Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Katharine A. Collins is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Katharine A. Collins.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2011

Potent CD8+ T-Cell Immunogenicity in Humans of a Novel Heterosubtypic Influenza A Vaccine, MVA−NP+M1

Tamara Berthoud; Matthew Hamill; Patrick J. Lillie; Lenias Hwenda; Katharine A. Collins; Katie Ewer; Anita Milicic; Hazel C. Poyntz; Teresa Lambe; Helen A. Fletcher; Adrian V. S. Hill; Sarah C. Gilbert

Background. Influenza A viruses cause occasional pandemics and frequent epidemics. Licensed influenza vaccines that induce high antibody titers to the highly polymorphic viral surface antigen hemagglutinin must be re-formulated and readministered annually. A vaccine providing protective immunity to the highly conserved internal antigens could provide longer-lasting protection against multiple influenza subtypes. Methods. We prepared a Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vector encoding nucleoprotein and matrix protein 1 (MVA−NP+M1) and conducted a phase I clinical trial in healthy adults. Results. The vaccine was generally safe and well tolerated, with significantly fewer local side effects after intramuscular rather than intradermal administration. Systemic side effects increased at the higher dose in both frequency and severity, with 5 out of 8 volunteers experiencing severe nausea/vomiting, malaise, or rigors. Ex vivo T-cell responses to NP and M1 measured by IFN-γ ELISPOT assay were significantly increased after vaccination (prevaccination median of 123 spot-forming units/million peripheral blood mononuclear cells, postvaccination peak response median 339, 443, and 1443 in low-dose intradermal, low-dose intramuscular, and high-dose intramuscular groups, respectively), and the majority of the antigen-specific T cells were CD8+. Conclusions. We conclude that the vaccine was both safe and remarkably immunogenic, leading to frequencies of responding T cells that appear to be much higher than those induced by any other influenza vaccination approach. Further studies will be required to find the optimum dose and to assess whether the increased T-cell response to conserved influenza proteins results in protection from influenza disease.


Nature Communications | 2013

Protective CD8 + T-cell immunity to human malaria induced by chimpanzee adenovirus-MVA immunisation

Katie Ewer; Geraldine A. O'Hara; Christopher J. A. Duncan; Katharine A. Collins; Susanne H. Sheehy; Arturo Reyes-Sandoval; Anna L. Goodman; Nick J. Edwards; Sean C. Elias; Fenella D. Halstead; Rhea J. Longley; Rosalind Rowland; Ian D. Poulton; Simon J. Draper; Andrew M. Blagborough; Eleanor Berrie; Sarah Moyle; Nicola Williams; Loredana Siani; Antonella Folgori; Stefano Colloca; Robert E. Sinden; Alison M. Lawrie; Riccardo Cortese; Sarah C. Gilbert; Alfredo Nicosia; Adrian V. S. Hill

Induction of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells offers the prospect of immunization against many infectious diseases, but no subunit vaccine has induced CD8+ T cells that correlate with efficacy in humans. Here we demonstrate that a replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector followed by a modified vaccinia virus Ankara booster induces exceptionally high frequency T-cell responses (median >2400 SFC/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells) to the liver-stage Plasmodium falciparum malaria antigen ME-TRAP. It induces sterile protective efficacy against heterologous strain sporozoites in three vaccinees (3/14, 21%), and delays time to patency through substantial reduction of liver-stage parasite burden in five more (5/14, 36%), P=0.008 compared with controls. The frequency of monofunctional interferon-γ-producing CD8+ T cells, but not antibodies, correlates with sterile protection and delay in time to patency (Pcorrected=0.005). Vaccine-induced CD8+ T cells provide protection against human malaria, suggesting that a major limitation of previous vaccination approaches has been the insufficient magnitude of induced T cells.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2012

Clinical Assessment of a Recombinant Simian Adenovirus ChAd63: A Potent New Vaccine Vector

Geraldine A. O'Hara; Christopher J. A. Duncan; Katie Ewer; Katharine A. Collins; Sean C. Elias; Fenella D. Halstead; Anna L. Goodman; Nick J. Edwards; Arturo Reyes-Sandoval; Prudence Bird; Rosalind Rowland; Susanne H. Sheehy; Ian D. Poulton; Claire Hutchings; Stephen Todryk; Laura Andrews; Antonella Folgori; Eleanor Berrie; Sarah Moyle; Alfredo Nicosia; Stefano Colloca; Riccardo Cortese; Loredana Siani; Alison M. Lawrie; Sarah C. Gilbert; Adrian V. S. Hill

Background. Vaccine development in human Plasmodium falciparum malaria has been hampered by the exceptionally high levels of CD8+ T cells required for efficacy. Use of potently immunogenic human adenoviruses as vaccine vectors could overcome this problem, but these are limited by preexisting immunity to human adenoviruses. Methods. From 2007 to 2010, we undertook a phase I dose and route finding study of a new malaria vaccine, a replication-incompetent chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) encoding the preerythrocytic insert multiple epitope thrombospondin-related adhesion protein (ME-TRAP; n = 54 vaccinees) administered alone (n = 28) or with a modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) ME-TRAP booster immunization 8 weeks later (n = 26). We observed an excellent safety profile. High levels of TRAP antigen–specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, as detected by interferon γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay and flow cytometry, were induced by intramuscular ChAd63 ME-TRAP immunization at doses of 5 × 1010 viral particles and above. Subsequent administration of MVA ME-TRAP boosted responses to exceptionally high levels, and responses were maintained for up to 30 months postvaccination. Conclusions. The ChAd63 chimpanzee adenovirus vector appears safe and highly immunogenic, providing a viable alternative to human adenoviruses as vaccine vectors for human use. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00890019.


Molecular Therapy | 2012

ChAd63-MVA-vectored blood-stage malaria vaccines targeting MSP1 and AMA1: assessment of efficacy against mosquito bite challenge in humans

Susanne H. Sheehy; Christopher J. A. Duncan; Sean C. Elias; Prateek Choudhary; Sumi Biswas; Fenella D. Halstead; Katharine A. Collins; Nick J. Edwards; Alexander D. Douglas; Nicholas A. Anagnostou; Katie Ewer; Tom Havelock; Tabitha Mahungu; Carly M. Bliss; Kazutoyo Miura; Ian D. Poulton; Patrick J. Lillie; Richard D. Antrobus; Eleanor Berrie; Sarah Moyle; Katherine Gantlett; Stefano Colloca; Riccardo Cortese; Carole A. Long; Robert E. Sinden; Sarah C. Gilbert; Alison M. Lawrie; Tom Doherty; Saul N. Faust; Alfredo Nicosia

The induction of cellular immunity, in conjunction with antibodies, may be essential for vaccines to protect against blood-stage infection with the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. We have shown that prime-boost delivery of P. falciparum blood-stage antigens by chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) followed by the attenuated orthopoxvirus MVA is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults. Here, we report on vaccine efficacy against controlled human malaria infection delivered by mosquito bites. The blood-stage malaria vaccines were administered alone, or together (MSP1+AMA1), or with a pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine candidate (MSP1+ME-TRAP). In this first human use of coadministered ChAd63-MVA regimes, we demonstrate immune interference whereby responses against merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1) are dominant over apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) and ME-TRAP. We also show that induction of strong cellular immunity against MSP1 and AMA1 is safe, but does not impact on parasite growth rates in the blood. In a subset of vaccinated volunteers, a delay in time to diagnosis was observed and sterilizing protection was observed in one volunteer coimmunized with MSP1+AMA1-results consistent with vaccine-induced pre-erythrocytic, rather than blood-stage, immunity. These data call into question the utility of T cell-inducing blood-stage malaria vaccines and suggest that the focus should remain on high-titer antibody induction against susceptible antigen targets.


Molecular Therapy | 2011

Phase Ia clinical evaluation of the Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage antigen MSP1 in ChAd63 and MVA vaccine vectors.

Susanne H. Sheehy; Christopher J. A. Duncan; Sean C. Elias; Katharine A. Collins; Katie Ewer; Alexandra J. Spencer; Andrew R. Williams; Fenella D. Halstead; Samuel E. Moretz; Kazutoyo Miura; Christian Epp; Matthew D. J. Dicks; Ian D. Poulton; Alison M. Lawrie; Eleanor Berrie; Sarah Moyle; Carole A. Long; Stefano Colloca; Riccardo Cortese; Sarah C. Gilbert; Alfredo Nicosia; Adrian V. S. Hill; Simon J. Draper

Efficacy trials of antibody-inducing protein-in-adjuvant vaccines targeting the blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasite have so far shown disappointing results. The induction of cell-mediated responses in conjunction with antibody responses is thought to be one alternative strategy that could achieve protective efficacy in humans. Here, we prepared chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) replication-deficient vectors encoding the well-studied P. falciparum blood-stage malaria antigen merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1). A phase Ia clinical trial was conducted in healthy adults of a ChAd63-MVA MSP1 heterologous prime-boost immunization regime. The vaccine was safe and generally well tolerated. Fewer systemic adverse events (AEs) were observed following ChAd63 MSP1 than MVA MSP1 administration. Exceptionally strong T-cell responses were induced, and these displayed a mixed of CD4(+) and CD8(+) phenotype. Substantial MSP1-specific serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody responses were also induced, which were capable of recognizing native parasite antigen, but these did not reach titers sufficient to neutralize P. falciparum parasites in vitro. This viral vectored vaccine regime is thus a leading approach for the induction of strong cellular and humoral immunogenicity against difficult disease targets in humans. Further studies are required to assess whether this strategy can achieve protective efficacy against blood-stage malaria infection.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Phase Ia clinical evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of the Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage antigen AMA1 in ChAd63 and MVA vaccine vectors.

Susanne H. Sheehy; Christopher J. A. Duncan; Sean C. Elias; Sumi Biswas; Katharine A. Collins; Geraldine A. O'Hara; Fenella D. Halstead; Katie Ewer; Tabitha Mahungu; Alexandra J. Spencer; Kazutoyo Miura; Ian D. Poulton; Matthew D. J. Dicks; Nick J. Edwards; Eleanor Berrie; Sarah Moyle; Stefano Colloca; Riccardo Cortese; Katherine Gantlett; Carole A. Long; Alison M. Lawrie; Sarah C. Gilbert; Tom Doherty; Alfredo Nicosia; Adrian V. S. Hill; Simon J. Draper

Background Traditionally, vaccine development against the blood-stage of Plasmodium falciparum infection has focused on recombinant protein-adjuvant formulations in order to induce high-titer growth-inhibitory antibody responses. However, to date no such vaccine encoding a blood-stage antigen(s) alone has induced significant protective efficacy against erythrocytic-stage infection in a pre-specified primary endpoint of a Phase IIa/b clinical trial designed to assess vaccine efficacy. Cell-mediated responses, acting in conjunction with functional antibodies, may be necessary for immunity against blood-stage P. falciparum. The development of a vaccine that could induce both cell-mediated and humoral immune responses would enable important proof-of-concept efficacy studies to be undertaken to address this question. Methodology We conducted a Phase Ia, non-randomized clinical trial in 16 healthy, malaria-naïve adults of the chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) replication-deficient viral vectored vaccines encoding two alleles (3D7 and FVO) of the P. falciparum blood-stage malaria antigen; apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1). ChAd63-MVA AMA1 administered in a heterologous prime-boost regime was shown to be safe and immunogenic, inducing high-level T cell responses to both alleles 3D7 (median 2036 SFU/million PBMC) and FVO (median 1539 SFU/million PBMC), with a mixed CD4+/CD8+ phenotype, as well as substantial AMA1-specific serum IgG responses (medians of 49 µg/mL and 41 µg/mL for 3D7 and FVO AMA1 respectively) that demonstrated growth inhibitory activity in vitro. Conclusions ChAd63-MVA is a safe and highly immunogenic delivery platform for both alleles of the AMA1 antigen in humans which warrants further efficacy testing. ChAd63-MVA is a promising heterologous prime-boost vaccine strategy that could be applied to numerous other diseases where strong cellular and humoral immune responses are required for protection. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01095055


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2015

Evaluation of the Efficacy of ChAd63-MVA Vectored Vaccines Expressing Circumsporozoite Protein and ME-TRAP Against Controlled Human Malaria Infection in Malaria-Naive Individuals.

Susanne H. Hodgson; Katie Ewer; Carly M. Bliss; Nick J. Edwards; Thomas Rampling; Nicholas A. Anagnostou; Eoghan de Barra; Tom Havelock; Georgina Bowyer; Ian D. Poulton; Simone C. de Cassan; Rhea J. Longley; Joseph J. Illingworth; Alexander D. Douglas; Pooja B. Mange; Katharine A. Collins; Rachel Roberts; Stephen Gerry; Eleanor Berrie; Sarah Moyle; Stefano Colloca; Riccardo Cortese; Robert E. Sinden; Sarah C. Gilbert; Philip Bejon; Alison M. Lawrie; Alfredo Nicosia; Saul N. Faust; Adrian V. S. Hill

Background. Circumsporozoite protein (CS) is the antigenic target for RTS,S, the most advanced malaria vaccine to date. Heterologous prime-boost with the viral vectors simian adenovirus 63 (ChAd63)-modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) is the most potent inducer of T-cells in humans, demonstrating significant efficacy when expressing the preerythrocytic antigen insert multiple epitope–thrombospondin-related adhesion protein (ME-TRAP). We hypothesized that ChAd63-MVA containing CS may result in a significant clinical protective efficacy. Methods. We conducted an open-label, 2-site, partially randomized Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) study to compare the clinical efficacy of ChAd63-MVA CS with ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP. Results. One of 15 vaccinees (7%) receiving ChAd63-MVA CS and 2 of 15 (13%) receiving ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP achieved sterile protection after CHMI. Three of 15 vaccinees (20%) receiving ChAd63-MVA CS and 5 of 15 (33%) receiving ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP demonstrated a delay in time to treatment, compared with unvaccinated controls. In quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses, ChAd63-MVA CS was estimated to reduce the liver parasite burden by 69%–79%, compared with 79%–84% for ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP. Conclusions. ChAd63-MVA CS does reduce the liver parasite burden, but ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP remains the most promising antigenic insert for a vectored liver-stage vaccine. Detailed analyses of parasite kinetics may allow detection of smaller but biologically important differences in vaccine efficacy that can influence future vaccine development. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01623557.


PLOS ONE | 2011

Impact on Malaria Parasite Multiplication Rates in Infected Volunteers of the Protein-in-Adjuvant Vaccine AMA1-C1/Alhydrogel+CPG 7909

Christopher J. A. Duncan; Susanne H. Sheehy; Katie Ewer; Alexander D. Douglas; Katharine A. Collins; Fenella D. Halstead; Sean C. Elias; Patrick J. Lillie; Kelly M. Rausch; Joan Aebig; Kazutoyo Miura; Nick J. Edwards; Ian D. Poulton; Angela Hunt-Cooke; David Porter; Fiona M. Thompson; Ros Rowland; Simon J. Draper; Sarah C. Gilbert; Michael P. Fay; Carole A. Long; Daming Zhu; Yimin Wu; Laura B. Martin; Charles Anderson; Alison M. Lawrie; Adrian V. S. Hill; Ruth D. Ellis

Background Inhibition of parasite growth is a major objective of blood-stage malaria vaccines. The in vitro assay of parasite growth inhibitory activity (GIA) is widely used as a surrogate marker for malaria vaccine efficacy in the down-selection of candidate blood-stage vaccines. Here we report the first study to examine the relationship between in vivo Plasmodium falciparum growth rates and in vitro GIA in humans experimentally infected with blood-stage malaria. Methods In this phase I/IIa open-label clinical trial five healthy malaria-naive volunteers were immunised with AMA1/C1-Alhydrogel+CPG 7909, and together with three unvaccinated controls were challenged by intravenous inoculation of P. falciparum infected erythrocytes. Results A significant correlation was observed between parasite multiplication rate in 48 hours (PMR) and both vaccine-induced growth-inhibitory activity (Pearson r = −0.93 [95% CI: −1.0, −0.27] P = 0.02) and AMA1 antibody titres in the vaccine group (Pearson r = −0.93 [95% CI: −0.99, −0.25] P = 0.02). However immunisation failed to reduce overall mean PMR in the vaccine group in comparison to the controls (vaccinee 16 fold [95% CI: 12, 22], control 17 fold [CI: 0, 65] P = 0.70). Therefore no impact on pre-patent period was observed (vaccine group median 8.5 days [range 7.5–9], control group median 9 days [range 7–9]). Conclusions Despite the first observation in human experimental malaria infection of a significant association between vaccine-induced in vitro growth inhibitory activity and in vivo parasite multiplication rate, this did not translate into any observable clinically relevant vaccine effect in this small group of volunteers. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00984763]


PLOS ONE | 2013

Safety and Immunogenicity of Heterologous Prime-Boost Immunisation with Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Candidate Vaccines, ChAd63 ME-TRAP and MVA ME- TRAP, in Healthy Gambian and Kenyan Adults

Caroline Ogwang; Muhammed O. Afolabi; Domtila Kimani; Ya Jankey Jagne; Susanne H. Sheehy; Carly M. Bliss; Christopher J. A. Duncan; Katharine A. Collins; Miguel G Knight; Eva Kimani; Nicholas A. Anagnostou; Eleanor Berrie; Sarah Moyle; Sarah C. Gilbert; Alexandra J. Spencer; Peninah Soipei; Jenny Mueller; Joseph Okebe; Stefano Colloca; Riccardo Cortese; Nicola K. Viebig; Rachel Roberts; Katherine Gantlett; Alison M. Lawrie; Alfredo Nicosia; Egeruan B. Imoukhuede; Philip Bejon; Britta C. Urban; Katie L. Flanagan; Katie Ewer

Background Heterologous prime boost immunization with chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) and Modified vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA) vectored vaccines is a strategy recently shown to be capable of inducing strong cell mediated responses against several antigens from the malaria parasite. ChAd63-MVA expressing the Plasmodium falciparum pre-erythrocytic antigen ME-TRAP (multiple epitope string with thrombospondin-related adhesion protein) is a leading malaria vaccine candidate, capable of inducing sterile protection in malaria naïve adults following controlled human malaria infection (CHMI). Methodology We conducted two Phase Ib dose escalation clinical trials assessing the safety and immunogenicity of ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP in 46 healthy malaria exposed adults in two African countries with similar malaria transmission patterns. Results ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP was shown to be safe and immunogenic, inducing high-level T cell responses (median >1300 SFU/million PBMC). Conclusions ChAd63-MVA ME-TRAP is a safe and highly immunogenic vaccine regimen in adults with prior exposure to malaria. Further clinical trials to assess safety and immunogenicity in children and infants and protective efficacy in the field are now warranted. Trial Registration Pactr.org PACTR2010020001771828 Pactr.org PACTR201008000221638 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01373879 NCT01373879 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01379430 NCT01379430


PLOS ONE | 2014

Assessment of Humoral Immune Responses to Blood-Stage Malaria Antigens following ChAd63-MVA Immunization, Controlled Human Malaria Infection and Natural Exposure

Sumi Biswas; Prateek Choudhary; Sean C. Elias; Kazutoyo Miura; Kathryn H. Milne; Simone C. de Cassan; Katharine A. Collins; Fenella D. Halstead; Carly M. Bliss; Katie Ewer; Faith Osier; Susanne H. Hodgson; Christopher J. A. Duncan; Geraldine O’Hara; Carole A. Long; Adrian V. S. Hill; Simon J. Draper

The development of protective vaccines against many difficult infectious pathogens will necessitate the induction of effective antibody responses. Here we assess humoral immune responses against two antigens from the blood-stage merozoite of the Plasmodium falciparum human malaria parasite – MSP1 and AMA1. These antigens were delivered to healthy malaria-naïve adult volunteers in Phase Ia clinical trials using recombinant replication-deficient viral vectors – ChAd63 to prime the immune response and MVA to boost. In subsequent Phase IIa clinical trials, immunized volunteers underwent controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with P. falciparum to assess vaccine efficacy, whereby all but one volunteer developed low-density blood-stage parasitemia. Here we assess serum antibody responses against both the MSP1 and AMA1 antigens following i) ChAd63-MVA immunization, ii) immunization and CHMI, and iii) primary malaria exposure in the context of CHMI in unimmunized control volunteers. Responses were also assessed in a cohort of naturally-immune Kenyan adults to provide comparison with those induced by a lifetime of natural malaria exposure. Serum antibody responses against MSP1 and AMA1 were characterized in terms of i) total IgG responses before and after CHMI, ii) responses to allelic variants of MSP1 and AMA1, iii) functional growth inhibitory activity (GIA), iv) IgG avidity, and v) isotype responses (IgG1-4, IgA and IgM). These data provide the first in-depth assessment of the quality of adenovirus-MVA vaccine-induced antibody responses in humans, along with assessment of how these responses are modulated by subsequent low-density parasite exposure. Notable differences were observed in qualitative aspects of the human antibody responses against these malaria antigens depending on the means of their induction and/or exposure of the host to the malaria parasite. Given the continued clinical development of viral vectored vaccines for malaria and a range of other diseases targets, these data should help to guide further immuno-monitoring studies of vaccine-induced human antibody responses.

Collaboration


Dive into the Katharine A. Collins's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge