipperfield; J. de Grandpré; Jane Dignon; Johann Feichter; Christophe Genthon; William L. Grose; Prasad S. Kasibhatla; Ines Köhler; Mark A. Kritz; Kathy S. Law; Joyce E. Penner; Michel Ramonet; C. E. Reeves; Douglas A. Rotman; Deianeira Z. Stockwell; Peter F. J. van Velthoven; Gé Verver; Oliver Wild; Hu Yang; Peter H. Zimmermann

Simulations of 222Rn and other short-lived tracers are used to evaluate and intercompare the representations of convective and synoptic processes in 20 global atmospheric transport models. Results show that most established three-dimensional models simulate vertical mixing in the troposphere to within the constraints offered by the observed mean 222Rn concentrations and that subgrid parameterization of convection is essential for this purpose. However, none of the models captures the observed variability of 222Rn concentrations in the upper troposphere, and none reproduces the high 222Rn concentrations measured at 200 hPa over Hawaii. The established three-dimensional models reproduce the frequency and magnitude of high-222Rn episodes observed at Crozet Island in the Indian Ocean, demonstrating that they can resolve the synoptic-scale transport of continental plumes with no significant numerical diffusion. Large differences between models are found in the rates of meridional transport in the upper troposphere (interhemispheric exchange, exchange between tropics and high latitudes). The four two-dimensional models which participated in the intercomparison tend to underestimate the rate of vertical transport from the lower to the upper troposphere but show concentrations of 222Rn in the lower troposphere that are comparable to the zonal mean values in the three-dimensional models.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Impact of stratospheric ozone on Southern Hemisphere circulation change: A multimodel assessment

Seok-Woo Son; Edwin P. Gerber; Judith Perlwitz; Lorenzo M. Polvani; Nathan P. Gillett; Kyong-Hwan Seo; Veronika Eyring; Theodore G. Shepherd; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; J. Austin; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Rolando R. Garcia; Steven C. Hardiman; Patrick Jöckel; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Tetsu Nakamura

The impact of stratospheric ozone on the tropospheric general circulation of the Southern Hemisphere (SH) is examined with a set of chemistry-climate models participating in the Stratospheric Processes and their Role in Climate (SPARC)/Chemistry-Climate Model Validation project phase 2 (CCMVal-2). Model integrations of both the past and future climates reveal the crucial role of stratospheric ozone in driving SH circulation change: stronger ozone depletion in late spring generally leads to greater poleward displacement and intensification of the tropospheric midlatitude jet, and greater expansion of the SH Hadley cell in the summer. These circulation changes are systematic as poleward displacement of the jet is typically accompanied by intensification of the jet and expansion of the Hadley cell. Overall results are compared with coupled models participating in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC AR4), and possible mechanisms are discussed. While the tropospheric circulation response appears quasi-linearly related to stratospheric ozone changes, the quantitative response to a given forcing varies considerably from one model to another. This scatter partly results from differences in model climatology. It is shown that poleward intensification of the westerly jet is generally stronger in models whose climatological jet is biased toward lower latitudes. This result is discussed in the context of quasi-geostrophic zonal mean dynamics.


Journal of Climate | 2010

Chemistry-climate model simulations of twenty-first century stratospheric climate and circulation changes

Neal Butchart; Irene Cionni; Veronika Eyring; Theodore G. Shepherd; Darryn W. Waugh; Hideharu Akiyoshi; J. Austin; C. Brühl; M. P. Chipperfield; Eugene C. Cordero; Martin Dameris; Rudolf Deckert; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Rolando R. Garcia; Andrew Gettelman; Marco A. Giorgetta; Douglas E. Kinnison; Feng Li; E. Mancini; Charles McLandress; Steven Pawson; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer; E. Rozanov; F. Sassi; J. F. Scinocca; K. Shibata; B. Steil; Wenshou Tian

