Kartik A. Shah
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kartik A. Shah.
BMC Genomics | 2016
Kerry Routenberg Love; Kartik A. Shah; Charles A. Whittaker; Jie Wu; M. Catherine Bartlett; Duanduan Ma; Rachel Leeson; Margaret Priest; Jonathan Borowsky; Sarah K. Young; J. Christopher Love
BackgroundPichia pastoris has emerged as an important alternative host for producing recombinant biopharmaceuticals, owing to its high cultivation density, low host cell protein burden, and the development of strains with humanized glycosylation. Despite its demonstrated utility, relatively little strain engineering has been performed to improve Pichia, due in part to the limited number and inconsistent frameworks of reported genomes and transcriptomes. Furthermore, the co-mingling of genomic, transcriptomic and fermentation data collected about Komagataella pastoris and Komagataella phaffii, the two strains co-branded as Pichia, has generated confusion about host performance for these genetically distinct species. Generation of comparative high-quality genomes and transcriptomes will enable meaningful comparisons between the organisms, and potentially inform distinct biotechnological utilies for each species.ResultsHere, we present a comprehensive and standardized comparative analysis of the genomic features of the three most commonly used strains comprising the tradename Pichia: K. pastoris wild-type, K. phaffii wild-type, and K. phaffii GS115. We used a combination of long-read (PacBio) and short-read (Illumina) sequencing technologies to achieve over 1000X coverage of each genome. Construction of individual genomes was then performed using as few as seven individual contigs to create gap-free assemblies. We found substantial syntenic rearrangements between the species and characterized a linear plasmid present in K. phaffii. Comparative analyses between K. phaffii genomes enabled the characterization of the mutational landscape of the GS115 strain. We identified and examined 35 non-synonomous coding mutations present in GS115, many of which are likely to impact strain performance. Additionally, we investigated transcriptomic profiles of gene expression for both species during cultivation on various carbon sources. We observed that the most highly transcribed genes in both organisms were consistently highly expressed in all three carbon sources examined. We also observed selective expression of certain genes in each carbon source, including many sequences not previously reported as promoters for expression of heterologous proteins in yeasts.ConclusionsOur studies establish a foundation for understanding critical relationships between genome structure, cultivation conditions and gene expression. The resources we report here will inform and facilitate rational, organism-wide strain engineering for improved utility as a host for protein production.
Nature Biotechnology | 2018
Laura E. Crowell; Amos E. Lu; Kerry Routenberg Love; Alan Stockdale; Steven M. Timmick; Di Wu; Yu (Annie) Wang; William Doherty; Alexandra Bonnyman; Nicholas Vecchiarello; Chaz Goodwine; Lisa Bradbury; Joseph R. Brady; John Clark; Noelle Colant; Aleksandar Cvetkovic; Neil C Dalvie; Diana Liu; Yanjun Liu; Craig A Mascarenhas; Catherine Bartlett Matthews; Nicholas Joseph Mozdzierz; Kartik A. Shah; Shiaw-Lin Wu; William S. Hancock; Richard D. Braatz; Steven M. Cramer; J. Christopher Love
Conventional manufacturing of protein biopharmaceuticals in centralized, large-scale, single-product facilities is not well-suited to the agile production of drugs for small patient populations or individuals. Previous solutions for small-scale manufacturing are limited in both process reproducibility and product quality, owing to their complicated means of protein expression and purification. We describe an automated, benchtop, multiproduct manufacturing system, called Integrated Scalable Cyto-Technology (InSCyT), for the end-to-end production of hundreds to thousands of doses of clinical-quality protein biologics in about 3 d. Unlike previous systems, InSCyT includes fully integrated modules for sustained production, efficient purification without the use of affinity tags, and formulation to a final dosage form of recombinant biopharmaceuticals. We demonstrate that InSCyT can accelerate process development from sequence to purified drug in 12 weeks. We used integrated design to produce human growth hormone, interferon α-2b and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with highly similar processes on this system and show that their purity and potency are comparable to those of marketed reference products.
Analytical Chemistry | 2017
Yu Annie Wang; Di Wu; Jared R. Auclair; Joseph P. Salisbury; Richa Sarin; Yang Tang; Nicholas Joseph Mozdzierz; Kartik A. Shah; Anna Fan Zhang; Shiaw-Lin Wu; Jeffrey N. Agar; J. Christopher Love; Kerry Routenberg Love; William S. Hancock
With the advent of biosimilars to the U.S. market, it is important to have better analytical tools to ensure product quality from batch to batch. In addition, the recent popularity of using a continuous process for production of biopharmaceuticals, the traditional bottom-up method, alone for product characterization and quality analysis is no longer sufficient. Bottom-up method requires large amounts of material for analysis and is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Additionally, in this analysis, digestion of the protein with enzymes such as trypsin could induce artifacts and modifications which would increase the complexity of the analysis. On the other hand, a top-down method requires a minimum amount of sample and allows for analysis of the intact protein mass and sequence generated from fragmentation within the instrument. However, fragmentation usually occurs at the N-terminal and C-terminal ends of the protein with less internal fragmentation. Herein, we combine the use of the complementary techniques, a top-down and bottom-up method, for the characterization of human growth hormone degradation products. Notably, our approach required small amounts of sample, which is a requirement due to the sample constraints of small scale manufacturing. Using this approach, we were able to characterize various protein variants, including post-translational modifications such as oxidation and deamidation, residual leader sequence, and proteolytic cleavage. Thus, we were able to highlight the complementarity of top-down and bottom-up approaches, which achieved the characterization of a wide range of product variants in samples of human growth hormone secreted from Pichia pastoris.
BMC Genomics | 2016
Kerry Routenberg Love; Kartik A. Shah; Charles A. Whittaker; Jie Wu; M. Catherine Bartlett; Duanduan Ma; Rachel Leeson; Margaret Priest; Jonathan Borowsky; Sarah K. Young; J. Christopher Love
Erratum In the original publication of this article [1], the accession numbers for the genomes and transcriptome listed are incorrect. The correct details of the NCBI accession numbers can be found below: Availability of data and materials The genomic sequencing data and assembled and annotated genomes are deposited at NCBI under bioproject accession numbers PRJNA304627 (K. pastoris), PRJNA304977 (K. phaffii wildtype), and PRJNA304976 (K. phaffii GS115). RNA-seq data are deposited at NCBI under the bioproject accession numbers PRJNA311606. In addition to this, please find the direct links to the data below: Transcriptome study: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA311606 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra?linkname=bioproject_ sra_all&from_uid=311606 Genome assemblies: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA304627 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA304977 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA304976
Lab on a Chip | 2015
Nicholas Joseph Mozdzierz; Kerry Routenberg Love; Kevin S. Lee; Harry L. T. Lee; Kartik A. Shah; Rajeev J. Ram; J. Christopher Love
Biotechnology and Bioengineering | 2015
Kartik A. Shah; John J. Clark; Brittany A. Goods; Timothy J. Politano; Nicholas Joseph Mozdzierz; Ross M. Zimnisky; Rachel Leeson; J. Christopher Love; Kerry Routenberg Love
Nature | 2016
Sara Cleto; Kevin Lee; Pablo Perez-Pinera; Ningren Han; Jicong Cao; Oliver Purcell; Kartik A. Shah; Rajeev J. Ram; Timothy K. Lu
PMC | 2015
Kartik A. Shah; John Clark; Brittany A. Goods; Timothy J. Politano; Nicholas Joseph Mozdzierz; Ross M. Zimnisky; Rachel Leeson; John C Love; Kerry Routenberg Love