K. Stenson
University of Chicago
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by K. Stenson.
Annals of Oncology | 2008
Joseph K. Salama; K. Stenson; E. O. Kistner; Bharat B. Mittal; Athanassios Argiris; M. E. Witt; F. Rosen; Bruce Brockstein; Ezra E.W. Cohen; Daniel J. Haraf; Everett E. Vokes
BACKGROUND We hypothesized induction chemotherapy (IndCT) would improve distant control (DC) without compromising locoregional control (LRC) for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer patients. Additionally, we systematically lowered radiotherapy (RT) doses attempting to maintain LRC while decreasing toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Stages III-IV (M0) locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer patients received carboplatin/paclitaxel (Taxol) IndCT followed by four or five cycles consisting of 5 days of paclitaxel, fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and BID RT followed by a nine day break. RT dose to gross disease (high risk), intermediate, and low-risk volumes were reduced from cohort A (n = 68): 75, 60, and 45 Gy; to cohort B (n = 64): 75, 54, and 39 Gy; then cohort C (n = 90): 72, 51, and 36 Gy. RESULTS A total of 222 patients accrued from November 1998 to September 2002. Median follow-up is 56 months. In all, 93/96/76% achieved a complete response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in cohort A/B/C. Three- and 5-year overall survivals (OSs) are 68% and 62%, respectively. Five-year LRC and DC are 91% and 87%, respectively. Response to IndCT predicted for OS, LRC, and time to progression (TTP). Cohort C patients had similar OS (P = 0.95), LRC, and DC, but worse (TTP) (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS IndCT before CRT reduces distant progression while maintaining high LRC. The cohort B schedule provides the best therapeutic ratio. A randomized trial investigating IndCT before CRT has been initiated.
Annals of Oncology | 2011
Joseph K. Salama; Daniel J. Haraf; K. Stenson; Elizabeth A. Blair; M. E. Witt; R. Williams; R. Kunnavakkam; Ezra E.W. Cohen; Tanguy Y. Seiwert; Everett E. Vokes
INTRODUCTION We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate the impact of adding bevacizumab (B) to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea (HU), and radiotherapy (FHX) for intermediate-stage and select T4 head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had newly diagnosed HNSCC. Randomization was 2:1 in favor of BFHX. All patients received 500 mg HU p.o. b.i.d., 600 mg/m(2)/day continuous infusion 5-FU, and b.i.d. radiotherapy with or without bevacizumab 10 mg/kg administered on day 1 of each 14-day cycle. Patients received five cycles consisting of chemoradiotherapy for 5 days followed by 9 days without therapy. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were enrolled (19 BFHX and 7 FHX). The study was halted following unexpected locoregional progression. Two-year survival was 68%; 89% treated with FHX and 58% (95% confidence interval 33% to 78%) treated with BFHX. Two-year locoregional control was 80% after chemoradiotherapy and 85% after surgical salvage. All locoregional progression occurred in T4 tumors randomized to BFHX. Two patients receiving BFHX died during therapy, and one died shortly after therapy. No catastrophic bleeding events were seen. CONCLUSIONS Locoregional progression seen in T4N0-1 tumors treated with BFHX was unexpected and led to study termination. The addition of bevacuzimab to chemoradiotherapy for HNSCC should be limited clinical trials.
