Katalin Oláh
Eötvös Loránd University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Katalin Oláh.
Archive | 2014
József Topál; Anna Kis; Katalin Oláh
Abstract There is increasing scientific agreement that domestication has led to the adaptive specialisation of dogs in the human environment, and this evolutionary process has greatly impacted the behaviour of ‘man’s best friend’. There are, however, highly contrasting views on the question of how important a role domestication played in the formation of dogs’ responsiveness to human referential and ostensive cues. In this chapter, we argue that the evolutionary adaptation to the human social environment created an animal possessing functionally human infant-analogue skills with regard to communication abilities. We propose that, irrespective of its precise evolutionary origin and the underlying cognitive machinery, the dog–human communicative interaction can be described as a step-by-step constructive process based on a set of specific skills in both participants. This is a shared characteristic of dog–human and infant–adult interactions, and among others, this makes this animal—on an intuitive level—so childlike for us.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Katalin Oláh; Fruzsina Elekes; Gábor Bródy; Ildikó Király
Previous research has shown that human infants and young children are sensitive to the boundaries of certain social groups, which supports the idea that the capacity to represent social categories constitutes a fundamental characteristic of the human cognitive system. However, the function this capacity serves is still debated. We propose that during social categorization the human mind aims at mapping out social groups defined by a certain set of shared knowledge. An eye-tracking paradigm was designed to test whether two-year-old children differentially associate conventional versus non-conventional tool use with language-use, reflecting an organization of information that is induced by cues of shared knowledge. Children first watched videos depicting a male model perform goal-directed actions either in a conventional or in a non-conventional way. In the test phase children were presented with photographs taken of the model and of a similarly aged unfamiliar person while listening to a foreign (Experiment 1) or a native language (Experiment 2) text. Upon hearing the foreign utterance children looked at the model first if he had been seen to act in an unconventional way during familiarization. In contrast, children looked at the other person if the model had performed conventional tool use actions. No such differences were found in case of the native language. The results suggest that children take the conventionality of behavior into account in forming representations about a person, and they generalize to other qualities of the person based on this information.
Frontiers in Psychology | 2016
Katalin Oláh; Fruzsina Elekes; Réka Pető; Krisztina Peres; Ildikó Király
The present study investigated 3-year-old children’s learning processes about object functions. We built on children’s tendency to commit scale errors with tools to explore whether they would selectively endorse object functions from a linguistic in-group over an out-group model. Participants (n = 37) were presented with different object sets, and a model speaking either in their native or a foreign language demonstrated how to use the presented tools. In the test phase, children received the object sets with two modifications: the original tool was replaced by one that was too big to achieve the goal but was otherwise identical, and another tool was added to the set that looked different but was appropriately scaled for goal attainment. Children in the Native language condition were significantly more likely to commit scale errors – that is, choose the over-sized tool – than children in the Foreign language condition (48 vs. 30%). We propose that these results provide insight into the characteristics of human-specific learning processes by showing that children are more likely to generalize object functions to a category of artifacts following a demonstration from an in-group member.
Infant Behavior & Development | 2015
Katalin Oláh; Krisztina Kupán; Andor Csík; Ildikó Király; József Topál
Evidence suggests that infants and adults attribute different importance to certain object properties when performing object-directed actions. Namely, infants tend to rely on information about an objects location, whereas adults are more likely to base their actions on its features. In this study, we tested whether the strategic choices of infants (aged 13 months) and adults would be modified by the context of the demonstration. Participants watched as an experimenter hid a ball under one of two different coloured containers, using either a communicative or a non-communicative manner. Then, the locations of the two containers were changed out of sight of the participant. During the test, participants were encouraged to look for the ball under one of the containers. We found that adults were more likely to follow a feature-based strategy than infants. However, there was no effect of the context of the demonstration, suggesting that communication may play different roles in encoding object properties and directing overt behaviour.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2018
Ildikó Király; Katalin Oláh; Gergely Csibra; Ágnes Melinda Kovács
Significance The continuous flow of social interactions requires humans to monitor others’ mental states dynamically, yet this aspect of mind reading remains largely neglected. We tested whether, beyond prospective belief tracking, young children would also attribute beliefs to others retrospectively. We found that 3-year-old children retrospectively inferred the content of someone’s beliefs by combining present information with relevant events retrieved from episodic memory. This finding shows that emerging capacities for episodic memory contribute to the development of social cognitive processes, enriching children’s ability to monitor others’ mental states. A current debate in psychology and cognitive science concerns the nature of young children’s ability to attribute and track others’ beliefs. Beliefs can be attributed in at least two different ways: prospectively, during the observation of belief-inducing situations, and in a retrospective manner, based on episodic retrieval of the details of the events that brought about the beliefs. We developed a task in which only retrospective attribution, but not prospective belief tracking, would allow children to correctly infer that someone had a false belief. Eighteen- and 36-month-old children observed a displacement event, which was witnessed by a person wearing sunglasses (Experiment 1). Having later discovered that the sunglasses were opaque, 36-month-olds correctly inferred that the person must have formed a false belief about the location of the objects and used this inference in resolving her referential expressions. They successfully performed retrospective revision in the opposite direction as well, correcting a mistakenly attributed false belief when this was necessary (Experiment 3). Thus, children can compute beliefs retrospectively, based on episodic memories, well before they pass explicit false-belief tasks. Eighteen-month-olds failed in such a task, suggesting that they cannot retrospectively attribute beliefs or revise their initial belief attributions. However, an additional experiment provided evidence for prospective tracking of false beliefs in 18-month-olds (Experiment 2). Beyond identifying two different modes for tracking and updating others’ mental states early in development, these results also provide clear evidence of episodic memory retrieval in young children.
Royal Society Open Science | 2015
Geoff Kushnick; Ben Hanowell; Jun-Hong Kim; Banrida Langstieh; Vittorio Magnano; Katalin Oláh
Maternal care decision rules should evolve responsiveness to factors impinging on the fitness pay-offs of care. Because the caretaking environments common in industrialized and small-scale societies vary in predictable ways, we hypothesize that heuristics guiding maternal behaviour will also differ between these two types of populations. We used a factorial vignette experiment to elicit third-party judgements about likely caretaking decisions of a hypothetical mother and her child when various fitness-relevant factors (maternal age and access to resources, and offspring age, sex and quality) were varied systematically in seven populations—three industrialized and four small-scale. Despite considerable variation in responses, we found that three of five main effects, and the two severity effects, exhibited statistically significant industrialized/ small-scale population differences. All differences could be explained as adaptive solutions to industrialized versus small-scale caretaking environments. Further, we found gradients in the relationship between the population-specific estimates and national-level socio-economic indicators, further implicating important aspects of the variation in industrialized and small-scale caretaking environments in shaping heuristics. Although there is mounting evidence for a genetic component to human maternal behaviour, there is no current evidence for interpopulation variation in candidate genes. We nonetheless suggest that heuristics guiding maternal behaviour in diverse societies emerge via convergent evolution in response to similar selective pressures.
Frontiers in Psychology | 2016
Katalin Oláh; Fruzsina Elekes; Borbála Turcsán; Orsolya Kis; József Topál
Increasing evidence suggests that ostensive-communicative signals in social learning situations enable observers to focus their attention on the intrinsic features of an object (e.g., color) at the expense of ignoring transient object properties (e.g., location). Here we investigated whether off-line social cues, presented as social primes, have the same power to modulate attention allocation to stable and transient object properties as on-line ostensive-communicative cues. The first part of the experiment consisted of a pre-treatment phase, where adult male participants either received intensive social stimulation or were asked to perform non-social actions. Then, they participated in a change detection test, where they watched pairs of pictures depicting an array of five objects. On the second picture, a change occurred compared to the first picture. One object changed either its location (moving forward or backward) or was replaced by another object, and participants were required to indicate where the change had happened. We found that participants detected the change more successfully if it had happened in the location of the object; however, this difference was reduced following a socially intense pre-treatment phase. The results are discussed in relation to the claims of the natural pedagogy theory.
Archive | 2014
József Topál; Anna Kis; Katalin Oláh
Abstract There is increasing scientific agreement that domestication has led to the adaptive specialisation of dogs in the human environment, and this evolutionary process has greatly impacted the behaviour of ‘man’s best friend’. There are, however, highly contrasting views on the question of how important a role domestication played in the formation of dogs’ responsiveness to human referential and ostensive cues. In this chapter, we argue that the evolutionary adaptation to the human social environment created an animal possessing functionally human infant-analogue skills with regard to communication abilities. We propose that, irrespective of its precise evolutionary origin and the underlying cognitive machinery, the dog–human communicative interaction can be described as a step-by-step constructive process based on a set of specific skills in both participants. This is a shared characteristic of dog–human and infant–adult interactions, and among others, this makes this animal—on an intuitive level—so childlike for us.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science | 2014
Zsófia Sümegi; Katalin Oláh; József Topál
Frontiers in Psychology | 2017
Katalin Oláh; József Topál; Krisztina Kovács; Anna Kis; Dóra Koller; Soon Young Park; Zsófia Virányi