Karen L. Jensen

Chondrogenesis from single limb mesenchyme cells

Abstract It is believed that cell-cell interaction between mesenchyme cells is involved in the initiation of chondrogenesis, based largely on the inability of limb mesenchyme cells to differentiate into cartilage unless cultures are inoculated at densities greater than confluency. The present study describes a culture situation in which single limb mesenchyme cells either in or on type I collagen gels are shown to differentiate into cartilage, as defined by the appearance of a pericellular alcian blue staining matrix, intracellular type II collagen (demonstrated by indirect immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibody), and clonable cartilage cells. Because the differentiation of cartilage cells from single mesenchyme cells occurs only when the cells are in a round configuration, it is proposed that cell shape changes are one factor that can mediate effects of cell-cell interaction on differentiation.

Transient expression of a cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan (syndecan) during limb development

Syndecan is an integral membrane proteoglycan that contains both heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate chains and that links the cytoskeleton to interstitial extracellular matrix components, including collagen and fibronectin. Immunohistochemistry with a monoclonal antibody directed to the core protein of the syndecan ectodomain has been used to analyze the distribution of this proteoglycan in the developing mouse limb bud and in high-density cultures of limb mesenchyme cells. By Day 9 of gestation when the limb buds are just apparent, syndecan is detected on cells throughout the limb region, including both ectodermal and mesenchymal components. This distribution does not change as the limb bud elongates along its proximodistal axis, except for its reduction in the apical ectodermal ridge. By Day 11, the intensity of immunofluorescence in the central core decreases relative to other regions. By Day 13 immunostaining is lost in the regions destined for chondrogenesis and myogenesis but persists in the limb ectoderm and peripheral and distal mesenchyme. In the limb mesenchyme cell cultures, syndecan is initially undetected, but is found throughout the culture by 24 hr. With further culture the antigen becomes reduced in chondrogenic foci and in association with myogenic cells. When chick limb ectoderm is placed on the high-density cultures, immunoreactivity in the mouse mesenchyme is enhanced suggesting that epithelial-mesenchymal interactions modulate syndecan expression in the limb bud. Based on analysis of 35S-labeled syndecan from the cultures, syndecan from limb mesenchyme cells contains more glycosaminoglycan chains and is larger in size than the previously described polymorphic forms of syndecan from various epithelia. The high affinity of syndecan for components of the extracellular matrix and its distribution in the early limb bud are consistent with a role in maintaining the morphologic integrity of the limb bud during the period of initiation and rapid outgrowth, and in preventing the onset of chondrogenesis.

The distribution of mesenchyme proteoglycan (PG-M) during wing bud outgrowth.

SummaryThis study utilizes immunofluorescence to describe the distribution of several extracellular matrix molecules in the chick embryo during the process of limb outgrowth and the formation of precartilage condensations. A large chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (PG-M) is detected at the wing level at Hamburger and Hamilton stage 14 in and under the dorsal ectoderm, and is associated with the basement membranes around the neural tube, notochord and pronephros, but not with other basement membranes. The galactose-specific leetin, peanut agglutinin (PNA), has a similar distribution except that it also binds to the dorsal side of the neural tube. PG-M is not detected in the limb mesenchyme until after stage 17, when it is present in the distal region, as is PNA-binding material. With further development of the wing bud, PG-M is present in the subectodermal mesenchyme, the mesenchyme at the distal tip and in the prechondrogenic core. After stage 22 PNA-binding material becomes localized in the prechondrogenic core, the basement membranes under the apical ectodermal ridge, and the ventral sulcus. The distribution of these components (PG-M and PNA binding material) overlaps, but differs from that of type I collagen and fibronectin and basement membrane components, such as laminin, basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan, and type IV collagen. Tenascin, on the other hand, is not detected in the limb bud until stage 25, after the appearance of cartilage matrix components such as type II collagen and cartilage proteoglycan (PG-H). These results are considered in relation to the formation of precartilage aggregates, and indicate that PNA binds to components in precartilage aggregates other than PG-M or tenascin.