Annals of Oncology | 2000
Bruce Brockstein; Daniel J. Haraf; K. Stenson; Laura Sulzen; M. E. Witt; R. W. Weichselbaum; Everett E. Vokes
BACKGROUND Concomitant chemoradiotherapy is an effective treatment modality for advanced head and neck cancer, but improved regimens are needed. We sought to define the toxicities, recommended phase II dose, and outcome of a combination chemotherapy regimen with concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with poor prognosis cancers of the head and neck, including those having received prior curative intent radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1995 until 1997, 54 patients were treated, 25 of whom had received a prior full course of radiotherapy to the head and neck. Patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 600 mg/m2/day continuous infusion x 5 days (days 1-5), hydroxyurea, 500 mg p.o. bid x 11 doses (days 1-6) and paclitaxel (60-150 mg/m2) by one-hour infusion on day 2 using a dose escalation strategy. Radiotherapy was given concomitantly on days 2-6, 150 cGy bid. Each of 4-5 cycles was delivered every other week. RESULTS The MTD of paclitaxel was 100 mg/m2. The regimen was feasible; radiotherapy was delivered at a median of 7300 cGy and 83% of patients received > or = 80% planned dose intensity. Hematological toxicity, with granulocyte colony stimulating factor, was very mild. Dose limiting toxicities were mucositis and dermatitis. Despite poor prognosis, two-year survival was 45%. CONCLUSIONS The recommended phase II dose of this regimen is 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day x 120 hours (days 1-5), hydroxyurea 500 mg p.o. b.i.d. x 11 doses (days 1-6), paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 over one hour on day 2, and radiotherapy 150 cGy b.i.d. days 2-6. Concomitant chemotherapy and re-irradiation was feasible on this protocol and resulted in long-term survival in patients without other curative intent options.
Annals of Oncology | 2008
B. R. Knab; Joseph K. Salama; A.A. Solanki; K. Stenson; Ezra E.W. Cohen; M. E. Witt; Daniel J. Haraf; Everett E. Vokes
BACKGROUND Randomized trials established chemoradiotherapy as standard treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer. Patients with large-volume T4 disease (LVT4) were excluded from these trials. The purpose of this study was to report T4 laryngeal cancer patient outcome, including those with LVT4 disease, treated with chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study is a retrospective subset analysis of 32 patients with T4 laryngeal carcinoma including LVT4 tumors treated on three consecutive protocols investigating paclitaxel (Taxol), 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and 1.5-Gy twice daily (BID) radiotherapy (TFHX). RESULTS Median follow-up is 43 months. Four-year locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was 71%, 67%, 53%, and 86%, respectively. Four patients required laryngectomy for recurrent or persistent disease. Of disease-free patients with >or=1 year follow-up, 90% demonstrated normal or understandable speech. None required laryngectomy for complications. Among LVT4 patients, 4-year LRC, DFS, OS, and LFS was 71%, 65%, 56%, and 81%, respectively. Induction chemotherapy improved 4-year LRC (90% versus 46%, P = 0.03) and DFS (84% versus 42%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Promising control and functional outcomes are achieved with TFHX for T4 laryngeal patients. LVT4 disease had outcomes similar to patients with less advanced disease treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 91-11. Induction chemotherapy improved outcomes, warranting further investigation.
Annals of Oncology | 2011
Victoria M. Villaflor; Daniel J. Haraf; Joseph K. Salama; Masha Kocherginsky; Alexander Langerman; G. Gomez-Abuin; P. Beniwal; Elizabeth A. Blair; K. Stenson; Louis G. Portugal; Tanguy Y. Seiwert; R. Williams; Allison Dekker; M. E. Witt; Everett E. Vokes; Ezra E.W. Cohen
BACKGROUND Concurrent chemoreirradiation therapy (CRRT) offers a therapeutic option for patients with locoregionally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We hypothesized that response to induction chemotherapy (IC) would improve outcome and predict increased survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Subjects with recurrent SCCHN not amenable to standard therapy were eligible. IC consisted of two 28-day cycles of gemcitabine and pemetrexed on days 1 and 14, followed by surgical resection, if appropriate, and/or CRRT consisting of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and single daily fractionated radiotherapy. RESULTS Thirty-five subjects were enrolled, 31 were assessable for response, with 11 responders [response rate = 35%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 19.2-54.6]. Among 24 subjects who started CRRT, 11 were assessable for radiographic response, 4 complete response, 2 partial response, and 5 progressive disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 5.5 months (95% CI 3.6-8.3) and 9.5 months (95% CI 7.2-15.4), respectively. One-year OS was 43% (95% CI 26% to 58%). Subjects who responded to IC had improved survival (P = 0.02). Toxic effects included mucositis, dermatitis, neutropenia, infection, hemorrhage, dehydration, and pain. CONCLUSIONS The combination of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine was active and well tolerated in recurrent SCCHN. Response to IC may help stratify prognosis and offer an objective and dynamic metric in recurrent SCCHN patients being considered for CRRT.
Annals of Oncology | 2013
Tanguy Y. Seiwert; Thomas E. Darga; Daniel J. Haraf; Elizabeth A. Blair; K. Stenson; Ezra E.W. Cohen; Joseph K. Salama; Victoria M. Villaflor; M. E. Witt; Mark W. Lingen; Ralph R. Weichselbaum; Everett E. Vokes
BACKGROUND AdGV.EGR.TNF.11D (TNFerade™ Biologic) is a replication-deficient adenoviral vector expressing human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) under the control of the chemoradiation-inducible EGR-1 promoter. TNF-α has been shown to function as a radiation sensitizer. We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of TNFerade™ Biologic, when added to chemoradiotherapy in poor prognosis patients with recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS TNFerade™ Biologic was injected intratumorally on day 1 of each 14-day cycle and dose-escalated in log increments from 4 × 10(9) to 4 × 10(11) PU. Daily radiation, infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and hydroxyurea were given on days 1-5 for seven cycles (FHX). Tumor biopsies were obtained before, during, and after treatment. RESULTS Fourteen patients were treated. DLT was reached at a dose level of 3 (4 × 10(11) PU) with three thrombotic events. The response rate was 83.3%. The median survival was 9.6 months. One patient (7.1%) remained alive 3 years after treatment. Biopsies were obtained in 90% of patients. Nearly all tumors expressed adenovirus receptors, TNF-α, and TNF-α receptors. Adenoviral DNA was detected in three biopsies from one patient. CONCLUSIONS TNFerade™ Biologic can be safely integrated with FHX chemoradiotherapy at an MTD of 4 × 10(10) PU. Monitoring for thrombotic events is indicated.
Oral Oncology | 2013
Daniel W. Golden; Sonali Rudra; M. E. Witt; T. Nwizu; Ezra E.W. Cohen; Elizabeth A. Blair; K. Stenson; Everett E. Vokes; Daniel J. Haraf
PURPOSE Current standard therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is concurrent chemoradiation based on randomized data. However, limited randomized data exist to support the addition of induction chemotherapy (ICT). METHODS 58 Patients with NPC were treated from 1990 to 2010. All patients received platinum-based ICT. All 58 patients were treated with chemoradiation, 57 in a week-on/week-off (WOWO) fashion. Concurrent chemotherapy included hydroxyurea/5-fluorouracil for all patients. Median radiation dose was 70 Gy. No patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS AJCC 2009 stage was II=13, III=21, IVa=13, and IVb=11. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 66 months. Response to ICT was complete response (CR) 17% and partial response (PR) 64%. The CR rate after chemoradiation was 96%. Five-year actuarial freedom from local failure (FFLF), freedom from distant failure (FFDF), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was 98%, 90%, 90%, and 76%, respectively. Analysis of pediatric patients (n=9) demonstrated 5-year actuarial FFLF, FFDF, CSS, and OS of 100%, 88%, 80%, and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS ICT followed by concurrent chemoradiation demonstrates excellent FFLF, FFDF, CSS, and OS with tolerable toxicity. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation for patients with NPC should be explored further in a randomized setting.
Annals of Oncology | 2004
Bruce Brockstein; Daniel J. Haraf; Alfred Rademaker; Merrill S. Kies; K. Stenson; Fred Rosen; Bharat B. Mittal; Harold J. Pelzer; B. B. Fung; M. E. Witt; Barry L. Wenig; Louis G. Portugal; R. W. Weichselbaum; Everett E. Vokes
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2006
Joseph K. Salama; Everett E. Vokes; Steven J. Chmura; Michael T. Milano; Johnny Kao; K. Stenson; Mary Ellyn Witt; Daniel J. Haraf
Annals of Oncology | 2003
Athanassios Argiris; S. M. Smith; K. Stenson; Bharat B. Mittal; Harold J. Pelzer; Merrill S. Kies; Daniel J. Haraf; Everett E. Vokes