Karl Yngve Lervåg
SINTEF
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Karl Yngve Lervåg.
Journal of Computational Physics | 2014
Åsmund Ervik; Karl Yngve Lervåg; Svend Tollak Munkejord
The level-set method is a popular interface tracking method in two-phase flow simulations. An often-cited reason for using it is that the method naturally handles topological changes in the interface, e.g. merging drops, due to the implicit formulation. It is also said that the interface curvature and normal vectors are easily calculated. This last point is not, however, the case in the moments during a topological change, as several authors have already pointed out. Various methods have been employed to circumvent the problem. In this paper, we present a new such method which retains the implicit level-set representation of the surface and handles general interface configurations. It is demonstrated that the method extends easily to 3D. The method is validated on static interface configurations, and then applied to two-phase flow simulations where the method outperforms the standard method and the results agree well with experiments.
Communications in Mathematical Sciences | 2015
Karl Yngve Lervåg; John Lowengrub
In recent work, Li et al.\ (Comm.\ Math.\ Sci., 7:81-107, 2009) developed a diffuse-domain method (DDM) for solving partial differential equations in complex, dynamic geometries with Dirichlet, Neumann, and Robin boundary conditions. The diffuse-domain method uses an implicit representation of the geometry where the sharp boundary is replaced by a diffuse layer with thickness
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials | 2016
Eskil Aursand; Magnus Aa. Gjennestad; Karl Yngve Lervåg; Halvor Lund
\epsilon
arXiv: Fluid Dynamics | 2013
Karl Yngve Lervåg; Åsmund Ervik
that is typically proportional to the minimum grid size. The original equations are reformulated on a larger regular domain and the boundary conditions are incorporated via singular source terms. The resulting equations can be solved with standard finite difference and finite element software packages. Here, we present a matched asymptotic analysis of general diffuse-domain methods for Neumann and Robin boundary conditions. Our analysis shows that for certain choices of the boundary condition approximations, the DDM is second-order accurate in
Journal of Computational Physics | 2017
Magnus Aa. Gjennestad; Andrea Gruber; Karl Yngve Lervåg; Øyvind Johansen; Åsmund Ervik; Morten Hammer; Svend Tollak Munkejord
\epsilon
ECCOMAS CFD 2010 | 2010
Knut Erik Teigen; Karl Yngve Lervåg; Svend Tollak Munkejord
. However, for other choices the DDM is only first-order accurate. This helps to explain why the choice of boundary-condition approximation is important for rapid global convergence and high accuracy. Our analysis also suggests correction terms that may be added to yield more accurate diffuse-domain methods. Simple modifications of first-order boundary condition approximations are proposed to achieve asymptotically second-order accurate schemes. Our analytic results are confirmed numerically in the
Energy Procedia | 2014
Morten Hammer; Per Eilif Wahl; Rahul Anantharaman; David Berstad; Karl Yngve Lervåg
L^2
arXiv: Computational Physics | 2011
Karl Yngve Lervåg
and
Computers & Fluids | 2013
Karl Yngve Lervåg; Bernhard Müller; Svend Tollak Munkejord
L^\infty
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials | 2016
Eskil Aursand; Magnus Aashammer Gjennestad; Karl Yngve Lervåg; Halvor Lund
norms for selected test problems.