Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Karl-Henrik Robèrt is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Karl-Henrik Robèrt.


Journal of Cleaner Production | 2000

Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other?

Karl-Henrik Robèrt

Abstract We present a general framework to plan for sustainability and then relate it to some well-known tools for sustainable development. This framework follows from principles for how a system is constituted (ecological and social principles), and contains principles for a favorable outcome for the system (sustainability), as well as principles for the process to reach this outcome (sustainable development). The principles for sustainability define the favorable outcome and direct problem-solving upstream towards problemsources. A program of activities is then constructed by backcasting from defined outcomes to the current problems. This is followed by “metrics”, i.e. various concepts for measuring and monitoring the activities. Most concepts and tools for sustainable development function as metrics, for instance life cycle assessment (LCA), ecological footprinting (EF), and Factor X. An environmental management system (EMS), like ISO 14001 or EMAS, is an administrative vehicle that should systematically align a firms specific outcomes, activities and metrics with a general framework for sustainability. From a strategic point of view, metrics should measure alignment of activities with the principles contained in a framework for sustainability. A framework is not an alternative to concepts and tools for metrics. We need them all, because they represent different interrelated levels of strategic planning.


International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology | 2000

Backcasting — a framework for strategic planning

John Holmberg; Karl-Henrik Robèrt

Backcasting is a planning methodology that is particularly helpful when problems at hand are complex and when present trends are part of the problems. When applied in planning towards sustainability, backcasting can increase the likelihood of handling the ecologically complex issues in a systematic and coordinated way, and also to foresee certain changes, even from a self-beneficial point of view, of the market and increase the chances of a relatively strong economic performance. To that end, backcasting should be performed from a set of non-overlapping principles that are general enough to be helpful in the coordination of different sectors of society and in business, as well as to cover relevant aspects of sustainability. Such principles are helpful when developing reliable non-overlapping indicators for monitoring of the development when coordinating various measures from different sectors of the society or within individual firms with each other, and when handling trade-offs in a relevant way. Furthermore, the transition can benefit from being undertaken in a strategic step-by-step manner, by which such investments search for those that combine two qualities: (i) technical flexibility to serve as platforms for future investments in line with non-overlapping principles of sustainability, and (ii) good possibilities of giving relatively fast return on investment. This framework for planning is developed together with the Natural Step, a non-government organization, and in collaboration with a network of scientists and business. Examples are given from firms applying the framework.


International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology | 1997

A compass for sustainable development

Karl-Henrik Robèrt; Herman E. Daly; Paul Hawken; John Holmberg

SUMMARY The enlargement of complexity and effects of environmental problems has increased the need for a ‘compass’ to point us in the direction of sustainability. The four principles—System Conditions—which we have earlier described, along with a step-by-step approach to meet them, is such a compass. The System Conditions are first order principles for Sustainability: • they do not cover the whole area of Sustainability; • they are complementary, i.e. they do not overlap; • they are all necessary; • they are applicable at different scales and activities. The compass provides a model that does not only imply restrictions to business and policy-making, but also opportunities from a self-interest point of view. The model makes it possible to foresee changes regarding demands and costs on the future market. A number of business corporations and municipalities apply the compass as a guiding tool to the future market, asking the following strategic questions for each of the System Conditions: Does this measure ...


Archive | 2000

Backcasting from non-overlapping sustainability principles — a framework for strategic planning

John Holmberg; Karl-Henrik Robèrt


Archive | 2004

Strategic Leadership towards Sustainability

Karl-Henrik Robèrt; Göran Broman; David Waldron; Henrik Ny; Sophie Byggeth; David Cook; Lena Johansson; Jonas Oldmark; George Basile; Hördur V. Haraldsson


The business of sustainability : trends, policies, practices, and stories of success | 2011

A Systems-based Strategic Approach to Sustainable Enterprise: requirements, utility and limits

George Basile; Göran Broman; Karl-Henrik Robèrt


TMCE Conference 2000 | 2000

A Method for Sustainable Product Development In Small and Medium Sized Enterprises

Sophie Byggeth; Göran Broman; John Holmberg; Ulrika Lundqvist; Karl-Henrik Robèrt


Archive | 2000

Factor X for Subtle Policy-Making Objectives, Potentials and Obstacles

Karl-Henrik Robèrt; John Holmberg; Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker


Proceedings of Sustainable Innovation 08. Future Products, Technologies and Industries, Malmö, Sweden | 2008

Introducing strategic decision support systems for sustainable product-service development across value chains

Henrik Ny; Anthony Thompson; Pia Lindahl; Göran Broman; Ola Isaksson; Raul Carlson; Tobias Larsson; Karl-Henrik Robèrt


RSD3 Relating Systems Thinking and Design 2014, Oslo | 2014

Lessons from the field:A first evaluation of working with the elaborated social dimension of the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development

Merlina Missimer; Karl-Henrik Robèrt; Göran Broman

Collaboration


Dive into the Karl-Henrik Robèrt's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Holmberg

Chalmers University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henrik Ny

Blekinge Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sophie Byggeth

Blekinge Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ulrika Lundqvist

Chalmers University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Thompson

Blekinge Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Göran Broman

Blekinge Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Merlina Missimer

Blekinge Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pia Lindahl

Blekinge Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cecilia Bratt

Blekinge Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

César Levy França

Blekinge Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge