Kajsa G. V. Havelius

Direct quantification of the four individual S states in Photosystem II using EPR spectroscopy

EPR spectroscopy is very useful in studies of the oxygen evolving cycle in Photosystem II and EPR signals from the CaMn(4) cluster are known in all S states except S(4). Many signals are insufficiently understood and the S(0), S(1), and S(3) states have not yet been quantifiable through their EPR signals. Recently, split EPR signals, induced by illumination at liquid helium temperatures, have been reported in the S(0), S(1), and S(3) states. These split signals provide new spectral probes to the S state chemistry. We have studied the flash power dependence of the S state turnover in Photosystem II membranes by monitoring the split S(0), split S(1), split S(3) and S(2) state multiline EPR signals. We demonstrate that quantification of the S(1), S(3) and S(0) states, using the split EPR signals, is indeed possible in samples with mixed S state composition. The amplitudes of all three split EPR signals are linearly correlated to the concentration of the respective S state. We also show that the S(1) --> S(2) transition proceeds without misses following a saturating flash at 1 degrees C, whilst substantial misses occur in the S(2) --> S(3) transition following the second flash.

Visible Light Induction of an Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Split Signal in Photosystem II in the S2 State Reveals the Importance of Charges in the Oxygen-Evolving Center during Catalysis: A Unifying Model

Cryogenic illumination of Photosystem II (PSII) can lead to the trapping of the metastable radical Y(Z)(•), the radical form of the redox-active tyrosine residue D1-Tyr161 (known as Y(Z)). Magnetic interaction between this radical and the CaMn(4) cluster of PSII gives rise to so-called split electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals with characteristics that are dependent on the S state. We report here the observation and characterization of a split EPR signal that can be directly induced from PSII centers in the S(2) state through visible light illumination at 10 K. We further show that the induction of this split signal takes place via a Mn-centered mechanism, in the same way as when using near-infrared light illumination [Koulougliotis, D., et al. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 3045-3053]. On the basis of interpretations of these results, and in combination with literature data for other split signals induced under a variety of conditions (temperature and light quality), we propose a unified model for the mechanisms of split signal induction across the four S states (S(0), S(1), S(2), and S(3)). At the heart of this model is the stability or instability of the Y(Z)(•)(D1-His190)(+) pair that would be formed during cryogenic oxidation of Y(Z). Furthermore, the model is closely related to the sequence of transfers of protons and electrons from the CaMn(4) cluster during the S cycle and further demonstrates the utility of the split signals in probing the immediate environment of the oxygen-evolving center in PSII.

The formation of the split EPR signal from the S(3) state of Photosystem II does not involve primary charge separation.

Metalloradical EPR signals have been found in intact Photosystem II at cryogenic temperatures. They reflect the light-driven formation of the tyrosine Z radical (Y(Z)) in magnetic interaction with the CaMn(4) cluster in a particular S state. These so-called split EPR signals, induced at cryogenic temperatures, provide means to study the otherwise transient Y(Z) and to probe the S states with EPR spectroscopy. In the S(0) and S(1) states, the respective split signals are induced by illumination of the sample in the visible light range only. In the S(3) state the split EPR signal is induced irrespective of illumination wavelength within the entire 415-900nm range (visible and near-IR region) [Su, J. H., Havelius, K. G. V., Ho, F. M., Han, G., Mamedov, F., and Styring, S. (2007) Biochemistry 46, 10703-10712]. An important question is whether a single mechanism can explain the induction of the Split S(3) signal across the entire wavelength range or whether wavelength-dependent mechanisms are required. In this paper we confirm that the Y(Z) radical formation in the S(1) state, reflected in the Split S(1) signal, is driven by P680-centered charge separation. The situation in the S(3) state is different. In Photosystem II centers with pre-reduced quinone A (Q(A)), where the P680-centered charge separation is blocked, the Split S(3) EPR signal could still be induced in the majority of the Photosystem II centers using both visible and NIR (830nm) light. This shows that P680-centered charge separation is not involved. The amount of oxidized electron donors and reduced electron acceptors (Q(A)(-)) was well correlated after visible light illumination at cryogenic temperatures in the S(1) state. This was not the case in the S(3) state, where the Split S(3) EPR signal was formed in the majority of the centers in a pathway other than P680-centered charge separation. Instead, we propose that one mechanism exists over the entire wavelength interval to drive the formation of the Split S(3) signal. The origin for this, probably involving excitation of one of the Mn ions in the CaMn(4) cluster in Photosystem II, is discussed.

