Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Karen D. Schupak is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Karen D. Schupak.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer: An Update of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience

Jeremy Setton; N. Caria; Jonathan Romanyshyn; Lawrence Koutcher; Suzanne L. Wolden; Michael J. Zelefsky; Nicholas Rowan; Eric J. Sherman; Matthew G. Fury; David G. Pfister; Richard J. Wong; Jatin P. Shah; Dennis H. Kraus; Weiji Shi; Zhigang Zhang; Karen D. Schupak; D. Gelblum; S. Rao; Nancy Y. Lee

PURPOSE To update the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centers experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between September 1998 and April 2009, 442 patients with histologically confirmed OPC underwent IMRT at our center. There were 379 men and 63 women with a median age of 57 years (range, 27-91). The disease was Stage I in 2%, Stage II in 4%, Stage III in 21%, and Stage IV in 73% of patients. The primary tumor subsite was tonsil in 50%, base of tongue in 46%, pharyngeal wall in 3%, and soft palate in 2%. The median prescription dose to the planning target volume of the gross tumor was 70 Gy for definitive (n = 412) cases and 66 Gy for postoperative cases (n = 30). A total 404 patients (91%) received chemotherapy, including 389 (88%) who received concurrent chemotherapy, the majority of which was platinum-based. RESULTS Median follow-up among surviving patients was 36.8 months (range, 3-135). The 3-year cumulative incidence of local failure, regional failure, and distant metastasis was 5.4%, 5.6%, and 12.5%, respectively. The 3-year OS rate was 84.9%. The incidence of late dysphagia and late xerostomia ≥Grade 2 was 11% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm the feasibility of IMRT in achieving excellent locoregional control and low rates of xerostomia. According to our knowledge, this study is the largest report of patients treated with IMRT for OPC.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2003

Patterns of Failure Using a Conformal Radiation Therapy Tumor Bed Boost for Medulloblastoma

Suzanne L. Wolden; Ira J. Dunkel; Mark M. Souweidane; Laura Happersett; Yasmin Khakoo; Karen D. Schupak; David Lyden; Steven A. Leibel

PURPOSE To assess the patterns of failure for patients with medulloblastoma receiving a conformal tumor bed boost rather than a boost to the entire posterior fossa. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1994 to 2002, 32 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) received a conformal boost to the tumor bed in conjunction with craniospinal radiation therapy. Twenty-eight patients also received chemotherapy. The median age was 9 years (range, 3 to 34 years), and the male to female ratio was 3:1. Twenty-seven patients had standard-risk disease, and five patients had high-risk disease. Craniospinal doses ranged from 23.4 to 39.6 Gy, and total tumor bed doses ranged from 54 to 59.4 Gy. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 56 months, six patients have relapsed; five relapsed outside of the posterior fossa, and one failed within the posterior fossa, outside of the high-dose boost volume. Five-year actuarial disease-free and overall survival rates were 84% and 85%, respectively. Freedom from posterior fossa failure was 100% and 86% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Freedom from distant failure was 84% at 5 years, with a trend for improvement when full-dose craniospinal radiation (36 to 39.6 Gy) was used compared with a reduced dose (23.4 Gy) of radiation (100% v 63%, respectively; P =.06). No other predictive variables were identified. CONCLUSION Conformal treatment to the tumor bed allows for significant sparing of critical structures. The posterior fossa failure rate in this series is similar to that reported when the entire posterior fossa is treated. This approach should be investigated further in a phase III trial.


Journal of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network | 2016

Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Margaret von Mehren; R. Lor Randall; Robert S. Benjamin; Sarah Boles; Marilyn M. Bui; Ernest U. Conrad; Kristen N. Ganjoo; Suzanne George; Ricardo J. Gonzalez; Martin J. Heslin; John M. Kane; Henry B. Koon; Joel L. Mayerson; Martin D. McCarter; Sean V. McGarry; Christian Meyer; Richard J. O'Donnell; Alberto S. Pappo; I. Benjamin Paz; Ivy A. Petersen; John D. Pfeifer; Richard F. Riedel; Scott M. Schuetze; Karen D. Schupak; Herbert S. Schwartz; William D. Tap; Jeffrey D. Wayne; Mary Anne Bergman; Jillian L. Scavone

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare solid tumors of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Guidelines for STS provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as intra-abdominal/retroperitoneal STS, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines discusses general principles for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of STS of the extremities, superficial trunk, or head and neck; outlines treatment recommendations by disease stage; and reviews the evidence to support the guidelines recommendations.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2000

PRONE BREAST RADIOTHERAPY IN EARLY-STAGE BREAST CANCER: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS

Alison Grann; Beryl McCormick; Elizabeth S Chabner; Smitha Gollamudi; Karen D. Schupak; Borys Mychalczak; Alexandra S. Heerdt; Thomas E. Merchant; Margie Hunt

