Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Katherine E. McGowan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Katherine E. McGowan.


Nature | 2005

A short γ-ray burst apparently associated with an elliptical galaxy at redshift z = 0.225

Neil Gehrels; Craig L. Sarazin; Paul T. O'Brien; Bing Zhang; Loius M. Barbier; S. D. Barthelmy; Alexander J. Blustin; David N. Burrows; J. Cannizzo; J. R. Cummings; Michael R. Goad; Stephen T. Holland; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; Andrew J. Levan; Craig B. Markwardt; K. O. Mason; P. Meszaros; M. J. Page; David M. Palmer; E. Rol; Takanori Sakamoto; R. Willingale; Lorella Angelini; Andrew P. Beardmore; Patricia T. Boyd; Alice A. Breeveld; Sergio Campana; Margaret Chester; Guido Chincarini

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) come in two classes: long (> 2 s), soft-spectrum bursts and short, hard events. Most progress has been made on understanding the long GRBs, which are typically observed at high redshift (z ≈ 1) and found in subluminous star-forming host galaxies. They are likely to be produced in core-collapse explosions of massive stars. In contrast, no short GRB had been accurately (< 10″) and rapidly (minutes) located. Here we report the detection of the X-ray afterglow from—and the localization of—the short burst GRB 050509B. Its position on the sky is near a luminous, non-star-forming elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.225, which is the location one would expect if the origin of this GRB is through the merger of neutron-star or black-hole binaries. The X-ray afterglow was weak and faded below the detection limit within a few hours; no optical afterglow was detected to stringent limits, explaining the past difficulty in localizing short GRBs.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2010

Further calibration of the Swift ultraviolet/optical telescope

Alice A. Breeveld; P. A. Curran; Erik Andrew Hoversten; S. Koch; Wayne B. Landsman; F. E. Marshall; M. J. Page; T. S. Poole; P. W. A. Roming; Penelope Smith; Martin D. Still; V. Yershov; A. J. Blustin; Peter J. Brown; Caryl Gronwall; S. T. Holland; N. P. M. Kuin; Katherine E. McGowan; S. Rosen; P. T. Boyd; Patrick S. Broos; Michael P. Carter; M. M. Chester; Bruce R. Hancock; H. E. Huckle; Stefan Immler; M. V. Ivanushkina; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; K. O. Mason; Adam N. Morgan

The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments onboard the Swift observatory. The photometric calibration has been published, and this paper follows up with details on other aspects of the calibration including a measurement of the point spread function with an assessment of the orbital variation and the effect on photometry. A correction for large-scale variations in sensitivity over the field of view is described, as well as a model of the coincidence loss which is used to assess the coincidence correction in extended regions. We have provided a correction for the detector distortion and measured the resulting internal astrometric accuracy of the UVOT, also giving the absolute accuracy with respect to the International Celestial Reference System. We have compiled statistics on the background count rates, and discuss the sources of the background, including instrumental scattered light. In each case, we describe any impact on UVOT measurements, whether any correction is applied in the standard pipeline data processing or whether further steps are recommended.


web science | 2006

Very Early Optical Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts: Evidence for Relative Paucity of Detection

Peter W. A. Roming; Patricia Schady; Derek B. Fox; Bing Zhang; En-Wei Liang; Keith O. Mason; E. Rol; David N. Burrows; Alex J. Blustin; Patricia Therese Boyd; Peter J. Brown; Stephen T. Holland; Katherine E. McGowan; Wayne B. Landsman; Kim L. Page; James E. Rhoads; S. R. Rosen; Daniel E. Vanden Berk; S. D. Barthelmy; Alice A. Breeveld; Antonino Cucchiara; Massimiliano De Pasquale; Edward E. Fenimore; Neil Gehrels; Caryl Gronwall; Dirk Grupe; Michael R. Goad; M. V. Ivanushkina; Cynthia H. James; J. A. Kennea

