Katherine Harrington
London Metropolitan University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Katherine Harrington.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education | 2006
James Elander; Katherine Harrington; Lin Norton; Hannah Robinson; Peter Reddy
Assessment criteria are increasingly incorporated into teaching, making it important to clarify the pedagogic status of the qualities to which they refer. We reviewed theory and evidence about the extent to which four core criteria for student writing—critical thinking, use of language, structuring, and argument—refer to the outcomes of three types of learning: generic skills learning, a deep approach to learning, and complex learning. The analysis showed that all four of the core criteria describe to some extent properties of text resulting from using skills, but none qualify fully as descriptions of the outcomes of applying generic skills. Most also describe certain aspects of the outcomes of taking a deep approach to learning. Critical thinking and argument correspond most closely to the outcomes of complex learning. At lower levels of performance, use of language and structuring describe the outcomes of applying transferable skills. At higher levels of performance, they describe the outcomes of taking a deep approach to learning. We propose that the type of learning required to meet the core criteria is most usefully and accurately conceptualized as the learning of complex skills, and that this provides a conceptual framework for maximizing the benefits of using assessment criteria as part of teaching.
Psychology, Learning and Teaching | 2008
Peter Reddy; Alinka E. Greasley; Vanessa Parson; Joel B. Talcott; Katherine Harrington; James Elander
Three years of action research into a study skills and transition programme for psychology undergraduates are reported. The programme began as a ‘bolt-on’ response to perceptions of student deficit and developed to focus on transition to university. Data from three cohorts and over 600 students show attendance to be associated with higher academic grades and progression rates. The programme has also helped to establish relationships with peers and staff, prepare students for assessments, set expectations about study, and provided an opportunity to ask questions, to work collaboratively and to learn about referencing and plagiarism. Concerns with study skills highlighted by Wingate (2006) and others are discussed.
Innovations in Education and Teaching International | 2010
Lin Norton; Olaojo Aiyegbayo; Katherine Harrington; James Elander; Peter Reddy
Archive | 2006
Katherine Harrington; James Elander; Lin Norton; Pete Reddy; Edd Pitt
Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal | 2016
Mick Healey; Abbi Flint; Katherine Harrington
Archive | 2003
Katherine Harrington; James Elander
Archive | 2007
Katherine Harrington; Peter O’Neill; Savita Bakhshi
Archive | 2004
James Elander; Katherine Harrington; Lin Norton; Hannah Robinson; Peter Reddy; D. Stevens
Archive | 2006
Katherine Harrington; James Elander; Jo Lusher; Olaojo Aiyegbayo; Edd Pitt; Lin Norton; Hannah Robinson; Peter Reddy
Archive | 2005
Lin Norton; Katherine Harrington; James Elander; Sandra Sinfield; Pete Reddy; Edd Pitt; Ola Aiyegbayo