Kathrin Schwedler

Trastuzumab beyond progression: overall survival analysis of the GBG 26/BIG 3-05 phase III study in HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND Continuation of trastuzumab plus capecitabine (XH) showed a significantly improved overall response rate and time to progression compared with capecitabine (X) alone in women with HER2-positive breast cancer progressing during trastuzumab treatment. Here, we report the final analysis on overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer who progressed during treatment with trastuzumab with or without 1st-line metastatic chemotherapy were prospectively randomised to X (2500mg/m(2) on days 1-14, q3w) or XH (6 (8)mg/kg, q3w). Overall survival was a pre-specified secondary end-point. RESULTS Median follow-up at June 2010 was 20.7months. Fifty nine of 74 and 60 of 77 patients died in the X and XH arm, respectively. Median overall survival was 20.6 and 24.9months with X and XH, respectively (HR=0.94 [0.65-1.35]; p=0.73). Performance status and metastatic site were independent prognosticators for overall survival. No difference between treatment arms was observed for patients who achieved clinical response or clinical benefit, respectively. Patients who continued/restarted anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab or lapatinib) after 2nd progression (N=52) had a post-progression survival of 18.8 compared with 13.3months for those who did not receive 3rd line treatment with anti-HER2 agents (N=88) (HR 0.63; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Final overall survival analysis of the GBG-26 study did not demonstrate a significant survival benefit for treatment beyond progression with trastuzumab. However, in a post-hoc analysis, patients receiving anti-HER2 treatment as 3rd line therapy showed a better post-progression survival than those not receiving this targeted treatment.

Prognosis of Women With Primary Breast Cancer Diagnosed During Pregnancy: Results From an International Collaborative Study

PURPOSE We aimed to determine the prognosis of patients with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (BCP). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this cohort study, a multicentric registry of patients with BCP (from Cancer in Pregnancy, Leuven, Belgium, and GBG 29/BIG 02-03) compiled pro- and retrospectively between 2003 and 2011 was compared with patients who did not have associated pregnancies, using an age limit of 45 years. Patients with a diagnosis postpartum were excluded. The main analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) on exposure (pregnant or not), adjusting for age, stage, grade, hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor 2 status, histology, type of chemotherapy, use of trastuzumab, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy. RESULTS The registry contained 447 women with BCP, mainly originating from Germany and Belgium, of whom 311 (69.6%) were eligible for analysis. The nonpregnant group consisted of 865 women. Median age was 33 years for the pregnant and 41 years for the nonpregnant patients. Median follow-up was 61 months. The hazard ratio of pregnancy was 1.34 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.91; P = .14) for DFS and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.93; P = .51) for OS. Cox regression estimated that the 5-year DFS rate for pregnant patients would have increased from 65% to 71% if these patients had not been pregnant. Likewise, the 5-year OS rate would have increased from 78% to 81%. CONCLUSION The results show similar OS for patients diagnosed with BCP compared with nonpregnant patients. This information is important when patients are counseled and supports the option to start treatment with continuation of pregnancy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and everolimus in breast cancer patients with non-responsive tumours to epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) ± bevacizumab - results of the randomised GeparQuinto study (GBG 44).

BACKGROUND We tested the oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus in addition to paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative tumours not responding to initial neoadjuvant cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic treatment. METHODS Patients with primary HER2-negative tumours received four neoadjuvant cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) with or without bevacizumab. Patients without clinical response were randomised to receive weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) with or without everolimus (5mg p.o. daily, after a step-wise dose-escalation starting from 2.5mg bid) for 12 weeks before surgery. To detect an increase in pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0 ypN0) from 5% to 12.1% (odds ratio 2.62) 566 patients had to be recruited. The trial was stopped prematurely due to completion of accrual in the main study. FINDINGS Of 1948 patients initially starting neoadjuvant treatment 403 were randomised. A total of 18 (4.6%) patients, 7 (3.6%) treated with paclitaxel and everolimus and 11 (5.6%) treated with paclitaxel alone had a pCR (odds ratio 0.36 (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.24-1.6) p=0.34). Overall response rate in breast and lymph nodes at surgery was 52.2% after paclitaxel plus everolimus and 61.7% after paclitaxel alone (p=0.063). Breast conserving treatment was performed in 54.4% of patients with the combination treatment and 61.9% with paclitaxel alone (p=0.20). Mucosal inflammation, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, infection, and skin rash were more frequent when everolimus was added to paclitaxel. INTERPRETATION Neoadjuvant therapy with everolimus and paclitaxel for patients with HER2-negative disease unresponsive to EC with or without bevacizumab did not improve the pCR rate. Long-term outcome is awaited. FUNDING Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis.