PURPOSE Women with large breasts have marked dose inhomogeneity and often an inferior cosmetic outcome when treated with breast conservation compared to smaller-sized patients. We designed a prone breast board, which both minimizes breast separation and irradiated lung or heart volume. We report feasibility, cosmesis, and preliminary local control and survival for selected women with Stage 0-II breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-six patients with clinical Stage 0-II breast cancer were treated with lumpectomy and breast irradiation utilizing a prototype prone breast board. A total of 59 breasts were treated. Indications for treatment in the prone position were large or pendulous breast size (n = 57), or a history of cardiopulmonary disease (n = 2). The median bra size was 41D (range, 34D-44EE). Cosmesis was evaluated on a 1-10 (worst-to-best) scale. RESULTS Acute toxicity included skin erythema (80% of patients experienced Grade I or Grade II erythema), breast edema (72% of patients experienced mild edema), pruritus (20% of patients), and fatigue (20% of patients reported mild fatigue). One patient required a treatment break. The only late toxicity was related to long-term cosmesis. The mean overall cosmesis score for 53 patients was 9.37 (range, 8-10). Actuarial 3- and 5-year local control rates are 98%. Actuarial overall survival at 3 and 5 years are 98% and 94%. CONCLUSION Our data indicate that treating selected women with prone breast radiotherapy is feasible and tolerated. The approach results in excellent cosmesis, and short-term outcome is comparable to traditional treatment techniques. This technique offers an innovative alternative to women who might not otherwise be considered candidates for breast conservation.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in oropharyngeal carcinoma: effect of tumor volume on clinical outcomes.

Benjamin H. Lok; Jeremy Setton; N. Caria; Jonathan Romanyshyn; Suzanne L. Wolden; Michael J. Zelefsky; Jeffery Park; Nicholas Rowan; Eric J. Sherman; Matthew G. Fury; Alan Ho; David G. Pfister; Richard J. Wong; Jatin P. Shah; Dennis H. Kraus; Zhigang Zhang; Karen D. Schupak; D. Gelblum; S. Rao; Nancy Y. Lee

PURPOSE To analyze the effect of primary gross tumor volume (pGTV) and nodal gross tumor volume (nGTV) on treatment outcomes in patients treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between September 1998 and April 2009, a total of 442 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx were treated with IMRT with curative intent at our center. Thirty patients treated postoperatively and 2 additional patients who started treatment more than 6 months after diagnosis were excluded. A total of 340 patients with restorable treatment plans were included in this present study. The majority of the patients underwent concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. The pGTV and nGTV were calculated using the original clinical treatment plans. Cox proportional hazards models and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the correlation between tumor volumes and overall survival (OS), and competing risks analysis tools were used to evaluate the correlation between local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant metastatic failure (DMF) vs. tumor volumes with death as a competing risk. RESULTS Median follow-up among surviving patients was 34 months (range, 5-67). The 2-year cumulative incidence of LF, RF and DF in this cohort of patients was 6.1%, 5.2%, and 12.2%, respectively. The 2-year OS rate was 88.6%. Univariate analysis determined pGTV and T-stage correlated with LF (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.004, respectively), whereas nGTV was not associated with RF. On multivariate analysis, pGTV and N-stage were independent risk factors for overall survival (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0073, respectively) and distant control (p = 0.0008 and p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of patients with OPC treated with IMRT, pGTV was found to be associated with overall survival, local failure, and distant metastatic failure.


Cancer | 2012

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy†

Paul B. Romesser; Jonathan Romanyshyn; Karen D. Schupak; Jeremy Setton; Nadeem Riaz; Suzanne L. Wolden; D. Gelblum; Eric J. Sherman; Dennis H. Kraus; Nancy Y. Lee

The clinical benefit of routine placement of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (pPEG) tubes was assessed in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) who are undergoing intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2016

Phase II trial of bevacizumab + cetuximab + cisplatin with concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with stage III/IVB head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Matthew G. Fury; Han Xiao; Eric J. Sherman; Shrujal S. Baxi; Stephanie Smith-Marrone; Karen D. Schupak; R Gewanter; D. Gelblum; Sofia Haque; Heiko Schöder; Jatin P. Shah; Nora Katabi; Rachel Kurtzman; Brynna Lipson; Lisa Cox; Nancy Y. Lee; David G. Pfister

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of 2 monoclonal antibodies, bevacizumab and cetuximab, to 2 cycles of high‐dose cisplatin administered concurrently with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).


Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | 2001

The treatment of large extraskeletal chondrosarcoma of the leg: comparison of IMRT and conformal radiotherapy techniques.

Maria F. Chan; Chen-Shou Chui; Karen D. Schupak; Howard Amols; C Burman; C. Clifton Ling

Extraskeletal chondrosarcoma of the leg is a rare, malignant neoplasm with very few cases having been reported in the literature. In this study we investigate the possibility of using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for this type of disease and demonstrate its advantages over conventional three‐dimensional (3D) conformal treatment. A case was presented of a patient with extraskeletal chondrosarcoma of the lateral compartment of the leg in which the target volume was 50 cm in length and twisted around the surrounding bones. Both the 3D conformal plan and IMRT plan were designed using the Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center planning system. The IMRT plan produced a superior dose distribution to the patient as compared to the 3D conformal plan both in terms of dose conformity and homogeneity in the target volumes, and reduction of the maximum dose to the bone. The planning time of the IMRT plan was about 3–5 times shorter than that of the 3D conformal plan. It was demonstrated that the IMRT technique can be used not just for small tumors, but also for large and spiral‐shaped tumors close to critical organs. The IMRT method requires less planning time, and provides better target coverage with more sparing of critical structures. When planning patients with multiple target volumes receiving different prescribed doses, the IMRT technique can more easily meet this requirement. PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.90.+y


Oncologist | 2012

Time Course and Predictors for Cancer-Related Fatigue in a Series of Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated with Chemoradiation Therapy

Daniel E. Spratt; Mayuko Sakae; Nadeem Riaz; Benjamin H. Lok; Samuel Essandoh; Meier Hsu; Zhigang Zhang; Karen D. Schupak; Jeremy Setton; Nancy Y. Lee

BACKGROUND Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a highly prevalent and underestimated symptom in cancer patients. This study aims to analyze CRF solely in a cohort of oropharyngeal cancer patients who underwent treatment with radiotherapy (RT). METHODS In January 2008 to June 2010, 87 consecutive oropharyngeal carcinoma patients underwent definitive RT. Concurrent chemotherapy was used for 94% of patients. The median prescription dose to the planning target volume of the gross or clinical tumor volume was 70 Gy for definitive cases (n = 84) and 66 Gy for postoperative cases (n = 3), both delivered over 6.5 weeks. A normalized 12-point numeric rating scale assessed CRF from patient visits before, during, and after RT. RESULTS The median follow-up of living patients was 14 months. Fatigue peaked 1-2 weeks post-RT and remained higher than baseline for up to 2 years post-RT in 50% of patients. The average fatigue score at the time of completion of therapy or maximum thereafter up to 1 year post-RT was significantly worse than baseline. Patients who experienced pain had a trend toward significance with association for a higher maximum difference in fatigue from baseline. Karnofsky performance status score, weight change, and mood disorders did not correlate with CRF. CONCLUSIONS Fatigue was a common treatment-related symptom in this uniform cohort of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. RT was highly correlated with worsening of CRF. Pain control has the potential to help mitigate CRF in patients experiencing pain, and will need to be confirmed using larger datasets.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015

Sparing bilateral neck level IB in oropharyngeal carcinoma and xerostomia outcomes.

M. Tam; Nadeem Riaz; D. Kannarunimit; Angela P. Peña; Karen D. Schupak; D. Gelblum; Suzanne L. Wolden; S. Rao; Nancy Y. Lee

Objectives:To assess whether sparing neck-level IB in target delineation of node-positive (N+) oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) can improve xerostomia outcomes without compromising locoregional control (LRC). Methods:A total of 125 N+ OPC patients with a median age of 57 years underwent chemoradiation between May 2010 and December 2011. A total of 74% of patients had T1-T2 disease, 26% T3-T4, 16% N1, 8% N2A, 48% N2B, 28% N2C; 53% base of tongue, 41% tonsil, and 6% other. Patients were divided into those who had target delineation sparing of bilateral level IB (the spared cohort) versus no sparing (the treated cohort). Sparing of contralateral high-level II nodes was also performed more consistently in the spared cohort. A prospective xerostomia questionnaire (patient reported) was given at each patient follow-up visit to this cohort of patients to assess late xerostomia. Clinical assessment (observer rated) at each patient follow-up visit was also recorded. Results:The 2-year LRC for the spared and treated cohorts was 97.5% and 93.8%, respectively (median follow-up, 23.2 mo). No locoregional failures occurred outside of treatment fields. The spared cohort experienced significant benefits in patient-reported xerostomia summary scores (P=0.021) and observer-rated xerostomia scores (P=0.006). In addition, there were significant reductions in mean doses to the ipsilateral submandibular gland (63.9 vs. 70.5 Gy; P<0.001), contralateral submandibular gland (45.0 vs. 56.2 Gy; P<0.001), oral cavity (35.9 vs. 45.2 Gy; P<0.001), and contralateral parotid gland (20.0 vs. 24.4 Gy; P<0.001). Conclusions:Target delineation sparing of bilateral level IB nodes in N+ OPC reduced mean doses to salivary organs without compromising LRC. Patients with reduced target volumes had better patient-reported xerostomia outcomes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Karen D. Schupak's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nancy Y. Lee

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C Burman

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suzanne L. Wolden

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Gelblum

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric J. Sherman

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J Li

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M Chan

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Zelefsky

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeremy Setton

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nadeem Riaz

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge