Katie Snape

Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer

Recently, RAD51C mutations were identified in families with breast and ovarian cancer. This observation prompted us to investigate the role of RAD51D in cancer susceptibility. We identified eight inactivating RAD51D mutations in unrelated individuals from 911 breast-ovarian cancer families compared with one inactivating mutation identified in 1,060 controls (P = 0.01). The association found here was principally with ovarian cancer, with three mutations identified in the 59 pedigrees with three or more individuals with ovarian cancer (P = 0.0005). The relative risk of ovarian cancer for RAD51D mutation carriers was estimated to be 6.30 (95% CI 2.86–13.85, P = 4.8 × 10−6). By contrast, we estimated the relative risk of breast cancer to be 1.32 (95% CI 0.59–2.96, P = 0.50). These data indicate that RAD51D mutation testing may have clinical utility in individuals with ovarian cancer and their families. Moreover, we show that cells deficient in RAD51D are sensitive to treatment with a PARP inhibitor, suggesting a possible therapeutic approach for cancers arising in RAD51D mutation carriers.

Mosaic PPM1D mutations are associated with predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer

Improved sequencing technologies offer unprecedented opportunities for investigating the role of rare genetic variation in common disease. However, there are considerable challenges with respect to study design, data analysis and replication. Using pooled next-generation sequencing of 507 genes implicated in the repair of DNA in 1,150 samples, an analytical strategy focused on protein-truncating variants (PTVs) and a large-scale sequencing case–control replication experiment in 13,642 individuals, here we show that rare PTVs in the p53-inducible protein phosphatase PPM1D are associated with predisposition to breast cancer and ovarian cancer. PPM1D PTV mutations were present in 25 out of 7,781 cases versus 1 out of 5,861 controls (P = 1.12 × 10−5), including 18 mutations in 6,912 individuals with breast cancer (P = 2.42 × 10−4) and 12 mutations in 1,121 individuals with ovarian cancer (P = 3.10 × 10−9). Notably, all of the identified PPM1D PTVs were mosaic in lymphocyte DNA and clustered within a 370-base-pair region in the final exon of the gene, carboxy-terminal to the phosphatase catalytic domain. Functional studies demonstrate that the mutations result in enhanced suppression of p53 in response to ionizing radiation exposure, suggesting that the mutant alleles encode hyperactive PPM1D isoforms. Thus, although the mutations cause premature protein truncation, they do not result in the simple loss-of-function effect typically associated with this class of variant, but instead probably have a gain-of-function effect. Our results have implications for the detection and management of breast and ovarian cancer risk. More generally, these data provide new insights into the role of rare and of mosaic genetic variants in common conditions, and the use of sequencing in their identification.

Germline RAD51C mutations confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer

To the Editor: In 2010, Meindl and colleagues proposed that germline RAD51C mutations confer high risk for breast and ovarian cancer, comparable to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations1,2. However, multiple follow-up studies have provided no supportive evidence that RAD51C mutations predispose to breast cancer3–12. Following the original report, we began investigating the role of other RAD51 paralogs in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. This led to our recent discovery that germline RAD51D mutations predispose to ovarian cancer13. We identified truncating RAD51D mutations in 8 of 911 familial breast-ovarian cancer pedigrees and 1 of 1,060 population controls. Our analysis of simultaneous association with both breast and ovarian cancer risk showed that RAD51D mutations confer a sixfold increased risk of ovarian cancer (relative risk (RR) = 6.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.86–13.85; P = 4.8 °— 10-6) but do not affect or cause only a small increase in breast cancer risk (RR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.59– 2.96; P = 0.50). This result was supported by our analysis of 737 familial breast cancer pedigrees with no ovarian cancer, in which we detected no RAD51D mutations. These findings prompted us to reevaluate the role of RAD51C in cancer susceptibility. We sequenced the full coding region and intronexon boundaries of RAD51C in 1,132 probands from families with a history of ovarian cancer occurring with or without breast cancer, 272 individuals with ovarian cancer from a hospital-based unselected case series and 1,156 population-based controls (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 and Supplementary Methods). We identified 12 mutations that result in premature protein truncation in cases compared to 1 such mutation in controls (P = 0.009) (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Nine mutations were identified among the 1,132 familial cases, and there was a higher prevalence of mutations in families with multiple ovarian cancer cases: 4 mutations were detected in 311 families with 2 or more cases of ovarian cancer, and 2 mutations were detected in the 67 families with 3 or more cases of ovarian cancer. Three mutations were identified among the 272 individuals with ovarian cancer unselected for family history, suggesting that ~1% of ovarian cancer cases harbor germline RAD51C mutations. We also identified a total of 12 nonsynonymous RAD51C variants (Supplementary Table 3). Four variants were identified in cases and controls; only one, c.790G>A, encoding a p.Gly264Ser amino-acid change, showed any evidence of association with cancer (P = 0.02), consistent with other studies2,9,12. Of note, this variant is predicted to be benign by in silico analyses and has limited impact on RAD51C function2. The remaining eight nonsynonymous variants were each identified in a single individual; there was no significant difference in the overall frequency (P = 0.36), position or predicted functional effects of these variants between cases and controls (Supplementary Table 3). These data exemplify the inherent complexities of evaluating the clinical consequences of missense variants (outside simple Mendelian disorders) and underscore why non-truncating and truncating variants should be considered separately. Analyzing controls for specific rare variants detected in cases and concluding that their absence in controls is evidence of pathogenicity can result in over-interpretation of the data. Such findings confirm that the specific variant is rare but can seldom provide conclusive evidence of disease association. Full sequencing of the gene in both cases and controls is a more appropriate analysis, as it allows the spectrum of variants in cases and controls to be directly compared. Functional and conservation data can be useful in the evaluation of variants, but in vitro functional effects do not necessarily imply that the variant has clinical sequelae. Moreover, as we and others have shown (for example, in studies of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRIP1 and ATM), such an assumption can result in incorrect attribution of pathogenicity14,15. Better information is provided when mutational and functional analyses are equally ascertained in both cases and controls. To estimate the risk associated with RAD51C mutations, we undertook modified segregation analysis, in which we simultaneously modeled the risks of ovarian and breast cancer and incorporated control data and information from the full pedigrees of mutation-positive and mutation-negative families (Supplementary Methods). The relative risk of ovarian cancer for RAD51C mutation carriers was estimated to be 5.88 (95% CI = 2.91–11.88; P = 7.65 × 10-7), which constitutes a >9% cumulative risk by age 80. In contrast, there was no evidence of an association with breast cancer (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.45–1.86; P = 0.8). Thus, the cancer risk estimates for RAD51C mutations were similar to those estimated for RAD51D mutations13. These data are fully consistent with the results presented by Meindl et al. and provide a likely explanation for why Meindl et al. identified RAD51C mutations only in breast cancer cases that had relatives with ovarian cancer and not in 620 familial breast cancer pedigrees without ovarian cancer. As RAD51C

Mutations in CEP57 cause mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome

Using exome sequencing and a variant prioritization strategy that focuses on loss-of-function variants, we identified biallelic, loss-of-function CEP57 mutations as a cause of constitutional mosaic aneuploidies. CEP57 is a centrosomal protein and is involved in nucleating and stabilizing microtubules. Our findings indicate that these and/or additional functions of CEP57 are crucial for maintaining correct chromosomal number during cell division.

The spectra of clinical phenotypes in aplasia cutis congenita and terminal transverse limb defects.

The combination of aplasia cutis congenita (ACC) and terminal transverse limb defects (TTLD) is often referred to as the eponymous Adams–Oliver syndrome (AOS). The molecular basis of this disorder remains unknown, although the common occurrence of cardiac and vascular anomalies suggests a primary defect of vasculogenesis. Through the description of three previously unreported affected individuals, ascertained through the Adams–Oliver Syndrome European Consortium, we illustrate the phenotypic variability characteristically observed within extended families with AOS. Taken in combination with a detailed review of the available literature, we provide evidence for distinct clinical entities within the ACC/TTLD spectrum, which may reflect genetic heterogeneity within this spectrum of disorders.

Predisposition gene identification in common cancers by exome sequencing: insights from familial breast cancer

The genetic component of breast cancer predisposition remains largely unexplained. Candidate gene case–control resequencing has identified predisposition genes characterised by rare, protein truncating mutations that confer moderate risks of disease. In theory, exome sequencing should yield additional genes of this class. Here, we explore the feasibility and design considerations of this approach. We performed exome sequencing in 50 individuals with familial breast cancer, applying frequency and protein function filters to identify variants most likely to be pathogenic. We identified 867,378 variants that passed the call quality filters of which 1,296 variants passed the frequency and protein truncation filters. The median number of validated, rare, protein truncating variants was 10 in individuals with, and without, mutations in known genes. The functional candidacy of mutated genes was similar in both groups. Without prior knowledge, the known genes would not have been recognisable as breast cancer predisposition genes. Everyone carries multiple rare mutations that are plausibly related to disease. Exome sequencing in common conditions will therefore require intelligent sample and variant prioritisation strategies in large case–control studies to deliver robust genetic evidence of disease association.

