Kathrin Nachtkamp

Impact of the degree of anemia on the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and its integration into the WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS)

Background Anemia is an established negative prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndromes but the relationship between its degree and clinical outcome is poorly defined. We, therefore, studied the relationship between severity of anemia and outcome in myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Design and Methods We studied 840 consecutive patients diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndromes at the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, and 504 patients seen at the Heinrich-Heine-University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany. Hemoglobin levels were monitored longitudinally and analyzed by means of time-dependent Cox’s proportional hazards regression models. Results Hemoglobin levels lower than 9 g/dL in males (HR 5.56, P=0.018) and 8 g/dL in females (HR=5.35, P=0.026) were independently related to reduced overall survival, higher risk of non-leukemic death and cardiac death (P<0.001). Severe anemia, defined as hemoglobin below these thresholds, was found to be as effective as transfusion-dependency in the prognostic assessment. After integrating this definition of severe anemia into the WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System, time-dependent regression and landmark analyses showed that the refined model was able to identify risk groups with different survivals at any time during follow up. Conclusions Accounting for severity of anemia through the WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System provides an objective criterion for prognostic assessment and implementation of risk-adapted treatment strategies in myelodysplastic syndrome patients.

Development and validation of a prognostic scoring system for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

The natural course of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is highly variable but a widely accepted prognostic scoring system for patients with CMML is not available. The main aim of this study was to develop a new CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) in a large series of 558 patients with CMML (training cohort, Spanish Group of Myelodysplastic Syndromes) and to validate it in an independent series of 274 patients (validation cohort, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany, and San Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy). The most relevant variables for overall survival (OS) and evolution to acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) were FAB and WHO CMML subtypes, CMML-specific cytogenetic risk classification, and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependency. CPSS was able to segregate patients into 4 clearly different risk groups for OS (P < .001) and risk of AML evolution (P < .001) and its predictive capability was confirmed in the validation cohort. An alternative CPSS with hemoglobin instead of RBC transfusion dependency offered almost identical prognostic capability. This study confirms the prognostic impact of FAB and WHO subtypes, recognizes the importance of RBC transfusion dependency and cytogenetics, and offers a simple and powerful CPSS for accurately assessing prognosis and planning therapy in patients with CMML.

Improved survival in MDS patients receiving iron chelation therapy – A matched pair analysis of 188 patients from the Düsseldorf MDS registry

MDS patients are prone to develop transfusional iron overload. Iron overload may partly explain why transfusion dependency is associated with a decreased likelihood of survival. Our matched-pair analysis included 94 patients on long-term chelation therapy and 94 matched patients without it. All patients had iron overload, defined as serum ferritin (SF) above 1000 ng/ml or a history of multiple transfusions and SF ≥ 500 ng/ml. Median SF was 1954 ng/ml in chelated and 875 ng/ml in non-chelated patients. The difference in median survival (74 vs. 49 months, respectively; p=0.002) supports the idea that iron chelation therapy is beneficial for MDS patients.

The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation comorbidity index is of prognostic relevance for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

So far, prognostic evaluation of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome has mainly been based on disease-related parameters like cytopenias, karyotype, or percentage of blast cells in the bone marrow. Patients’ characteristics reflecting comorbidities like cardiovascular diseases and impaired renal or liver function were not taken into account. In this study, the authors found that the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCTCI) may be useful for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome receiving best supportive care only. See perspective article on page 602. We studied the impact of comorbidities on survival and evaluated the prognostic utility of comorbidity scores in MDS patients, who received best supportive care and were assessable according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCTCI): 171 patients were identified in the Duesseldorf MDS Registry. The HCTCI captured more comorbidities. Both scoring systems had prognostic relevance, but the HCTCI more clearly distinguished between low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients. Median survival times of the different risk groups according to the HCTCI were 68, 34 and 25 months, respectively. The HCTCI showed prognostic impact in the IPSS intermediate- and high-risk group. On multivariate regression analysis, only the HCTCI remained a prognostic factor independent of IPSS. Considering their prognostic impact, comorbidities of MDS patients should receive appropriate attention in clinical trials as well as day-to-day clinical decision making.

Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Azacitidine and Donor Lymphocyte Infusions—A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis from the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group

To expand the current knowledge about azacitidine (Aza) and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) as salvage therapy for relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and to identify predictors for response and survival, we retrospectively analyzed data of 154 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 124), myelodysplastic (MDS, n = 28), or myeloproliferative syndrome (n = 2). All patients received a median number of 4 courses of Aza (range, 4 to 14) and DLI were administered to 105 patients (68%; median number of DLI, 2; range, 1 to 7). Complete and partial remission rates were 27% and 6%, respectively, resulting in an overall response rate of 33%. Multivariate analysis identified molecular-only relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 9.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 43.5; P = .004) and diagnosis of MDS (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 12.2; P = .011) as predictors for complete remission. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 29% ± 4%. Molecular-only relapse (HR, .14; 95% CI, .03 to .59; P = .007), diagnosis of MDS (HR, .33; 95% CI, .16 to .67; P = .002), and bone marrow blasts <13% (HR, .54; 95% CI, .32 to .91; P = .021) were associated with better OS. Accordingly, 2-year OS rate was higher in MDS patients (66% ± 10%, P = .001) and correlated with disease burden in patients with AML. In summary, Aza and DLI is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with relapse after allo-HSCT, in particular those with MDS or AML and low disease burden. The latter finding emphasizes the importance of stringent disease monitoring and early intervention.

Impact on survival of different treatments for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)

Therapies for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) often achieve hematological responses but their impact on overall survival has generally not been evaluated. The Duesseldorf MDS Registry allowed us to perform matched-pair analyses to assess a possible survival benefit of treatment with thalidomide, valproic acid, low-dose Ara-C, antithymocyte globulin (ATG), induction chemotherapy, or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). For all treatment modalities, lengthening of survival was restricted to certain subgroups of patients. With the exception of allo-SCT, MDS treatment was generally palliative. Recently, epigenetic treatment with demethylating agents proved to be the first therapy that can significantly prolong survival in patients with higher-risk MDS.

Validation and proposals for a refinement of the WHO 2008 classification of myelodysplastic syndromes without excess of blasts.

In 2008, the WHO proposed changes in the classification of MDS regarding RCUD and MDS unclassifiable. We validated these proposals by using 2032 patients of the Düsseldorf MDS Registry. 10% of the patients had RCUD and 6% MDS-U. Among patients with RCUD, only 9% had RN and 6% had RT. There was no correlation between dysplastic cell line and type of cytopenia. There was no difference in prognosis between RCMD and MDS-U and between RA, RT, and RN. The separation of RA, RN, and RT is not justified suggesting a consolidation as RCUD. MDS-U should be integrated into RCMD.

The myelodysplastic syndrome- comorbidity index provides additional prognostic information on patients stratified according to the revised international prognostic scoring system

The myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of disorders of the hematopoietic stem cell and stem cell niche.[1][1] The revised version of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), which is based on disease-related factors, was recently published.[2][2] In 2010, the MDS-

Cellularity, characteristics of hematopoietic parameters and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) present with a normo‐ or hyperplastic bone marrow in most cases. We aimed at a characterization of patients with different types of cellularity.

New proposals of the WHO working group (2016) for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): Characteristics of refined MDS types

Based on centrally diagnosed 3528 patients in the Düsseldorf registry, we validated the new proposals for the classification of the MDS by the WHO working group: 256 patients were diagnosed as MDSSLD (7,3%), 978 MDSMLD (27,7%), 227 MDS RS SLD (6,4%); 321 MDS RS MLD (9,1%), 159 MDS del(5q) (4,5%), 481 MDSEB 1 (13,6%), 620 MDSEB 2 (17,6%), and 148 MDS-U (4,2%). 352 patients (16,9% of the non blastic types) changed the category, mainly moving from RCMD to MDS RS MLD, RCUD and RCMD to MDS del(5q). Median survival times of the refined groups differed from more than 60 months in the MDSSLD (RS) groups, 37 months in the MDSMLD (RS) groups, 79 months of the MDS del(5q) group and 21 and 11 months in the MDSEB 1 and 2 groups, respectively. The difference between the groups with regard to the risk of AML evolution was also impressing. No major changes were made with regard to the MDS-U categories. In summary, the proposals of the WHO group for the classification of MDS are thoughtful, taking into account biologic parameters of the diseases, a more precise wording, to some extend pragmatic and feasible.