Very early observations with the Swift satellite of γ-ray burst (GRB) afterglows reveal that the optical component is not detected in a large number of cases. This is in contrast to the bright optical flashes previously discovered in some GRBs (e.g., GRB 990123 and GRB 021211). Comparisons of the X-ray afterglow flux to the optical afterglow flux and prompt γ-ray fluence is used to quantify the seemingly deficient optical, and in some cases X-ray, light at these early epochs. This comparison reveals that some of these bursts appear to have higher than normal γ-ray efficiencies. We discuss possible mechanisms and their feasibility for explaining the apparent lack of early optical emission. The mechanisms considered include, foreground extinction, circumburst absorption, Lyα blanketing and absorption due to high-redshift, low-density environments, rapid temporal decay, and intrinsic weakness of the reverse shock. Of these, foreground extinction, circumburst absorption, and high redshift provide the best explanations for most of the nondetections in our sample. There is tentative evidence of suppression of the strong reverse shock emission. This could be because of a Poynting flux-dominated flow or a pure nonrelativistic hydrodynamic reverse shock.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

ULTRAVIOLET, OPTICAL, AND X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF THE TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA 2005am WITH SWIFT

Peter J. Brown; S. T. Holland; Cynthia H. James; Peter A. Milne; Pwa Roming; K. O. Mason; Kim L. Page; A. P. Beardmore; David N. Burrows; Adam N. Morgan; Caryl Gronwall; Alexander J. Blustin; P. T. Boyd; Martin D. Still; Alice A. Breeveld; M. De Pasquale; Sally D. Hunsberger; M. V. Ivanushkina; Wayne B. Landsman; Katherine E. McGowan; T. S. Poole; S. R. Rosen; Patricia Schady; N. Gehrels

We present ultraviolet and optical light curves in six broadband filters and grism spectra obtained by Swifts Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope for the Type Ia supernova SN 2005am. The data were collected beginning about 4 days before the B-band maximum, with excellent coverage of the rapid decline phase and later observations extending out to 69 days after the peak. The optical and near-UV light curve match well those of SN 1992A. The other UV observations constitute the first set of light curves shorter than 2500 A and allow us to compare the light curve evolution in three UV bands. One interesting feature is that the decay in the intermediate UVM2 band is shallower than in the filters on either side and may result from the bump in the interstellar extinction curve. The UV behavior of this and other low-redshift supernovae can be used to constrain theories of progenitor evolution or to interpret optical light curves of high-redshift supernovae. Using Swifts X-Ray Telescope, we also report the upper limit to SN 2005ams X-ray luminosity to be 6 × 1039 ergs s-1 in the 0.3-10 keV. This result is derived from 58 ks of exposure time spread out over 7 weeks beginning 4 days before the B-band maximum.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

Swift UVOT Observations of X-Ray Flash 050406

Patricia Schady; K. O. Mason; Julian P. Osborne; M. J. Page; Pwa Roming; Martin D. Still; Bing Zhang; Alexander J. Blustin; P. T. Boyd; A. Cucchiara; N. Gehrels; Caryl Gronwall; M. De Pasquale; S. T. Holland; F. E. Marshall; Katherine E. McGowan; John A. Nousek

We present Swift UVOT data on the optical afterglow of the X-ray flash of 2005 April 6 ( XRF 050406) from 88 to similar to 10(5) s after the initial prompt gamma-ray emission. Our observations in the V, B, and U bands are the earliest that have been taken of an XRF optical counterpart. Combining the early-time optical temporal and spectral properties with gamma-ray and simultaneous X-ray data taken with the BAT and XRT telescopes on board Swift, we are able to constrain possible origins of the XRF. The prompt emission had a FRED ( fast-rise, exponential decay) profile with a duration of T-90 = 5.7 +/- 0.2 s, putting it at the short end of the long-burst duration distribution. The absence of photoelectric absorption redward of 4000 (A) over circle in the UV/optical spectrum provides a firm upper limit of z <= 3.1 on the redshift, thus excluding a high redshift as the sole reason for the soft spectrum. The optical light curve is consistent with a power-law decay with slope alpha = 0.75 +/- 0.26( F-v proportional to t(alpha)) and a maximum occurring in the first 200 s after the initial gamma-ray emission. The softness of the prompt emission is well described by an off-axis structured jet model, which is able to account for the early peak flux and shallow decay observed in the optical and X- ray bands.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