Genetic variants in VEGF pathway genes in neoadjuvant breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab: Results from the randomized phase III GeparQuinto study.

Studies assessing the effect of bevacizumab (BEV) on breast cancer (BC) outcome have shown different effects on progression‐free and overall survival, suggesting that a subgroup of patients may benefit from this treatment. Unfortunately, no biomarkers exist to identify these patients. Here, we investigate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VEGF pathway genes correlate with pathological complete response (pCR) in the neoadjuvant GeparQuinto trial. HER2‐negative patients were randomized into treatment arms receiving either BEV combined with standard chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. In a pre‐planned biomarker study, DNA was collected from 729 and 724 patients, respectively from both treatment arms, and genotyped for 125 SNPs. Logistic regression assessed interaction between individual SNPs and both treatment arms to predict pCR. Five SNPs may be associated with a better response to BEV, but none of them remained significant after correction for multiple testing. The two SNPs most strongly associated, rs833058 and rs699947, were located upstream of the VEGF‐A promoter. Odds ratios for the homozygous common, heterozygous and homozygous rare rs833058 genotypes were 2.36 (95% CI, 1.49–3.75), 1.20 (95% CI, 0.88–1.64) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.34–1.12). Notably, some SNPs in VEGF‐A exhibited a more pronounced effect in the triple‐negative subgroup. Several SNPs in VEGF‐A may be associated with improved pCR when receiving BEV in the neoadjuvant setting. Although none of the observed effects survived correction for multiple testing, our observations are consistent with previous studies on BEV efficacy in BC. Further research is warranted to clarify the predictive value of these markers.

Genetic variants in VEGF pathway genes in neoadjuvant breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab

Studies assessing the effect of bevacizumab (BEV) on breast cancer (BC) outcome have shown different effects on progression‐free and overall survival, suggesting that a subgroup of patients may benefit from this treatment. Unfortunately, no biomarkers exist to identify these patients. Here, we investigate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VEGF pathway genes correlate with pathological complete response (pCR) in the neoadjuvant GeparQuinto trial. HER2‐negative patients were randomized into treatment arms receiving either BEV combined with standard chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. In a pre‐planned biomarker study, DNA was collected from 729 and 724 patients, respectively from both treatment arms, and genotyped for 125 SNPs. Logistic regression assessed interaction between individual SNPs and both treatment arms to predict pCR. Five SNPs may be associated with a better response to BEV, but none of them remained significant after correction for multiple testing. The two SNPs most strongly associated, rs833058 and rs699947, were located upstream of the VEGF‐A promoter. Odds ratios for the homozygous common, heterozygous and homozygous rare rs833058 genotypes were 2.36 (95% CI, 1.49–3.75), 1.20 (95% CI, 0.88–1.64) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.34–1.12). Notably, some SNPs in VEGF‐A exhibited a more pronounced effect in the triple‐negative subgroup. Several SNPs in VEGF‐A may be associated with improved pCR when receiving BEV in the neoadjuvant setting. Although none of the observed effects survived correction for multiple testing, our observations are consistent with previous studies on BEV efficacy in BC. Further research is warranted to clarify the predictive value of these markers.

Re-Challenging Taxanes in Recurrent Breast Cancer in Patients Treated with (Neo-)Adjuvant Taxane-Based Therapy

Background: Docetaxel and paclitaxel are among the most active substances for the treatment of breast cancer. As both drugs are used today in adjuvant regimens, efficacy data from pivotal trials in the metastatic setting in taxanenaive populations cannot reliably be used as references. Patients and Methods: The Taxane Re-Challenge Cohort Study identified participants from 6 prospective (neo-)adjuvant taxane-based studies with recurrent disease and collected data on their subsequent treatment. Out of 381 recurrent patients, 106 (27.8%) were re-challenged with a taxane-based treatment as first- or later-line therapy for recurrent disease. Results: Taxanes were used as first-line therapy in 74 patients and showed a response rate of 48.6% (including complete responses in 27.0%). The response rate was dependent on the disease-free interval (<1 year: 34.8%; 1–2 years: 42.9%; > 2 years: 63.3%; p = 0.04) and visceral metastasis (present: 62.5%; not present 32.4%; p = 0.01). Patients without visceral metastasis and with a disease-free interval of >2 years achieved the longest overall survival. Hormone and HER2 receptor status were not predictive; however, triple-negative tumors responded in 50.0%. The overall response rate of later-line taxane-based treatment was 28.2%. Conclusion: Re-challenging taxanes appears to be effective and therefore represents a reasonable option in this population.

S3-6: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Paclitaxel with or without Rad001: Results of the Non-Responder Part of the GEPARQUINTO Study (GBG 44).

Background: The oral signal transduction inhibitor everolimus (RAD001 = R), binds selectively to mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), an intracellular protein kinase implicated in the control of cellular proliferation of activated T-lymphocytes and neoplastic cells. Phase II data suggested that R can enhance the clinical efficacy of endocrine treatment in the metastatic and neoadjuvant setting. The GeparQuinto phase III study had 3 settings (HER2−positive: trastuzumab vs lapatinib; HER2−negative: +/− bevacizumab (Bev); HER2−negative non-responder: +/− R). Primary aim of the last setting was to improve pathological complete response (pCR) for patients with HER2−negative breast cancer not responding to 4x epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) +/− Bev by adding R to weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with untreated HER2−negative breast cancer were eligible if their tumors were stage cT3/4a-d; or estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor-negative; or ER/PgR-positive tumors with clinically N+ (for cT2) or pNSLN+ (for cT1). Only patients without response ( Results: Between 11/07 and 15/06/11 402 P were randomized to Pac (N=201) and Pac+R (N=201). Median age was 51.0 and 50.0 [-R/+R] years. Median clinical tumor size was 40/40 mm; 62%/55% had cT2, 18% / 20% cT3, and 16.7% / 16.7% cT4a-d tumors; 88% / 89% had non-lobular; 35% / 33% grade 3; 55% / 57% node-positive; and 29% / 27% ER and PgR-negative (triple-negative) disease. The futility interim analysis was performed in 02/10, futility boundary was not reached and the trial was continued. After the other 2 settings completed accrual in 06/10, recruitment to the 3rd setting dropped such that it appeared not possible to recruit the full number of patients.. The trial will therefore close recruitment on June, 30th 2011 with an estimated statistical power of 65%. Results on histological response and surgical outcome will be reported. Conclusion: This will be the first report on efficacy data of neoadjuvant R + Pac for patients with early breast cancer. The results of the GeparQuinto study will have to be set into context with the results from the Bolero studies in metastatic disease. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S3-6.

Abstract OT1-03-08: DESIREE - A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II study to evaluate the tolerability of an induction dose escalation of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Background: The BOLERO-2 study demonstrated a relevant benefit for patients who received everolimus in addition to exemestane in patients who progressed during/after a non steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI), which led to approval of everolimus in this indication. However, in routine use a high rate of intolerability due to side effects is reported. The most common side effect of everolimus is mucositis with a reported high rate of intolerability especially during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Mucositis is also considered to be the leading cause for treatment discontinuation not related to tumor progression. In the neoadjuvant GeparQuinto study, a dose-escalation schema was successfully used to improve tolerability of everolimus together with cytotoxic agents. Methods: DESIREE (NCT02387099) is a randomized, double-blind, phase II study of everolimus in addition to exemestane in patients who progressed during or after NSAI. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either everolimus 10 mg/day (week 1-3: 4x2.5 mg/day, blinded; week 4-24: 10mg/day, open according to label) or an escalating dose of everolimus as follows: week 1: 1x2.5 mg verum + 3x placebo/day; week 2: 2x2.5 mg verum + 2x placebo/day; week 3: 3x2.5 mg verum + 1x placebo/day; week 4-24: 10 mg/day (open according to label). The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the incidence of the first episode of mucositis grade 2-4 (WHO9s oral toxicity scale) any time during a 12 week period after start of everolimus treatment. Secondary objectives are to compare the cumulative rate of mucositis grade 2-4 at 24 weeks after start of treatment, the cumulative rate of mucositis grade 1 and any grade at 12 and 24 weeks after start of treatment, the rate of patients on 10 mg daily at 12 weeks and 24 weeks after start of treatment, the clinical benefit rate after 24 weeks, safety, time to onset of grade ≥2 mucositis, the cumulative everolimus dose at 4 weeks, the relative dose intensity for everolimus, and quality of life using the FACT-B and the QSDQ questionnaire. Biomaterial (whole blood, serum, plasma and optional primary tumor/metastasis tissue) will be collected to evaluate potential biomarkers predicting safety and compliance. Overall, 156 evaluable patients (78 in each arm) are required to detect a clinically relevant difference of 20% in the mucositis rate between treatment arms using a continuity-corrected χ2-test on a significance two sided level alpha of 0.2 and a power of 90%. The rate was estimated to be 40% and 20% in the control arm and the treatment arm, respectively. Results: The study will be conducted in up to 60 German centers. Recruitment will start in June 2015. Enrollment is planned to be completed within 24 months. Conclusion: The combination of everolimus and exemestane has shown to improve the outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer. In the DESIREE trial a dose-escalating schema will be employed to enhance patient compliance and tolerability necessary to achieve an adequate dose-intensity. Citation Format: Loibl S, Furlanetto J, Barinoff J, Bauerschlag D, Herr D, Lubbe K, Maass N, Muller V, Mundhenke C, Schmidt M, Schwedler K, Thill M, Gkantiragas I, Burchardi N, von Minckwitz G. DESIREE - A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II study to evaluate the tolerability of an induction dose escalation of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-08.

Rechallenging taxanes in recurrent breast cancer in patients treated with (neo-) adjuvant taxane-based therapy.

1055 Background: Docetaxel and paclitaxel are among the most active substances for the treatment of breast cancer. As they are today used in adjuvant regimen, efficacy data from pivotal trials in the metastatic setting in taxane-naïve populations cannot still reliably been used as reference. METHODS The Taxane Re-challenge Cohort Study identified participants from 6 prospective (neo-)adjuvant taxane-based studies with recurrent disease and collected data about their subsequent treatment. Out of 381 recurrent patients, 106 (27.8%) were re-challenged with a taxane-based treatment as first- or later-line therapy for recurrent disease. RESULTS Taxanes were used as first-line therapy in 74 patients and showed an overall response rate of 48.6% (including complete responses in 27.0%). Response rate was dependent on the disease-free interval (<1 year: 34.8%, 1-2 years: 42.9%, >2 years: 63.3%; P=0.04) and presence of visceral metastasis (present: 62.5%; not present 32.4%; P=0.01). Patients without visceral metastasis and disease-free interval >2 years achieved the longest overall survival. Hormone- and HER2 receptor status was not predictive, however triple-negative tumors responded in 50.0%. Overall response rate of later-line taxane-based treatment was 28.2%. CONCLUSIONS Re-challenging taxanes appears to be effective and therefore represents a reasonable option in this population.

Preoperative (Neoadjuvant) Systemic Therapy

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy today has become a widely accepted standard therapeutical approach for early breast cancer [1, 2, 3]