The S0 state of the water oxidizing complex in photosystem II: pH dependence of the EPR split signal induction and mechanistic implications.

Water oxidation in photosystem II is catalyzed by the CaMn(4) cluster. The electrons extracted from the CaMn(4) cluster are transferred to P(680)(+) via the redox-active tyrosine residue D1-Tyr161 (Y(Z)). The oxidation of Y(Z) is coupled to a deprotonation creating the neutral radical Y(Z)(*). Light-induced oxidation of Y(Z) is possible down to extreme temperatures. This can be observed as a split EPR signal from Y(Z)(*) in a magnetic interaction with the CaMn(4) cluster, offering a way to probe for Y(Z) oxidation in active PSII. Here we have used the split S(0) EPR signal to study the mechanism of Y(Z) oxidation at 5 K in the S(0) state. The state of the hydrogen bond between Y(Z) and its proposed hydrogen bond partner D1-His190 is investigated by varying the pH. The split S(0) EPR signal was induced by illumination at 5 K between pH 3.9 and pH 9.0. Maximum signal intensity was observed between pH 6 and pH 7. On both the acidic and alkaline sides the signal intensity decreased with the apparent pK(a)s (pK(app)) approximately 4.8 and approximately 7.9, respectively. The illumination protocol used to induce the split S(0) EPR signal also induces a mixed radical signal in the g approximately 2 region. One part of this signal decays with similar kinetics as the split S(0) EPR signal ( approximately 3 min, at 5 K) and is easily distinguished from a stable radical originating from Car/Chl. We suggest that this fast-decaying radical originates from Y(Z)(*). The pH dependence of the light-induced fast-decaying radical was measured in the same pH range as for the split S(0) EPR signal. The pK(app) for the light-induced fast-decaying radical was identical at acidic pH ( approximately 4.8). At alkaline pH the behavior was more complex. Between pH 6.6 and pH 7.7 the signal decreased with pK(app) approximately 7.2. However, above pH 7.7 the induction of the radical species was pH independent. We compare our results with the pH dependence of the split S(1) EPR signal induced at 5 K and the S(0) --> S(1) and S(1) --> S(2) transitions at room temperature. The result allows mechanistic conclusions concerning differences between the hydrogen bond pattern around Y(Z) in the S(0) and S(1) states.

ESEEM study of the light-inducible Split S1 EPR signal from photosystem II

ESE field sweep and two and three pulse ESEEM measurements were performed on the Split S1 signal induced by illumination at liquid He temperatures of the PSII centers poised in the S1-state. The field sweep experiments in the radical region indicated possible involvement of YZ• in the formation of the Split S1 EPR signal. Frequency domain ESEEM revealed light inducible features which origin is discussed with respect to the Split S1 signal formation.

The Mechanism Behind the Formation of the “Split S3” EPR Signal in Photosystem II Induced by Visible rr Near-Infrared Light

A split EPR signal can be induced at 5 K in Photosystem II in the S3-state by light in the range of 400–900 nm. To investigate if the same mechanism is involved in the signal induction in the full spectral range we compared the properties of the S3 signal induced by 830 nm light or white light. Our results indicate that the same mechanism is responsible for the formation of the “Split S3” signal in the whole spectral range. The mechanism of the “Split S3” signal is not P680 driven but is instead driven by manganese excitation.

pH Dependence of the S0 Split EPR Signal in Photosystem II

The Split Epr Signals From YZ • In Magnetic Interaction With The Camn4, Cluster Offer A Way To Probe For Oxidation Of YZ In Active Psii. We Have Studied How Ph (Ph 4.0–6.5) Affects The Formation Of The Split S0 Signal Induced By Low Temperature Illumination. Maximum Signal Intensity Was Observed Around Ph 6.3. The Signal Intensity Decreased With An Apparent PK,A Of 5.1. The Results Are Compared And Discussed In Context To Previousobservations At Room Temperature.