Swift UVOT Detection of GRB 050318

Martin D. Still; Pwa Roming; K. O. Mason; Alexander J. Blustin; Patricia T. Boyd; Alice A. Breeveld; Peter J. Brown; M. De Pasquale; Caryl Gronwall; S. T. Holland; Sally D. Hunsberger; M. Ivanushkina; Cynthia H. James; Wayne B. Landsman; Katherine E. McGowan; Adam N. Morgan; T. S. Poole; S. R. Rosen; Patricia Schady; Bing Zhang; Hans A. Krimm; Takanori Sakamoto; P. Giommi; Mike R. Goad; Vanessa Mangano; Kim L. Page; Matteo Perri; David N. Burrows; N. Gehrels; John A. Nousek

We present observations of GRB 050318 by the Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) on board the Swift observatory. The data are the first detections of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow decay by the UVOT instrument, launched specifically to open a new window on these transient sources. We showcase UVOTs ability to provide multicolor photometry and the advantages of combining UVOT data with simultaneous and contemporaneous observations from the high-energy detectors on the Swift spacecraft. Multiple filters covering 1800-6000 A reveal a red source with a spectral slope steeper than the simultaneous X-ray continuum. Spectral fits indicate that the UVOT colors are consistent with dust extinction by systems at z = 1.2037 and 1.4436, redshifts where absorption systems have been preidentified. However, the data can be most easily reproduced with models containing a foreground system of neutral gas redshifted by z = 2.8 ± 0.3. For both of the above scenarios, spectral and decay slopes are, for the most part, consistent with fireball expansion into a uniform medium, provided a cooling break occurs between the energy ranges of the UVOT and Swifts X-ray instrumentation.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

Prompt optical observations of GRB 050319 with the Swift UVOT

K. O. Mason; Alexander J. Blustin; P. T. Boyd; S. T. Holland; M. J. Page; Pwa Roming; Martin D. Still; Bing Zhang; Alice A. Breeveld; M. De Pasquale; N. Gehrels; Caryl Gronwall; Sally D. Hunsberger; M. V. Ivanushkina; Wayne B. Landsman; Katherine E. McGowan; John A. Nousek; T. S. Poole; James E. Rhoads; S. Rosen; Patricia Schady

The UVOT telescope on the Swift observatory has detected optical afterglow emission from GRB 050319. The flux declined with a power-law slope of alpha = -0.57 between the start of observations some 230 s after the burst onset (90 s after the burst trigger) until it faded below the sensitivity threshold of the instrument after similar to 5 x 10(4) s. There is no evidence for the rapidly declining component in the early light curve that is seen at the same time in the X-ray band. The afterglow is not detected in UVOT shortward of the B band, suggesting a redshift of about 3.5. The optical V-band emission lies on the extension of the X-ray spectrum, with an optical-to-X-ray slope of beta = 0.8. The relatively flat decay rate of the burst suggests that the central engine continues to inject energy into the fireball for as long as a few x 10(4) s after the burst.


arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics | 2010

Paper II: Calibration of the Swift ultraviolet/optical telescope

Alice A. Breeveld; P. A. Curran; Erik Andrew Hoversten; S. Koch; Wayne B. Landsman; F. E. Marshall; M. J. Page; T. S. Poole; P. W. A. Roming; Penelope Smith; V. Yershov; Alexander J. Blustin; Peter J. Brown; Caryl Gronwall; S. T. Holland; N. P. M. Kuin; Katherine E. McGowan; S. Rosen; P. T. Boyd; Patrick S. Broos; Michael P. Carter; M. M. Chester; Bruce R. Hancock; Howard E. Huckle; Stefan Immler; M. V. Ivanushkina; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; K. Mason; Adam N. Morgan; S. R. Oates

The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments onboard the Swift observatory. The photometric calibration has been published, and this paper follows up with details on other aspects of the calibration including a measurement of the point spread function with an assessment of the orbital variation and the effect on photometry. A correction for large-scale variations in sensitivity over the field of view is described, as well as a model of the coincidence loss which is used to assess the coincidence correction in extended regions. We have provided a correction for the detector distortion and measured the resulting internal astrometric accuracy of the UVOT, also giving the absolute accuracy with respect to the International Celestial Reference System. We have compiled statistics on the background count rates, and discuss the sources of the background, including instrumental scattered light. In each case, we describe any impact on UVOT measurements, whether any correction is applied in the standard pipeline data processing or whether further steps are recommended.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2010

Further calibration of the Swift ultraviolet/optical telescope: Further calibration of the Swift UVOT

Alice A. Breeveld; P. A. Curran; Erik Andrew Hoversten; S. Koch; Wayne B. Landsman; F. E. Marshall; M. J. Page; T. S. Poole; P. W. A. Roming; Penelope Smith; Martin D. Still; V. Yershov; Alexander J. Blustin; Peter J. Brown; Caryl Gronwall; S. T. Holland; N. P. M. Kuin; Katherine E. McGowan; S. Rosen; P. T. Boyd; Patrick S. Broos; Michael P. Carter; M. M. Chester; Bruce R. Hancock; Howard E. Huckle; Stefan Immler; M. V. Ivanushkina; Tracy L. M. Kennedy; K. Mason; Adam N. Morgan

The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments onboard the Swift observatory. The photometric calibration has been published, and this paper follows up with details on other aspects of the calibration including a measurement of the point spread function with an assessment of the orbital variation and the effect on photometry. A correction for large-scale variations in sensitivity over the field of view is described, as well as a model of the coincidence loss which is used to assess the coincidence correction in extended regions. We have provided a correction for the detector distortion and measured the resulting internal astrometric accuracy of the UVOT, also giving the absolute accuracy with respect to the International Celestial Reference System. We have compiled statistics on the background count rates, and discuss the sources of the background, including instrumental scattered light. In each case, we describe any impact on UVOT measurements, whether any correction is applied in the standard pipeline data processing or whether further steps are recommended.


Scopus | 2006

Swift UVOT observations of X-ray flash 050406

Patricia Schady; Pwa Roming; A. Cucchiara; Caryl Gronwall; Ja Nousek; M. J. Page; Alexander J. Blustin; De Pasquale M; Katherine E. McGowan; K. Mason; J. P. Osborne; Martin D. Still; P. T. Boyd; N. Gehrels; S. T. Holland; F. E. Marshall; Bing Zhang

We present Swift UVOT data on the optical afterglow of the X-ray flash of 2005 April 6 ( XRF 050406) from 88 to similar to 10(5) s after the initial prompt gamma-ray emission. Our observations in the V, B, and U bands are the earliest that have been taken of an XRF optical counterpart. Combining the early-time optical temporal and spectral properties with gamma-ray and simultaneous X-ray data taken with the BAT and XRT telescopes on board Swift, we are able to constrain possible origins of the XRF. The prompt emission had a FRED ( fast-rise, exponential decay) profile with a duration of T-90 = 5.7 +/- 0.2 s, putting it at the short end of the long-burst duration distribution. The absence of photoelectric absorption redward of 4000 (A) over circle in the UV/optical spectrum provides a firm upper limit of z <= 3.1 on the redshift, thus excluding a high redshift as the sole reason for the soft spectrum. The optical light curve is consistent with a power-law decay with slope alpha = 0.75 +/- 0.26( F-v proportional to t(alpha)) and a maximum occurring in the first 200 s after the initial gamma-ray emission. The softness of the prompt emission is well described by an off-axis structured jet model, which is able to account for the early peak flux and shallow decay observed in the optical and X- ray bands.

Collaboration


Dive into the Katherine E. McGowan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. Gehrels

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. S. Poole

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Caryl Gronwall

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. T. Holland

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin D. Still

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. V. Ivanushkina

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wayne B. Landsman

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge