Karen C. Williams

Group Projects: Student Perceptions of the Relationship Between Social Tasks and a Sense of Community in Online Group Work

Abstract This study explored the relationship between specific social tasks and student perceptions of a sense of community during online group work. A survey instrument was developed, piloted, and deployed to 125 students in six different online classes. Results revealed few significant relationships between each of the five social tasks examined and student perceptions of a sense of community during online group work; however, students reported that some social tasks were important. Students seemed to focus more on completing a task for a grade than seeing group projects as part of developing community to enhance learning. This might reflect a lack of understanding by the students of the importance of social tasks to successful group project completion.

How do students define their roles and responsibilities in online learning group projects

The goal of this study was to explore the processes of group role formation in online class settings. Qualitative analysis was used to code chat logs and discussion threads in six undergraduate Family and Consumer Sciences online courses that required online group projects. Four themes related to the process of group role formation emerged: testing the waters, apologies as being nice, tag – you’re it, and struggling to find one’s role. Students created roles of leader, wannabe, spoiler, agreeable enabler, coat‐tails, and supportive worker as the group process evolved over the course of the semester. Results lend support for a balance between allowing students to create and experience roles on their own and faculty assignment of roles. Questions are raised related to faculty approaches toward directing and scaffolding the group process.

Are Interpersonal Relationships Necessary for Developing Trust in Online Group Projects

Trust between group members has been suggested as an important part of small group work in online classrooms. Developing interpersonal relationships with group members may promote a sense of trust among them; however, research shows mixed results. The current study explored how students’ perceptions of the importance of interpersonal relationships in online groups affected their perceptions of trust and experiences within the group. Students enrolled in online classes that incorporated a group project were surveyed about their experiences with online group projects. Participants did not find interpersonal relationships as necessary in trust development. However, student gender and type (i.e., distance versus on-campus) were important factors in determining the type of experiences students had within their online groups. Males reported more negative experiences than females, and distance education students desired relationships with group members more than on-campus students.

Children's Language Proficiency at Ages 2 and 3 as Predictors of Behavior Problems, Social and Cognitive Development at Age 3

This study examined the relationship between language proficiency, behavior problems, and other areas of development in a sample of 36 children ranging from 36–40 months (M = 37.3; SD = 1.1). Although none of the children were in the clinical range of behavioral disturbance, the findings indicated a strong general association between deficiencies in both expressive and receptive language and childrens behavioral difficulties. Specifically, deficits in expressive language at age 2 (M = 25.5 mo.; SD = 0.6 mo.) were more predictive of internalizing rather than externalizing behavior problems at age 3, including symptoms associated with anxiety and depression, withdrawal, sleep and somatic problems. However, deficits in receptive language at age 3 were more predictive of these same types of symptoms at age 3, along with more destructive kinds of behaviors. Scores on measures of receptive language abilities at age 2 were positively predictive of social and cognitive development at age 3. These findings indicate a need for early identification of language delays in young children to help prevent deficits in language that might be linked to behavior problems or delays in other areas of development. Further, our results suggest the need for early intervention, especially for children who display both language delays and behavioral difficulties.