The response of stratospheric climate and circulation to increasing amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and ozone recovery in the twenty-first century is analyzed in simulations of 11 chemistry–climate models using near-identical forcings and experimental setup. In addition to an overall global cooling of the stratosphere in the simulations (0.59 6 0.07 K decade 21 at 10 hPa), ozone recovery causes a warming of the Southern Hemisphere polar lower stratosphere in summer with enhanced cooling above. The rate of warming correlates with the rate of ozone recovery projected by the models and, on average, changes from 0.8 to 0.48 K decade 21 at 100 hPa as the rate of recovery declines from the first to the second half of the century. In the winter northern polar lower stratosphere the increased radiative cooling from the growing abundance of GHGs is, in most models, balanced by adiabatic warming from stronger polar downwelling. In the Antarctic lower stratosphere the models simulate an increase in low temperature extremes required for polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) formation, but the positive trend is decreasing over the twenty-first century in all models. In the Arctic, none of the models simulates a statistically significant increase in Arctic PSCs throughout the twentyfirst century. The subtropical jets accelerate in response to climate change and the ozone recovery produces a westward acceleration of the lower-stratospheric wind over the Antarctic during summer, though this response is sensitive to the rate of recovery projected by the models. There is a strengthening of the Brewer–Dobson


Nature | 1997

Prolonged stratospheric ozone loss in the 1995–96 Arctic winter

Markus Rex; N. R. P. Harris; Ralph Lehmann; Geir O. Braathen; E. Reimer; Alexander Beck; M. P. Chipperfield; Reimond Alfier; Marc Allaart; F. M. O'Connor; H. Dier; V. Dorokhov; H. Fast; Manuel Gil; E. Kyrö; Zenobia Litynska; Ib Steen Mikkelsen; Mike G. Molyneux; Hideaki Nakane; Justus Notholt; Markku Rummukainen; Pierre Viatte; John C. Wenger

It is well established that extensive depletion of ozone, initiated by heterogenous reactions on polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) can occur in both the Arctic and Antarctic lower stratosphere. Moreover, it has been shown that ozone loss rates in the Arctic region in recent years reached values comparable to those over the Antarctic,. But until now the accumulated ozone losses over the Arctic have been the smaller, mainly because the period of Arctic ozone loss has not—unlike over the Antarctic—persisted well into springtime. Here we report the occurrence—during the unusually cold 1995–96 Arctic winter—of the highest recorded chemical ozone loss over the Arctic region. Two new kinds of behaviour were observed. First, ozone loss at some altitudes was observed long after the last exposure to PSCs. This continued loss appears to be due to a removal of the nitrogen species that slow down chemical ozone depletion. Second, in another altitude range ozone loss rates decreased while PSCs were still present, apparently because of an early transformation of the ozone-destroying chlorine species into less active chlorinenitrate. The balance between these two counteracting mechanisms is probably a fine one, determined by small differences in wintertime stratospheric temperatures. If the apparent cooling trend in the Arctic stratosphere is real, more dramatic ozone losses may occur in the future.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Tropics and global trends

Andrew Gettelman; M. I. Hegglin; Say-Jin Son; Jung-Hyun Kim; Masatomo Fujiwara; Thomas Birner; Stefanie Kremser; Markus Rex; Juan A. Añel; Hideharu Akiyoshi; John Austin; Slimane Bekki; P. Braesike; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; Hella Garny; Steven C. Hardiman; Patrick Jöckel; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Olaf Morgenstern; Steven Pawson; G. Pitari; David A. Plummer

The performance of 18 coupled Chemistry Climate Models (CCMs) in the Tropical Tropopause Layer (TTL) is evaluated using qualitative and quantitative diagnostics. Trends in tropopause quantities in the tropics and the extratropical Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere (UTLS) are analyzed. A quantitative grading methodology for evaluating CCMs is extended to include variability and used to develop four different grades for tropical tropopause temperature and pressure, water vapor and ozone. Four of the 18 models and the multi‐model mean meet quantitative and qualitative standards for reproducing key processes in the TTL. Several diagnostics are performed on a subset of the models analyzing the Tropopause Inversion Layer (TIL), Lagrangian cold point and TTL transit time. Historical decreases in tropical tropopause pressure and decreases in water vapor are simulated, lending confidence to future projections. The models simulate continued decreases in tropopause pressure in the 21st century, along with ∼1K increases per century in cold point tropopause temperature and 0.5–1 ppmv per century increases in water vapor above the tropical tropopause. TTL water vapor increases below the cold point. In two models, these trends are associated with 35% increases in TTL cloud fraction. These changes indicate significant perturbations to TTL processes, specifically to deep convective heating and humidity transport. Ozone in the extratropical lowermost stratosphere has significant and hemispheric asymmetric trends. O3 is projected to increase by nearly 30% due to ozone recovery in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) and due to enhancements in the stratospheric circulation. These UTLS ozone trends may have significant effects in the TTL and the troposphere.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008

Coupled chemistry climate model simulations of the solar cycle in ozone and temperature

John Austin; K. Tourpali; E. Rozanov; Hideharu Akiyoshi; Slimane Bekki; G. E. Bodeker; C. Brühl; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Makoto Deushi; V. I. Fomichev; Marco A. Giorgetta; Liz Gray; Kunihiko Kodera; François Lott; Elisa Manzini; Daniel R. Marsh; Katja Matthes; Tatsuya Nagashima; K. Shibata; Richard S. Stolarski; H. Struthers; W. Tian

The 11-year solar cycles in ozone and temperature are examined using newsimulations of coupled chemistry climate models. The results show a secondary maximumin stratospheric tropical ozone, in agreement with satellite observations and in contrastwith most previously published simulations. The mean model response varies by upto about 2.5% in ozone and 0.8 K in temperature during a typical solar cycle, at the lowerend of the observed ranges of peak responses. Neither the upper atmospheric effectsof energetic particles nor the presence of the quasi biennial oscillation is necessaryto simulate the lower stratospheric response in the observed low latitude ozoneconcentration. Comparisons are also made between model simulations and observed totalcolumn ozone. As in previous studies, the model simulations agree well with observations.For those models which cover the full temporal range 1960–2005, the ozone solarsignal below 50 hPa changes substantially from the first two solar cycles to the last twosolar cycles. Further investigation suggests that this difference is due to an aliasingbetween the sea surface temperatures and the solar cycle during the first part of the period.The relationship between these results and the overall structure in the tropical solarozone response is discussed. Further understanding of solar processes requiresimprovement in the observations of the vertically varying and column integrated ozone.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Review of the formulation of present‐generation stratospheric chemistry‐climate models and associated external forcings

Olaf Morgenstern; Marco A. Giorgetta; Kiyotaka Shibata; Veronika Eyring; Darryn W. Waugh; Theodore G. Shepherd; Hideharu Akiyoshi; J. Austin; A. J. G. Baumgaertner; Slimane Bekki; Peter Braesicke; C. Brühl; M. P. Chipperfield; David Cugnet; Martin Dameris; S. Dhomse; S. M. Frith; Hella Garny; Andrew Gettelman; Steven C. Hardiman; M. I. Hegglin; Patrick Jöckel; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; E. Mancini; Elisa Manzini; Marion Marchand; M. Michou; Tetsu Nakamura; J. E. Nielsen

The goal of the Chemistry-Climate Model Validation (CCMVal) activity is to improve understanding of chemistry-climate models (CCMs) through process-oriented evaluation and to provide reliable projections of stratospheric ozone and its impact on climate. An appreciation of the details of model formulations is essential for understanding how models respond to the changing external forcings of greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances, and hence for understanding the ozone and climate forecasts produced by the models participating in this activity. Here we introduce and review the models used for the second round (CCMVal-2) of this intercomparison, regarding the implementation of chemical, transport, radiative, and dynamical processes in these models. In particular, we review the advantages and problems associated with approaches used to model processes of relevance to stratospheric dynamics and chemistry. Furthermore, we state the definitions of the reference simulations performed, and describe the forcing data used in these simulations. We identify some developments in chemistry-climate modeling that make models more physically based or more comprehensive, including the introduction of an interactive ocean, online photolysis, troposphere-stratosphere chemistry, and non-orographic gravity-wave deposition as linked to tropospheric convection. The relatively new developments indicate that stratospheric CCM modeling is becoming more consistent with our physically based understanding of the atmosphere.

Collaboration


Dive into the M. P. Chipperfield's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. A. Pyle

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Slimane Bekki

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas E. Kinnison

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hideharu Akiyoshi

National Institute for Environmental Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Braesicke

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge