K Van Vaerenbergh

Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Combination Strategies

It is now generally accepted that mono- and bitherapy for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection are only transiently efficient mainly due to virus drug resistance. To obtain a sustained benefit from antiviral therapy, current guidelines recommend at least triple-drug combinations, or the so-called highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In some patients, HAART can be problematic, either because it is difficult to remain compliant or because previous suboptimum therapies have limited the choice of drugs. For compliant drug-naive patients, HAART should be able to offer long-term virus suppression, when changing from first- to second- to third-line HAART at drug failure. Long-term treatment might ultimately result in multi-drug resistant virus leaving few options for salvage therapy. HIV drug resistance testing to guide this salvage therapy and the development of new drugs to allow new options will therefore remain priorities in anti-HIV drug research.

Prevalence and characteristics of multinucleoside-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 among European patients receiving combinations of nucleoside analogues.

ABSTRACT The prevalence and the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of multinucleoside-resistant (MNR) human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants in Europe were investigated in a multicenter study that involved centers in nine European countries. Study samples (n = 363) collected between 1991 and 1997 from patients exposed to two or more nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and 274 control samples from patients exposed to no or one NRTI were screened for two marker mutations of multinucleoside resistance (the Q151M mutation and a mutation with a 2-amino-acid insertion at codon 69, T69S-XX). Q151M was identified in six of the study samples (1.6%), and T69S-XX was identified in two of the study samples (0.5%; both of them T69S-SS), but both patterns were absent among control samples. Non-NRTI (NNRTI)-related changes were observed in viral strains from two patients, which displayed the Q151M resistance pattern, although the patients were NNRTI naive. The patients whose isolates displayed multinucleoside resistance had received treatment with zidovudine and either didanosine, zalcitabine, or stavudine. Both resistance patterns conferred broad cross-resistance to NRTIs in vitro and a poor response to treatment in vivo. MNR HIV-1 is found only among multinucleoside-experienced patients. Its prevalence is low in Europe, but it should be closely monitored since it seriously limits treatment options.

Phenotypic assays and sequencing are less sensitive than point mutation assays for detection of resistance in mixed HIV-1 genotypic populations.

The sensitivity and discriminatory power of the 151 and 215 amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) were evaluated, and their performance for the detection of drug resistance in mixed genotypic populations of the reverse transcription (RT) gene of HIV-1 were compared with T7 sequencing, cycle sequencing, the line probe assay (LiPA) HIV-1 RT test, and the recombinant virus assay (RVA). ARMS and the LiPA HIV-1 RT test were shown to be able to detect minor variants that in particular cases comprised only 1%. T7 sequencing on an ALF semiautomated sequencer could correctly score mixtures only when variants were present at 50%. Cycle sequencing on an ABI PRISM 310 improved the sensitivity for mixtures to about 25%. Using RVA, it was shown that at least 50% of the virus population needed to carry the resistance mutation at codon 184 to afford phenotypic resistance against lamivudine. The two point mutation assays therefore proved to be more sensitive methods than sequencing and RVA to reliably determine a gradual shift in HIV-1 drug resistance mutations in follow-up of patients infected with HIV-1. In 4 of 5 treated patients who were followed by ARMS, a gradual shift in resistant genotypic populations was observed during a period of 6 to 19 months. For 1 patient, a shift from wild to mutant type at position 151 occurred within 2 months, without mixed genotypic intermediate types being detected.

Initiation of HAART in drug-naive HIV type 1 patients prevents viral breakthrough for a median period of 35.5 months in 60% of the patients.

The introduction of potent combinations of antiviral drugs is a major breakthrough in the treatment of HIV. We investigated the long-term virologic outcome and the development of resistance after initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in drug-naive patients in daily clinical practice. Twenty-five treatment-naive HIV-1 patients were started on HAART. Fifteen patients responded with a drop in viral load below the limit of detection during 35.5 (interquartile range: 7) months of therapy. In 6 of 10 patients with virologic failure, virus with resistance-related mutations against the received drugs emerged. Compared with responders (R), nonresponding (NR) patients were in a later disease stage at therapy start (p = 0.0089) with lower CD4 cell counts at baseline (p = 0.040), and a lower proportion of nonresponders showed protease inhibitor (PI) levels above C(min) (p = 0.049). More NR patients showed secondary PI mutations at baseline (p = 0.079), and the CCR2-64I coreceptor polymorphism was absent among NR patients, compared with 38.5% of R patients displaying CCR2-64I (p = 0.053), although the differences were not significant. In conclusion, starting HAART in antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-infected patients followed in daily clinical practice prevented viral breakthrough for up to 44 months in 60% of the patients. Virologic failure was associated with the development of resistance-related mutations, a later stage of disease at start of therapy and lower PI drug levels.

Baseline HIV Type 1 Genotypic Resistance to a Newly Added Nucleoside Analog Is Predictive of Virologic Failure of the New Therapy

We evaluated the predictive value of baseline HIV-1 genotypic resistance mutations for failure of a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) containing therapy. The change in therapy of 88 HIV-1-infected patients was analyzed retrospectively, relating the genotypic resistance profile at baseline to the evolution of viral load and CD4+ T cell counts. Genotypic resistance at baseline and at 6 months was evaluated with the LiPA HIV-1 RT, which detects mutations at codons 41, 69, 70, 74, 184, and 215. At 1 to 3 months after change in therapy, patients without preexisting resistance mutations to the new drug (group S) had a significantly better evolution in viral load (reduction of 0.37 log(10)) compared with patients with known preexisting resistance mutation(s) (group R) (increase of 0.08 log(10)). This difference was particularly striking for patients with the baseline M184V mutation and whose treatment was modified by the addition of lamivudine. After 6 months the median difference in viral load evolution between the two groups increased to 0.61 log(10): the viral load of patients of group S was still 0.18 log(10) below baseline while patients of group R had an increase of 0.43 log(10) in viral load above baseline. Changes in CD4+ T cell counts were not significantly different. The evolution in viral load in HIV-1-infected patients with and without baseline resistance mutation(s) toward a newly added NRTI is significantly different at 1-3 months and at 6 months after changing or adding one NRTI.