Haploinsufficiency of the NOTCH1 Receptor as a Cause of Adams–Oliver Syndrome With Variable Cardiac Anomalies

Background—Adams–Oliver syndrome (AOS) is a rare disorder characterized by congenital limb defects and scalp cutis aplasia. In a proportion of cases, notable cardiac involvement is also apparent. Despite recent advances in the understanding of the genetic basis of AOS, for the majority of affected subjects, the underlying molecular defect remains unresolved. This study aimed to identify novel genetic determinants of AOS. Methods and Results—Whole-exome sequencing was performed for 12 probands, each with a clinical diagnosis of AOS. Analyses led to the identification of novel heterozygous truncating NOTCH1 mutations (c.1649dupA and c.6049_6050delTC) in 2 kindreds in which AOS was segregating as an autosomal dominant trait. Screening a cohort of 52 unrelated AOS subjects, we detected 8 additional unique NOTCH1 mutations, including 3 de novo amino acid substitutions, all within the ligand-binding domain. Congenital heart anomalies were noted in 47% (8/17) of NOTCH1-positive probands and affected family members. In leukocyte-derived RNA from subjects harboring NOTCH1 extracellular domain mutations, we observed significant reduction of NOTCH1 expression, suggesting instability and degradation of mutant mRNA transcripts by the cellular machinery. Transient transfection of mutagenized NOTCH1 missense constructs also revealed significant reduction in gene expression. Mutant NOTCH1 expression was associated with downregulation of the Notch target genes HEY1 and HES1, indicating that NOTCH1-related AOS arises through dysregulation of the Notch signaling pathway. Conclusions—These findings highlight a key role for NOTCH1 across a range of developmental anomalies that include cardiac defects and implicate NOTCH1 haploinsufficiency as a likely molecular mechanism for this group of disorders.

DOCK6 mutations are responsible for a distinct autosomal-recessive variant of Adams-Oliver syndrome associated with brain and eye anomalies.

Adams–Oliver syndrome (AOS) is characterized by the association of aplasia cutis congenita with terminal transverse limb defects, often accompanied by additional cardiovascular or neurological features. Both autosomal‐dominant and autosomal‐recessive disease transmission have been observed, with recent gene discoveries indicating extensive genetic heterogeneity. Mutations of the DOCK6 gene were first described in autosomal‐recessive cases of AOS and only five DOCK6‐related families have been reported to date. Recently, a second type of autosomal‐recessive AOS has been attributed to EOGT mutations in three consanguineous families. Here, we describe the identification of 13 DOCK6 mutations, the majority of which are novel, across 10 unrelated individuals from a large cohort comprising 47 sporadic cases and 31 AOS pedigrees suggestive of autosomal‐recessive inheritance. DOCK6 mutations were strongly associated with structural brain abnormalities, ocular anomalies, and intellectual disability, thus suggesting that DOCK6‐linked disease represents a variant of AOS with a particularly poor prognosis.

Tumour risks and genotype–phenotype correlations associated with germline variants in succinate dehydrogenase subunit genes SDHB, SDHC and SDHD

Background Germline pathogenic variants in SDHB/SDHC/SDHD are the most frequent causes of inherited phaeochromocytomas/paragangliomas. Insufficient information regarding penetrance and phenotypic variability hinders optimum management of mutation carriers. We estimate penetrance for symptomatic tumours and elucidate genotype–phenotype correlations in a large cohort of SDHB/SDHC/SDHD mutation carriers. Methods A retrospective survey of 1832 individuals referred for genetic testing due to a personal or family history of phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma. 876 patients (401 previously reported) had a germline mutation in SDHB/SDHC/SDHD (n=673/43/160). Tumour risks were correlated with in silico structural prediction analyses. Results Tumour risks analysis provided novel penetrance estimates and genotype–phenotype correlations. In addition to tumour type susceptibility differences for individual genes, we confirmed that the SDHD:p.Pro81Leu mutation has a distinct phenotype and identified increased age-related tumour risks with highly destabilising SDHB missense mutations. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the penetrance (cumulative risk of clinically apparent tumours) in SDHB and (paternally inherited) SDHD mutation-positive non-probands (n=371/67 with detailed clinical information) by age 60 years was 21.8% (95% CI 15.2% to 27.9%) and 43.2% (95% CI 25.4% to 56.7%), respectively. Risk of malignant disease at age 60 years in non-proband SDHB mutation carriers was 4.2%(95% CI 1.1% to 7.2%). With retrospective cohort analysis to adjust for ascertainment, cumulative tumour risks for SDHB mutation carriers at ages 60 years and 80 years were 23.9% (95% CI 20.9% to 27.4%) and 30.6% (95% CI 26.8% to 34.7%). Conclusions Overall risks of clinically apparent tumours for SDHB mutation carriers are substantially lower than initially estimated and will improve counselling of affected families. Specific genotype–tumour risk associations provides a basis for novel investigative strategies into succinate dehydrogenase-related mechanisms of tumourigenesis and the development of personalised management for SDHB/SDHC/SDHD mutation carriers.

Donor-transmitted malignancy confirmed by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction genotype analysis: A rare indication for liver retransplantation

Identifying the origin of a malignancy post transplantas being either donor-derived or recipient-derived hasimportant clinical consequences, including withdrawalof immunosuppression and retransplantation. It alsohas implications for other recipients of donor organs. Insex-mismatched allografts, this distinction can bemade with chromosomal analysis.