Environmental regulation of type X collagen production by cultures of limb mesenchyme, mesectoderm, and sternal chondrocytes

We have examined whether the production of hypertrophic cartilage matrix reflecting a late stage in the development of chondrocytes which participate in endochondral bone formation, is the result of cell lineage, environmental influence, or both. We have compared the ability of cultured limb mesenchyme and mesectoderm to synthesize type X collagen, a marker highly selective for hypertrophic cartilage. High density cultures of limb mesenchyme from stage 23 and 24 chick embryos contain many cells that react positively for type II collagen by immunohistochemistry, but only a few of these initiate type X collagen synthesis. When limb mesenchyme cells are cultured in or on hydrated collagen gels or in agarose (conditions previously shown to promote chondrogenesis in low density cultures), almost all initiate synthesis of both collagen types. Similarly, collagen gel cultures of limb mesenchyme from stage 17 embryos synthesize type II collagen and with some additional delay type X collagen. However, cytochalasin D treatment of subconfluent cultures on plastic substrates, another treatment known to promote chondrogenesis, induces the production of type II collagen, but not type X collagen. These results demonstrate that the appearance of type X collagen in limb cartilage is environmentally regulated. Mesectodermal cells from the maxillary process of stages 24 and 28 chick embryos were cultured in or on hydrated collagen gels. Such cells initiate synthesis of type II collagen, and eventually type X collagen. Some cells contain only type II collagen and some contain both types II and X collagen. On the other hand, cultures of mandibular processes from stage 29 embryos contain chondrocytes with both collagen types and a larger overall number of chondrogenic foci than the maxillary process cultures. Since the maxillary process does not produce cartilage in situ and the mandibular process forms Meckels cartilage which does not hypertrophy in situ, environmental influences, probably inhibitory in nature, must regulate chondrogenesis in mesectodermal derivatives. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Extracellular matrix mediates epithelial effects on chondrogenesis in vitro

It has been previously observed that single chick embryonic limb mesenchymal cells can differentiate into chondrocytes without cell-cell interactions when cultured in collagen or agarose gels. In the present study, limb ectoderm, but not dermis, inhibits chondrogenesis when placed on such collagen gel cultures. The inhibitory influence can be transmitted extensive distances in the gel, even when the ectoderm is placed on a porous filter. Collagen gels, preconditioned with limb ectoderms, are also inhibitory to chondrogenesis. On the other hand, chondrogenesis is less inhibited by ectoderm when the mesenchymal cells are placed in agarose. These results suggest that the antichondrogenic effect of limb ectoderm is mediated through alterations of the collagenous extracellular matrix and support the idea that the extracellular matrix must be considered as an organized, functional unit capable of regulating cell differentiation.

Two distinct regulatory steps in cartilage differentiation

Abstract The effect of developmental stage on chondrogenic capacity in high-density cell cultures of chick embryonic wing bud mesenchyme is examined. Mesenchyme from stage 19 embryos forms aggregates of closely associated cells which do not form cartilage matrix, nor contain significant levels of type II collagen that are detectable by immunofluorescence, unless they are treated with dibutyryl cyclic AMP. Mesenchyme from stage 24 embryonic wing buds in high-density cell cultures will spontaneously form cartilage, as defined by electron microscopy and immunofluorescence with antibody to type II collagen. Cultures prepared from stage 26 wings form numerous aggregates which fail to accumulate an Alcian blue-staining matrix and which resemble mesenchyme cells morphologically. However, because these cells show considerable intracellular immunofluorescence for type II collagen, they are actually unexpressed cartilage cells. Several treatments, including exposure to dibutyryl cyclic AMP, ascorbic acid and an atmosphere of 5% oxygen, or mixture with small numbers of stage 24 wing mesenchyme cells, stimulate expression, as determined by the accumulation of an Alcian blue-staining matrix and an ultrastructurally recognizable cartilage matrix. Since the addition of similar numbers of differentiated cartilage cells does not stimulate expression of stage 26 cells, it is proposed that initial cartilage expression is dependent on a mesenchyme-specific influence which might be removed by cell dissociation. These studies demonstrate that there are at least two distinct transitions in cartilage differentiation: one involves the conversion of mesenchyme to unexpressed chondrocytes and the second involves mesenchyme-dependent expression of chondrogenic differentiation.